Parenting an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can be highly stressful, undermine parental confidence and minimise involvement in infant care. Enhancing parental self-efficacy is therefore crucial to promoting active engagement and supporting positive child outcomes. This study aims to identify the psychosocial needs (emotion regulation and stress management) of NICU parents and examine the factors that influence their engagement in infant care. It also seeks to determine whether higher levels of parental self-efficacy are associated with greater engagement and collaboration with healthcare providers (HCPs) and a shorter NICU stay.

A mixed-methods study will be conducted at the Montreal Children’s Hospital’s Level III NICU located in Quebec, Canada. Parents (ie, mothers and, when available, their partners) will be recruited during their infant’s hospitalisation. Participants will complete a set of self-report questionnaires measuring parental engagement, self-efficacy, parent-infant attachment, mental health, perceived stress and social support. Additionally, one parent per family will be invited to participate in a qualitative interview to discuss their experience in the NICU. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically using NVivo 12 to identify key themes, and statistical analyses will be conducted using RStudio to determine which factors are most strongly associated with parental engagement and their interactions with the clinical team. Finally, HCPs will be invited to assist and participate in a qualitative interview regarding their perspectives on the NICU environment and the study’s impact on the unit (ie, reduction in HCP burden due to increased parental engagement). Findings from this study will offer valuable insights to inform future clinical strategies aimed at enhancing parental engagement and self-efficacy in the NICU. These outcomes may contribute to improved neonatal outcomes, parental mental health and the advancement of evidence-based, family-centred care policies.

The protocol was approved by the Montreal University Health Centre’s (MUHC) Research Ethics Board (2025-9392). Findings derived from this study have the potential to optimise parental engagement in the NICU to promote family resilience and child well-being.

Our study protocol aims to underscore the critical role of self-efficacy and other key psychosocial factors, such as lower parental stress and higher emotion regulation, in promoting parental engagement and collaboration within the NICU. We anticipate that higher levels of self-efficacy will correlate with parental well-being, increased caregiving engagement (ie, basic baby care, improved communication with NICU staff) and enhanced parent-infant bonding. These findings may support the development of structured interventions that empower parents and streamline provider-parent collaboration. In clinical practice, these insights can guide the integration of tailored parental support programmes to optimise discharge preparation and reduce provider burden by promoting shared caregiving responsibilities. Future initiatives could build further on this model to guide institutional policies that aim to prioritise parental empowerment (ie, greater self-efficacy and engagement) as a fundamental pillar of neonatal care.

We designed the Optimising Care in Critically Ill at the UCHealth by Liberalising the Target O₂ in Mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) Patients to determine the effectiveness of a multimodal educational and electronic health record order panel intervention in limiting occult hypoxaemia and hyperoxaemia in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation by targeting a prespecified oxygen saturation (S_pO₂ 90%–96%) range.

This trial is a pragmatic electronic health record-embedded, multisite, cluster-randomised, stepped-wedge implementation of a multimodal educational and electronic health record order panel intervention aimed at achieving a standardised intermediate target range of S_pO₂ (90%–96%) or partial pressure of oxygen (P_aO₂ 60–100 mm Hg) in mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to the ICU across a 10 hospital health system that includes a large academic centre and smaller community hospitals.

The primary endpoint is ventilator-free days to day 30, defined as the number of days alive and not receiving support through invasive mechanical ventilation following the first initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation in a participating ICU during the hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes include a variety of clinical endpoints: hospital-free days to day 30, all-cause mortality to day 90, need for supplemental oxygen at discharge and incidence of occult hypoxaemia and hypoxaemia. We will analyse primary and secondary endpoints using a mixed effects modelling framework, with specific distributions chosen depending on the type of outcome (eg, binary, count, ordinal, time-to-event).

Research is performed under a waiver of informed consent for minimal-risk research, as approved by Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (24-0065). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and at national and international conferences.

NCT06501118.

The goal of this study was to identify strategies and assess priorities to increase human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among unvaccinated young adults using a concept mapping approach.

