Geriatric patients often face issues related to polypharmacy and adverse drug events. Re-evaluating prescribed medications and considering deprescribing is critical. Medication discrepancies (MDs) during care transitions can compromise patient safety, as over 60% of medication errors occur at these points. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of MDs and their contributing factors through the medication reconciliation (MedRec) process among geriatric patients in emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia, as well as to determine the acceptance of pharmaceutical interventions.

In this multicentre prospective observational study, the best possible medication history (BPMH) was obtained within 24 hours of emergency department admission from at least two sources. A comparison of the BPMH list with medication orders from treating physicians revealed discrepancies. Data were analysed using STATA V.17.0, using multivariable logistic regression to assess variable associations.

Adult emergency departments of comprehensive specialised hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.

Overall, 384 geriatric patients with chronic conditions and current medication use who visited the adult emergency department of the hospital from 10 January 2025 to 30 March 2025 were involved in this study.

Magnitude and types of MDs, acceptance of pharmacist interventions, and factors associated with MDs.

In total, 384 patients with chronic diseases visiting the hospital emergency department were recruited in the present study. Out of 384 patients involved in the study, 218 (56.77%) had encountered at least one MD. Omission error 190 (45.24%) was the most common type of MD, followed by wrong dose 82 (19.50%). Among 420 interventions, 80.48% of the total cases were accepted. Number of previous/home medications (≥5 medicines; adjusted OR (AOR)=3.12; 95% CI 1.190 to 8.151), older age (≥75 years; AOR=1.62; 95% CI 1.054 to 2.495), and number of comorbidities (≥3; AOR=1.65; 95% CI 1.066 to 2.546) were associated factors with MDs.

This study revealed a high prevalence of MDs in the emergency department. Polypharmacy, comorbidities and older age were factors associated with MDs. The study findings show the need for a clinical pharmacist-led MedRec implementation to enhance patient safety.

To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment satisfaction and associated factors among older adults with acute heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia.

Prospective, multicentre observational study.

Three tertiary hospitals in Northwest Ethiopia provide secondary and tertiary care services.

A total of 422 patients aged ≥60 years with a confirmed diagnosis of acute heart failure were consecutively enrolled between December 2024 and April 2025. Patients with unstable psychiatric conditions or advanced kidney disease were excluded.

HRQoL was assessed using the WHO Quality of Life – Brief Version questionnaire, and treatment satisfaction was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). Multiple linear regression identified factors associated with HRQoL and treatment satisfaction.

95% of participants reported moderate HRQoL, and 3% reported poor HRQoL. Weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL (β=1.52; 95% CI 0.04 to 3.07; p=0.021), whereas asthma was negatively associated with HRQoL (β = –3.28; 95% CI 6.94 to 0.37; p=0.001). Regarding treatment satisfaction, 65% of patients were moderately satisfied, with notable concerns regarding medication safety and overall experience. Rural residents reported lower satisfaction than urban residents (β = –0.20; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.05; p=0.007). Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III had higher satisfaction (β=0.25; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.45; p=0.016). Effective hypertension management was linked to increased satisfaction (β=0.20; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.37; p=0.026), whereas coronary heart disease was associated with lower satisfaction (β = –0.40; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88; p=0.012).

Among older adults with heart failure in Northwest Ethiopia, 98% reported moderate to low HRQoL. Asthma and polypharmacy negatively affected HRQoL, whereas weight loss was positively associated with HRQoL. An NYHA class III status and well-managed hypertension improved treatment satisfaction, whereas rural residency and coronary heart disease were associated with lower satisfaction. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to enhance outcomes and QoL in this vulnerable population.

To detail the development of the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM), a questionnaire aimed at assessing the perspectives of key stakeholders towards elements of overdose prevention interventions—supervised consumption sites (SCSs) and overdose hotlines and applications (ORHAs).

Cross-sectional survey.

Canadian health system.

English or French speaking adults from four key informant groups: people who use substances (PWUS), health professionals, emergency responders and the general public.

Test–retest reliability of CNQOM items.

A novel questionnaire was developed. Item development followed a standard approach, with face validity verified by representatives from the four informant groups. Input from experts in harm reduction and addiction medicine enhanced content and face validity of the questionnaire. A rigorous response validation approach was undertaken to ensure respondents were human and from Canada. Test–retest reliability items were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Cohen’s kappa.

After data cleaning and response validation, 4445 valid responses were obtained from the four key informant groups. Respondents represented a range of sociodemographic backgrounds and housing scenarios from all provinces and territories in Canada. Test–retest reliability was assessed using a small subsample of 142 participants (primarily from general public informants). Questionnaire items demonstrated slight to substantial stability in responses (kappa coefficients: 0.15–0.58; Spearman’s r: 0.08–0.66).

