FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Effect of a culturally adapted heart-healthy diet with phytosterols and/or krill oil on lipid-related outcomes in familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Brazil

Introduction

An affordable heart-healthy dietary approach is essential for the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH); however, the optimal dietary pattern and the role of adjunctive nutrient supplementation remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DICA Br), adapted from the Portfolio Diet, with or without phytosterol and/or krill oil supplementation in individuals with probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (Dutch MEDPED) criteria.

Methods and analysis

The DICA-FH study is a national, multicentre, randomised, factorial, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants aged ≥16 years receiving age-appropriate lipid-lowering therapy will be randomised into four groups: (1) adapted cardioprotective diet (DICA-FH) plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil placebo; (2) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil placebo; (3) DICA-FH plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil 2 g/day or (4) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil 2 g/day. All participants will undergo whole-genome sequencing and receive appropriate genetic counselling. Primary outcomes will be means of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels after 120 days. Secondary outcomes will include additional lipid biomarkers, adherence to protocol and adverse events. The planned sample size is 300 participants. Follow-up is expected to conclude in July 2026.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was registered under CAAE 65549622.2.1001.0060 and received ethical approval from the Hcor Research Ethics Committee (approval number 5.805.072) and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP; approval number 6.864.951). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and channels aimed at the general public.

Trial registration number

NCT06331195.

Simulation and the Translation Into Clinical Practice of Nursing Students' Clinical Judgement, Knowledge of the Nursing Process and Self‐Confidence: A Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Study

ABSTRACT

Aims

To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation on nursing students' translation into practice of clinical judgement, knowledge about the nursing process self-confidence and to comprehend the learning process and translation into clinical practice of competencies developed through clinical simulation in nursing students.

Design

Two-arm, experimental, randomized controlled study designed using the explanatory sequential mixed method with qualitative step anchored in grounded theory.

Methods

Eighty undergraduate nursing students were allocated in practice groups and the groups were randomly assigned to an experimental (simulation; n = 39) or control group (study case; n = 41) and, after the intervention, participated in 3-day clinical practice activities and were assessed regarding clinical judgement, knowledge of the nursing process and self-confidence. Students in the experimental group were invited to focus groups.

Results

Seventy-six students were analysed. The findings showed the effectiveness of simulation combined with clinical practice in the development and translation of clinical judgement (β = 5.03; p = 0.001) and knowledge of nursing process (β = 2.20; p < 0.001). There was no difference regarding self-confidence. A grounded theory emerged with three categories related to consolidation of prior knowledge, translating competencies into clinical practice and application of these competencies in nursing care that explain the theoretical category ‘learning and translating into clinical practice’.

Conclusion

Findings suggest that simulation combined with clinical practice can effectively enhance nursing students' clinical judgement and knowledge of the nursing process, facilitating the translation of these competencies into real-world practice. The qualitative findings suggest that simulation promotes meaningful learning and supports the practical application of nursing competencies.

Implications for Nursing Education

This study supports the integration of simulation into nursing curricula to enhance clinical judgement and nursing process competencies. By promoting meaningful learning and facilitating knowledge transfer to clinical settings, simulation prepares students for real-world decision-making and strengthens the quality and safety of nursing care delivery.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Registration

RBR-7v374c6 (Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry) https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-7v374c6

SAGE (safer analgesia): a protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to reduce the use of high-risk medicines in people with chronic back and/or neck pain

Por: Abdel Shaheed · C. · McLachlan · A. J. · Mathieson · S. · Ivers · R. · Clare · P. J. · Blyth · F. · Stanaway · F. · Degenhardt · L. · Gnjidic · D. · French · S. · Thompson · R. · Hilmer · S. · Pinheiro · M. · Machado · G. C. · Austin · T. · Gardner · T. · Sharma · S. · Bennett · A. · Boogs
Introduction

Chronic back and neck pain are commonly treated with opioid analgesics, gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines, despite their high-risk profile and potential limited efficacy. Deprescribing interventions (aimed at medicine reduction or cessation) have shown some effectiveness in reducing the use of these medications, but similar approaches tailored to individuals with complex chronic back and/or neck pain are lacking and urgently needed. This trial will evaluate the effect of the safer analgesia (SAGE) intervention (training of general practitioners (GPs) in deprescribing and support to deprescribe) on cessation and/or reduction of the target high-risk medicine (a benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) for people with chronic back and/or neck pain.

