FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Drug-related pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients: a multicentre retrospective study in Japan identifying high-risk medications and patient characteristics

Por: Mizokami · F. · Kinoshita · T. · Sekine · Y. · Miyagawa · T. · Toriumi · M. · Ooka · K. · Nakashima · A. · Fukuda · K. · Sadaoka · M. · Ishii · H. · Kadowaki · H. · Iikura · K. · Fujimoto · S. · Yamanouchi · T. · Shiraishi · Y. · Ozaki · T. · Tatebe · H. · Fuse · T. · Ikushima · S. · Higashi
Objectives

To characterise patient and medication-related patterns observed in drug-related pressure ulcers (DRPUs) and provide descriptive findings that may support future consensus-building.

Design

Multicentre retrospective observational study.

Setting

20 hospitals across Japan participated in the study with hospital pharmacists specialised in PU care.

Participants

A total of 1113 hospitalised patients with existing PUs were included and classified into three groups (definite, probable and no-possibility of DRPUs) based on predefined criteria.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was the description of medication-related characteristics observed in each DRPU classification group, including polypharmacy, initiation of new medications and dose adjustments. Secondary outcomes included differences in ulcer characteristics and functional status across DRPU categories.

Results

The definite group (n=128, 11.5%) showed a significantly higher prevalence of polypharmacy (83.6% vs 71.1% in the no-possibility group, p

Conclusions

Medication-related characteristics such as polypharmacy, initiation of new medications, dose modifications and use of antipsychotics were more frequently observed in the definite DRPU group. These descriptive findings may help characterise the clinical patterns of DRPUs and may inform future hypothesis generation.

Association between the central sensitization inventory score and health-related quality of life in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults

by Naoki Segi, Hiroaki Nakashima, Ryotaro Oishi, Sadayuki Ito, Jun Ouchida, Ippei Yamauchi, Yasuhiro Nagatani, Taisuke Seki, Yasuhiko Takegami, Shinya Ishizuka, Yukiharu Hasegawa, Shiro Imagama

Background

Central sensitization is an important factor associated with impaired health-related quality of life in patients with musculoskeletal disorders and community-dwelling older adults. However, health-related quality-of-life domains strongly associated with central sensitization in the general population remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and health-related quality of life using community health checkup data.

Methods

A total of 419 middle-aged and older adults (mean age, 64.4 ± 11.2 years; 59.4% female) were included. Participants completed a questionnaire survey on pain, including visual analogue scales (VASs) for lower-back and knee pain, and the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A. Additionally, participants completed the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey, and three component-summary scores and eight subscales were calculated. Additionally, participants completed the 5-level EuroQol 5 dimensions, and health-state utility values were calculated. The correlation between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and these health-related quality-of-life measures was investigated.

Results

Central Sensitization Inventory Part A score ≥40 was observed in 2.6% participants. Significant moderate negative correlations were observed between the Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores and EuroQol 5 dimensions health-state utility values (r = −0.631, P r = −0.550, P r = −0.556, P r = −0.556, P r = −0.610, P r = −0.556, P  Conclusions

In community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults, Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores were negatively correlated with health-related quality-of-life scores, even in participants with Central Sensitization Inventory Part A scores

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of antibiotic faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with Parkinsons disease (FLORA-PD): a study protocol

Por: Takeshige-Amano · H. · Igami · E. · Okuzumi · A. · Kamo · R. · Iseki · M. · Tsuyama · K. · Wakamori · R. · Okada · H. · Taniguchi · D. · Ueno · S.-I. · Oji · Y. · Ishikawa · K.-i. · Nishikawa · N. · Orikasa · M. · Odakura · R. · Koma · M. · Maruyama · T. · Nomura · K. · Ishikawa · D. · Shibu
Introduction

The intestinal microbiota of people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP) differs significantly from that of healthy individuals. Given that altered microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the efficacy of FMT in improving motor symptoms in PwP has been inconclusive in some pilot randomised controlled trials (RCT). Previous RCTs on PwP employed simple FMT, but our modified approach—pretreatment with antibiotics before FMT (A-FMT)—has been shown to improve the engraftment rate of given species and the beneficial effects of FMT. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-FMT for PwP, particularly in those with motor fluctuations.

Methods and analysis

This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with an 8-week observation period following a single A-FMT. Thirty clinically established PwP with prominent motor fluctuation episodes will be randomised 1:1 to FMT or placebo. Participants in both groups will receive antibiotic treatment prior to colonoscopy for FMT or placebo treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints will include subjective and objective evaluations of motor and non-motor symptoms and will be evaluated before and after antibiotic treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks after the procedure. Exploratory endpoints will include blood and faecal sample analyses, advanced brain MRI and pharmacokinetic assessment of levodopa concentrations during a levodopa challenge test.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the ethical committee of Juntendo University in August 2024 (J24-005) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Clinical Trials Act and related laws and regulations. All patient data will be anonymised to protect privacy and used solely for study purposes. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.

Trial registration number

jRCTs031240344.

