Conectar
To examine triggers, responses, and outcomes for patient-related violence and/or aggression events during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive observational study undertaken at two healthcare organisations.
Pre-existing data were extracted from organisational incident reports and individual medical records during a retrospective period (1/1/2023 to 30/6/2023) and a prospective period (7/6/2024 to 16/11/2024). Violence and/or aggression events requiring an organisational response that involved patients hospitalised in general ward areas at a metropolitan (Site A) and a regional (Site B) site were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
The sample included 100 retrospective cases and 42 prospective cases. The most prevalent causes for hospitalisation related to a medical or mental health condition and dementia. Confusion and irritability were the most common forms of behaviour of concern prior to the event. Physical restraint was utilised more frequently in the prospective period compared with the retrospective period. Chemical restraint was used in approximately half of the cases in both study periods. A form of physical violence was the most prevalent behavioural symptom in both periods, followed by verbal aggression and inability to be re-directed.
Patients with a pre-existing medical condition, confusion and/or dementia are frequently involved in violent and/or aggressive events in ward settings. Physical and chemical restraints are commonly used to manage violence and aggression.
Alternative strategies are needed to manage occupational violence and aggression to minimise the need for physical and/or chemical restraint.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding triggers, responses and outcomes for patients exhibiting violence and aggression in ward settings during hospitalisation. Patients with dementia, confusion and irritability frequently exhibit behaviours of concern, exposing healthcare workers to potential physical and psychological harm.
STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To assess the quality of the Spanish Triage System performed by nurses according to the triage code assigned to each patient and to examine factors associated with the need for re-evaluation after completion of triage.
Retrospective longitudinal observational study.
A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients triaged in the emergency department between 2018 and 2023. Patients triaged by other healthcare professionals and those who did not receive a triage priority level were excluded.
493,211 episodes were analysed. Most were low/intermediate acuity (Level IV 65.4%, Level III 23.9%; Level I 0.1%). Mean time-to-first physician record entry increased as acuity decreased (38 min Level I vs. 81 min Level V), yet recorded time-target compliance was lowest in Levels I–II (23.8% and 14.7%). Re-evaluation occurred more often in high-acuity levels and was independently associated with older age, male sex, lower oxygen saturation and longer emergency department length of stay; compared with Level I, Levels II–III and lower adjusted odds of re-evaluation.
Nurse-led triage demonstrated coherent clinical and operational stratification; however, the lowest recorded time-target compliance in the sickest patients suggests a gap between immediate care and electronic documentation.
Streamline documentation workflows for high-acuity cases and use re-evaluation risk profiles to prioritize monitoring and escalation.
Evidence on nurse-led Spanish Triage System performance and time-documentation quality is limited. Acuity and flow metrics showed expected gradients, but target-time compliance was lowest in Levels I–II; predictors of re-evaluation were also identified. Findings support emergency department nursing, quality improvement and potential benefits for patients attending emergency departments.
STROBE guidelines.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.
Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.
A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.
Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group’s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid’s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).
Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.
by Verner N. Orish, Renosten E. Tetteh, David Adzah, Chinecherem A. Ndiokwelu, Emmanuel A. Allotey, Evans A. Yeboah, Sylvester Y. Lokpo, Kenneth Ablordey, Duneeh R. Vikpebah, Ekene K. Nwaefuna, Precious K. Kwadzokpui, Noble D. Dika, Elom Y. Dzefi, Kokou H. Amegan-Aho, Aninagyei Enoch, Senyo Tagboto
BackgroundToxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) is a successful protozoan parasite infecting up to a third of the human population. It has varied transmission routes including ingestion of food and water contaminated by cat feces containing oocysts of the parasite and ingestion of bradyzoites in poorly cooked meat. Blood transfusion is another possible route of transmission especially among people with medical conditions requiring blood transfusion, such as those with sickle cell disease (SCD). This study aimed at finding out the prevalence of T. gondii infection and the association of blood transfusion among patients with SCD.