Methods and analysis

SAGE is a pragmatic cluster randomised trial that will be conducted with at least 30 general practices in Australia randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SAGE intervention or no intervention (usual care control group). The SAGE intervention is a GP-facing intervention comprising (i) training for GPs in deprescribing and access to deprescribing resources and (ii) deprescribing support—to assist the deprescribing process for their patients, GPs can conduct a long GP consultation (20–40-min duration), refer to trained physiotherapists for the provision of psychologically informed physiotherapy sessions and provide alternate pain management options including heat wrap and diclofenac gel. A total of 320 adult patient-participants experiencing chronic back and/or neck pain (≥ 3 months duration) prescribed a target high-risk medicine (benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) persistently for this pain will be recruited via participating general practices. The primary outcome is cessation of dispensation of the trial participant’s high-risk medicine (a benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid or opioid) prescribed by their trial GP. The primary time-point for the primary outcome will be 1-year post-enrolment with an observation window of the preceding 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include self-reported outcomes such as pain, quality of life and adverse events. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat approach with a nested economic evaluation and per-protocol analysis planned separately.

Ethics and dissemination

The study received approval from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2024/HE001706). The results will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, presentation at conferences and media.

Trial registration number

ANZCTR: ACTRN12625000953437.

Isolated and Combined Effects of Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

We aim the isolated and combined effects of sedentary behaviour exposure time and physical activity levels on muscle strength in older adults.

Design

This prospective observational cohort study, analytical in nature, using exploratory survey methods and physical performance testing. With 5-year longitudinal follow-up (2015–2020).

Methods

A total of 459 older adults participated in the baseline, with a total of 224 being included/located again in the follow-up. We evaluate muscle strength using handgrip tests and sit-to-stand tests. The international physical activity questionnaire was used to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Generalised Estimation Equations tested both independent and combined effects, reporting results as β coefficients and confidence intervals.

Results

Older adults exhibiting low sedentary behaviour displayed enhanced handgrip strength compared to those with high sedentary behaviour. Notably, older adults who were sufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour, sufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour, and insufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour showed increased handgrip strength compared to their counterparts who were insufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour. This trend was consistent for lower limb strength.

Conclusion

Interventions that encourage a reduction in sedentary behaviour and an increase in physical activity are essential to maintain muscle strength among older adults.

Implications for Practice

The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing both sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels in clinical interventions aimed at preserving muscle strength in older adults. Routine assessments of physical activity and sedentary behaviour could help tailor personalised exercise programs, potentially enhancing functional independence and reducing the risk of frailty and disability in older patients.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patients were involved in the sample of the study.

Reporting Method

This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

Typologies of common maternal mental disorders and associated factors: a quantitative life course study applied to cohort data in a resource-constrained setting in Northeastern Brazil

Objectives

We aim to identify trajectories of probable maternal common mental disorders (CMD), as well as risk and protective factors associated with maternal mental health among postpartum women during the pandemic using life course theory approach.

Design

Prospective individual level cohort study from the Iracema-COVID Study.

Population

Mothers (n=335) at postpartum period who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic in the fourth largest city in Brazil.

Methods

Probable CMDs were accessed using validated instruments in five cohort waves at postpartum period. Sequence analyses (SA) were employed to extract CMD trajectories, and a set of generalised binomial logistic and log-Poisson multivariable regression models with robust variance were employed to assess risk and protective factors for probable CMDs diagnosis.

Outcome measures

Trajectories patterns of probable maternal common mental disorders.

Results

Fit indices demonstrated a two-cluster-SA solution of probable CMD. The patterns of probable CMDs indicated that 335 mothers were clustered into occasional/transitory (n=240, 71.64%) and mostly/persistent (n=95, 28.36%) CMD trajectories. We found that mothers with low education (OR: 2.44; 95% CI 1.13 to 5.23), single (OR: 1.97; 95% CI 1.03 to 3.75) or in a stable union (OR: 2.00; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.90) and travel time spent to access the nearest primary healthcare unit (OR: 1.02; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.04) were associated with increased OR of belonging to the mostly/persistent CMD trajectory. Deprived green areas acted as a risk factor to maternal CMDs prevalence (OR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.002 to 1.87).