The concept mapping process was conducted in two phases. In phase 1, eligible participants generated qualitative statements in response to a topic prompt. In phase 2, participants organised and grouped the statements by perceived similarity, and then rated each statement on a scale of perceived effectiveness. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were conducted to develop a conceptual map of the data.

This study was conducted at a university in the southwestern USA.

Eligibility criteria for participation included individuals (1) aged 18–26, (2) who had not received any dose of the HPV vaccine or were unsure if they had received the vaccine and (3) who were enrolled students at the study site institution. 24 participants engaged in the concept mapping process; five participated in phase 1 only, five participated in phase 2 only and 14 participated in both phases.

The 41 statements generated were organised into five cluster concepts: media and messaging, information and education, promotion, legal and accessibility. Accessibility was the highest-rated cluster for effectiveness followed by information and education. Exploratory trends across participant demographics were also identified. Differences in perceived effectiveness of the cluster concepts were observed by gender, race, political affiliation and vaccination status.

This study provides valuable preliminary insights into strategies and factors perceived influential in enhancing HPV vaccination from the perspective of unvaccinated young adults. Using concept mapping, multiple factors were identified that varied in their degree of perceived effectiveness across different groups. Future HPV vaccination interventions should consider multi-component elements to ensure their success and reduce the burden of HPV-related disease.

Parental psychological challenges and poor well-being are key factors in shaping both the quality of parent-child interactions and child development. Specifically, maternal psychological distress is a central determinant of child development. Elevated levels of distress in mothers are associated with poorer child cognitive, behavioural and social-emotional outcomes, with effects persisting into adolescence and adulthood. While this highlights the critical importance of early prevention and intervention efforts to support parents, postpartum mental healthcare remains limited, despite ongoing and evident needs.

This protocol outlines a 2-year longitudinal follow-up study investigating the impact of a secondary perinatal programme (ie, Toi, Moi, Bébé), completed by mothers during pregnancy, and its impact on children’s cognitive and social-emotional functioning at 24 and 48 months. Further, the study aims to explore whether maternal self-efficacy and emotion regulation may serve as potential mediators or moderators of the relationship between programme participation and child development outcomes. The research aims to leverage the Toi, Moi, Bébé programme, by recruiting mother-child dyads (n=250) in which the mothers participated in the programme during pregnancy. Mothers were randomly assigned to complete the parenting well-being intervention either independently or with added telephone support. Participants who consent will be invited to take part in a two-wave follow-up at 24 months (T1) and 48 months postpartum (T2). At both time points, mothers will complete demographic questionnaires and standardised measures assessing maternal well-being (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Perceived Stress Scale), child cognitive functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory), child social-emotional functioning (Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Social Emotional—second Edition-2 and Child Behaviour Checklist for Ages 1.5–5), maternal emotion regulation (Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) and maternal self-efficacy (Parental Cognitions and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale & Me as a Parent Scale). Parents’ perceptions of their parenting experience will be measured using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. Mother-child interaction, parenting quality and cognitive stimulation in the home environment will be measured using a brief virtual interview (StimQ₂-Toddler) and a naturalistic observation assessment (Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes). Using RStudio, linear mixed models will be used to assess the impact of the intervention (online intervention only vs only with telephone support) on child cognitive and social-emotional development at T1 and T2. In parallel, separate models will be conducted to examine associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy on the child development outcomes at the same timepoints. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to examine potential moderating effects of child sex and group assignment on the associations between maternal emotion regulation and self-efficacy and child developmental (cognitive and socioemotional) outcomes, using causal inference models.

The current study has been registered, reviewed and approved (MP-37-2025-10894) by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board. Findings from this research will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open access publications, and presentations at national and international conferences.

NCT05110456.

People with serious mental illness (SMI) can experience significant physical health challenges. The Health Champions intervention was developed to support their physical health through using trained volunteers. However, volunteer and patient perspectives on the impact and implementation of this intervention have yet to be understood.

To compare the views of patients and volunteers on the Health Champions intervention.

A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with 29 study participants. Interviews were carried out either face-to-face, via Microsoft Teams, or by telephone and included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) and 17 volunteers (the Health Champions) (5 men and 12 women).