MethodThis study was a cross-sectional study involving SCD patients attending the SCD clinic at the Ho Teaching Hospital in the Volta Region of Ghana. Questionnaire administration was employed to obtain sociodemographic information, cat ownership, consumption of poorly cooked meat, as well as blood transfusion history. A blood sample was collected and anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM were detected using Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT), while Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) was used as the gold standard and reference. Seropositivity was defined as either positive for IgG, IgM or both. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23, with frequency distribution done for the sociodemographic variables and the prevalence of RDT and ELISA anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM. Pearson Chi-square analysis was performed to find any significant association between diagnosis of T. gondii infection with sociodemographic variables and blood transfusion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the odds of seropositivity (ELISA) with sociodemographic variables and blood transfusion.
ResultsA total of 156 SCD patients participated in this study of which 124 (79.5%) and 32(20.5%) were HbSS and HbSC respectively. Among the study participants, 105 (67.3%) had a history of blood transfusion. A total of 60 (38.5%) and 83 (53.2%) patients were positive for RDT and ELISA respectively. No significant association was seen between T. gondii diagnosis and cat ownership (RDT,20[37.7%], p = 0.891; ELISA, 27[50.9%], p = 0.673) and consumption of poorly cooked meat (RDT,37[41.6%],p = 0.370;ELISA,53[59.6%], p = 0.211). However there was a significant association between T. gondii diagnosis and age, with seropositive results predominantly seen among older patients (≥20 years) (RDT, 38[52.1%], p = 0.002; ELISA 49 [67.1%, p = 0.002]. Blood transfusion had a significant association with T.gondii diagnosis (RDT, p = 0.003; ELISA, p = 0.001). A total of 66 (62.9%) of SCD patients who had history of blood transfusion tested positive for ELISA and they had 3 times the odds of testing positive for ELISA (adjusted OR 3.14[95% CI 1.50–6.58]; p = 0.002).
ConclusionThe prevalence of T. gondii infection was higher by ELISA (53.0%) than by rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) (38.5%), and sickle cell disease patients with a transfusion history had higher odds of seropositivity. These findings highlight the need to strengthen transfusion safety protocols and consider screening strategies for T. gondii among high-risk populations such as patients with sickle cell disease. Also, there is the need for longitudinal research to help elucidate the true contribution of blood transfusion transmission of T. gondii since a cross-sectional study, causality could not be established.
To compare attitudes and perceptions towards opioid use disorder among people with opioid use disorder and emergency providers, describe interactions between the two groups, and identify barriers to providing and receiving care.
Mixed methods observational study.
Participants were recruited from an academic, tertiary care hospital and a community-based harm reduction agency in New England. Emergency healthcare providers (nurses, physicians, and paramedics) and adult people with opioid use disorder were enrolled. Electronic surveys were administered to providers, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with opioid use disorder and a subset of providers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for surveys, and directed content analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews.
Sixty-eight providers completed the survey, 11 of whom also completed a semi-structured interview. Twenty-two people with opioid use disorder completed the semi-structured interview. Both providers and people with opioid use disorder agreed that addiction is a disease; however, opinions differed on the extent to which personal choice played a role in the onset of opioid use disorder. Participants described how factors such as experiencing homelessness, alongside other personal or familial challenges, contributed to ongoing substance use and presented barriers to accessing healthcare. There was discordance in priorities between providers and people with opioid use disorder, which often drove conflict and perceived stigma. Both groups described physical and emotional trauma from prior interactions, which shaped expectations of future interactions and biases towards each other.
Educational initiatives should arm providers not only with clinical knowledge about opioid use disorder but with skills to recognize implicit biases, navigate unique barriers related to social determinants of health, and effectively deploy shared decision-making techniques. Healthcare organizations should provide support for trauma that emergency care providers are exposed to in caring for people with opioid use disorder.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ)–32 item checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rising and disproportionately affects South Asian adults, including those in the United Kingdom. South Asians develop T2D at a higher rate and at a younger age than their white British counterparts, at a lower body mass index. Active efforts to reduce adiposity can improve glycaemic control and in some cases achieve T2D remission. However, a substantial proportion of lean mass is lost while achieving weight loss, which may have physiological and metabolic consequences, affecting long-term health outcomes and quality of life for people living with T2D and obesity. We are examining the impact of a combined low energy diet and supervised exercise intervention versus a low energy diet alone for the preservation of lean mass in an understudied South Asian population living with T2D and excess adiposity.