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that individual vulnerabilities and neighbourhood deprivation play an important role in understanding maternal mental health, beyond the patterns and trajectories of probable maternal CMD due to issues confronted during the COVID-19 outbreak in the northeastern region of Brazil. Policies to prevent and treat maternal mental health issues and improvement in neighbourhood deprivation need to be developed and addressed to avoid exacerbation of probable maternal CMDs.

The Green Maternity project: A midwife‐led initiative to promote correct waste segregation on an Australian postnatal ward

Abstract

Aims

Healthcare waste production is a significant contributor to carbon emissions, negatively impacting the environment. Ineffective healthcare waste disposal results in greater measures to manage it which is costly to both the environment and healthcare organizations. This study aimed to improve waste management in a tertiary maternity hospital. Specifically, the impact of a midwife-led intervention to improve waste segregation, staff knowledge and attitudes and waste management-related costs was investigated.

Design

A multi-method study including pre- and post-intervention staff waste management knowledge and attitude surveys and waste audits of bins located on the postnatal ward.

Methods

The intervention included education sessions, posters and signage by waste bins and monthly newsletters distributed throughout 2021 to raise staff awareness of correct waste segregation processes. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were distributed in early 2021 and early 2022, respectively. The waste audits occurred on three occasions, January, July and December of 2021. The waste audit included total waste in kilograms (kg), waste in kg by segregation and identification of correct and incorrect segregation. Waste audit and quantitative staff survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi square. Qualitative data from the staff surveys were analysed using content analysis.

Results

Knowledge and attitudes to waste management were similar across pre- and post-intervention staff surveys. Knowledge of accurate allocation of specific items to waste streams was variable with errors identified in both the pre- and post-surveys. Waste audit data showed reductions in clinical waste at each measurement, with a 71.2% decrease in clinical waste from baseline to the final audit. Accuracy of waste segregation also improved from the baseline to final audit, resulting in a 48% reduction in waste management costs.

Conclusion

The midwife-led initiative improved waste segregation and achieved the associated waste management cost reduction.

Impact

A midwifery-led initiative to address waste production and segregation on a maternity ward had a positive impact on waste segregation practices and associated waste management costs. The existence of change champions along with in-service sessions, posters and newsletters to raise awareness of correct waste segregation resulted in a 71% reduction of incorrect items being placed in clinical waste bins. Challenges such as COVID-19 pressures and workload made it difficult for midwives to engage in waste management education and effective waste segregation.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

What Does this Paper Contribute to the Wider Global Clinical Community?

Implementing clinician-led waste management interventions across hospital wards while addressing workload issues are likely to have significant cost benefits for organisations and minimise the environmental impacts of healthcare settings.

Nurse Roles Implementing the Choice for Self‐Collection Cervical Screening in Rural Settings: A Qualitative Study Following National Policy Change

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore the key factors influencing nurses' capability, opportunity and motivation to offer the choice for self-collection for cervical screening within rural primary care services, following a national policy change in Australia.

Design

A qualitative study informed by implementation and behavioural change frameworks.

Methods

Primary health nurses working in Victoria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video or telephone between December 2022 and March 2023. Eighteen nurses from 18 clinics participated. Interview data were analysed following a Framework analysis approach, and themes were mapped to the COM-B model.

Results

Nurses were highly motivated to offer the choice for self-collection due to perceived advantages for their patients and potential opportunities for reaching people hesitant to screen. There was variation in how nurses offered this choice, and to whom. Some nurses were concerned about lost opportunities to visualise the vulval area or cervix, or to have broader health and wellbeing conversations with patients. Views were mixed about how self-collection would impact nurse roles, and several external factors were impacting their opportunities as cervical screening providers.

Conclusions

Appropriately trained nurses have the capability and motivation to incorporate the choice for self-collection within their screening practice; however, their opportunity to maximise equity and increase participation is impacted by funding models and structures that limit their autonomy.

