Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and timely detection enables interventions that can substantially reduce this risk. General practice, with continuity of care (COC) as one of its core values, plays a pivotal role in hypertension detection. This study aimed to investigate the association between COC and the detection of hypertension in general practice.

Longitudinal dynamic cohort study.

This study used routine care data from 48 Dutch general practices between 2013 and 2022.

106 755 adults without known cardiovascular diseases or risk factors at baseline.

The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, an established measure for COC, was used to calculate both general practitioner (GP)- and team-COC. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between COC level (low, intermediate, high) and the incidence of hypertension detection.

We included 106 755 patients (59.5% female, median age 35 years) in our analysis. The overall incidence rate was 9.42 hypertension diagnoses per 1000 person-years (95% CI 9.20 to 9.64). Compared with low COC, patients receiving intermediate or high GP-COC had a 1.9 (95% CI 1.7 to 2.1) to 4.9 (95% CI 4.4 to 5.4) higher HR of hypertension detection; patients receiving intermediate or high team-COC had a 2.3 (95% CI 2.2 to 2.5) to 7.3 (95% CI 6.8 to 7.8) higher HR of hypertension detection. High personal continuity was associated with up to 8.3 months (95% CI 8.6 to 7.9) earlier detection of hypertension. The association between COC and hypertension detection was dose-dependent.

This study shows that both GP-COC and team-COC are dose-dependently associated with increased HRs and earlier detection of hypertension in adults without preregistered cardiovascular conditions. Promoting COC contributes to cardiovascular preventive care.

Patient falls in hospitals lead to patient harm, staff distress and economic burden on health systems. There are few strategies with robust evidence demonstrating benefit for the prevention of falls, especially in acute hospital settings. Education and multicomponent fall prevention approaches are promising. Rigorous systematic measurement of implementation has been lacking in most hospital fall prevention trials. This paper describes the protocol for a trial that will evaluate the impact of supported implementation of tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions on patient falls in hospital.

A stepped-wedge hybrid type I effectiveness implementation cluster randomised trial will be conducted. Twelve inpatient wards across four metropolitan hospitals will be enrolled in the trial, clustered into groups of four and randomised to commence the intervention at one of three time periods. Patients and ward staff will be recruited to complete pre-implementation surveys, which, combined with analysis of routinely collected local falls data and staff brainstorming, will inform tailored multicomponent fall prevention interventions for each ward. Wards will receive quality improvement training, clinical facilitation and staff education for at least 4 months to support implementation of their fall prevention interventions. The primary outcome—rate of falls—will be measured using routinely collected hospital falls data from the incident management system and medical records. Pre-implementation and post-implementation patient and staff surveys, qualitative interviews and bedside audits will measure secondary effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Healthcare utilisation from hospital data will inform the cost-effectiveness analysis.

The Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (RPAH Zone) approved this trial (protocol number X24-0087 and 2024/ETH00583). The trial is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572). Data collection commenced in October 2024, due for completion in May 2026. Results will be published in reputable international journals and presented at relevant conferences.

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12624000896572).

Current expert consensus statements generally suggest cardiovascular risk assessment, including atrial fibrillation (AF) screening, on detection of covert brain infarctions (CBIs). However, evidence to guide management of CBI remains limited. In the absence of randomised clinical trials specifically targeting CBI populations, observational studies comparing individuals with and without CBI can provide insights into the prevalence and burden of cardiovascular risk factors.

We aimed to compare the burden of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors in participants with CBI to those without, and to explore the yield of AF screening in individuals with CBI.

A prospective population-based birth cohort study including men and women born in 1950 and resident in Akershus County, Norway.

The two hospitals serving the population of Akershus county, Norway.

Participants included in the Akershus Cardiac Examination (ACE) 1950 study who also underwent a subsequent MRI examination were eligible for this study.

Cardiovascular risk assessment was performed at study inclusion (2012–2015). Carotid ultrasound was used to quantify atherosclerosis through a carotid plaque score, and CHA₂DS₂-VA and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) scores were calculated to estimate cardiovascular risk. Brain MRI was performed in a randomly selected, blood pressure-stratified subset of participants (2016–2024). CBI was defined as focal lesions consistent with ischaemia in the absence of clinical stroke. Participants with CBI were offered 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring for AF detection.

