Conectar
Compression therapy is the evidence-based treatment for healing venous leg ulcers. However, it is not routinely applied in many UK hospitals. This paper explores hospital staff's' perspectives of venous leg ulcer care provision where compression therapy is not routinely applied. A semi-structured interview study was conducted with 11 participants, drawn from a larger study, who confirmed that their respective hospitals did not apply compression therapy to inpatients with venous leg ulcers. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings indicate that venous leg ulcer care in hospitals was de-prioritised, which, along with structural and organisational constraints, affected clinicians' engagement and focus on it in their hospitals. This de-prioritisation also led to a lack of formal leg ulcer training in hospitals. However, some clinicians showed remarkable empathy for patients derived from their clinical professionalism and deep understanding of their suffering. To help hospital clinicians and senior managers prioritise venous leg ulcer care, it is crucial to first understand their clinical practise priorities. Secondly, understanding how some hospitals implement compression therapy could be beneficial for those where it is not routine practise. Further research should focus on better understanding clinicians and senior managers' clinical priorities and the structural and organisational constraints in real-world settings, ideally in hospitals where compression therapy is a routine practise. Most importantly, the study highlighted key questions for hospital leaders and policymakers: consider fostering the established clinicians' empathy before it is too late.
by Yi-De Tai, Joel Villalobos, Nima Wickramasinghe, Bryce Widdicombe, Ranjith R. Unnithan, David B. Grayden, Sam E. John
BackgroundEndovascular neural interfaces (ENIs) offer a minimally invasive approach for neural stimulation and recording without the need for open brain surgery. However, current generation devices have long transvascular wires from the implant site to the chest. Eliminating these wires will unlock clinical usability, including lowering infection risk from transvascular wires, reducing the risk of thrombosis from altered hemodynamics, and improving mechanical reliability. However, removing these transvascular wires would require efficient power transfer across the skull and tissue while meeting specific absorption rate (SAR) limits, which is a significant challenge in the field.
ObjectiveThis work designed and evaluated endovascular receiver (Rx) and transmitter (Tx) coils within endovascular geometric and biological constraints to maximize wireless power transfer.
MethodsThis study evaluated the optimal operating frequencies, quantified coupling, coil quality factors, power transfer efficiency, and SAR using computational modeling, benchtop, and in-vivo testing. The study also assessed the tolerance to coil misalignment and load mismatch. We evaluated each case with and without ferrites with measurements in air, sheep tissue, and in vivo in sheep.
ResultsThe results showed that inductive power transfer delivered power to endovascular geometry devices at clinically relevant depths. The maximum power transfer efficiency (PTE) reached 11% at 15 mm and 2% at 30 mm, with up to 72 mW delivered at 30 mm under SAR safety limits. The rectangular planar coil pair performed best at ≤15 mm, whereas the ferrite-core flux-pipe Tx with a helical Rx outperformed beyond ~20 mm and was more tolerant to misalignment.
ConclusionThis study demonstrated the feasibility of wirelessly powering multichannel ENIs using coils that can be placed inside a blood vessel and powered inductively. Making an endovascular neural interface fully wireless has the potential to transform the technology by improving both safety and reliability.
The Mental health care: Adverse Sequelae of COVID-19 study aimed to (1) compare the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for mental health services and people with pre-existing mental health conditions (MHCs) in six low- and middle-income countries and (2) identify good practice to mitigate these impacts.
An observational study, using a mixed-methods convergent design triangulating data from (1) semistructured interviews or focus groups and/or a self-completed survey, (2) routine service utilisation data, (3) local grey literature and (4) expert consultation.
The study was conducted in Chile, Ethiopia, Georgia, Nigeria, South Africa and Sri Lanka.
121 key informants.
We found clear evidence in all sites that the pandemic exacerbated pre-existing disadvantages experienced by people with MHCs and led to a deterioration in the availability and quality of care, especially psychosocial care. Alongside increased vulnerability to COVID-19, people with MHCs faced additional barriers to accessing prevention and treatment interventions compared with the general population. To varying extents, sites showed accelerated implementation of digital technologies, but with evidence of worsening inequities in access. In sites where primary care-based mental healthcare was more developed or prioritised, systems seemed more resilient and adaptive.