This prospective, randomised, two-arm parallel-group, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial is being conducted in Leicester, UK. 36 South Asian adults aged 40–65 years within 10 years of T2D diagnosis and not on insulin therapy will be enrolled. Both intervention arms will receive an 800–900 kcal/day low energy diet for 12 weeks. Those randomised to the exercise group will additionally receive a mixture of supervised and home-based resistance and aerobic exercise training three times per week. The primary outcome is the difference in the change of lean mass between groups measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 weeks and will be analysed using linear regression modelling.
The trial was approved by the NHS research ethics service (23/WM/0201). All participants will provide informed consent prior to enrolment, and the study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Findings will be shared widely (publications, presentations, press releases, social media platforms) and will inform an effectiveness trial.
To explore how nurse practitioners and physicians providing primary care for LGBTQ+ people experience and make sense of their practice.
Qualitative study using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 clinicians (four nurse practitioners, eight physicians) working in LGBTQ+-focused primary care across diverse U.S. regions. Interviews were online, audio-recorded via Zoom, and lasted 50–90 min. Reflexive notes were maintained. Analysis followed Smith and Nizza's six-stage Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) process from close reading to experiential statements, clustering to personal experiential themes, development of group experiential themes, and synthesis, supported by memoing and peer debriefing.
Four Group Experiential Themes: (1) Belonging, Affirmation, and the Power of LGBTQ+-Centred Spaces: clinicians practised as their full selves and modelled culturally safe care; (2) Personal Pain as Professional Purpose: personal histories of marginalisation informed a reparative ethic that fostered empathy, trust, and safety; (3) Expanding the Boundaries of Health Work: care routinely extended beyond clinic walls to advocacy, harm reduction, administrative support, and navigation of social determinants amid political precarity; (4) Resistance Within Broken Systems: persistent, invisible labour was required to navigate heteronormative and cisnormative infrastructures.
LGBTQ+-focused primary care operates as clinical practice and social justice work. Clinicians translate lived experience into reparative, relational care while constantly negotiating systemic constraints and policy volatility.
Embed LGBTQ+-affirming competencies and reflexivity in education; redesign digital/administrative systems for affirmed names/pronouns and streamlined access; resource and protect services and staff wellbeing in hostile policy climates.
Problem: Persistent inequities and under-recognised experiential labour in LGBTQ+ primary care. Main Findings: Belonging and affirmation; reparative ethic; expanded health work; daily systemic workarounds. Impact Audience: Nurses, physicians, educators, leaders, and policymakers. Reporting Method: COREQ.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation and often coexists with seven comorbid conditions on average. This study aimed to examine the gender differences in disease burden, symptom burden, and quality of life among older adults with heart failure and multimorbidity.
Cross-sectional study.
This study utilised a baseline survey from an ongoing cohort study in 2022–2023. Adults aged ≥ 50 years with heart failure and more than one chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital using an electronic patient portal. Disease burden was measured using a modified Disease Burden Impact Scale. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale and EuroQoL-5D-5L assessed symptom burden and quality of life. Gender differences in baseline outcomes were examined using Pearson's Chi-square tests, Welch's t-tests, and multiple linear regressions.
Among 353 participants who completed the baseline survey, the mean (±SD) age was 70 (±9.5) years, and 50.1% were women (mean age: 67 ± 9 vs. men: 72 ± 10). In adjusted models, women had 4.9 points higher disease burden (p = 0.003) and reported higher symptom scores of pain (p = 0.018), tiredness (p = 0.021), nausea (p = 0.007), and loss of appetite compared to men (p = 0.036). Women had significantly more moderate/severe problems in usual activities and pain/discomfort and 0.07 points lower EuroQoL index than men (p = 0.010).