MRI was performed in 414 of 3706 (11%) participants in the ACE 1950 Study. The mean age at the time of the MRI examination was 70.2±2.3 years, and 165 (41%) were women. CBI was identified in 54 participants (13%), of whom 45 (83%) completed 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring. There were no differences in mean carotid plaque score, SCORE2 or CHA₂DS₂-VA score between participants with CBI compared with those with normal MRI findings. AF was detected in one (2%) participant with CBI.

In this community-based cohort of individuals in late midlife, individuals with CBI did not have an increased cardiovascular risk compared with those without, as indicated by SCORE2, CHA₂DS₂-VA score, age-appropriate carotid plaque burden and a low prevalence of AF.

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01555411.

Workplace disclosure of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) identity by healthcare employees is an understudied area and existing reviews of LGBTQ+ disclosure in the healthcare sector focus on patient perspectives, overlooking the unique challenges that healthcare professionals encounter. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of existing qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare employees.

The literature search integrated current research from 2011 to March 2023 and focused on qualitative studies exploring disclosure experiences of LGBTQ+ healthcare professionals. Ovid served as the primary platform for literature searches, supplemented by forward and backward citation tracking and additional searches in academic databases such as Google Scholar and Scopus. The studies underwent quality evaluation using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme 2022 checklist and were synthesised using thematic analysis.

The findings revealed seven studies with five prominent themes: (1) risk associated with disclosure, (2) making the decision to disclose, (3) cost of non-disclosure, (4) cost of disclosure and (5) benefit of disclosure. Additionally, five critical factors of disclosure were identified: level, scope, time, elements and method. Finally, the risk–benefit analysis underscored the dilemma and balance between authenticity and conformity, largely influenced by pervasive heteronormativity, resulting in a significant mental toll.

The findings must be interpreted considering certain limitations, such as the lack of generalisability of studies. However, the findings emphasise the critical need for cultivating trusting and accepting healthcare work environments for LGBTQ+ staff.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 1–2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. AF is associated with a fivefold increased risk of cardioembolic events; approximately 20% of all strokes are caused by AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the first-line treatment for AF. However, PVI cannot eliminate the residual stroke risk. Current guidelines recommend that anticoagulation be continued in this specific group of patients, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. In this large AF population post-PVI, who are considered to be in an earlier stage of AF, it is unknown whether left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) offers an alternative to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy.

The trial will be a prospective, randomised, multicentre non-inferiority study comparing two treatment strategies in AF patients after atrial ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to either percutaneous LAAC (group A) or DOAC treatment (group B) in a 1:1 ratio; both sequential and concomitant planned ablation with or without LAAC are accepted. Randomisation will be conducted using web-based randomisation software. A total of 1012 participants (506 patients per group) will be enrolled. The primary effectiveness measure will be the occurrence of any of the specified events within 24 months after randomisation: stroke/transient ischaemic attack/systemic thromboembolism, cerebral haemorrhage, other major haemorrhages (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥2), cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality.

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Shanghai Chest Hospital, China (KS(Y)20287). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The trial will follow the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Confidentiality will be maintained with anonymised, securely stored data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

ChiCTR2000036538.

Urgent and emergency care in Germany is delivered across multiple, loosely connected sectors. In the absence of coherent, time-resolved data on patient movements between emergency medical services (EMS), out-of-hours ambulatory care, emergency departments (EDs) and inpatient care, inefficiencies and coordination gaps remain difficult to quantify. A process-centric, trans-sectoral analysis is required to characterise real-world patient pathways and identify actionable levers for improvement. The study aims to reconstruct, model and analyse patient pathways for urgent health complaints across all relevant sectors of the healthcare system in a German model region.

We will employ a mixed-methods observational study design. Routine data from EMS, out-of-hours ambulatory care, EDs and subsequent inpatient care will be pseudonymised at source, linked via a trusted third party and analysed within a trusted research environment. Time-stamped event logs will support process mining for discovery, conformance and performance analysis alongside descriptive statistics with stratification by context, such as setting, time of day, urgency and patient cohorts. Anonymous cross-sectional surveys of patients and front-line professionals, complemented by quarterly snapshot surveys in out-of-hours ambulatory care and interviews, will provide convergent evidence on the motives, barriers and coordination of utilisation behaviour. Enrolment for surveys is anticipated from the fourth quarter of 2025; routine data capture covers 1 January–31 December 2026; analyses and dissemination run until 31 December 2027.

