Target trial emulation (TTE) has emerged as a methodological framework to strengthen causal inference from observational health data when randomised controlled trials are infeasible. The credibility of TTE studies depends not only on rigorous design and transparent reporting, but also on their relevance and acceptability to patients and the public. Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) has been shown to enhance the relevance, transparency and impact of health research by shaping research priorities, informing study design and ensuring outcomes reflect patient perspectives. However, the extent to which PPIE has been incorporated into TTE studies remains unclear. This scoping review aims to systematically map the use and reporting of PPIE in published TTE studies.

This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We will search MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid) from January 2011 to present, limited to English-language publications. Eligible studies will be studies that self-identify as using the TTE framework and report empirical analyses of health outcomes using observational or trial data. We will exclude protocols, methodological or simulation-only studies, preprints, conference abstracts and grey literature. Three reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and then full texts, with disagreements resolved by discussion or adjudication. Data extraction will include study characteristics and PPIE information guided by the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public 2-Short Form checklist. Findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics, tables, figures and narrative synthesis.

Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use publicly available data. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and presented at conferences.

Geriatric patients often face issues related to polypharmacy and adverse drug events. Re-evaluating prescribed medications and considering deprescribing is critical. Medication discrepancies (MDs) during care transitions can compromise patient safety, as over 60% of medication errors occur at these points. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of MDs and their contributing factors through the medication reconciliation (MedRec) process among geriatric patients in emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia, as well as to determine the acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions.

In this multicentre prospective observational study, the best possible medication history (BPMH) was obtained within 24 hours of emergency department admission from at least two sources. A comparison of the BPMH list with medication orders from treating physicians revealed discrepancies. Data were analysed using STATA V.17.0, using multivariable logistic regression to assess variable associations.

Adult emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.

Overall, 384 geriatric patients with chronic conditions and current medication use who visited the adult emergency department of the hospital from 10 January 2025 to 30 March 2025 were involved in this study.

Magnitude and types of MDs, acceptance of pharmacist interventions, and factors associated with MDs.

In total, 384 patients with chronic diseases visiting the hospital emergency department were recruited in the present study. Out of 384 patients involved in the study, 218 (56.77%) had encountered at least one MD. Omission error 190 (45.24%) was the most common type of MD, followed by wrong dose 82 (19.50%). Among 420 interventions, 80.48% of the total cases were accepted. Number of previous/home medications (≥5 medicines; adjusted OR (AOR)=3.12; 95% CI 1.190 to 8.151), older age (≥75 years; AOR=1.62; 95% CI 1.054 to 2.495), and number of comorbidities (≥3; AOR=1.65; 95% CI 1.066 to 2.546) were associated factors with MDs.

This study revealed a high prevalence of MDs in the emergency department. Polypharmacy, comorbidities and older age were factors associated with MDs. The study findings show the need for a clinical pharmacist-led MedRec implementation to enhance patient safety.

This scoping review protocol aims to examine the role of the Internal Regulation Core (IRC) as an intra-hospital governance structure that coordinates capacity and patient flow and may function as a strategic hub for disruptive innovation in hospital management. By integrating organisational routines, rules and, when available, enabling technologies, IRCs may strengthen operational efficiency and contribute to higher-quality care delivery. As hospitals face increasing operational complexity and constrained resources, clarifying what IRCs are, how they are implemented across settings, and what innovations and impacts are reported has become a priority.

This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) and grey literature sources, without language or date restrictions. The searches were conducted up to 6 July 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen studies and extract data using a standardised form; disagreements will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. Findings will be synthesised descriptively and thematically, with results presented in tables and narrative summaries, including innovation streams.

Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/HWZJS).

Earlier heart failure (HF) diagnosis in the community could allow timely treatment initiation and prevent unnecessary hospitalisation, but identifying those at risk remains challenging. We aimed to summarise the performance of risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF.

Systematic review of multivariable incident HF risk prediction models in the community setting.

MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to 9 November 2023.

Observational, community-based studies reporting prediction model performance for incident HF within a 5-year time horizon.

Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Where possible, C-statistics (or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) with 95% CIs were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool and certainty of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

Eighteen studies described 45 prediction models, 27 used traditional statistical methods and 18 applied machine learning. Most (39/45) demonstrated acceptable discrimination (C-statistic >0.70). Overall, C-statistics ranged from 0.675 to 0.954, typically with narrow 95% CIs. External validation was performed for 31 models, but only two—the modified PCP-HF models for white men and women—were validated in three cohorts, the highest among all the models. Exploratory random-effects meta-analysis of these models showed pooled C-statistics of 0.82 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.82) for men and 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.88) for women, indicating excellent discrimination but more heterogenous performance among women. Model performance was at high risk of bias due to unreported or inappropriate handling of missing data, and the certainty of evidence was very low.

Risk prediction models for a new diagnosis of HF in the community performed well, but were at high risk of bias and lacked external validation. Future model development requires appropriate data sources, robust handling of missing data, external validation and clinical testing to assess their impact on earlier HF diagnosis and outcomes.

CRD42022347120.

The term ‘culture of care’ began to be used following the Francis Report in the UK in 2013. This concept involves three dimensions: personal care, leadership care and co-worker care. Personal care focuses on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Co-worker care relates to a sense of community, and leadership care relates to how employees perceive leaders and managers as caring individuals dedicated to ensuring the well-being of others. Previous studies investigating culture assessment tools used in the healthcare system reported that although organisations are increasingly using culture assessment instruments, there is a focus on assessing safety and quality cultures rather than on caring perspectives. This scoping review aims to map existing studies related to the assessment of culture of care.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will include four indexed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences) and additional sources not retrieved with the adopted search strategy. The search strategy will be constructed using the controlled vocabulary in Health Sciences Descriptors, Medical Subject Headings and Emtree. Relevant articles in all languages, without restrictions related to date of publication, will be considered eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers will select articles based on the inclusion criteria, and a third author will be consulted to establish consensus, if necessary. Data extraction will involve a form with information on the study characteristics, methodological issues and main results from the evidence sources. The extracted data will be analysed using descriptive and content analysis.

Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use data from publicly available bibliographic sources. The results will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and presentation of the evidence to interested parties.

The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9Q53).

Hospitalised patients nearing the end of life (EOL) often face complex treatment decisions, leading to potential conflicts among care teams, patients and families. Palliative care consultations may enhance decision-making processes, improve satisfaction and reduce unnecessary interventions. This systematic review will assess the impact of palliative care consultations on treatment decisions, family and patient satisfaction, and psychological outcomes in hospitalised adults.

We will include randomised controlled trials comparing palliative care consultations to standard care in hospitalised adults. The primary outcomes will include decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments, patient and family satisfaction with EOL decision-making, and psychological outcomes such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Secondary outcomes will include intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, utilisation of potentially non-beneficial treatments, and the use of institutional policies or legal actions. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO will be systematically searched from inception to September 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data using Covidence. Meta-analyses will use random-effects models to generate pooled estimates for primary and secondary outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evidence certainty will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Subgroup analyses will explore variations by ICU versus non-ICU settings, cancer versus non-cancer diagnoses and default versus clinician-initiated consultations.

Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD420250624190.

The global population of older adults has grown at an unprecedented rate, and projections indicate that the number of older adults will continue to increase considerably in the coming decades. The clinical complexity of older adults living in retirement homes, also known as assisted living settings, is also increasing, and the regulations to ensure quality and safety standards in retirement homes are highly variable. The purpose of this scoping review is to map and summarise the methods used to monitor and measure the safety of older adults living in retirement homes, providing an overview of existing approaches and areas requiring further investigation.

This scoping review will follow the five stages of the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review process. We will report this review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. A comprehensive search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO) and Web of Science Core Collection) will be performed, and reference lists of included articles will be searched. We will conduct a two-step screening process, data extraction and analysis of the included studies. We will include all primary study designs that report on safety measurement and monitoring of any type of harms. Relevant grey literature will also be identified. We will exclude studies that only report results from facilities providing 24-hour skilled nursing care or specialised care services, and those not published in English or French. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/8rheq).

No ethical approval is needed for the review, and we plan to present the results at research conferences and in a peer-reviewed article. Our findings may inform future research studies that seek to support and improve safety practices in retirement homes.