Our findings have the following implications. First, these mental health service reductions are clear examples of ‘structural stigma’, namely policy level decisions in healthcare which place a low priority upon services for people with MHCs. Second, integration of mental healthcare into all general healthcare settings is key to ensuring accessibility and parity of physical and mental healthcare. Third, digital innovations should be designed to strengthen and not fragment health systems. We discuss these findings in terms of anticipating such challenges for future pandemics and preparing layers of resilience.
by Robert Parisien, Alexander Drost, Amin Razi, Sina Ramtin, David Ring, Stein J. Janssen
ObjectivesTo inform efforts to promote regular and normalized Bayesian reasoning, we studied factors associated with the degree to which surgeons use Bayesian reasoning to navigate uncertainty across different clinical scenarios.
MethodsScience of Variation Group members (153; 58% North America, 30% Europe, 69% over 15 years of experience) completed an online survey reading 8 scenarios of test and treatment decisions and chose one of 4 answer options with higher scores indicating more Bayesian reasoning. Internal consistency of the survey was assessed using Cronbach alpha.
ResultsThe average Bayesian reasoning score across all scenarios was 3.0 (IQR 2.7–3.2) on a 4-point scale, indicating a relative context-dependent variability. Completely non-Bayesian reasoning was selected least often (8.6%, 90 of 1,044) and fully Bayesian reasoning represented 29% (301 of 1,044) of responses. Most surgeons showed mixed patterns (defined as reasoning in which prior probability is acknowledged but underweighted, without explicit probabilistic updating): 85% (121 of 142) used fully Bayesian reasoning at least once (121 of 142) while 42% (60 of 142) used completely non-Bayesian reasoning at least once. The Cronbach alpha was 0.43 suggesting the scenarios measured different aspects of clinical reasoning rather a unified construct.
ConclusionsThe finding that surgeons use relatively context-dependent reasoning suggests an opportunity for surgeons to develop and practice Bayesian reasoning strategies both in training programs and in practice.
by Stephen J. Flusberg, Asher Donnelly, J. D. Jarolimek, Esmé Nix, Lili B. Davis, Boshang Yin, Lindsey Anderson, Dylan Ciolfi, Kevin J. Holmes
A person accused of victimizing others may be described as the “real” victim by their defenders to garner empathy and mitigate blame. Recent research shows that this rhetorical strategy, known as “victim framing,” can increase support for a man accused of sexually assaulting a woman. Little is known, however, about its effects in other contexts. Across five experiments (N = 2,941), we investigated whether victim framing generalizes beyond prototypical sexual assault cases. Participants read fictionalized news reports where one party was labeled the victim (or neither was) and expressed support for the individuals involved. We found significant framing effects across diverse scenarios: (a) a man accused of sexual assault who self-described as the victim; (b) a woman accused of sexually assaulting a man; (c) same-sex assault allegations involving men or women; (d) a celebrity or stranger accused of physically assaulting his girlfriend; and (e) a police officer who shot an unarmed civilian. As in prior work, only participants who explicitly cited the victim-related language as influencing their evaluations showed robust and reliable framing effects. Multiple observer characteristics (e.g., gender, political ideology) predicted attitudes in expected ways, yet victim framing effects persisted when controlling for these individual differences. Taken together, these findings are consistent with a social-pragmatic account of victim framing: many people treat a victim label as communicating relevant information and adjust their evaluations accordingly, while others either do not draw this inference or weigh other information more strongly. Our findings highlight the power and limits of explicit forms of linguistic framing.by Rena Xu, David Pletta, Caitlynn Feng, Cassandra Morrow, Maya C. Clark, Badar Omar, Alex S. Keuroghlian, Sari L. Reisner
BackgroundDepression is highly prevalent among U.S. young adults and associated with long-term functional impairment and increased suicide risk. While delays in diagnosis and treatment of depression are well documented among older adults, the magnitude and predictors of such delays in the younger population are poorly understood.