There were gender differences in disease/symptom burdens and quality of life. Women living with heart failure and multimorbidity had higher burdens but lower quality of life.
Identifying gender differences among people with heart failure and multimorbidity can be the first step to explaining health disparities. Research should take more inclusive and equitable approaches to address these differences. Healthcare providers, including nurses, should implement targeted strategies for effective multimorbidity management by considering these differences and disparities in clinical settings.
STROBE checklist, cross-sectional.
No patient or public contribution.
Effective communication is essential between health professionals during surgical procedures for delivery of safe patient care. The influence of noise on communication during critical moments of surgery and on communication failures is unclear.
To examine communication events among health professionals in the operating room and investigate the influence of noise on communication.
Non-participatory observations were undertaken of communication between health professionals during surgical procedures while simultaneously measuring sound pressure levels. Audio visual recording was used to document communication events, ensuring data accuracy. A generalised linear mixed model was used to examine relationships between various explanatory variables and the presence of at least one communication failure. The STROBE checklist guided the reporting of this paper.
A representative range of procedures was observed from diverse surgical specialties (N = 80). Observations comprised 2274 communication events; communication failures were observed in 24% and repeated communication was observed in 25% of all communication events. The mean maximum sound pressure levels were 64.9 dB[A] for communication events, 64.5 dB[A] for communication failures and 65.5 dB[A] for repeats. The type of surgical procedure, the emergence from anaesthesia compared to other phases of surgery, communication related to the surgical safety checklist, communication related to the surgical count, the presence of multitasking, and the use of surgical facemasks, were associated with the presence of at least one communication failure.
This research identified the inherent risks and occurrence of communication failure in noisy operating room environments where health professionals are undertaking complex cognitive tasks and where effective communication is essential to ensure patient safety.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
by Obed Kwaku Duah Asumadu, Gilbert Abotisem Abiiro, Joyce Aputere Ndago, David Abatanie Kanligi, Martin Nyaaba Adokiya
IntroductionGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the provision of maternal health services, especially facility-based delivery. However, there is little evidence on the proportion of women who delivered at the health facility in various locations and the factors that influenced women’s decision-making in choosing a place of delivery during and amid the COVID-19 restrictions. Therefore, this study assessed the prevalence and factors associated with health facility delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Tamale Metropolis of Ghana.
MethodsAn analytical cross-sectional study design was conducted. A multistage sampling technique was used in selecting the study communities. At the individual level, random sampling technique was applied, and 461 women were recruited from 21st February 2021–21st March 2021. Using a questionnaire, a face-to-face approach was used to conduct the interviews. The questionnaire included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, place of childbirth and factors that led to the choice of delivery place. Using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25, descriptive and binary logistic regression analysis were conducted.
ResultsThe results revealed that 64.0% of the women delivered in health facilities during the pandemic. Health facility delivery was more likely to occur among women with higher educational status (AOR: 5.2; 95% CI: 1.40–19.40), married women (AOR:6.3; 95% C.I:1.10–35.80), active National Health Insurance Scheme holders during delivery (AOR: 13.8; 95% C.I: 4.60–41.90), women who received education on birth preparedness and complication readiness (AOR: 7.6; 95% C.I:3.30–17.50) and women with underlying conditions before pregnancy (AOR:3.3; 95% C.I:1.20–9.20). There were reduced odds of health facility delivery among women with a history of home delivery (AOR:0.2; 95% C.I:0.10–0.50), when the mother-in-law decides on the place of delivery (AOR:0.1; 95% C.I:0.03–0.50), longer distance to the place of delivery (AOR:0.3; 95% C.I:0.01–1.00) and when women perceived COVID-19 as a barrier to facility delivery (AOR:0.1; 95% C.I:0.03–0.20).
ConclusionOur findings show that health facility delivery declined during COVID-19. Factors that affected health facility delivery were educational status, marriage, having an active National Health Insurance Scheme, education on birth preparedness and complication readiness, underlying conditions before pregnancy, history of home delivery, mother-in-law decision on place of delivery, distance to place of delivery and perceiving COVID-19 as a barrier to facility delivery. These contributed to low facility delivery. Thus, maternal health services need to be brought to the doorsteps of communities, including proper implementation of the Focused Antenatal Care and community-based pregnancy school programmes, especially during future pandemics.