The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at RWTH Aachen University (EK 25-351). Survey modules are conducted anonymously with voluntary participation and without collection of direct identifiers; routine care data are processed in pseudonymised form and analysed within a trusted research environment. Stakeholder interviews will be conducted with informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summary reports for participating institutions and stakeholders, complemented by plain-language materials to support patient-centred navigation.

DRKS00035916.

A significant proportion of adults in England and Wales report experiencing childhood trauma, which is often associated with poor health and negative social outcomes including a significant increase in the risk of poor mental health outcomes in adulthood. This proposed scoping review adopts a broad definition of childhood trauma and applies both a salutogenic framework and ecological systems theory to explore how protective factors at five ecological levels can support mental well-being. The review will also examine how protective factors vary across different population groups and contexts.

The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) protocol for scoping reviews. The databases that will be searched are Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Medline. Studies will be included if they include protective factors and involve adults aged 18 and over who have experienced childhood trauma, whether self-identified, retrospectively self-reported or measured using a validated instrument. Studies will be excluded if they focus on participants under the age of 18.

All search results will be uploaded to Covidence, duplicates removed, and titles/abstracts screened by at least two reviewers based on inclusion criteria. Full texts of potentially relevant sources will be imported into EndNote 21. Reasons for exclusions will be documented and disagreements resolved through discussion or a third reviewer. The full process will be reported using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. Data will be extracted by at least two reviewers using a tool developed by the team based on the JBI guidance. A best-fit framework analysis will be used, using a matrix developed by the researchers including the four salutogenic domains and the five levels of the ecological framework.

Formal ethical approval is not necessary for this scoping review as it does not involve the collection of primary data. The outcomes of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal articles, conference/seminar presentations, and developed into resources for stakeholders and collaborators.

Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/CJRUY).

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially fatal condition requiring timely diagnosis and treatment. CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for diagnosis and indicates PE severity through radiological markers of right heart strain. However, accurate interpretation and communication of these findings is often suboptimal in real-world practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) could alleviate pressure on radiology services by supporting PE identification, risk stratification and worklist prioritisation. Before widespread adoption, AI tools must be rigorously validated for diagnostic accuracy, safety and clinical impact.

This pragmatic single-centre, non-randomised quasi-experimental study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and clinical-cost impact of AI-assisted PE detection and risk stratification using AIDOC and IMBIO software. We will recruit two consecutive cohorts of adult patients undergoing CTPAs for suspected PE: a comparator cohort (12 months pre-AI implementation) and an intervention cohort (12 months post-AI implementation). AI will be applied retrospectively to the comparator cohort, while in the intervention cohort, radiologists will have contemporaneous access to the AI’s interpretation of CTPA images.

A subset of retrospective scans, both PE-positive and PE-negative, will undergo expert thoracic radiologist review to establish a reference standard. Data on patient demographics, clinical management and outcomes will be collected. Clinical management pathways and patient outcomes will be compared between cohorts to assess AI’s influence on acute PE management. Health economic modelling will assess the cost-effectiveness of integrating AI technology within the diagnostic workflow of acute PE.

This study was approved by the UK Healthcare Research authority (IRAS 311735, 10 May 2023). Ethical approval was granted by West of Scotland Research Ethics Service (23/WS/0067, 3 May 2023). Results will be shared with stakeholders, presented at national and international conferences, and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals.

NCT06093217.

Providing peer support can benefit youth peer support workers (peers)et by supporting self-determination, recovery and resilience to self-stigma. There is a need to clarify the role of the organisation in providing benefits for peers. We aimed to identify the organisational contexts and mechanisms that result in the creation of healthy workplaces for peers.

Rapid realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-Narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards guidelines and Pawson’s iterative approach.

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, SocINDEX, Google Scholar and Embase were searched from 1979 to 2025.