ObjectiveTo characterize the time to diagnosis and treatment of depressive disorder and predictors of diagnostic and treatment delay among young adults.
MethodsThis cross-sectional study used a self-reported survey conducted via the online research platform Prolific in May 2025. Eligible participants were U.S. adults aged 18–35 years with a history of at least one depressive episode. Sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics, including age of depressive symptom onset, degree of social support, and frequency of social group engagement, were assessed. Primary outcomes were probability of not receiving a depressive disorder diagnosis despite symptoms, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, probability of not seeking treatment, and time from symptom onset to treatment. Secondary outcomes were perceived treatment effectiveness and current symptom control.
ResultsIn total, 871 respondents met inclusion criteria. Of those with one or more lifetime depressive episodes, 46.2% reported never receiving a depressive disorder diagnosis. Median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 3 years (IQR: 0–7). Over a quarter (27.4%) never sought treatment; among those who did, 93.5% received care, but 31.4% experienced a delay of 1–4 years, and 28.8% experienced a delay of 5 + years. Symptom onset in childhood (ages 0–12) or adolescence (ages 13–17) was associated with longer time to diagnosis and treatment and lower perceived treatment effectiveness. Greater social support was associated with shorter time to diagnosis; lower probability of never receiving a diagnosis, never seeking treatment, or experiencing prolonged treatment delay; and higher perceived treatment effectiveness and current symptom control. Frequent engagement in social groups was also associated with greater perceived treatment effectiveness.
ConclusionsAmong U.S. young adults, prolonged delays in depression diagnosis and treatment are common. Early symptom onset is associated with longer delays and worse outcomes, whereas greater social support is associated with shorter delays and more favorable outcomes. These findings highlight the need for further research to clarify causal mechanisms and for interventions to promote timely diagnosis and treatment among young adults at risk for depression.
Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) contributes significantly to diabetes-related morbidity and amputation. In Barbados, where amputation rates are among the highest globally, the influence of socioeconomic factors on ulceration outcomes remains underexplored. Educational attainment, a social determinant of health, may influence health behaviours, engagement with healthcare services, and ultimately clinical outcomes. This study examines whether educational attainment is associated with diabetic foot ulcer severity, as measured by the SINBAD scoring system, and six-week healing outcomes among inpatients with DFU. A prospective observational study was conducted over 6 months at Barbados' sole public hospital. A total of 176 participants admitted with a diagnosis of DFU were recruited. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and ulcer characteristics were collected, and SINBAD scores were determined. Random forest modelling was employed to evaluate predictors of complete healing at 6 weeks and to assess ulcer severity stratified by educational attainment. Of the cohort, 17.5% reported primary education as their highest attainment level, compared with 2.9% of the general adult population. The mean SINBAD score was 2.45 among those with primary education and 2.51 among those with secondary education (p > 0.05). No statistically significant association was found between educational attainment and healing outcomes at 6 weeks. Educational attainment in this inpatient DFU cohort was lower than that of the general Barbadian population; however, it was not significantly associated with ulcer severity or six-week healing outcomes. In a universal healthcare setting, equitable access to care may attenuate the effect of educational attainment on clinical outcomes. These null findings highlight the need for future adequately powered studies incorporating health literacy assessment and key clinical confounders. Nonetheless, the observed disparity in educational attainment among DFU inpatients suggests that foot health education initiatives should be designed to be accessible to individuals across all educational levels.
by Jesús del Moral Preciado, David Gurpegui, Montserrat Royo, Bernardo Hontanilla
IntroductionRegenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) and Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) have demonstrated superior outcomes compared to classical amputation in prophylactic prevention of pain, primarily by reducing the incidence of symptomatic neuromas, residual limb pain, and phantom limb pain. However, direct comparisons between these two techniques remain limited. Furthermore, their comparative effectiveness across diverse patient demographics (including age, sex, and comorbidities) and surgical variables (amputation level, etiology, and nerve handling) has not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesize the available evidence to determine the comparative safety and efficacy of primary TMR or RPNI.