Impact

People living outside major cities experience greater healthcare inequities. Australia introduced access to the choice for self-collection for all eligible individuals in 2022, in part to achieve greater equity in the national screening program. Nurses can play a key role in program delivery. Understanding how they incorporate self-collection into their practice, and the key factors influencing implementation in rural primary care settings, can inform future program implementation and improve outcomes for patients.

Reporting Method

We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines.

Patient or Public Involvement

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.

Effects of photobiomodulation therapy combined with static magnetic field on pain and function in patients with lateral epicondylitis: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Por: de Oliveira · M. F. D. · Leal-Junior · E. C. P. · Machado · C. d. S. M. · Ribeiro · N. F. · Dias · L. B. · Lino · M. M. A. · Araujo-Silva · O. M. · Casalechi · H. L. · Johnson · D. S. · Tomazoni · S. S.
Introduction

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), particularly when combined with a static magnetic field (PBMT-sMF), is a promising non-pharmacological approach for managing musculoskeletal disorders. However, high-quality evidence for its efficacy in lateral epicondylitis remains limited.

Objectives

The study aims to investigate the effectiveness of PBMT-sMF vs placebo in reducing pain, improving function and modulating inflammatory markers in individuals with lateral epicondylitis.

Design

Multicentre, randomised, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Three outpatient physiotherapy clinics in Brazil.

Participants

50 adults (18–50 years) with unilateral lateral epicondylitis and baseline pain ≥50 on the visual analogue scale (VAS).

Interventions

Participants received either active PBMT-sMF (n=25) or placebo (n=25), 2 times per week for 3 weeks. PBMT-sMF involved multi-wavelength irradiation at 4 epicondyle sites (60 s; 27.1 J/site). The placebo group underwent the same procedure without active irradiation.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was degree of pain rating (VAS). Secondary outcomes included forearm disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, PRTEE), grip strength, serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels and treatment satisfaction. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-treatment (3 weeks) and at 4-week follow-up.

Results

PBMT-sMF yielded a higher responder rate (defined as the proportion of participants achieving at least a 30% reduction in pain intensity relative to baseline) than placebo (72% vs 40%, p=0.045), with a clinically and statistically significant between-group difference. Compared with placebo, the PBMT-sMF group showed significantly greater reductions in pain intensity both at the end of treatment (51.4±19.8 vs 36.9±22.6; p=0.0223) and at follow-up (37.4±24.1 vs 20.3±21.2; p=0.0049). TNF-α levels also decreased significantly in the PBMT-sMF group compared with placebo at both time points (p

Conclusions

PBMT-sMF significantly reduced pain intensity and TNF-α levels, suggesting an anti-inflammatory mechanism. Although functional outcomes were not improved, PBMT-sMF may be a valuable short-term, non-invasive option for lateral epicondylitis pain management.

Trial registration number

NCT04829734 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Assessing tuberculosis infection prevalence and test concordance in high-risk groups: a cross-sectional study in Mexicali, Baja California

Por: Brumwell · A. · Herrera · R. · Contreras · K. · Lee · M. · Becerra · E. · Estrada-Guzman · J. · Nicholson · T. · Machado Contreras · R. · Brooks · M. B.
Background

Despite low sensitivity and implementation challenges, the tuberculin skin test (TST) remains the standard-of-care tuberculosis (TB) infection test in Mexico. Interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) may overcome TST-related challenges. Within the confines of the local programmatic setting, this cross-sectional study evaluated the prevalence of TB infection (TBI) and concordance of TST and IGRA in three high-risk populations in Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico.

Methods

Household contacts (HHC) of individuals with TB, people who use drugs (PWUD), people deprived of liberty (PDL) and prison employees underwent evaluation for TBI using TST and QIAreach, a novel IGRA. Prevalence of infection, concordance of test results and reactivity trends of time-to-results (TTR) by TST-induration size were assessed.

Results

In total, 214 of 411 (52.07%) people who had TST and 269 of 460 (58.48%) people who had IGRA tested positive for TBI. Frequency of infection varied across risk groups (HHC 29 (29.6%); PWUD 67 (70.53%); PDL 111 (56.06%) and prison employees 7 (35.0%), p20 mm, p=0.05).