Four overarching themes were identified, highlighting both similarities and differences between stakeholders’ perspectives: (1) supporting goal setting; (2) impact on positive lifestyle; (3) experiences and perception of the programme and (4) navigating challenges during the programme. Both groups found the programme to be largely successful, by motivating patients to work towards their physical health goals and facilitating successful matching of patients with volunteers. Volunteers and patients valued good communication with the research team. Though both groups shared some views on the challenges with scheduling and a lack of face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, their perceptions on how patients incorporated their health changes during and after the programme, as well as other administrative concerns such as views on the efficacy of journaling and breakdown of roles, differed.

The Health Champions intervention was perceived as useful to improve the physical health of patients with SMI. Differences in the views between the two stakeholders may result from their distinct experiences and expectations. Future volunteering programmes should further support the diverse physical health needs of patients with SMI.

Type 2 diabetes is a growing global health challenge that requires effective prevention strategies. Public health and community-based approaches play an essential role in reaching vulnerable populations and addressing broader determinants of health. This protocol outlines a scoping review aimed at systematically mapping the existing evidence on lifestyle-based diabetes prevention interventions implemented in public health and community contexts.

A systematic literature search will be conducted to identify relevant studies published in English or German from 1 January 2014 onwards. The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL (via EBSCO), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (via OVID) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Relevant websites and grey literature sources will be searched to identify further eligible studies. (Cluster-)randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and clinical trials will be included. These must examine nutrition-based, physical activity-based or lifestyle-based interventions aimed at preventing type 2 diabetes in healthy adults or individuals with pre-diabetes, implemented in public health or community settings. Case reports and studies involving medical therapies or pharmacological interventions will be excluded. The literature search started in May 2025 and is expected to be completed by the end of December 2025.

As this scoping review is based on the secondary analysis of publicly available data, no ethical approval is required. Our dissemination strategy includes publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences and targeted dissemination to relevant interest holders.

This project has been registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/zafg5/), as PROSPERO does not accept registrations for scoping reviews.

Students enrolling in higher education often adopt lifestyles linked to worse mental health, potentially contributing to the peak age onset of mental health problems in early adulthood. However, extensive research is limited by focusing on single lifestyle behaviours, including single time points, within limited cultural contexts, and focusing on a limited set of mental health symptoms.

The UNIversity students’ LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M) is a prospective worldwide cohort study aiming to investigate the associations between students’ lifestyle behaviours and mental health symptoms during their college years. The UNILIFE-M will gather self-reported data through an online survey on mental health symptoms (ie, depression, anxiety, mania, sleep problems, substance abuse, inattention/hyperactivity and obsessive/compulsive thoughts/behaviours) and lifestyle behaviours (ie, diet, physical activity, substance use, stress management, social support, restorative sleep, environment and sedentary behaviour) over 3.5 years. Participants of 69 universities from 28 countries (300 per site) will be assessed at university admission in the 2023 and/or the 2024 academic year and followed up for 1, 2 and 3.5 years.

The study was first approved at a national level in Brazil (CAE:63025822.8.1001.5346). Study sites outside Brazil obtained additional ethics approval from their institutions using the main approval. Results from the UNILIFE-M cohort will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations at scientific meetings, press releases, the general media and social media.

Acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) is a life- and limb-threatening vascular emergency requiring urgent intervention. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, outcome reporting for ALI remains inconsistent, limiting evidence synthesis and guideline development. The CORE-ALI study aims to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) to standardise outcome reporting and ensure the inclusion of both clinical and patient-centred metrics.

CORE-ALI will use a structured, multi-phase methodology guided by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and the Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) guidelines. Phase 1 involves stakeholder engagement through semi-structured interviews with patients, clinicians and policymakers from diverse European healthcare systems. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis to generate a preliminary list of outcomes. In Phase 2, a multi-round Delphi survey (anticipated two to three rounds) will prioritise and refine outcomes through consensus building, with quantitative data analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistical methods. Phase 3 will culminate in a consensus meeting to finalise the COS. Multilingual accommodations will ensure inclusivity, and General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant platforms will secure data handling.

