FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Effectiveness of education programme to increase competency of health cadres in Indonesia: a cluster non-randomised controlled trial

Por: Sulistyorini · D. · Huq · K. A. T. M. E. · Babaita · A. O. · Aivey · S. A. · Huiying · G. · Kazawa · K. · Fukushima · Y. · Kako · M. · Moriyama · M.
Objectives

Health cadres, who assist midwives in supporting pregnant women in community settings, need to enhance their competencies in identifying risk factors and referring high-risk pregnant women to midwives for further care. Since the capabilities of these health cadres are influenced by maternal complications, an educational programme was implemented to strengthen their skills. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the competency of health cadres by providing a researcher-developed educational programme.

Design

An open-label, cluster non-randomised controlled trial.

Setting and participants

Health cadres with at least 1 year of work experience were recruited at six public health centres (PHCs) in Banjarnegara Regency, Indonesia.

Interventions

Six PHCs were selected and allocated into intervention group (IG=3 PHCs) and control group (CG=3 PHCs) groups. A total of 133 female health cadres were enrolled across the selected PHCs. At each PHC, a systematic random sampling method was used to select the participants. The researchers and health professionals provided a 3-week period of theoretical and scenario-based simulations to the IG, while the CG received no education.

Outcome measures

Researcher-developed questionnaires and checklists were used to assess the knowledge, skills (health assessment, communication, attitude) and confidence. The primary endpoint was competency, a total score of knowledge and skills. The outcome domains were compared between the two groups, and a linear mixed-effect model was used to account for cluster-level variation.

Results

A total of 130 (97.7%) completed the study (IG:64, CG:66). The competency score showed significant improvement at endline (CG=49.5 and IG=52.5; p=0.002). The median scores for health assessment skills (CG=12 vs IG=14; p

Conclusion

Education effectively increased the competency of health cadres. A well-structured education programme is necessary for health cadres to improve and maintain their competencies in monitoring high-risk pregnant women.

Trial registration number

NCT06134518.

Intensive care with endovascular catheter rewarming for accidental severe hypothermia (ICE-CRASH II): a protocol for a randomised controlled study

Por: Takauji · S. · Hayakawa · M. · Yokobori · S. · Kano · H. · Shimizu · K. · Horikoshi · Y. · Shimazaki · J. · Tachino · J. · Inoue · A. · Moriyama · T. · Sawano · H. · Fukushima · H. · Sugiyama · K. · Sunada · D. · Toyohara · T. · Sawamoto · K. · Isokawa · S. · Morikawa · M. · Suzuki · G. · Om
Introduction

Accidental hypothermia (AH) can occur in mild-to-severe cases; however, its management is crucial in severe cases as it can cause ventricular fibrillation and lead to death. Among various rewarming therapies for AH, endovascular catheter rewarming has been the focus of recent studies as a minimally invasive alternative to invasive internal rewarming, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, no study has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovascular catheter rewarming therapy. This study aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of endovascular catheter rewarming for patients with AH.

Methods and analyses

The intensive care with endovascular catheter rewarming in accidental severe hypothermia (ICE-CRASH II) study is a multicentre, randomised study of patients with AH. This study will include patients with AH (age ≥65 years, core temperature

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Hokkaido University Certified Review Board (approval number: 024-00013). Written informed consent will be obtained from all the participants or their legally acceptable representatives. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT1012240051).

Neurological outcomes with hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with moderate initial illness severity following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (R-CAST OHCA)

Por: Naito · H. · Nishikimi · M. · Okada · Y. · Maeyama · H. · Kiguchi · T. · Yorifuji · T. · Nishida · K. · Matsui · S. · Kuroda · Y. · Nishiyama · K. · Iwami · T. · Nakao · A. · JAAM R-CAST OHCA Trial Group · Nishikimi · Otani · Ryosuke · Yumoto · Hayakawa · Sakurai · Fukushima · Tanaka
Introduction

Temperature control is a fundamental intervention for neuroprotection following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) remains unclear. Retrospective studies suggest that the clinical effectiveness of hypothermia may depend on the severity of PCAS. The R-CAST OHCA trial aims to compare the efficacy of hypothermia versus normothermia in improving 30-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderately severe PCAS following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods and analysis

The multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) is conducted with the participation of 35 emergency and critical care centres and/or intensive care units at academic and non-academic hospitals. The study enrols moderately severe PCAS patients, defined as those with a revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for induced Therapeutic Hypothermia score of 5.5–15.5. A target number of 380 participants will be enrolled. Participants are randomised to undergo either hypothermia or normothermia within 3 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Patients in the hypothermia group are cooled and maintained at 34°C until 28 hours post-randomisation, followed by rewarming to 37°C at a rate of 0.25°C/hour. Patients in the normothermia group are maintained at normothermia (36.5°C–37.7°C). Total periods of intervention, including the cooling, maintenance and rewarming phases, will occur 40 hours after randomisation. Other treatments for PCAS can be determined by the treating physicians. The primary outcome is a favourable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 30 days after randomisation and compared using an intention-to-treat analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Ethics Committee (approval number: R2201-001). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants or their authorised surrogates. Results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

jRCT1062220035.

❌