Methods and designThis review will be conducted following the methodological guidance of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A comprehensive electronic search will be performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and MedRxiv, without language restrictions. We will include randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized trials, and observational studies. Study selection and data extraction will be managed using Covidence. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, assess full-text eligibility, evaluate risk of bias, and extract data.
Ethics and disseminationAs this systematic review relies on the analysis of secondary data from published studies, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.
PROSPERO registration numberCRD42024617299
Care provided in people’s own homes (domiciliary care) is an increasingly important part of long-term care. There are various services, including home visits, live-in care and housing with care. Some people directly employ care staff, called personal assistants. Services vary in quality, price and availability, and there is currently little evidence of the value these services provide to the public purse and individuals. This study protocol presents planned research to fill this important gap.
This will be a cross-sectional study based on surveys of care recipients, their unpaid carers as well as formal care providers. In the first half of 2026, we will survey 1850 people accessing domiciliary care either through a homecare agency, a housing with care scheme or by directly employing personal assistants and 400 unpaid carers, all based in England. We will conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis taking a ‘production function’ approach and use quality of life as measured by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit as the main outcome of interest.
The study received ethical approval from the School of Social Sciences Staff Review Committee at the University of Kent on 20 May 2025 (reference 1195) and the Health Research Authority, London—Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee on 28 October 2025 (reference 25/LO/0652). Implications around consent, data protection and confidentiality, risk and participant payment are discussed. In addition to academic outputs (eg, academic articles, conference presentations), we aim to coproduce news items and blogs with people with lived experience of accessing long-term care and jointly present findings at events aimed at the care sector. Moreover, we will offer participating care providers benchmarking briefs based on our findings.
To examine the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between medication adherence and self-care behaviours in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease by describing their levels and exploring the interconnections among these variables.
Multicenter, cross-sectional.
A total of 452 patients were recruited through consecutive non-probabilistic sampling across nine Italian outpatient Inflammatory Bowel Disease Units. Data were collected using validated tools: the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8, the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and mediation analyses were performed to explore associations and the mediating role of self-efficacy between medication adherence and self-care behaviours.
Participants had a mean age of 43.49 years; 50.9% were male, 49.2% had Crohn's disease, and 50.8% had ulcerative colitis. Only 10.2% reported high medication adherence, while most showed medium or low adherence. The mean self-efficacy score was 74.82. Medication adherence was positively associated with self-care maintenance, and self-efficacy statistically accounted for part of this association. Lower levels were observed in self-care monitoring and management behaviours.
Medication adherence was positively associated with self-care maintenance, and self-efficacy partially explained this relationship.
Routine assessment of medication adherence and self-efficacy may help identify patients at risk of poor self-care. Interventions aimed at strengthening self-efficacy, such as motivational interviewing, nurse-led counselling, and digital monitoring tools, may improve adherence and self-care maintenance.
The study addressed low medication adherence and suboptimal self-care in patients with IBD. Findings support integrating self-efficacy-enhancing strategies into multidisciplinary care to improve adherence and self-care behaviours.
Patients completed validated self-report questionnaires; however, they were not involved in the study design, conduct, analysis, or manuscript preparation.
This paper aims to explain the process of formulating a robust theory that comprehensively explains the nurse's role during the transition from curative to the palliative phase in advanced cancer care.
A qualitative theory synthesis approach was applied, utilising Turner's 9-step theory synthesis method to integrate five grounded theories and 10 qualitative studies. The Walker and Avant method of concept development and analysis further ensured rigour.
Turner's theory synthesis was used to formulate a more comprehensive, testable theory from five existing grounded theories and 10 other qualitative studies that explain the nurse's role in supporting and facilitating the transition from curative to palliative care in oncology.