Patients with chronic somatic diseases such as obesity often develop comorbid depressive symptoms. E-mental health interventions are an innovative and effective treatment option within a stepped care approach. Studies have shown that acceptance and adherence are higher when they are tailored to the specific needs of the target group. This study protocol describes a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an internet-based self-help intervention, Fit4Mood, to improve mental health in the high-risk group of adults with obesity. The objective of the @ktivPLUS research project is to evaluate the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in comparison to an online bibliotherapy.

Eligible individuals will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (access to an internet-based intervention) or to an active control group (access to an online bibliotherapy). Assessments will be conducted before the start of the intervention (baseline (BL)) and 4 months after BL (follow-up (FU)). The primary outcome is the reduction in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in n=190 participants. Secondary outcomes are anxiety, quality of life, activity, self-efficacy, resilience, mental and digital health literacy, stress, sleep quality, weight loss, weight management activities and readiness to lose weight, weight self-stigma, uptake, adherence and satisfaction with the intervention, workability and cost-effectiveness at follow-up. Additionally, sociodemographics, health, comorbidities and disabilities, as well as internet-specific information, will be assessed at BL. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalised linear mixed models will be applied.

Approval for this study has been granted by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (ID: 140/25-ek). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. In the case of a successful evaluation, the internet-based self-help intervention Fit4Mood will be provided as freeware, which will be easily accessible and free of charge.

The current RCT study has been registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Identifier: DRKS00036178, Registered 24 June 2025; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00036178).

Ovarian cancer remains a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and high mortality rate. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play a critical role in the tumour microenvironment, influencing treatment response and patient survival across various cancer types, including ovarian cancer. A systematic review is warranted to consolidate evidence on TILs as prognostic biomarkers in ovarian cancer, with the goals of integrating them into clinical practice to enhance patient outcomes. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of TILs in ovarian cancer.

A comprehensive literature search will be conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect and LILACS. No restrictions regarding publication date or language will be applied. Original studies evaluating the role of TILs in women with ovarian cancer will be considered for inclusion. Two independent authors will screen titles and abstracts, and any discrepancies will be resolved through discussion with a third author. The risk of bias in included studies will be assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Data synthesis will be performed using R software (V.4.3.1).

This study reviews the published data; thus, obtaining ethical approval is unnecessary. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42024543955.

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), particularly when combined with a static magnetic field (PBMT-sMF), is a promising non-pharmacological approach for managing musculoskeletal disorders. However, high-quality evidence for its efficacy in lateral epicondylitis remains limited.

The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PBMT-sMF vs placebo in reducing pain, improving function and modulating inflammatory markers in individuals with lateral epicondylitis.

Multicentre, randomised, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Three outpatient physiotherapy clinics in Brazil.

50 adults (18–50 years) with unilateral lateral epicondylitis and baseline pain ≥50 on the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Participants received either active PBMT-sMF (n=25) or placebo (n=25), 2 times per week for 3 weeks. PBMT-sMF involved multi-wavelength irradiation at 4 epicondyle sites (60 s; 27.1 J/site). The placebo group underwent the same procedure without active irradiation.

The primary outcome was degree of pain rating (VAS). Secondary outcomes included forearm disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, PRTEE), grip strength, serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels and treatment satisfaction. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment (3 weeks) and at 4-week follow-up.

PBMT-sMF yielded a higher responder rate (defined as the proportion of participants achieving at least a 30% reduction in pain intensity relative to baseline) than placebo (72% vs 40%, p=0.045), with a clinically and statistically significant between-group difference. Compared with placebo, the PBMT-sMF group showed significantly greater reductions in pain intensity both at the end of treatment (51.4±19.8 vs 36.9±22.6; p=0.0223) and at follow-up (37.4±24.1 vs 20.3±21.2; p=0.0049). TNF-α levels also decreased significantly in the PBMT-sMF group compared with placebo at both time points (p

PBMT-sMF significantly reduced pain intensity and TNF-α levels, suggesting an anti-inflammatory mechanism. Although functional outcomes were not improved, PBMT-sMF may be a valuable short-term, non-invasive option for lateral epicondylitis pain management.

NCT04829734 on ClinicalTrials.gov

This study explored how Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are being undertaken and the challenges to their successful implementation and sustainability.

A cross-sectional mixed methods online survey.

Primary care in England.

120 clinical pharmacists with experience in conducting SMRs in primary care.