We included qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies and grey literature that captured characteristics of organisational practices and employment considerations in youth peer support programmes.

Articles were screened independently by multiple reviewers. Inclusion criteria were adjusted to capture literature on organisational practices, and employment considerations for youth peer support programmes. Data were extracted and analysed retroductively to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs).

Five employment-related risks to peer well-being were identified: (1) difficulty entering the job market, (2) lack of role clarity, (3) pressure to live up to ideals, (4) retraumatisation and (5) stigma. Six CMOCs were developed; all focused on the creation of equitable employment and supporting peer development and empowerment were developed.

Community-based mental health organisations can facilitate equitable peer employment through strategies that reduce professional stigma, enhance peer resilience and promote professional and personal development. Policy reform that addresses precarious work conditions is needed to support healthy work environments.

Respiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients’ health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them.

The top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process.

This PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.

The redeployment of healthcare staff from their normal place of work and duties to alternative activities is not a new phenomenon and has typically been used as a temporary measure to address capacity gaps. While redeployment supports the mobilisation of a flexible healthcare workforce, it also presents as a source of tension in relation to staff well-being and retention. This paper reports findings from a survey of staff in the UK National Health Service (NHS), exploring the impact of redeployment.

An online survey was administered by YouGov (2023), addressing contemporary evidence on variables impacting staff health, well-being and disposition to remain in NHS employment. The sample comprised NHS employees representing the principal healthcare job families and grades across acute hospitals, mental health, community and ambulance services. Statistical analysis (SPSS V.29.0.2.0) compared (independent samples t-test, z-test and ² test for trend) redeployed and non-redeployed staff response profiles.

The staff who had experienced redeployment in the 6 months prior to spring 2023 showed higher rates of submitting applications for non-NHS jobs (22%; non-redeployed staff 12%). Redeployed staff reported higher stress, lower morale and less ability to switch off from work than non-redeployed staff (p

The findings highlight the negative impacts associated with staff redeployment and challenges to staff health, well-being and disposition to remain employed in healthcare. Despite a growing consensus regarding the need to support the redeployed, evidence regarding ‘what works’ remains under-researched. Such insight is particularly pertinent given the growing interest in technological solutions for a more agile workforce, where deployment flexibility is a key feature.

Large-scale stroke registries can provide critical insights into disease mechanisms, progression and healthcare needs, informing prevention and care. However, few collect detailed demographic, brain imaging, and comprehensive long-term follow-up data. To address this, we established the prospective Stroke Investigation Group in North And central London (SIGNAL) registry in 2017.

The SIGNAL registry included 3931 adults aged ≥18 years with confirmed acute stroke (cerebral ischaemia or intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH)) admitted to the University College London Hospital hyperacute stroke unit between January 2017 and 2020, drawn from an ethnically diverse North and Central London population (~1.6 million). Baseline data included demographic, clinical, brain imaging and next-of-kin information. Six month follow-up included measures of functional status and non-motor outcomes (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep, pain, language, continence, social participation, cognition) via face-to-face, telephone or postal follow-up methods.

The mean age of individuals included in the SIGNAL registry was 72.1 years, and 1806 (45.9%) were female. The ethnic distribution comprised 2365 (60%) white, 649 (16.5%) black and 511 (13%) Asian. Stroke diagnoses included 3371 (85.8%) with cerebral ischaemia and 560 (14.2%) with ICH. On admission, 2240 individuals (57.0%) had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >4, indicating moderate stroke severity. At hospital discharge, the median functional outcome, measured by the modified Rankin Scale, was 3 (IQR 1–4), indicating moderate disability. At 6 months, functional outcomes measured with mRS were available for 3755 individuals (95.6%) with a median score of 1 (IQR=0–3) and non-motor outcomes were available for 3080 individuals (92.3%). The most prevalent adverse non-motor outcomes were fatigue 1756 (57%), reduced social participation 1694 (55%) and sleep disturbance 1663 (54%).

Further analyses of SIGNAL registry data will investigating associations between stroke mechanisms, subtypes and neuroimaging features and 6-month functional status, non-motor outcomes and cognitive impairment. Longer term follow-up of survivors for ~10 years is also planned.