The synthesis preparation stage involved a detailed literature review that located five grounded theories and 10 qualitative studies. The theory synthesis phase from steps 1–8 produced the following theory. ‘During transitions from curative to palliative care in advanced cancer, nurses perform various roles that fall within the known and recognised—“visible spectrum” and the unknown and unrecognised—“invisible spectrum”. Step 9 involves the refinement of the theory by further interrogation of its merit in the real world.
Theory synthesis offers a new possibility of cumulating all the evidence research that is already done to adapt it to practice and helping to build theory-driven evidence-based practice.
This paper offers a novel theoretical framework that explicates the visible and invisible roles of nurses in transitioning patients with advanced cancer from curative to palliative care. It contributes to clinical practice by clarifying complex nursing responsibilities that are often unacknowledged, such as brokering referrals, emotional reframing and cultural advocacy. The theory, validated through expert review, can inform curriculum development, support professional recognition and guide practice standards. Broader impacts include enhancing patient-centred care, improving interdisciplinary collaboration and shaping policies that acknowledge the full scope of nursing work in oncology and palliative care transitions.
No patient or public contribution.
Near-falls, defined as events in which individuals momentarily lose their balance but avoid falling, are strong predictors of subsequent falls. Wearable technologies have the potential to accurately detect near-falls in both laboratory and real-world settings, providing opportunities for early intervention in geriatric nursing practice.
This study has a two-fold aim: (1) to appraise and synthesize current evidence on wearable sensor technologies for near-fall detection, and (2) to discuss their potential applications for monitoring near-fall risk and implementing prevention strategies in older adults.
This is a systematic review. Articles were searched in five electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore) that explored wearable sensors for near-fall detection. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
A total of 18 studies, mostly experimental or observational, were included. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) were the most commonly used wearable technology, and the most frequently captured biomarker was linear acceleration. Lower-body placements (feet, ankles, and lower back) demonstrated superior performance in detecting near-falls. Single-sensor systems achieved sensitivities of 80%–98%, whereas multi-sensor configurations achieved 100% sensitivity, 99% specificity, and 100% accuracy.
Integrating wearable technologies for near-fall detection into geriatric nursing practice may enhance early identification of older adults at high risk for falls and enable timely, personalized interventions. Future research should validate these technologies in real-world settings and assess their acceptability among nurses, caregivers, and older adults.
This study aimed to co-design a tailored model of care for older people with long COVID.
Using a human-centred design approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and health professionals from a long COVID service to explore their experiences. Insights were further developed during a co-design workshop involving patients, health professionals and community members who identified as older people and who had experience with chronic illness. Key themes were identified and used to map an ideal patient journey and inform the final model of care.
Long COVID outpatient service in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia.
Four patients and four health professionals participated in the interviews. The workshop included four patients, five health professionals and seven community members.
The co-design process identified challenges experienced by people with long COVID, including lack of validation, delayed multidisciplinary care, mental health deterioration and difficulties navigating the healthcare system. These challenges were described as having particular relevance for older adults. In response, a model of care was developed focused on comprehensive assessment, coordinated multidisciplinary care, education for self-management, mental health support and opportunities for research participation.
A comprehensive and adaptable model of care is needed to address the complex and multifaceted nature of long COVID. This human-centred design approach ensured the model was grounded in lived experience, clinically informed and aligned with patient priorities. While not unique to older adults, the findings highlight areas that may require particular attention in this population, including care coordination, validation and support for comorbidities and social vulnerabilities. While developed in a single tertiary service, these principles may inform the design of services for similar populations in other healthcare settings.
To examine whether shared decision-making at baseline is associated with trajectories of self-management confidence over 12 months among individuals living with chronic conditions attending nurse-led clinics.
A longitudinal design.
Individuals with at least one clinician confirmed chronic condition were recruited from six nurse-led primary care clinics between March and September 2022. Data collection took place between March 2022 and September 2023, with baseline, 6 and 12-month assessments completed within routine follow-up contacts. Self-management confidence was measured using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale, and perceived shared decision-making was assessed using the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Linear mixed-effects modelling examined changes in confidence over time and associations with baseline shared decision-making, adjusting for age, gender, education and number of chronic conditions.
