Persistent pain after finishing breast cancer treatment is a common and disabling problem. The current state-of-the-art pain management advocates, in addition to biomedical (non-)pharmacological approaches, a biopsychosocial rehabilitation approach to address persistent pain, combining pain science education with promoting an active lifestyle through self-regulation techniques. We propose testing an innovative eHealth self-management support programme for this purpose in the breast cancer population with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. This delivery mode is believed to reduce barriers to pain self-management by providing timely, safe and cost-effective assistance addressing the biopsychosocial needs of patients. Utilising a chatbot format, the eHealth programme delivers pain science education and promotes physical activity (PA), personalised through decision-tree-based algorithms to support pain self-management. The programme aims to empower patients with understanding, coping skills and self-management techniques to reduce pain-related disability and enhance participation in daily life. The primary objective is to determine programme effectiveness compared with (1) usual care (superiority) and (2) a similar face-to-face pain self-management support programme (non-inferiority).

A pragmatic, three-arm randomised controlled trial was started in April 2024 at the University Hospitals of Antwerp and Leuven and primary care settings in Belgium. Participants are breast cancer survivors with persistent pain after finishing cancer treatment. Two hundred seventy participants will be randomised to one of three trial arms: (1) eHealth self-management support programme, (2) usual care or (3) a face-to-face self-management support programme. The ‘eHealth self-management support programme’ begins with a pain science education (PSE) module to initially convey key pain-related concepts and provide personalised pain management tips. Then, the programme progresses to daily activity planning to promote an active lifestyle. Guided by the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model, participants set and review daily activity goals and track progress. The eHealth self-management programme uses a chatbot and is accessible on any digital device. The ‘usual care programme’ involves sending the participants a study-specific brochure by postal mail and does not include any formal PSE and/or PA programmes. They may pursue or continue self-initiated care. In Belgium, usual care primarily involves pharmacological treatment, general advice on PA and the provision of informational brochures. The ‘face-to-face self-management support programme’ mirrors the eHealth intervention, combining PSE with PA coaching. It starts with three individual sessions with a trained physical therapist for biopsychosocial assessment and PSE, followed by six sessions on goal setting and active lifestyle coaching. The educational content is delivered both verbally and in written form. The primary outcome will be pain-related disability 6 months after baseline assessment. As a key secondary outcome, the effect on pain beliefs and attitudes will be investigated after the educational part of the eHealth and face-to-face programme (ie, at 6 weeks after baseline). Other secondary outcomes related to other dimensions of pain and physical-, psychosocial- and health-economic outcomes will be assessed at 12 weeks and 6 and 12 months after baseline as well.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2024). The protocol has been approved by the ethical committee of the University Hospitals of Leuven and Antwerp. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations at congresses. Ethical Committee of the University Hospitals Leuven and Antwerp: BUN B3002023000132.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06308029.

Ventilation tube insertion for paediatric otitis media (POM), including acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME), has been signalled in the past for potential unwarranted treatment variation. Quality improvement initiatives, like Audit & Feedback (A&F), often ignore the care pathway when identifying such variation, possibly overestimating variation at a specific care step. To gain more insight into the effect of prior care steps, this study examined (1) the degree of regional variation in each step of the care pathway (general practitioner (GP) contacts, referrals and surgeries) and (2) investigated the effect of adjusting for prior care steps.

Observational study using general practice electronic health record data linked to specialist claims data.

272 790 children ≤12 years with and without POM registered in 320 GP practices between 2017 and 2018.

Using multilevel logistic regression, the degree of regional variation in each step of the POM care pathway was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV).

The effect of adjusting for prior care steps was determined by estimating correlations between subsequent care steps and analysing the impact on the CV.

Regional variation in POM treatment was larger in each subsequent step in the care pathway (CV POM GP contacts 0.110; referral 0.179; surgery 0.239). In regions with a higher proportion of children with frequent AOM/persistent OME, referral rates were higher (POM: OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.11) and surgical rates were higher (for OME only: OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.15). Regional variation in referrals and surgery decreased after adjusting for the regional frequent AOM/persistent OME rate (CV referrals POM 0.103 vs 0.128; CV surgery OME 0.047 vs 0.059).

Regional variation is observed in GP contact rates for POM and is larger in referrals and surgeries. Adjusting for the proportion of frequent AOM/persistent OME significantly reduces regional variation in POM treatment. Future A&F should adjust for prior care processes and develop tailored interventions for quality improvement.

To assess atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, symptoms and quality of life (QoL) in endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF.

Prospective cohort study.

Otherwise healthy endurance athletes with paroxysmal AF in Norway, Australia and Belgium. The current study presents baseline measurements collected before the intervention of a randomised controlled trial on effects of individually tailored training adaptation.

AF burden (percentage time in AF) was measured by insertable cardiac monitors (Confirm Rx, Abbott). AF-related symptoms and QoL were assessed using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life Questionnaire (AFEQT) with any score

43 athletes (age 57±10 (mean±SD), range 33–75 years, 3 women) were included. The athletes were monitored for 50±18 days. Median AF burden was 0.18% (IQR 0%–2.6%). Out of 29 athletes with at least one AF episode, 21 (72%) had AF episodes >60 min. 13 athletes (30%) had AFEQT overall score 60 min were associated with reduced QoL (mean AFEQT score 78 vs 90, p=0.001 and 78 vs 90, p=0.001, respectively). There were large individual variations between the athletes concerning AF burden, symptoms and QoL.

Although most athletes were still competing, more than half had troublesome symptoms. One-third had reduced QoL, which was associated with higher AF burden and longer duration of AF episodes. Variations between the athletes highlight the need for individually tailored AF management in athletes with paroxysmal AF.

NCT04991337.

For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), surgical resection remains the sole treatment modality that can potentially result in cure. Unfortunately, the majority of patients present with unresectable tumours or are excluded from surgical treatment due to complications like cholangitis affecting their performance status. In the Netherlands, recommended first-line treatment for patients with unresectable pCCA is palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. This regimen yields an estimated median overall survival (OS) of 11.7–15.2 months, highlighting the urgent need for novel treatment options. The STRONG I trial, a phase I study in patients with unresectable pCCA, was completed in 2020. Its aim was to assess the feasibility and toxicity profile of adding stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to chemotherapy. SBRT, delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0 Gray (Gy), was considered to be feasible and safe, with no dose-limiting toxicity being observed. The 1-year local tumour control rate was 80% and the 1-year OS rate 100%, with maintenance of quality of life (QoL). These results encouraged us to initiate the STRONG II trial, aiming to investigate the efficacy of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in a larger patient cohort.

STRONG II is a single-arm, multicentre phase II study. Patients with non-metastatic unresectable pCCA (T1-4, N0-2) are eligible. A total of 30 patients will be enrolled in six academic centres in the Netherlands and two in Belgium. SBRT will be delivered in 15 fractions of 4.0–4.5 Gy. The primary endpoint is local tumour control, defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) V.1.1. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, biliary stent-related events, progression-free survival, OS and QoL using the EuroQoL five-dimensional, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Biliary Module (QLQ-BIL21). In addition, we will explore the predictive value of the peripheral immunological status (immune-related proteins and serum functional immunological status assay) and its dynamics in determining survival outcomes. For this explorative translational study, two blood samples will be collected, one before the start of chemotherapy and another after completing chemotherapy.

Approval of the study was obtained on 5 June 2024 by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (ID: NL86210.078.24). The anticipated time frame for patient enrolment is July 2024 to December 2027. The main study findings will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals, and presented at national and international conferences.

NCT06493734 (ClinicalTrials.gov).