Survey responses were received from clinical pharmacists working in 15 different regions. The majority were independent prescribers (62%, n=74), and most were employed by Primary Care Networks (65%, n=78), delivering SMRs for one or more general practices. 61% (n=73) had completed, or were currently enrolled in, the approved training pathway. Patient selection was largely driven by the primary care contract specification: care home residents, patients with polypharmacy, patients on medicines commonly associated with medication errors, patients with severe frailty and/or patients using potentially addictive pain management medication. Only 26% (n=36) of respondents reported providing patients with information in advance. The majority of SMRs were undertaken remotely by telephone and were 21–30 min in length. Much variation was reported in approaches to conducting SMRs, with SMRs in care homes being deemed the most challenging due to additional complexities involved. Challenges included not having sufficient time to prepare adequately, address complex polypharmacy and complete follow-up work generated by SMRs, issues relating to organisational support, competing national priorities and lack of ‘buy-in’ from some patients and General Practitioners.

These results offer insights into the role being played by the clinical pharmacy workforce in a new country-wide initiative to improve the quality and safety of care for patients taking multiple medicines. Better patient preparation and trust, alongside continuing professional development, more support and oversight for clinical pharmacists conducting SMRs, could lead to more efficient medication reviews. However, a formal evaluation of the potential of SMRs to optimise safe medicines use for patients in England is now warranted.

Incretin-based drugs, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 RAs, are increasingly used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. While these agents have shown cardiovascular benefits, their effects on both cardiovascular outcomes and cardiac structure and function remain uncertain—particularly in patients with and without a history of heart failure (HF).

We will conduct a systematic review and search major medical databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S)), as well as clinical trial registries from their inception and onwards to identify relevant randomised trials. The literature search is scheduled for July 2025. Two review authors will independently extract data and assess risk of bias. We will include randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of cagrilintide/semaglutide, liraglutide, semaglutide and tirzepatide in patients with and without a history of HF. The primary outcome will be cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes will include HF hospitalisation, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular end-systolic volume. Data will be synthesised by aggregate data meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, version 2, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).

As this study is a systematic review based on secondary analysis of published data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals.

CRD420251003374.

Paediatric hospitalisation, encompassing the period from admission to discharge, often involves feelings of pain, fear and anxiety, primarily due to clinical diagnoses and, more significantly, discomfort and stress-inducing procedures. Numerous methodologies and interventions have been investigated and implemented to alleviate these phenomena during paediatric hospitalisation. Virtual reality (VR), for example, has demonstrated efficacy in pain relief for hospitalised children in recent studies. This systematic review, therefore, aims to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of VR in alleviating pain, fear and anxiety in hospitalised children undergoing painful procedures.

This systematic review and meta-analysis will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols guidelines. A systematic search will be conducted in March and April 2025 across the following databases, with no restrictions on language or publication year: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies will include randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials involving children (aged 2–10 years) and adolescents (aged 10–18 years) who received VR interventions during painful procedures. Data will be managed and analysed using Review Manager software (RevMan 5.2.3). In cases of significant heterogeneity (I² > 50%), a random-effects model will be employed to combine studies and calculate the OR with a 95% CI. The methodological quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

This study will solely review published data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This systematic review is expected to provide subsidies, evidence and insights into the use of VR. It is also anticipated that the results will directly impact the improvement of care for these patients and the qualification of professional care.

CRD42024568297.

Acute pain in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is mostly treated with opioid analgesics. However, with the risk of adverse reactions and complications, strategies which do not involve opioid analgesics can be considered, such as aromatherapy. This systematic review aims to analyse the effectiveness of aromatherapy in relieving pain in post-cardiac surgery patients.

Two researchers will independently and simultaneously conduct searches and select studies from the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane (Library) and clinical trial registries (clinicaltrials.com), with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomised and quasi-randomised clinical trials on the use of aromatherapy for pain relief in postcardiac surgery patients will be included. Then, two researchers will independently examine the studies based on inclusion criteria, extract data from the included studies and assess the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool from Cochrane. Data will be synthesised using Review Manager software. The strength of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The literature search, study selection, review and meta-analysis stages will be conducted from early October 2025 to April 2026.

This study is based on secondary data, and therefore ethical approval from a research ethics committee was not required. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

CRD42024568532.