The treatment of tobacco dependence in patients admitted to hospital is a priority for the National Health Service in England. We aimed to conduct an economic analysis of a pilot ‘opt-out’ tobacco dependence treatment intervention adapted from the Ottawa Model of Smoking Cessation.

Observational cost analysis of an inpatient tobacco dependence treatment intervention, and matched cohort study comparing readmission costs between patients who received the intervention and benchmarked equivalents who did not.

11 acute inpatient wards in a major teaching hospital in London, England.

673 patients who smoked, admitted between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2021.

The intervention consisted of the systematic identification of smoking status, automatic referral to tobacco dependence advisors, provision of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support throughout the hospital stay and telephone support for 6 months after discharge.

The primary outcomes were cost-per-patient, cost-per-quit and incremental cost effectiveness ratio among patients who received the intervention. The secondary outcomes were patient-level readmission costs and bed-days from 6 months after discharge, compared between the intervention group and a group of matched benchmark patients who smoked but did not receive the intervention.

The total cost of the intervention was £178 105. On the basis of 104 patients who reported not smoking at 6 months, the cost-per-quit was £1712.55, equating to an estimated age-adjusted incremental cost per life year gained of £3325. Among 611 patients who were successfully matched to a benchmark cohort, readmissions for patients in the intervention group cost £492 k less than their benchmark equivalents over 21 months from 1 January 2021 to 30 September 2022 (£266 k vs £758 k), incurred 414 fewer bed days (303 vs 717) and readmitted at a lower rate (5% vs 11%). There were reduced readmission rates and costs among all patients who received the intervention compared with their benchmarked equivalents, regardless of smoking status at 6 months, except among those who opted out.

A pilot ‘opt-out’ tobacco dependence treatment intervention implemented in an acute hospital setting in London demonstrated value for money through reduced readmission rates and costs among all patients who received it.

Smoking and vaping are especially prevalent among people with experience of psychosis (EoP), potentially increasing their toxicant exposure. Switching from tobacco smoking to vaping e-cigarettes reduces exposure to tobacco-related toxicants and likely associated diseases. We compared levels of nicotine and tobacco-related toxicant exposure among people with versus without EoP.

Cross-sectional study, secondary data analysis of Wave 5 (2018) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.

Data collection took place in the USA at the home of participants.

Data were from 5750 adults (aged >18 years) with and without EoP who smoked, vaped, did both or did neither. EoP was defined as ever being told by a health professional that you have schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, a psychotic illness or psychotic episode.

Levels of urinary toxicants: nicotine metabolites, metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) among people with and without EoP. Analyses were adjusted for demographics, cannabis use and past 30-day smoking/vaping status, and were repeated after stratifying by smoking /vaping status.

Of the 5750 participants, 6.3% (n=361) reported EoP, and 93.7% reported no EoP. Levels of nicotine and TSNA metabolites, cadmium, uranium and some VOCs were significantly higher among participants with EoP compared with those without. However, when smoking, vaping and cannabis use were taken into account, the associations of EoP with nicotine and TSNA metabolites, and most of the VOCs, were attenuated and no longer significant.

Participants with EoP are exposed to more nicotine and tobacco-related toxicants than those without EoP, likely largely due to the high prevalence of smoking, vaping and cannabis use among this population.

People in rural areas of Australia experience poorer health in almost every indicator compared with urban populations; however, rural communities have lower access to primary health, allied health and specialist healthcare. Timely access to care is compounded by persistent and widespread health workforce issues, including attracting and retaining staff.

Australian University Departments of Rural Health (UDRH) have been established to address the needs of rural populations with the goal of improving recruitment and retention of health professionals across rural and remote Australia. The work-integrated learning team within The University of Melbourne works with nursing and allied health university students on clinical placement to provide exposure to working in rural health, with a remit to build the capacity of the existing and future workforce. The service-learning model aims to provide reciprocal benefits to stakeholders through purposefully co-designed placements that respond to rural health needs by providing services to underserved communities and ensuring university students are exposed to real world, diverse practice settings.