To investigate associations between body composition indices and metabolic status among normal-weight adults.
Cross-sectional study using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (phaseVII: 2019–2021).
Primary care and community health services in an urban Tehran population.
1298 adults (40.5% men, 59.5% women), aged 18–80years, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–24.9 kg/m². Exclusions: known diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, malignancy, pregnancy or lactation, diuretic or glucocorticoid use. Participants were classified as metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW) or unhealthy (MUHNW).
The primary outcome was the association between body composition and anthropometric indices with metabolic status. The secondary outcome was identification of the strongest predictors of MUHNW. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis to obtain fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (BFP), skeletal muscle mass percentage (SMM%), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index, skeletal muscle indices and the fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR). Anthropometric measures included waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Associations were examined using logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking and physical activity.
Mean age: 37.5±12.8 y; MUHNW participants were older than MHNW (44.5±13.2 vs 35.8±12.1 years, p
BMI, WC, WHR and body fat indices were positively associated with metabolically unhealthy status among normal-weight adults of both sexes. WHR was the strongest predictor, highlighting its value for identifying at-risk individuals where advanced body composition tools are unavailable.
Understanding the patient perspective is crucial for enhancing healthcare delivery and outcomes for chronic conditions like diabetic foot ulcers. This qualitative study examined the perspectives of patients with diabetic foot ulcers to inform clinical strategies for both physicians and current patients to enhance care and prevent lower extremity amputations. Fifteen patients with a history of diabetes and diabetic foot ulcers and/or amputations participated in semi-structured interviews which explored their lived experiences and advice for both physicians and fellow patients to improve diabetic foot ulcer related care. Interview transcriptions were analysed to identify recurring themes. Advice for physicians emphasised increasing patient education, initiating preventive foot care at the time of diabetes diagnosis, providing instructions for managing diabetic ulcers early and demonstrating empathetic bedside manner. Advice for fellow patients focused on adopting healthy lifestyle practices, regular foot self-examinations, consistent blood glucose monitoring, medication adherence and seeking prompt medical attention for new or worsening foot lesions. Participants also stressed the importance of routine check-ups with providers to support prevention and management efforts. This qualitative study highlights the value of incorporating patient perspectives to improve our understanding of diabetic foot ulcer onset, care and outcomes and thereby reduce the risk of lower extremity complications.
To examine factors, including symptom burden profiles and self-care, associated with quality of life among individuals with heart failure and multimorbidity.
A cross-sectional design.
353 adults aged 50 years or older with heart failure and at least one additional chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital. Three symptom burden groups were identified (low, moderate, and high) through latent profile analysis of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores. The Heart Failure Self-care Index and EuroQoL-5D-5L measured self-care behaviours and quality of life. This study examined group differences and associations overall and stratified by symptom burden groups via multivariable linear regression.
A higher disease burden and the high symptom burden group compared to the low symptom burden group were associated with lower quality of life. Self-care maintenance was positively associated with a higher quality of life, but not in the high-burden group. Among individual symptoms, pain and depression were associated with lower quality of life. In the high-burden group, older age was positively associated with quality of life. Higher symptom burden groups included a greater proportion of women and middle-aged adults.
Symptom burden and self-care maintenance show significant associations with quality of life in multimorbidity. Symptom burden profiles identified through latent profile analysis may complement conventional approaches by targeting high-risk individuals, such as middle-aged individuals and women with high symptom burden, for follow-up and integrated multimorbidity management.
For healthcare providers, including nurses, these findings underscore the importance of holistic, symptom-based care approaches combined with routine support for self-care maintenance. Adopting a life-course approach, through early identification and management of high-risk individuals, may help promote aging in place with a better quality of life for those with heart failure and multimorbidity.
STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
by Jimmy Andreyvan Cainamarks-Alejandro, Liliana Cruz-Ausejo, Miguel Angel Burgos-Flores, Jaime Rosales-Rimache, Jonh Astete-Cornejo, David Villarreal-Zegarra
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic marked an increase in depressive, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, more specifically among healthcare workers, teachers, and police officers. These workers face external and occupational factors which had a significant impact on mental health, significant increase in workload and direct exposure to the virus, shortage of personnel protective equipment, and instances of abuse, including discrimination. Mental health care in primary care requires a process of early identification and timely referral of complex cases. Telehealth emerges as an effective alternative for addressing challenges in mental health care, although its implementation encounters obstacles.
ObjectiveTo design a telehealth service that facilitates screening, initial management, and timely referral for mental health diagnoses in workers with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to evaluate usability, acceptability, and user satisfaction.
MethodsMixed-method study with a user-centered design approach involving key external and internal service users in three sequential stages (pre-design, co-design, and post-design). The study phases lasted 6 months, involving a total of 23 participants in the pre-design phase (contextual inquiry and preparation and training), 12 participants in the co-design phase (framing the issue, generative design, and sharing design), and in the post-design phase, 4 participants were involved in service implementation, and 81 participants—drawn from the subgroup of 134 users who received psychoeducation—were included in the efficacy assessment.
ResultsThe proposal included the development and evaluation of a service model guide and a telehealth software platform. First, the participants took part in a series of workshops (Pre-design, Co-design) where they provided ideas for meeting the product requirements, based on the Design Thinking methodology framework. The telehealth service model was named TelePsico CENSOPAS. It comprised four processes: a) Service promotion; b) User pre-identification; c) Appointment management; d) Psychoeducation counseling and referral. The Telehealth platform was designed through three cycles of an iterative process and integrated a proprietary development platform with third-party service technologies for communication support and information exchange. During post-design, the pilot test involved 698 screened patients; 193 were identified with mental health risks, and 134 of them received psychoeducation sessions. In addition to user acceptance, the usability score of the platform was 86.1 ± 16.9 SD, satisfaction dimensions of the service was 45.1 ± 7.2 SD for satisfaction with care processes, and 36.7 ± 5.2 SD satisfaction with psychological care.
ConclusionThe proposal for mental health telehealth services and its supporting platform was successfully developed and accepted by both internal and external users, particularly within well-structured occupational health services in workplaces serving vulnerable occupational groups. In addition, it achieved higher satisfaction and usability scores than Peru’s outpatient care services. These findings support the replicability of user-centered design frameworks—such as design thinking—within the occupational health sphere.
Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) are a heterogeneous group of diseases with multiple subtypes. Both idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other ILDs associated with a risk of developing progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) are subtypes of this category. A multidisciplinary team discussion, including a chest high-resolution CT (HRCT), is usually considered the gold standard for diagnosis of F-ILD. Repeated HRCT is one of several established methods to assess progression and thus development of PPF, but it is associated with substantial costs and radiation exposure. Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) and other ultrasound (US) methods have emerged as radiation-free methods for both diagnosing and monitoring disease severity in F-ILD. Yet, consistent knowledge on the use of different TUS- and US methods in patients with F-ILD is limited.
The LORD study is a prospective cohort study conducted in participants with F-ILD at a tertiary ILD centre in Denmark. Physiological testing and patient-related outcome measures, together with TUS- and US examinations, will be performed at inclusion, after 6 and 12 months. The correlations between these assessments will be evaluated. HRCT will be conducted between 3 months prior to and 1 month after baseline, and after 1 year. At least 34 participants will be included.
The protocol was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (journal number: 22/45135) and the Science Ethics Committee for the Region of Southern Denmark (journal number: S-20220036). Results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals and will be presented at an international congress.
The rise in smartphone use presents opportunities and challenges in clinical settings. Despite guidelines restricting mobile phone use, nurses frequently rely on them for various purposes. While beneficial, smartphone use poses risks to information security, patient safety, and care quality, prompting the need for monitoring.
This study examined smartphone usage among nursing students and their perspectives on acceptable and unacceptable use during clinical placements.