Feasibility of implementing a non-invasive self-sampling method for saliva specimens that can be used for the diagnosis of respiratory infections among paediatric patients in the Tshwane District, South Africa: a study protocol

Por: Nxele · S. · Dlangalala · T. · Gxekwa · N. V. · Ramatsokotla · S. · Musekiwa · A. · Kgatle · M. M. · Hatchett · D. B. · Shin · A. · Tu · W.-c. · Robertson · I. H. · Su · X. · Berthier · E. · Thongpang · S. · Theberge · A. B. · Mashamba-Thompson · T. P.
Introduction

Effective community-based disease management is essential for public health. In low- and middle-income countries, sustainable strategies for timely diagnosis and treatment are a research priority. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a non-invasive saliva self-sampling method, paired with digitally linked molecular point-of-care diagnostics, for detecting respiratory infections among paediatric patients in the Tshwane District, South Africa.

Methods and analysis

A field study will be conducted at Steve Biko Academic Hospital to compare saliva collection using the CandyCollect lollipop device and standard mouth swabs. The spiral groove of the lollipop device captures pathogens, which are stored in DNA/RNA preservation media and later analysed using quantitative PCR and commercially available rapid antigen tests. The multiplex respiratory pathogen panel, based on TaqMan real-time PCR technology, targets key paediatric pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A/B. Nucleic acids will be extracted using standard viral extraction kits and analysed following manufacturer protocols. Internal controls will be included in each qPCR run, and samples with CT values below defined thresholds will be considered positive. Rapid antigen tests will detect common pathogens such as influenza A/B, RSV and SARS-CoV-2 for comparative analysis. User experience and acceptability will be assessed via child-friendly and caregiver surveys following sample collection. The study will be implemented in two phases: diagnostic performance evaluation and user feedback assessment. The protocol is aligned with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 checklist.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been granted by the University of Pretoria (509/2023) and the Gauteng Department of Health (GP_202406_032). The study is registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202411743094783). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conferences and stakeholder briefings. The study complies with South Africa’s Protection of Personal Information Act. Data collection is scheduled from November 2024 to February 2025, with project completion expected within 1 year.

Trial registration number

Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202411743094783).

Shared decision-making using a decision aid for patients with breast cancer considering breast reconstruction: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Japan

Por: Sowa · Y. · Osaka · W. · Tsuge · I. · Komiya · T. · Saiga · M. · Taminato · M. · Nagura · N. · Shiraishi · T. · Seki · H. · Otsuki · Y. · Matsuoka · Y. · Tomita · S. · Akita · S. · Fujimoto · H. · Otani · K. · Yoshimura · K.
Introduction

Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that individuals are correctly and smoothly supported to make decisions. However, in Japan, development of decision aids (DAs) to support implementation of SDM is lagging behind Western countries, and there are few reports focused on breast reconstruction. Thus, it is unclear if SDM using a DA in the context of the unique national character and medical culture in Japan is useful in decision-making for breast reconstruction, including whether or not to undergo reconstruction. The aim of this multicentre collaborative study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of SDM using a DA for patients with breast cancer considering reconstruction, from the perspectives of decisional conflict and postoperative quality of life.

Methods and analysis

A multisite trial will be conducted at 12 facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. A cluster-randomised controlled trial is planned at centres that have implemented SDM with DAs and those that have not implemented SDM, but use a conventional surgical explanation and informed consent to make decisions about reconstruction methods. The study participants will be female patients aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed stage 0–III breast cancer who are interested in breast reconstruction. Data collection includes baseline and follow-up patient surveys and medical record review. The effectiveness of the DA at reducing conflict and regret in decision-making (primary outcome) will be evaluated using the decision conflict scale.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol has been approved by the Kyoto University Central Institutional Review Board, and permission for performance of the study has been obtained from the Ethics Review Board at each participating centre. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including a presentation of the research results at the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making and have the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities.

Trial registration number

UMIN000052161.

Visual perception and cognitive functioning in MCI and mild Alzheimers disease: a cross-sectional study protocol from the DEM-VIS study in Germany

Por: Roloff · J. · Stemmler · M. · Graessel · E. · Krakat · L. · Weis · J. · Lehfeld · H. · Jascenoka · J. C. · Daseking · M.
Introduction

Visual perception is a fundamental skill that plays a central role in sensing the external environment. Deficits can lead to impairments in everyday activities. Visual perception is known to be impaired in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the extent to which visual perception is impaired in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), often a prodromal state of AD, has not been sufficiently investigated. This study aims to assess visual perceptual abilities in people with MCI and mild AD compared with healthy controls. It will also investigate whether executive functions, activities of daily living and intelligence are affected in this context, providing new insights into the research of visual perception together with MCI and mild AD.

Methods and analysis

People with MCI, mild AD and healthy controls will be assessed for cognitive deficits using the Syndrom-Kurztest (SKT). Visual perceptual performance will be assessed using the German version of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception-Adolescent and Adult: Second Edition (DTVP-A:2; Frostings Entwicklungstest der visuellen Wahrnehmung – Jugendliche und Erwachsene 2. Auflage). Activities of daily living will be assessed through the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with Mild Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (ETAM) and the Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale (B-ADL). Executive functions will be measured using the German adaptation of the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult (BRIEF-A) and intelligence will be assessed using the Matrix Reasoning and Vocabulary Test of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Data analysis will involve descriptive analyses, linear regression analyses, multivariate analysis of variance, mediation analysis and structural equation modelling.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, Germany (number: 2023_009). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number

Registered at OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PM5AV

❌