Conectar
The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to introduce a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach and discuss its application within the context of WSs in the field of health science, (2) To present a method and a practical guide when conducting WSs in the field of health science.
Epistemological and methodological discussions based on workshops as a self-standing research method.
The epistemological and methodological discussions show that workshops conducted in health science are a self-standing research methods and align with a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. Examples of research studies within this framework are provided to illustrate how workshops can be conducted in health science within this epistemological approach.
The phenomenological-hermeneutical approach embraces workshops as a research method as it includes individual experiences through self-reflection and shared contributions through interpretation. Furthermore, a systematic approach with regard to planning, conduction, data collection, and data analysis leads to reliable findings, enhancing the transparency of the research method and thus creating scientific knowledge. This paper argues that the systematic approach of “the how” to conduct workshops with “the why” enhances the transparency and trustworthiness of the research.
Workshops are a way to involve and engage users in co-design processes that aim to develop solutions in clinical practice. User involvement has become an important part in academia and is essential in all aspects of the research process. However, we need solid systematic methods to create valid knowledge. Workshops are a self-standing research method, and a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach allows for an understanding of the phenomena as they unfold, emphasising subjective perceptions and meanings, which will finally lead to the development of a suitable solution for clinical practice.
This paper contributes theoretical knowledge about the use of workshops as a research method. It combines “the how” to conduct a workshop with “the why” and highlights the relevance of a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach. The main argument is that workshops are a self-standing research method; hence, this paper adds value in the academic field as it provides a scientific framework. The paper presents a method and a practical guide for researchers who plan to conduct workshops in the field of health science.
No available EQUATOR guidelines were applicable to this methodological paper because no new data was created or analysed.
This is a methodological paper, and thus, there was no direct patient or public involvement.
To examine how patients experience day surgery.
Systematic review using Thomas and Harden's framework for synthesis and analysed through Ricoeur's theory of interpretation.
Systematic searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE (September 2023) identified qualitative studies focusing on patients' lived experiences with day surgery (defined as < 24-h hospital stay). Studies were required to provide qualitative data on patient experiences and be published in English or Scandinavian languages. Forward and backward citation searches were also conducted in Scopus.
Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed four key themes: (1) ‘Perceptions of the day surgery concept shape patient expectations’; (2) ‘Navigating expectation and reality: Surprises and challenges in day surgery’; (3) ‘Navigating through postoperative recovery: Feelings of responsibility and insecurity following day surgery’; and (4) ‘The vital role of support from both family and professionals during recovery after day surgery’.
Patients' expectations of day surgery strongly influence their overall experience, while the complex self-care demands of postoperative recovery underscore the need for robust support systems involving families and healthcare professionals.
This review highlights the importance of thorough preoperative counselling and ongoing support for patients' complex postoperative self-care. These findings suggest that improved patient-centred care and targeted support could enhance recovery outcomes in day surgery pathways.
Problem addressed: The study explores the often-overlooked challenges that patients face with postoperative self-care following day surgery. Main findings: Expectations of day surgery as ‘minor’ often conflict with patients' emotional and physical self-care needs, revealing a need for comprehensive support. Research impact: Insights from this review can inform patient-centred care practices in day surgery settings globally, underscoring the critical role of family and professional support.
No patient or public contribution.
Registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023414310
FreshRSS 