Conectar
Effective communication is essential between health professionals during surgical procedures for delivery of safe patient care. The influence of noise on communication during critical moments of surgery and on communication failures is unclear.
To examine communication events among health professionals in the operating room and investigate the influence of noise on communication.
Non-participatory observations were undertaken of communication between health professionals during surgical procedures while simultaneously measuring sound pressure levels. Audio visual recording was used to document communication events, ensuring data accuracy. A generalised linear mixed model was used to examine relationships between various explanatory variables and the presence of at least one communication failure. The STROBE checklist guided the reporting of this paper.
A representative range of procedures was observed from diverse surgical specialties (N = 80). Observations comprised 2274 communication events; communication failures were observed in 24% and repeated communication was observed in 25% of all communication events. The mean maximum sound pressure levels were 64.9 dB[A] for communication events, 64.5 dB[A] for communication failures and 65.5 dB[A] for repeats. The type of surgical procedure, the emergence from anaesthesia compared to other phases of surgery, communication related to the surgical safety checklist, communication related to the surgical count, the presence of multitasking, and the use of surgical facemasks, were associated with the presence of at least one communication failure.
This research identified the inherent risks and occurrence of communication failure in noisy operating room environments where health professionals are undertaking complex cognitive tasks and where effective communication is essential to ensure patient safety.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.
To explore healthcare professionals', patients', and family members' experiences of managing regular medications across the perioperative pathway in a specialist cancer hospital in Melbourne.
An exploratory qualitative study using a descriptive-interpretive approach.
Interviews were conducted with 11 patients and seven family members, and focus groups with 10 anaesthetists, seven surgeons, four nurses, and 10 pharmacists (N = 49) between October 2024 and April 2025. Transcripts were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach and mapped into the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 human factors framework.
Three interrelated themes were constructed: (1) Work system elements shaping perioperative medication management, encompassing medication and surgical contexts, documentation gaps, reliable medication information, communication infrastructures, roles and responsibilities, and perioperative area resources; (2) Processes influencing medication management practice, characterised by continuity of care at transition points and flagging processes, interdisciplinary collaboration and role interpretation in medication management, patient involvement, family member involvement, and healthcare professional perspectives; and (3) Outcomes of medication management, including patient and organisational outcomes, such as workflow inefficiencies, procedure cancellations, and unplanned readmissions.
Findings indicated that addressing the complexity of perioperative medication safety demands coordinated contributions across multiple professional disciplines. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, clarifying shared responsibilities, embedding structured reconciliation processes at transitions of care, standardizing communication protocols, and involving patients and families are all critical strategies.
This study highlights the need for interdisciplinary coordination and clear role definitions, with nurses as the key contributor, to support collaborative medication decisions in perioperative cancer care.
This study explored challenges in managing regular medications during cancer surgery, offering insights to guide safer practices for perioperative teams, patients, and families in cancer care settings.
COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines.
None.
FreshRSS 