Of 157 eligible individuals approached, 151 consented to participate (96.2%), and 146 were retained at 12 months (96.7%). Mean self-management confidence increased from 40.2 at baseline to 44.5 at 12 months. In adjusted models, confidence was significantly higher at 6 months (β = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.54–3.72, p < 0.001) and 12 months (β = 4.21, 95% CI: 2.93–5.49, p < 0.001) compared with baseline. Higher baseline shared decision-making was positively associated with repeated confidence scores across follow-up (β = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04–0.16, p = 0.002). The association was stronger among participants aged under 60 years.
Within established nurse-led chronic condition care, perceived shared decision-making was statistically associated with subsequent trajectories of self-management confidence over 12 months. Confidence demonstrated gradual change rather than stability within routine practice.
Strengthening the visibility and consistency of collaborative dialogue within nurse-led consultations may support self-management confidence. Structured conversational approaches that help nurses enact shared decision-making more explicitly warrant further evaluation in primary care.
No patients were involved in study design.
The interaction between the gut microbiota and the host immune system is implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis (UC). Targeting the gut microbiota with faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from a healthy donor has shown promise in inducing remission in patients with active UC. However, mixed results and protocol heterogeneity have limited its practical application. Our previous Transfer of Faeces in Ulcerative Colitis; Restoring Homeostasis (TURN) trial found a correlation of clinical response with specific strains and butyrate production. Since most gut microbes, including many butyrate producers, are anaerobes, anoxic processing of donor stool may be essential to increase efficacy of FMT in UC. This trial aims to enhance FMT efficacy by applying strict anoxic processing, selecting donors based on microbial composition and using repetitive dual-route administration.
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study evaluates the efficacy of strictly anoxic prepared donor FMT compared with anoxic prepared autologous FMT in patients with mild to moderate active UC. An open-label extension option is available for non-responders in the autologous arm. Included patients will receive 4 weekly FMTs, comprising two double-route administrations (nasoduodenal administration combined with enema) and two single enemas. Donors are selected based on their microbiota profile, informed by our previous TURN trial and literature. A total of 76 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint will be included. The primary endpoint is steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 8, assessed by the adapted Mayo score. An interim analysis will be conducted midway through the study by a Data Safety Monitoring Board to monitor efficacy and safety. Other outcomes of this study include the evaluation of clinical, endoscopic and histological response. In addition to clinical results, this study aims to provide valuable insights into specific microbial strains, metabolites and mechanisms correlated with response, aiding in the development of future microbial therapies.
Ethics approval was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre in the Netherlands (reference number 2018_057). All participants will provide written informed consent. The results of the trial will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at (inter)national conferences.
Prospectively registered in May 2018 in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR/LTR) as NL7770. Assigned NL-OMON52507 following the transition of the Dutch Trial Register to the Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands. Also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05998213).
To explore families’ experiences participating in a 10-week web-based lifestyle programme for school-aged children with overweight or obesity.
A qualitative study using inductive analysis of semi-structured interview data.
Victoria, Australia.
Families (children aged 7–13 years with overweight or obesity—body mass index ≥85th percentile—and accompanying parent) recruited for a randomised controlled trial that evaluated the effectiveness of the web-based programme and who received the programme (n=102 children/85 families) were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview at 3 months post-programme.
Families received a 10-week family-focused electronic health (e-Health; web-based) lifestyle programme with health coaching sessions—an evidence-based programme adapted from its in-person, group-based counterpart.
A total of 28 families, including 34 children (eight siblings) and mostly mothers, shared their experiences. 10 themes were identified on family members’ experiences and aligned with the socioecological model: intrapersonal—knowledge development on healthy living; experiences and stigma related to overweight, obesity or weight; engaging with structural features of the web-based programme, interpersonal—family dynamic; connections with others (non-healthcare professionals) outside of home; relationship with healthcare professionals, environmental/institutional—impact of COVID-19 lockdowns; health-promoting environments; promotion of and access to overweight or obesity management programmes; web-based programme as part of a larger or established system. Each theme highlighted factors that influenced programme uptake and engagement.
