Conectar
Physiotherapists recognise the biopsychosocial model as important in treating chronic pain. However, the adoption of this model in Dutch private practice is limited. Participatory action research, including co-design methods and an explicit perspective on workplace learning, may be helpful in developing a work-integrated learning programme to facilitate the use of a biopsychosocial perspective in private practice physiotherapy.
To give insight into the development of a work-integrated learning programme for private practice physiotherapists in assessing and treating patients with chronic pain from a biopsychosocial perspective.
An interprofessional development team of designers, developers, educational professionals and researchers engaged in a co-design process together with private practice physiotherapists, experts in chronic pain, patients and other relevant stakeholders. In this design process, the team developed several prototypes and the subsequent work-integrated learning programme during three 2-week design sprints, living-lab tests and validation sessions. All available co-design data were structured and analysed by three researchers, resulting in a plan of requirements as a foundation for the work-integrated learning programme.
The data rendered two specific outcomes: (1) a plan of requirements to be used as an educational foundation for the work-integrated learning programme and (2) several prototypes based on the underlying principles that are used in the development and validation of the work-integrated learning programme.
This study shows how co-design methods can be successfully applied to generate insights and develop interventions that bridge theory and practice for physiotherapists working in private practice. The designed prototypes and subsequent distilled plan of requirements for the development of a work-integrated learning programme offer new opportunities to facilitate the transition to working from a biopsychosocial perspective in private practice physiotherapy.
RAAK.PUB06.014.
To assess self-reported practices and knowledge of nurses and prescribers (i.e., physicians and nurse practitioners) on intravenous fluid therapy, and to evaluate how this is documented through a clinical documentation review.
Multicentre cross-sectional study, between April 2022 and July 2022, across 13 wards from four Dutch hospitals.
A survey study was conducted to assess self-reported practices related to intravenous fluid therapy. A 12-item questionnaire evaluated knowledge. To gain insights into documentation practices, a retrospective chart review was performed. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, with group differences analysed using the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
Three hundred and four healthcare professionals completed the questionnaire (92% nurses). The majority of prescribers (n = 20/25; 80%) expected that nurses would start, stop or change intravenous fluid therapy. Overall, the median number of correct answers to knowledge questions was eight (IQR 7–9, range 0–12); four participants (1%) answered all knowledge questions correctly. Knowledge about the composition of sodium chloride 0.9% solution was limited. Analysis of patient charts revealed that 54% (196/362) received intravenous fluids, most commonly 0.9% sodium chloride infusion (168/195; 86%), although the indication was described in 3% (6/196). Thirty-one percent (61/196) of patients received intravenous fluids to keep the vein open (< 30 mL/h).
The study identified shared responsibility, a knowledge gap, and limited documentation concerning intravenous fluids. Prescribers expect nurses to adjust intravenous fluids without consulting a prescriber, which aligns with what nurses do, although they are not legally authorised. Given the limited documentation of the indication for intravenous fluids, it is plausible that several patients received intravenous fluids unnecessarily.
The perceived shared responsibility presents an opportunity to develop a protocol engaging both prescribers and nurses, aiming to guide more targeted infusion therapy.
Reducing unnecessary infusions to keep-the-vein-open can help eliminate low-value care.
CROSS guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
To better develop and understand the practice of rooming-in in adult care, this study aims to explore the perceptions of the three most important stakeholders: nurses, patients, and family members.
A cross sectional survey study in a university medical centre in the Netherlands.
A convenience sample was drawn from nurses, adult patients, and family members across ten general wards. Data of patients and family members were collected through online questionnaires, developed and validated prior to the study. Their responses were summarised using descriptive statistics. For the nurses, data were obtained by analysing responses to an open-ended question from an existing questionnaire, using thematic analysis.
The sample consisted of 364 nurses, 26 patients, and 35 family members. Thematic analysis of the nursing data revealed four themes: (1) reducing the workload of nurses, (2) optimising patient recovery, (3) unclear policy and inadequate facilities, and (4) complexities for nurses. Regarding the perceptions of patients and family members, more than 75% perceived that rooming-in enhanced patients' sense of safety. Additionally, 54.1% of family members indicated that rooming-in improved their understanding of medical information. For most patients (57.7%) and family members (62.9%), the rules and conditions for rooming-in were not clear. Moreover, 65.7% of family members reported experiencing physical burden. Both patients and family members rated rooming-in with a median of 8 out of 10.
According to nurses, patients, and family members, rooming-in may be beneficial in reducing nurses' workload, enhancing patient safety, and improving family understanding of medical information.
