To examine whether the use of a venous access-site closure device is associated with the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation under propofol sedation.

Observational study.

A single-centre retrospective observational study in Okayama, Japan.

We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation under deep propofol sedation with adaptive servo-ventilation. A total of 686 patients were included. Patients were managed using a standardised sedation protocol with or without low-dose pentazocine. Patients treated with conventional manual compression for haemostasis (n=383) were compared with those treated using a venous access-site closure device (n=303).

Postprocedural bed rest duration and the incidence and timing of PONV were compared between groups. Associations between closure device use and PONV were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

The primary outcome was the occurrence of PONV following AF ablation.

All procedures were completed under propofol sedation without conversion to general anaesthesia. The duration of postprocedural bed rest was shorter in the device group than in the conventional-compression group (mean difference –14.7 hours, 95% CI –15.2 to –14.0).

PONV occurred in 6/303 patients (2.0%) in the device group and 20/383 patients (5.2%) in the conventional-compression group, corresponding to a relative risk of 0.38 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.93), an OR 0.25 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.62) and a risk difference of –3.2% (95% CI –6.0% to –0.5%).

In multivariable analysis, use of a venous closure device was associated with a lower likelihood of PONV.

In this single-centre observational study, use of a venous access-site closure device was associated with a lower occurrence of PONV after AF ablation under propofol sedation. These findings suggest that postprocedural management strategies enabling earlier mobilisation may be associated with improved patient comfort; however, causal inference is limited by the observational design.

Addition of bevacizumab and paclitaxel as induction therapy prior to standard atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) may help to overcome vascular endothelial growth factor-associated resistance mechanisms that limit the immune-mediated antitumour efficacy of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel.

The Induction Therapy of PTX+BV Followed by Atezolizumab+Nab-PTX for PD-L1+TNBC (INDUCE) study is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two cycles of induction therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel followed by atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel compared with standard atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive mTNBC. The primary outcome of the study is progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours, V.1.1. We have estimated that 89 PFS events are needed to allow a power of 80% to detect a difference between treatment groups at a one-sided significance level of 10% in this study. The target sample size is set to 106 patients to account for dropouts.

The study protocol and informed consent form have been approved by the Certified Research Review Board at the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. Study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

jRCTs041240039 NCT06793553.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often causes permanent neurological dysfunction. Although no medication has been validated yet to prevent secondary injury of brain tissue, recent animal studies have reported that perampanel, a glutamine receptor antagonist, could improve the neurological functions of animals with TBI by mitigating the abnormal calcium influx and cell death around the site of primary injury. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of perampanel administration in improving the neurological function of patients with TBI.

The perampanel for alleviation of secondary injury in TBI trial is a multicentre, phase-II, open-label randomised controlled trial targeting patients with mild-to-moderate TBI. This trial will include adult TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9–14 from five tertiary centres. Patients with epilepsy as a comorbidity, delayed presentation of symptoms (>24 hours after injury) or Injury Severity Score of ≥25 will be excluded. The study participants will be randomly assigned to either the perampanel group (2 mg/day) or the control group (fosphenytoin administered at a dose of 15–18 mg/kg/day, followed by 5–7.5 mg/kg/day of fosphenytoin). In both groups, the medication will be initiated within 12 hours of the TBI diagnosis and continued for 7 days. The antiepileptic drugs can be increased, changed or added as necessary if early post-traumatic seizures are observed. The primary outcome is favourable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of ≥5 at 90 days after the TBI diagnosis, which will then be compared between the groups through an intention-to-treat analysis.

The present study has been approved by the Certified Review Board of Keio at the principal institution (approval number: N20240004). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives. The results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031250067).