Valuable insights were gained on ways to better adapt e-Health (web-based) lifestyle programmes for children with overweight or obesity. Families perceived advantages in a web-based lifestyle programme and highly regarded humanised features and elements comparable to conventional in-person programmes. Further research is needed to explore the perspectives of families from diverse populations, fathers and families who decline participation in the follow-up period. Web-based lifestyle programmes that incorporate contemporary e-Health technologies, including responsive AI, also warrant further investigation to maximise programme benefits.
ACTRN12621001762842.
To map the existing literature on transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people’s experiences of healthcare in the UK, summarising key findings and characteristics of current research.
This scoping review was guided by the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.
MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched on 29 October 2024. Reference lists of included studies were searched to identify further relevant literature.
Primary research of any design reporting the healthcare experiences of TGD people in the UK from 2019 onwards was included.
Relevant data were extracted using a data charting form guided by the research questions and the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Results were narratively synthesised to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature.
52 studies were included, comprising qualitative (n=38), mixed-methods (n=12) and quantitative (n=2) designs. TGD people reported varying experiences across general and transition-related healthcare settings. Positive experiences were often attributed to individual clinicians. Negative experiences were common, including transphobic discrimination, insufficient clinician knowledge and barriers to effective transition-related care. Strategies for navigating healthcare, such as information sharing within the TGD community and educating clinicians about trans health needs, reflected adaptive responses to systemic barriers.
The findings highlight a need for greater recognition of diverse gender identities, more inclusive approaches in healthcare education and practice and further targeted research. This is especially urgent in light of the recent UK Supreme Court judgement regarding definitions of ‘sex’ under the Equality Act 2010, the emerging implications of which risk compounding existing barriers by reinforcing exclusionary practices within healthcare settings and further limiting recognition and protections for TGD people in the UK.
Patient safety is a global priority, as adverse events represent the 14th leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Among the most common complications in hospitalized adults are functional decline, pressure injuries, and falls, all of which increase hospital stays, healthcare costs, and mortality. Although these risks are typically assessed independently, their interaction has been scarcely explored, and the identification of integrated patient risk profiles could better guide nursing care.
To establish profiles of adult inpatients based simultaneously on their level of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries, and risk of falls.
Cross-sectional observational study.
A total of 2.666 patients were admitted to adult inpatient units in a Spanish hospital.
Data from the Barthel, Braden, and Downton scales collected within 24 h of admission were analyzed. A hierarchical cluster analysis followed by the k-means method was used to classify patients. Relationship between profiles and clinical variables were explored through multiple correspondence analysis, and predictors for each profile were identified using multinomial logistic regression.
Three patient profiles were identified: profile 1 (low risk), minor dependency, low risk of pressure injuries and falls (68.5%); profile 2 (moderate risk), moderate dependency and intermediate risk (15.4%); and profile 3 (high risk), severe dependency with high risk of pressure injuries and falls (16.1%). Older age, female sex, and higher comorbidity were significantly associated with higher-risk profiles (p < 0.001).
Hospitalized adults can be reliably classified into risk profiles based on functional capacity and the risk of pressure injuries and falls.
The identification of combined risk profiles may potentially guide nursing strategies to enhance patient safety, support individualized care planning, and contribute to optimizing resource distribution in hospital settings.
Loss of functional capacity, pressure injuries, and falls are key nursing-sensitive indicators of care quality. Profile-based stratification offers a new framework for personalized, data-driven, and safety-oriented nursing care.
The identification of integrated risk profiles based on functional capacity, pressure injury risk, and fall risk may support more comprehensive nursing assessment in hospitalized adults. These profiles may help inform care prioritization, facilitate early identification of vulnerable patients, and contribute to more efficient allocation of nursing resources. Incorporating multidimensional risk stratification into clinical practice may enhance coordinated and patient-centered care planning.
FreshRSS 