The overarching aim of this project is to determine the impact of the SL programme for key stakeholders, predominately end users and those stakeholders involved in the delivery of the SL model. The key stakeholders are host site staff, allied health university students, allied health supervisors and the end users of the programme. End users are those individuals that have received allied health services through the programme, such as clients, residents and children.

This study will adopt a convergent mixed methods methodology underpinned by a RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance)/PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation Sustainability Model) approach. Data collection will include document review, existing programme data review and primary data collection. This will involve conducting surveys and interviews with allied health university students, host organisations and allied health supervisors, and interviews with adult recipients of the service-learning programme. Art-based consultation will be conducted with school-aged children recipients of the service-learning programme. Analysis will be underpinned by the RE-AIM/PRISM framework to inform programme learnings and impact for key stakeholders.

This study has been approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 30409).

Findings will be published in a stakeholder project report and peer-review journals in the fields of rural health, implementation science and work integrated learning.

The Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Evaluation Study with Addition of the Nonavalent Vaccine Study (QUEST-ADVANCE) aims to provide insight into the long-term immunogenicity and effectiveness of one, two and three HPV vaccine doses. Here, we describe the protocol for QUEST-ADVANCE.

QUEST-ADVANCE is an observational cohort study including males and females who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine in British Columbia, Canada. Female participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1–3 doses of the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited approximately 5 or 12 years postvaccination eligibility. Male participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1 or 2 doses of the nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited at approximately 5 years postvaccination eligibility. The study involves a maximum of four visits over a period of 4–5 years for female participants, and two visits over a 12-month period for male participants. At each visit, self-collected swabs (cervico-vaginal or penile) and questionnaire data will be collected. In each study group, a subset of participants will be invited to participate in a substudy evaluating the long-term humoral immunogenicity of the HPV vaccine. Additional blood samples will be collected from participants who are part of the immunogenicity substudy. The total required sample size is 7180 individuals. The primary objectives are (1) to examine vaccine effectiveness in males and females against prevalent genital HPV infections for one, two and three doses of the HPV vaccine compared with unvaccinated participants and (2) to evaluate if there is non-inferior immunogenicity as indicated by type-specific antibody response of one dose of the HPV vaccine in 20–27-year-old females vaccinated at 9–14 years of age compared with historical data of three doses of the HPV vaccine females vaccinated at 16–26 years of age up to 12 years postvaccination.

QUEST-ADVANCE was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia (H20-02111). Individual electronic informed consent or assent will be obtained from each participant before any study-specific procedures are undertaken. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and on the study website.

The efficacy and safety of SMS text message-delivered interventions for providing pain self-management education and improving clinical pain outcomes have been demonstrated in several randomised controlled trials. However, little is known about the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions within Australian hospital settings. The current protocol describes a trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of an SMS text message-delivered intervention designed to support patients’ engagement with pain self-management strategies and improve clinical pain outcomes after total knee replacement surgery.

A hybrid, type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial will be conducted at a private hospital in Australia. Participants (n=130) will be randomised to either the intervention group (receiving a pain self-management educational video prior to surgery, plus daily SMS text message reminders for 3 weeks after surgery) or an active control group (receiving the pre-surgery video alone, without text message reminders) in addition to usual care. Effectiveness outcomes will be pain intensity (primary), opioid dose, knee function and pain-related distress and will be recorded at baseline, 3 days, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery using self-reported surveys. Pain self-efficacy and health-related quality of life will be measured at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-surgery. Implementation outcomes (Reach, Experience, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) will be evaluated using mixed (qualitative and quantitative) methods. This trial represents a first step towards the translation of digitally delivered postoperative support for engaging with pain self-management in the Australian healthcare system.

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Ethics Research Committee (Australia, HREC/110142/Austin-2024). Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific and professional meetings.

ACTRN12624001060538