Engaging patients in surgical safety is challenging and has not been thoroughly investigated. Although surgical checklists and other safety protocols have been introduced across various surgical fields, preventable adverse events still occur, highlighting the need for additional research. A Patient’s Safety Checklist (PASC) has been developed and validated for use by surgical patients. Its effect on patient safety and patient outcomes is currently being investigated in a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (NCT03105713). In connection with this trial, we have examined elective patients’ experiences with using the PASC.

An exploratory qualitative study was conducted based on individual in-depth telephone interviews with 31 elective surgical patients. The interviews were carried out across three Norwegian hospitals including seven surgical specialties. The patients interviewed were part of the trial’s intervention arm and had used PASC. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, and reflective thematic analysis was applied.

Three themes were identified in the data: patient awareness, patient actions and utility value. Patients perceived PASC to increase awareness around surgical information, preparations, what to speak up about and which information to seek and repeat. This awareness led to a series of actions, such as ensuring medication control, optimising their own health, contacting healthcare professionals, asking questions, and for some no actions were needed. Patients perceived PASC to have high utility value for their surgical preparation.

The PASC enhanced patients’ involvement in surgical care and safety by ensuring they received systematic, accurate, clear, and understandable information and instructions throughout the surgical pathway. It is one of the few existing interventions that specifically focuses on assisting patients in preparing for surgery and managing their recovery. Further research is needed on the implementation of PASC and its adaptation to other clinical settings.

NCT03105713.

To systematically review the evidence on the association between non-standard working time arrangements (such as night work or shift work) and the occurrence of safety incidents.

Systematic review conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and using a structured narrative approach and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis framework to evaluate and summarise findings.

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and ProQuest Health and Safety Science Abstracts were searched through February 2024.

We included peer-reviewed English-language studies of paid workers (18–70 years) that examined the association between non-standard working time arrangements and safety incidents (accidents, near-accidents, safety incidents or injuries), excluding cross-sectional designs and studies on unpaid workers, athletes or military personnel.

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using standardised forms, extracting study characteristics (author, year, country, sector and population), working time arrangements and exposure assessment, outcomes and their assessment, and reported risk estimates. We conducted a narrative synthesis, classifying studies into three exposure contrasts (shift worker versus non-shift worker, time-of-day and shift intensity), and summarised risk estimates using forest plots without calculating pooled effects.

A total of 13 569 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that shift workers generally had an elevated safety incident risk compared with non-shift workers (risk estimates ranged from 1.11 to 5.33). Most of the included studies found an increased risk of safety incidents during or after night shifts. Accumulated exposure to evening or night shifts increased the risk of safety incidents during the following 7 days. However, bias and heterogeneity across studies in design, populations and outcome measures resulted in an overall low to very low certainty of the evidence.

Non-standard working time arrangements, including night and evening shifts, appear to increase the risk of occupational safety incidents. Despite the low certainty of evidence, the findings highlight a potential area for preventive measures in work scheduling. Future longitudinal studies using individual data on daily working hours are needed.