Given the ambiguity surrounding rooming-in policies in adult care, clear guidelines and their implementation are essential for ensuring their success.
Rooming-in can positively contribute to adult care by facilitating family involvement.
STROBE statement.
No patient or public contribution.
Ventilation tube insertion for paediatric otitis media (POM), including acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME), has been signalled in the past for potential unwarranted treatment variation. Quality improvement initiatives, like Audit & Feedback (A&F), often ignore the care pathway when identifying such variation, possibly overestimating variation at a specific care step. To gain more insight into the effect of prior care steps, this study examined (1) the degree of regional variation in each step of the care pathway (general practitioner (GP) contacts, referrals and surgeries) and (2) investigated the effect of adjusting for prior care steps.
Observational study using general practice electronic health record data linked to specialist claims data.
272 790 children ≤12 years with and without POM registered in 320 GP practices between 2017 and 2018.
Using multilevel logistic regression, the degree of regional variation in each step of the POM care pathway was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV).
The effect of adjusting for prior care steps was determined by estimating correlations between subsequent care steps and analysing the impact on the CV.
Regional variation in POM treatment was larger in each subsequent step in the care pathway (CV POM GP contacts 0.110; referral 0.179; surgery 0.239). In regions with a higher proportion of children with frequent AOM/persistent OME, referral rates were higher (POM: OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.11) and surgical rates were higher (for OME only: OR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.15). Regional variation in referrals and surgery decreased after adjusting for the regional frequent AOM/persistent OME rate (CV referrals POM 0.103 vs 0.128; CV surgery OME 0.047 vs 0.059).
Regional variation is observed in GP contact rates for POM and is larger in referrals and surgeries. Adjusting for the proportion of frequent AOM/persistent OME significantly reduces regional variation in POM treatment. Future A&F should adjust for prior care processes and develop tailored interventions for quality improvement.
To investigate the effects of active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care on patients' readmissions, complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, quality of life, psychological distress and activities of daily living, as well as on the satisfaction of patients, HCPs and family caregivers.
Systematic review.
Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Cochrane Library (from inception to February 2024).
The PRISMA 2020 statement was followed. Prospective controlled studies focusing on active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care were included. Two independent teams of authors conducted study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.
Thirteen studies were included, comprising 11 randomised controlled trials. The clinical and methodological heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Six of these studies were performed in stroke patients. Some studies reported statistically significant benefits of active family involvement on readmission rates, hospital LOS, ADL, psychological distress for patients and family members, QoL and satisfaction of family caregivers. However, others did not observe differences in these outcomes. For complication rates, mortality and satisfaction of patients and HCPs, no studies demonstrated significant differences between groups.
Further research is needed to provide a conclusive answer as to whether active family caregiver involvement improves outcomes of adult hospitalised patients.
Despite the inconclusive findings of this review, advocating for active involvement of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care fits the perspective of patient- and family-centred care.
As the care of hospitalised adults is shifting to a more family-centric approach, investigating the effects of an active role of family caregivers in adult in-hospital care is necessary. However, the small number of studies available and heterogeneity between studies included in this review hamper firm conclusions. Further evaluations through well-designed studies are required.
Providing an overview of the organisation, tasks, and responsibilities of acute and transitional pain services in the Netherlands.
Cross-sectional questionnaire study.
An online questionnaire was sent to representatives of Dutch hospital pain services performing inpatient surgery. It included items on organisation, staffing, education, roles, tasks and responsibilities. Data were analysed descriptively.
Of the surveyed hospitals, 92.2% reported having an acute pain service, while only 6.5% had a transitional pain service. Most pain services (acute pain services 76.3%, transitional pain services 80.0%) are part of the anaesthesiology department. Staffing includes anaesthesiologists, nurses, and/or nurse anaesthetists, with or without pain specialisation. Acute pain service teams monitor complex pain management techniques. Nearly all acute pain services (89.8%) provide pain management training, and 60% monitor hospital-wide pain management quality. All transitional pain services monitored opioid use post-discharge and conducted follow-up calls with patients.
Acute pain services are well established in Dutch hospitals, whereas transitional pain services remain limited. Organisational structures, tasks, and responsibilities vary, with key challenges in staffing, service organisation, and education. Future research should focus on optimising staffing, expanding transitional pain services, the role of the pain nurse, and establishing a national pain management education framework.
This study highlights the significant impact of pain nurses as a central professional within the interdisciplinary team, contributing to quality care and education, ultimately benefiting patients.
This study provides a current overview of pain services in the Netherlands, supporting pain nurses in innovating pain services, highlighting key challenges and opportunities for improvement.
STROBE checklist.
None.
FreshRSS 