The CNQOM is the first online questionnaire in Canada designed to capture perspectives and attitudes towards specific elements of SCSs and ORHAs among diverse key informant groups. Our questionnaire was administered to a large, geographically diverse sample and designed to capture the perspectives of four key informant groups. Lower than expected test–retest reliability may be explained by lack of participant familiarity with SCS and especially ORHAs and the impersonal nature of the instrument content among some respondents. Future work will elucidate key informant perspectives on these services based on the data.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a cardiac device recommended for use to prevent the occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The evidence informing this guidance comes from landmark trials that are now more than 20 years old. The risk-benefit profile of ICD for the contemporary target population may have changed substantially since then, which raises the question of whether there is evidence for sparing patients a procedure associated with potentially severe complications and high healthcare costs. A main part of the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation (PROFID) project is the PROFID EHRA trial, which is supported by the European Heart Rhythm Association. PROFID EHRA is a European Union-funded, prospective, randomised, multi-centre, non-inferiority study designed to compare optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone to ICD with OMT, for post-MI patients with reduced LVEF. The study also describes economic evaluation methods to quantify the cost and health implications of using OMT alone in place of ICD implantation plus OMT in this group of patients.

The economic evaluation has been designed to conduct a pre-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) prior to the availability of trial data, followed by a within-trial cost-consequences analysis (CCA) and a long-term post-trial CEA, conducted from the National Health Service and Personal Social Service perspective in England. The pre-trial CEA uses simulation modelling informed by available evidence to assess the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years of OMT alone and ICD+OMT in post-MI patients with reduced LVEF at risk of SCD, as defined in the PROFID EHRA trial. The within-trial CCA is intended to summarise the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource use and associated costs observed during the PROFID EHRA trial follow-up period. The post-trial CEA updates the pre-trial model by incorporating contemporary evidence about the HRQoL and costs observed during the trial and the occurrence of those events and outcomes accruing during the trial follow-up period and projecting them into the expected lifetime of the patients. Sensitivity analyses are performed to assess the robustness of the CEA results with respect to both model assumptions and uncertainty in the value of the model input parameters. Finally, a value of information analysis will identify the key drivers of uncertainty surrounding the model conclusions regarding the optimal treatment strategy, establishing if further research may be required.

The PROFID EHRA trial, under legal sponsorship of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany, received its first ethics approval by the Medicine Research Ethics Committee of the La Paz University Hospital in Madrid, Spain (reference number LHS-2019-0209). Before including patients, for all participating study centres, the required local, central and/or national ethical approval has to be obtained. As of the date 13 November 2025, at least one participating study centre in the following countries has received ethical approvals from relevant ethics committees: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain. Results will be shared with the general public through various media channels and additionally with healthcare professionals and the scientific community through scientific meetings, conferences and publications.

NCT05665608.

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract distinguished by progressive bowel damage with a risk of structuring and penetrating complications. It is characterised by focal or segmental transmural inflammation that disrupts intestinal mucosal integrity and favours the development of abscesses and fistulas. Perianal fistula develops in 13%–39% of patients with CD. Their care is difficult but improves with medical and surgical treatment to preserve anal continence and avoid a maximum proctectomy. Combined treatment with seton placement and concomitant anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab) allows wound healing in 40%–70% of cases. The currently available treatments are not curative and fail to provide a long-term resolution. The injection of adipose stromal cells is currently being evaluated in clinical studies for repair-damaged tissues in various diseases (limb ischaemia, osteoarthritis, systemic sclerosis, etc). Immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory properties of AdMSC (adipose-derived stroma/stem cells) are responsible for accelerating healing and represent an innovative approach for treating perianal fistulas associated with CD.

This phase I/IIa study is designed to assess the treatment of complex perianal fistulas linked with CD after failure of conventional treatment by injection of AdMSC (CellReady) into the fistula. Two doses of associated AdMSC will be tested for a dose escalation (5x10⁷ and 10x10⁷ cells) and injected into the wall of the fistula. Those eligible for inclusion include patients with controlled luminal CD characterised by a Harvey-Bradshaw score below or equal to eight and diagnosed on clinical, endoscopic, histological and/or radiological criteria, a colonoscopy dating back less than 1 year without ulcer in the rectum and presence of complex chronic perianal fistula with a maximum of two internal ports and three external ports. All patients must have social security insurance or equivalent social protection. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal dose corresponding to maximum efficacy 6 months after injection of cells with a treatment-related adverse event rate of 20%.

The EU CT number 2024-511821-75-00 was approved by the following Ethics Committee: CPP (committee for the protection of persons in French: comité de protection des personnes) Ouest 1 – Tours #2024UEMED-18 and ANSM (French Agency for the Safety of Health and Medicinal Products in French : Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) #2024-511821-75-00 (Sponsor number RC31/13/7030, protocol V2.1). The results will be disseminated through conventional scientific channels.

NCT06636032.

The results will be disseminated through conventional scientific channels.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a heterogeneous disease, which current treatment guidelines insufficiently accommodate, as they predominantly emphasise the suppression of disease activity. However, a step towards personalised medicine is preferred to further optimise treatment and requires homogeneous subgroups with similarities in pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment responses. Prior research has already demonstrated notable differences in the pathophysiology of patients with autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA, as well as differences in treatment responses, which may serve as a strong basis for personalised medicine. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that an early treatment response is indicative of future courses. Based on these findings, we designed a personalised medicine trial in RA that compares the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a tailor-made approach with routine care.