The study has received ethics approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Innsbruck (EK Nr: 1082/2025) on 20/05/2025. Additional local ethics approvals are required and will be obtained at all participating sites prior to the initiation of recruitment. The final Core outcome set will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and engagement with professional societies and patient organisations.

COMET initiative (Registration No. 3346).

Surgical margins are crucial in determining postoperative local recurrence (LR) in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Achieving a margin greater than 1 cm can be challenging due to constraints related to remnant liver reserve, proximity to major vascular structures and tumour depth. We previously published findings from a retrospective study suggesting that additional margin coagulation (AMC) using radiofrequency may reduce LR, and this multicentre randomised clinical trial aims to further assess this hypothesis.

The LIVERATION trial is an international, multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial involving 698 patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM or HCC. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either AMC (study group) or conventional liver resection (control group) to assess oncological outcomes for both CRLM and HCC. The primary outcome is the incidence of LR. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, surgical complications and quality of life. Follow-ups occur at 30 days, 90 days, and 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively.

The LIVERATION trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee at the sponsor site Hospital del Mar de Barcelona, CEIM-PSMAR (Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos – Parc de Salut Mar), as well as by the Institutional Ethics Committees in all participating countries. The results of the main trial, along with each of the secondary endpoints, will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The study adheres to national and international guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki, and complies with regulations for studies involving biological samples under Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research. A dissemination strategy has been developed to engage stakeholders and facilitate knowledge transfer to support the use of the findings of the study. LIVERATION is funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe Framework Programme (Project Number: 101104360).

NCT05492136.

Practice guidelines recommend addressing patient non-medical drivers of health such as access to nutritious food and transportation as part of whole-person care. Emergent electronic health record (EHR)-based tools can enable non-medical needs care coordination, but adoption commonly faces workflow and infrastructure barriers. Targeted implementation support strategies (eg, training, practice facilitation) can enhance technology adoption in healthcare settings, but no prior research has assessed if implementation strategies can improve how care managers use enabling technologies for non-medical needs care coordination. This study will test whether providing implementation support to primary care health centre care management teams improves the adoption of EHR-based enabling technologies to address patients’ non-medical needs.

This hybrid implementation-effectiveness type 2 pragmatic trial has a mixed methods design. The primary outcomes include: (1) Whether patients enrolled in care management programmes have been screened for unmet non-medical health-related needs and (2) Whether patients with identified unmet non-medical health-related needs received a referral to a community organisation to address their need. The secondary outcomes include: (1) Whether referrals for financial-related non-medical needs had a documented outcome in the EHR, such as successful connection to services, service unavailability or other disposition statuses, (2) Whether the referral outcomes indicated ‘successful connection to services’ and (3) Clinical markers including hypertension and diabetes control. Formative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to using EHR tools to conduct non-medical needs screening, referrals and tracking of receipt of services will include semi-structured interviews and a ‘guided tour’ of enabling technology used by care managers. A modified Delphi process will then inform the development of a set of implementation strategies for inclusion in the intervention. The intervention will be piloted in three health centres, refined, then tested in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in 20 health centres.

We obtained ethics approval for all study activities from Advarra Institutional Review Board (registration number #00000971). Results will be disseminated to Health Centres and Health Centre network nationally at meetings and we will disseminate to researchers via manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals and scientific meetings.

NCT06489002.

People in rural areas of Australia experience poorer health in almost every indicator compared with urban populations; however, rural communities have lower access to primary health, allied health and specialist healthcare. Timely access to care is compounded by persistent and widespread health workforce issues, including attracting and retaining staff.

Australian University Departments of Rural Health (UDRH) have been established to address the needs of rural populations with the goal of improving recruitment and retention of health professionals across rural and remote Australia. The work-integrated learning team within The University of Melbourne works with nursing and allied health university students on clinical placement to provide exposure to working in rural health, with a remit to build the capacity of the existing and future workforce. The service-learning model aims to provide reciprocal benefits to stakeholders through purposefully co-designed placements that respond to rural health needs by providing services to underserved communities and ensuring university students are exposed to real world, diverse practice settings.

