FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
Ayer — Octubre 2nd 2025Tus fuentes RSS

Investigation of prophylactic clip haemorrhage control for colorectal cold snare polypectomy in patients taking antithrombotic drugs (PERCOLD): study protocol--a multicentre prospective parallel-group non-inferiority RCT phase 3 trial

Por: Okimoto · K. · Matsumura · T. · Taida · T. · Ishikawa · T. · Koshibu · Y. · Shu · N. · Ozeki · Y. · Furuya · M. · Mamiya · Y. · Nakazawa · H. · Ohyama · Y. · Takahashi · S. · Horio · R. · Goto · C. · Kurosugi · A. · Sonoda · M. · Kaneko · T. · Ohta · Y. · Matsusaka · K. · Inaba · Y. · Kato · J.
Introduction

The effect of prophylactic clipping for colorectal cold snare polypectomy (CSP) on delayed bleeding (DB) in patients with antithrombotic drugs remains unverified. The aim of the PERCOLD study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DB rates in cases without prophylactic clips compared with cases with prophylactic clips in patients taking antithrombotic drugs for colorectal CSP through randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Methods and analysis

This study is a multicentre prospective parallel-group RCT phase 3 trial that is being conducted at 14 institutions in Japan at the time of writing this manuscript. After providing consent, patients will undergo screening and assessment for study enrolment eligibility. Patients taking antithrombotic drugs (aged 20 years or older at the time of consent and who have agreed to participate in this study) will be selected if they have a preoperative suspected adenoma (including sessile serrated lesion) with an endoscopic diameter of

Ethics and dissemination

The trial protocol has been approved by the Chiba University Certified Clinical Research Reviewer Board (CRB3180015), which serves as the central ethics committee, and registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials. The current protocol V.1.7, dated 4 October 2024. Written informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained from all participating patients. All participating institutions have formally agreed to conduct the study in accordance with this central approval, and local site permissions were obtained as required by each institution. The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1032230086).

AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Perampanel for alleviation of secondary injury in traumatic brain injury (PEACE-TBI): a protocol for a phase-II multicentre randomised clinical trial

Por: Yamamoto · R. · Tamura · R. · Morimoto · Y. · Nakaya · M. · Terao · S. · Shoji · T. · Kanazawa · T. · Sasao · R. · Inaba · M. · Shimizu · M. · Kuranari · Y. · Katayama · M. · Ueno · K. · Oishi · Y. · Nakamura · A. · Kikuo · Y. · Murakami · R. · Homma · K. · Wakahara · S. · Ishikawa · K. · Kosu
Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often causes permanent neurological dysfunction. Although no medication has been validated yet to prevent secondary injury of brain tissue, recent animal studies have reported that perampanel, a glutamine receptor antagonist, could improve the neurological functions of animals with TBI by mitigating the abnormal calcium influx and cell death around the site of primary injury. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of perampanel administration in improving the neurological function of patients with TBI.

Methods and analysis

The perampanel for alleviation of secondary injury in TBI trial is a multicentre, phase-II, open-label randomised controlled trial targeting patients with mild-to-moderate TBI. This trial will include adult TBI patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9–14 from five tertiary centres. Patients with epilepsy as a comorbidity, delayed presentation of symptoms (>24 hours after injury) or Injury Severity Score of ≥25 will be excluded. The study participants will be randomly assigned to either the perampanel group (2 mg/day) or the control group (fosphenytoin administered at a dose of 15–18 mg/kg/day, followed by 5–7.5 mg/kg/day of fosphenytoin). In both groups, the medication will be initiated within 12 hours of the TBI diagnosis and continued for 7 days. The antiepileptic drugs can be increased, changed or added as necessary if early post-traumatic seizures are observed. The primary outcome is favourable neurological outcome, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score of ≥5 at 90 days after the TBI diagnosis, which will then be compared between the groups through an intention-to-treat analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

The present study has been approved by the Certified Review Board of Keio at the principal institution (approval number: N20240004). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants or their legal representatives. The results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031250067).

❌