To examine which information sources medical specialists use to answer clinical questions in daily practice and to describe the relative frequency of use for each source.

Systematic review with narrative synthesis and meta-analysis.

Academic Search Premier, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Emcare, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant studies published from 2000 to 1 June 2025.

We included peer-reviewed English-language studies reporting on the frequency of information source usage by medical specialists when addressing clinical questions. Studies reporting usage on a continuous (0–100%) scale were eligible for meta-analysis.

Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment tool with Diverse Studies tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted for studies that were not eligible for quantitative pooling to summarise patterns in information-seeking behaviour and reported barriers. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting continuous usage percentages and assessing at least four information sources. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using a leave-one-out approach. Potential publication bias was explored descriptively using funnel plots.

25 studies were included, of which 6 (with 8641 participants) were eligible for meta-analysis. The narrative synthesis of non-pooled studies showed a consistent reliance on standalone information sources and identified barriers to the use of aggregated sources. In the meta-analysis, digital databases such as PubMed were the most frequently used information source (74%, 95% CI 63% to 85%), followed by textbooks (71%, 95% CI 57% to 85%) and consultation with colleagues (43%, 95% CI 15% to 71%). Systematically aggregated sources, including clinical practice guidelines (38%, 95% CI 27% to 49%) and point-of-care websites (49%, 95% CI 17% to 81%), were used less frequently. Sensitivity analyses indicated that pooled estimates were generally robust, although results should be interpreted cautiously given methodological variability across studies.

Medical specialists predominantly rely on standalone information sources when addressing clinical questions, while systematically aggregated and interpreted sources such as clinical practice guidelines and point-of-care tools are used less frequently. These findings highlight the need to better understand and address barriers to the use of aggregated information sources in clinical practice.

CRD42022267431.

Ventilation tube insertion for paediatric otitis media (POM), including acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME), has been signalled in the past for potential unwarranted treatment variation. Quality improvement initiatives, like Audit & Feedback (A&F), often ignore the care pathway when identifying such variation, possibly overestimating variation at a specific care step. To gain more insight into the effect of prior care steps, this study examined (1) the degree of regional variation in each step of the care pathway (general practitioner (GP) contacts, referrals and surgeries) and (2) investigated the effect of adjusting for prior care steps.

Observational study using general practice electronic health record data linked to specialist claims data.

272 790 children ≤12 years with and without POM registered in 320 GP practices between 2017 and 2018.

Using multilevel logistic regression, the degree of regional variation in each step of the POM care pathway was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV).

The effect of adjusting for prior care steps was determined by estimating correlations between subsequent care steps and analysing the impact on the CV.

Regional variation in POM treatment was larger in each subsequent step in the care pathway (CV POM GP contacts 0.110; referral 0.179; surgery 0.239). In regions with a higher proportion of children with frequent AOM/persistent OME, referral rates were higher (POM: OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.11) and surgical rates were higher (for OME only: OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.15). Regional variation in referrals and surgery decreased after adjusting for the regional frequent AOM/persistent OME rate (CV referrals POM 0.103 vs 0.128; CV surgery OME 0.047 vs 0.059).

Regional variation is observed in GP contact rates for POM and is larger in referrals and surgeries. Adjusting for the proportion of frequent AOM/persistent OME significantly reduces regional variation in POM treatment. Future A&F should adjust for prior care processes and develop tailored interventions for quality improvement.