The overarching aim of this project is to determine the impact of the SL programme for key stakeholders, predominately end users and those stakeholders involved in the delivery of the SL model. The key stakeholders are host site staff, allied health university students, allied health supervisors and the end users of the programme. End users are those individuals that have received allied health services through the programme, such as clients, residents and children.

This study will adopt a convergent mixed methods methodology underpinned by a RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance)/PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation Sustainability Model) approach. Data collection will include document review, existing programme data review and primary data collection. This will involve conducting surveys and interviews with allied health university students, host organisations and allied health supervisors, and interviews with adult recipients of the service-learning programme. Art-based consultation will be conducted with school-aged children recipients of the service-learning programme. Analysis will be underpinned by the RE-AIM/PRISM framework to inform programme learnings and impact for key stakeholders.

This study has been approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 30409).

Findings will be published in a stakeholder project report and peer-review journals in the fields of rural health, implementation science and work integrated learning.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to major disruptions in society across many spheres, including healthcare, the economy and social behaviours. While early predictions warned of an increased risk of suicide during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of suicide deaths remained stable or decreased over that period for most countries. In contrast, the prevalence of suicidal ideation doubled and suicide attempts slightly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in the adult general population worldwide, accompanied by a higher prevalence of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders. While these data can tell us what happened, they cannot tell us why. Qualitative suicide research seeks to understand experiences of individuals with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours, provides an in-depth exploration of their lives and interactions with others and centres their views and unique context. There is little qualitative research focusing on suicidality during the pandemic. This study will use a qualitative approach to explore the extent and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadians who experienced suicidality and review their experiences of accessing mental healthcare to identify key components in supporting safety and recovery.

This study will involve approximately 100 semistructured interviews with participants across four Canadian provinces and will explore experiences with suicide-related thoughts and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Transcripts will be analysed through qualitative analysis informed by constructivist grounded theory.

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto Academic Health Sciences Network (for JZ: CAMH REB No 104-2022). In addition to traditional peer-reviewed presentations and publications, a report will make study findings accessible to policy makers, media and the public.

Haematuria contributes significantly to emergency urology admissions with over 4 per 1000 annual UK emergency admissions and 10% readmitted within 30 days. However, there is limited focus on optimising inpatient pathways internationally. Existing studies highlight a substantial underlying malignancy rate (32%) in patients presenting with visible haematuria, yet many receive inconsistent care, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased resource use. A systematic review performed by our research group found no large-scale prospective studies have been performed in this area, and little is known about current practice. This study aims to address these gaps by investigating current management practices and their impact on outcomes, with the goal of informing evidence-based guidelines and improving patient care.

The Ward AdmiSsion of Haematuria: an Observational mUlticentre sTudy is an international, multicentre prospective observational study designed to describe the management of patients with unplanned admission to hospital with haematuria under the care of the urology team. The study will use a collaborative methodology using the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training model. This model delivers international multicentre studies by empowering trainees to lead all aspects of multi-centre clinical studies, building research skills cost-effectively while shaping the future urological consultant workforce. Data on demographics, comorbidities, management practices and outcomes will be collected using a standardised case report form and analysed using multilevel linear regression modelling. Primary outcomes include length of stay, while secondary outcomes cover hospitalisation free survival, mortality, readmission rates at 90 days and resource use. The study was launched in January 2024 and will continue follow-up data collection through December 2025. Patient and public involvement (PPI) has been integral to the study design, ensuring that outcomes reflect patient priorities and that the research addresses key areas of concern.

Ethical and regulatory approvals will be obtained as required in each participating region. In the UK, the study is classified as a service evaluation and does not require individual patient consent. Participating sites must obtain local audit department approval. Data will be collected and stored securely, ensuring patient confidentiality. Results will be disseminated through scientific conferences, peer-reviewed publications and patient advocacy groups.