Conectar
To examine triggers, responses, and outcomes for patient-related violence and/or aggression events during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive observational study undertaken at two healthcare organisations.
Pre-existing data were extracted from organisational incident reports and individual medical records during a retrospective period (1/1/2023 to 30/6/2023) and a prospective period (7/6/2024 to 16/11/2024). Violence and/or aggression events requiring an organisational response that involved patients hospitalised in general ward areas at a metropolitan (Site A) and a regional (Site B) site were included. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
The sample included 100 retrospective cases and 42 prospective cases. The most prevalent causes for hospitalisation related to a medical or mental health condition and dementia. Confusion and irritability were the most common forms of behaviour of concern prior to the event. Physical restraint was utilised more frequently in the prospective period compared with the retrospective period. Chemical restraint was used in approximately half of the cases in both study periods. A form of physical violence was the most prevalent behavioural symptom in both periods, followed by verbal aggression and inability to be re-directed.
Patients with a pre-existing medical condition, confusion and/or dementia are frequently involved in violent and/or aggressive events in ward settings. Physical and chemical restraints are commonly used to manage violence and aggression.
Alternative strategies are needed to manage occupational violence and aggression to minimise the need for physical and/or chemical restraint.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding triggers, responses and outcomes for patients exhibiting violence and aggression in ward settings during hospitalisation. Patients with dementia, confusion and irritability frequently exhibit behaviours of concern, exposing healthcare workers to potential physical and psychological harm.
STROBE checklist.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To measure patients' views of nurses' communication and interpersonal skills during acute hospitalisation.
This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.
From January to June 2024, a convenience sampling approach was used to recruit patients hospitalised in acute care wards across two healthcare organisations in regional Victoria, Australia. A self-report survey, the Communication Assessment Tool for Nurses, included 15 items that measured patients' opinions about the quality of nurses' communication using a 5-point scale. Data were analysed by descriptive and univariate statistics and logistic regression.
The sample included 204 participants. Higher ratings were found for respectful care: ‘Treated me with respect’ and ‘Showed care and concern’. Lower ratings largely related to shared decision-making: ‘Encouraged me to ask questions’, ‘Informed me about my plan of care’, ‘Involved me in decisions as much as I wanted’ and ‘Showed interest in my ideas about my health’. Logistic regression revealed lower ratings for the quality of nurses' communication based on longer hospital stay for items related to greetings and shared decision-making.
Whilst this study found that patients perceive a high quality of respectful nursing care, the findings underscore the need for communication skills training to enhance shared decision-making by nurses. Consideration is needed regarding how nurses are prepared to engage in shared decision-making with patients during acute hospitalisation, particularly for longer hospital stays.
This study addresses a gap in evidence regarding patients' perceptions about the quality of nurses' communication during acute hospitalisation in the Australian context. Whilst they perceive that nurses communicate in a respectful and caring manner, opportunities for shared decision-making may not be capitalised on. Hospital managers and nurse academics should develop interventions to address essential communication skills.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To propose a conceptual model of dignity-centred care for hospitalised older adults using Levine's Conservation Model as a theoretical framework.
A discursive approach.
Data were obtained from an extensive search of five databases and grey literature without date restrictions for information on patient dignity, dignified care for hospitalised older adults and the Levine Conservation Model.
Dignity is a multifaceted concept encompassing an inherent self-worth and self-worth acquired through personal accomplishments and associations. Hospitalised older adults are at risk of dignity erosion due to complex health conditions, poor healthcare professional- patient communication, inadequate health information, loss of autonomy, inadequate privacy, and infrastructural and systemic barriers. Key components of dignified care include respect, autonomy, privacy, effective symptom management, effective communication and active patient involvement in decision-making. The proposed conceptual model integrates Levine's principles of conservation into a dignity-centred care framework. This model identifies threats to dignity in hospitalised older adults and outlines practical interventions to mitigate these threats in order to maintain or restore dignity.
The proposed conceptual model of dignity in care for hospitalised older adults, underpinned by the Levine Conservation Model, offers a practical framework to guide healthcare professionals in providing care that upholds the dignity and well-being of older adults. The model can serve as a foundation for developing institutional policies and training programmes that reflect the multidimensional nature of dignity in care for older adults.
The study addressed both the conceptual ambiguity and skills gap surrounding dignity-centred care for older adults by offering a practical guide for integrating dignity-centred principles into routine clinical practice. The findings hold substantial relevance for healthcare practice, providing a structured, theory-informed model to advance dignity-centred care and protect the dignity of hospitalised older adults.
Not applicable.
The aim of this scoping review was to identify factors associated with delayed initiation of end-of-life care for adult patients with cardiovascular disease in critical care settings.
Scoping review.
This scoping review was designed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Included articles were uploaded and examined in Covidence.
A systematic search of bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Medline and Embase) and Google Scholar was performed to identify relevant literature between January 2003 and April 2025. Key search concepts included ‘end of life’, ‘cardiac’ and ‘critical care’.
A total of 9430 articles were initially identified. After removing 7750 irrelevant articles, 207 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 34 articles were included in the final review. Four major themes were identified: (1) confidence in communication regarding end of life; (2) transition from active therapies to end-of-life care; (3) role clarity in the initiation and provision of end-of-life care; and (4) breakdown in the shared decision-making process.
Delayed initiation of end-of-life care for patients with cardiovascular disease in critical care settings could be mitigated through training to improve confidence when discussing end of life with patients and families, and utilisation of prognostic prediction assessment tools. Increased focus on inter-professional collaboration and shared decision-making in family meetings may reduce indecision at end of life.
The results were reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
To examine nurses' opinions and assess their level of engagement in clinical research.
An observational study employing a cross-sectional online survey from April to August 2024.
A convenience sample of registered nurses in a metropolitan health service in Victoria, Australia completed a self-report survey from April to August 2024. The survey consisted of fixed-response questions (5-point Likert scale) that measured nurses' opinions about clinical research and level of research involvement. Data were analysed using descriptive and univariate statistics, and content for two free-text open-ended questions.
There were 186 participants who reported positive opinions towards the role of clinical nursing research in improving patient outcomes and quality of care. Lower ratings were observed for items concerning confidence in understanding and conducting research, enjoyment of reading research articles and access to resources necessary for participation in research. Few participants had previous experience in study design, data analysis and manuscript preparation and publication. Nurses with higher academic qualifications (e.g., Master's, PhD), and those employed in senior roles, had more positive opinions about clinical nursing research and were more actively engaged in it. Content analysis revealed five themes: (1) Accessibility and awareness of research opportunities, (2) Support and resources, (3) Time constraints and workload, (4) Professional development and (5) Integration of research into clinical practice.
Whilst nurses perceive the importance of research, the findings underscore the need for targeted strategies to build their confidence and capacity to engage in clinical nursing research.
Nurses face significant barriers to active participation in research. Consideration is needed regarding how nurses are prepared for and adequately resourced to increase their involvement in clinical nursing research.
This study addresses the gap in evidence regarding nurses' opinions and level of engagement in clinical nursing research. Research leaders need to develop and test interventions to increase nurses' involvement in research.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
FreshRSS 