The PeRsonalIsed Medicine in RA (PRIMERA) trial is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial that includes 300 adult patients with newly diagnosed, DMARD-naïve RA, according to 2010 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR criteria. Patients are randomised into either routine care or a tailor-made approach. Both management approaches use a treat-to-target strategy, aiming for low disease activity (LDA, Disease Activity Score using 44 joints (DAS) ≤2.4). In routine care, initial treatment consists of methotrexate along with a single intramuscular dose of glucocorticoids (GCs) and treatment can be intensified after 3, 7 and 10 months if LDA is not reached. Conversely, initial treatment in the tailor-made approach depends on the presence of autoantibodies, with patients with autoantibody-positive and autoantibody-negative RA starting with hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate together with a single intramuscular dose of GCs, respectively. Medication intensifications will be allowed at months 1, 3, 4, 7 and 10. Intensifications at months 1 and 4 depend on whether patients have an early sufficient response to GCs and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs), respectively. The tailor-made approach is superior to routine care if no more biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) or tsDMARDs are used after 10 months of treatment, while the mean DAS over time is lower. Our primary outcome is the proportional difference in bDMARD or tsDMARD usage after 10 months of treatment between routine care and the tailor-made approach. Secondary outcomes are DAS over time, time to achieve LDA, cost-effectiveness and patient-reported outcome measurements over time.

Ethical approval has been granted by Erasmus MC Medical Ethics Review Committee (MEC-2020-0825). The results will be disseminated through peer-review journals and medical congresses.

ISRCTN16170070.

This study aims to explore the experiences of individuals living in a container city after an earthquake and providing informal care to disabled individuals.

This study is of a qualitative design.

The research was conducted in Teknokent Container Settlement, located in Malatya/Türkiye.

The study was concluded with nine participants. In the study, the criterion sampling method, one of the purposive sampling methods, was used, and the criteria for criterion sampling were as follows: living in a container city, providing care for an individual with special needs and agreeing to participate in the study.

All of our participants were women, and their ages ranged from 32 to 70. As a result of the data analysis, two main themes emerged: ‘change of comfort zone’ and ‘positive perspective’, along with a total of seven subthemes related to these main themes.

Findings of this study highlight the need for empowering disabled individuals and their caregivers, including them in disaster management plans. Disability rehabilitation centres should provide regular, free care, while health units in the container settlement area should conduct home visits. The study emphasises the importance of addressing the physical and social environment’s impact on health and promoting proactive measures to improve quality of life for both individuals.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial decrease was observed in hospital admissions and in-hospital procedures for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The extent to which measures to prevent COVID-19 transmission, for example, lockdowns, affected the outpatient care of patients at higher cardiovascular risk remains unclear. We aimed to compare outpatient department (OPD) attendance, cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) and cardiovascular health (CVH) of patients at higher cardiovascular risk referred to an OPD of a tertiary care centre between preCOVID-19, during and postCOVID-19 periods.

We included all adult patients at higher cardiovascular risk referred to the cardiology, vascular medicine, diabetology, geriatrics, nephrology or multidisciplinary vascular surgery OPDs of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands, between March 2019 and December 2022, in a prospective cohort study.

We assessed trends in the number of first and follow-up appointments and in the completeness of extractable CVRM indicators from the electronic health record (EHR) as a proxy for CVRM guideline adherence. CVH was determined using the Life’s Essential 8 metric (score 0–100, the higher score, the better). We investigated whether CVH differed between COVID-19 periods compared with the reference period (ie, 2019) and stratified by OPDs, using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, CVD history and whether the patient had a previous appointment before the reference period.

Among 15 143 patients, we observed a 33% reduction in the weekly number of first appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the largest reductions in the cardiology and nephrology OPDs, with no differences between women and men. Follow-up appointments conducted remotely, compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic, increased significantly for all OPDs. CVRM indicators were up to 11% less extractable during the first lockdown yet returned to prepandemic levels directly after the first lockdown period. The CVH score of patients visiting the nephrology, vascular medicine and geriatrics OPDs during the first lockdown was 11.23 (95% CI 2.74 to 19.72), 5.68 (95% CI 0.82 to 10.54) and 5.66 (95% CI 0.01 to 11.31) points higher, respectively, compared with the prepandemic period. In between the second and third lockdowns, the CVH score was comparable to the preCOVID reference period, yet for the cardiology OPD it was significantly higher (5.54, 95% CI 2.04 to 9.05).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, weekly numbers of first appointments to OPDs decreased, and a population with a higher CVH score (ie, better CVH) visited certain OPDs, especially during the first lockdown period. These suggest that patients with poorer CVH more often avoided or were unable to visit OPDs, which might have resulted in missed opportunities to control cardiovascular risk factors and potentially may have led to preventable disease outcomes. For future epidemics and pandemics, it seems vital to develop a strategy that includes an emphasis on seeking healthcare when needed, with specific attention to patients at higher CVD risk.