Conclusion

All risk groups had a high frequency of TBI, necessitating locally tailored guidelines for screening, treatment and management of TBI to optimise care for vulnerable populations.

Acciones de la enfermería láser y la estomaterapia: revisión integradora

Objetivo principal: Identificar en la literatura las acciones de la enfermería en láser y estomaterapia.Metodología:Revisión integradora de la literatura realizada en abril de 2022, mediante consulta de las Bases de Datos Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (BVS) a partir de los cruces de los descriptores, se realizó una encuesta bibliográfica en las siguientes bases de datos: Literatura Latinoamericana y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud (LILACS) y Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (MEDLINE). Resultados principales: Se incluyeron once artículos en la muestra, que destacan el uso de la terapia láser de baja intensidad en la cicatrización de heridas con efectos positivos, su uso por parte de la enfermera profesional y la especialización en estomaterapia, poniendo al profesional en el punto de mira. Conclusión principal:La importancia del uso de las nuevas tecnologías en la cicatrización de heridas, como el láser siendo la enfermera el pilar de esta atención, pudiendo especializarse en el área de la estomaterapia, pero es necesario profundizar en la investigación en esta área por parte de las enfermeras.

Preparación preoperatoria: la percepción de la persona que se somete a una cirugía programada

Objetivo principal: Conocer la percepción de la persona sometida a una cirugía general programada sobre su preparación preoperatoria. Método: Estudio cualitativo y exploratorio. Se realizaron diez entrevistas semiestructuradas con personas que se habían sometido a una cirugía general programada en los últimos seis meses en un hospital universitario de la región central de Portugal. Para analizar los datos se utilizó la técnica del análisis de contenido. Resultados principales: Surgieron cinco unidades temáticas, percepción de la experiencia quirúrgica, sentimientos/emociones percibidas, necesidades de información, expectativas sobre los cuidados de enfermería preoperatorios y perspectivas sobre la existencia de una consulta de enfermería, que se subdividieron en varias categorías y subcategorías. Conclusión principal: Algunas personas siguen viendo la experiencia quirúrgica como algo traumático y consideran el entorno quirúrgico como un generador de estrés. Este estudio refuerza la relevancia del personal de enfermería en la preparación de las personas en situaciones perioperatorias y puede proporcionar importantes contribuciones a la estructuración de una consulta de enfermería.

Caracterización de la conciliación de medicamentos en urgencias

Objetivo: Explorar los aspectos principales de la conciliación de medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias. Metodología: Revisión panorámica de la literatura que sintetice los conocimientos existentes sobre la conciliación de medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias. Para ello se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de artículos originales publicados en revistas específicas de la ciencia enfermera y ciencias de la salud durante los últimos 10 años, e indexadas en bases de datos y otros recursos en español e inglés, como son: Cuiden Plus, Pubmed, IBECS, SCIELO y Google académico. En cada base de datos, se introdujeron una serie de palabras claves relacionadas con el tema y basadas en las nomenclaturas MeSH y DeCS.  Resultados: Se encontraron 5 artículos que identifican áreas claves en la conciliación de medicamentos en urgencias. En este sentido, las personas mayores de 65 años, polimedicadas y pluripatológicas son las más susceptibles de padecer un error en la medicación, sucediendo entre un 79,3 y un 95,8%. La omisión de la medicación es la discrepancia no justificada más frecuente (23,8 - 71,7%). A pesar del tipo de error y la frecuencia que se produce en un perfil de paciente vulnerable de antemano, en raras ocasiones les produce daño. Las barreras principales para una correcta conciliación se observan en la incorrecta anamnesis y registro en la historia clínica, así como la ausencia de un listado único de medicamentos. Los estudios realizados en urgencias se han centrado en el farmacéutico como profesional para detectar dichos errores. Conclusión: La caracterización de los errores en la conciliación de medicamentos facilita diseñar estrategias específicas que prevengan dichos errores o detectarlos precozmente con el fin de reducir los efectos adversos y la descompensación de patologías con consecuencias para la salud de la población y para el sistema sanitario.

❌