This cross-sectional study used convenience sampling to recruit undergraduate nursing students from five universities in Australia and New Zealand. Participants completed the Attitude Towards Digital Device Use during Clinical Placement (Adduct) Scale online between September 2021 and August 2022. The survey included closed and open-ended questions. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using SPSS. Exploratory factor analysis identified attitudinal dimensions, while group comparisons assessed demographic variations. Qualitative responses were thematically analysed. Reporting followed the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
Among 279 respondents, drawn from an eligible population of 2682 students, the response rate was 10.4%. Age significantly influenced perceptions of unacceptable smartphone use. Younger students (mean age = 25.0, SD = 9.8) were more likely to view such use as acceptable, with those up to 21 years reporting higher scores on the Unacceptable Use sub-scale compared to older peers (p = 0.024). Most respondents found smartphone use beneficial for accessing information and learning, though concerns included distractions and confidentiality breaches. Younger students were at greater risk of non-adherence to guidelines.
Smartphones can enhance learning and efficiency, but clear guidelines and education are needed to balance benefits with risks, particularly for younger students.
This study highlights the need for clear guidelines and structured training to balance educational benefits of smartphone use with the risks of distraction and breaches of patient confidentiality in clinical practice.
No patient or public pontribution.
This study investigated the efficacy and safety of a novel thermo-reversible antimicrobial wound gel (TRG, revyve Antimicrobial Wound Gel) designed to combat biofilm-related infections in wounds. The TRG was evaluated for its ability to disrupt biofilms, sustain antimicrobial activity and promote wound healing. The gel exhibited thermo-reversible properties, transitioning from a less viscous liquid ≤ 18°C to a highly viscous solid gel at wound temperature which would facilitate easy application and removal. Antimicrobial testing demonstrated that TRG effectively inactivated a broad range of wound-related pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with a 99.99%–99.9999% reduction in bacterial counts within 30 min. The TRG also maintained its antimicrobial efficacy after multiple inoculations with high microbial load (107 CFU/mL) over 7 days. In vitro biofilm assays showed effectiveness against biofilm bacteria with a reduction of ≥ 99.99% bacterial counts with one application over the course of 7 days. Biocompatibility testing confirmed that TRG was safe, with no signs of tissue necrosis or signs of tissue damage and no impact on wound healing in a porcine wound model. TRG's ability to reduce both planktonic and biofilm-based bacteria without compromising wound healing makes it a promising candidate for treating both chronic and acute wounds.
To explore how critical care nurses access, negotiate and apply knowledge in high-pressure clinical environments, focusing on organisational, cultural and leadership factors influencing evidence-based practice implementation in acute hospital settings.
A focused ethnographic collective case study was conducted across two contrasting critical care units in England.
Methods included non-participant observation (56 sessions), semi-structured interviews (36 participants) and document review. Spradley's Developmental Research Sequence guided data generation and analysis. Data were collected over an eight-month period (February to September 2022).
Five major themes were identified: sources of knowledge and acquisition strategies; institutional and hierarchical influences on knowledge use; role of experiential knowledge and clinical intuition; challenges to evidence-based practice implementation; and strategies for integrating knowledge into practice. Organisational structures, leadership engagement, mentorship and access to updated digital resources were key enablers of evidence-based practice. Barriers included workload pressures, inconsistent guideline dissemination and hierarchical cultures. Adaptive blending of formal evidence, clinical experience and intuition characterised effective knowledge negotiation at the bedside.
Knowledge use in critical care nursing is a dynamic, relational process shaped by leadership, organisational culture and systemic pressures. The availability of evidence alone is insufficient; visible leadership, peer learning, protected educational time and valuing of experiential knowledge are critical to embedding evidence-based practice into routine practice.
Strengthening organisational systems, investing in nurse manager development, expanding simulation-based learning and legitimising experiential knowledge are vital strategies to enhance evidence-based critical care.
This study provides actionable insights for healthcare leaders, educators and policymakers seeking to optimise evidence-based practice adoption in high-acuity clinical environments and improve patient outcomes.
The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist guided reporting.
Patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination of this research.
FreshRSS 