FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Associations between heart failure-related quality of life and clinical parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a cross-sectional analysis of data from a multicentre Japanese registry

Por: Saotome · M. · Akita · K. · Kageyama · S. · Suzuki · S. · Ohno · K. · Kamakura · M. · Nawada · R. · Takanaka · C. · Wakabayashi · Y. · Kanda · T. · Tawarahara · K. · Muto · M. · Matsunaga · M. · Suwa · S. · Takeuchi · Y. · Sakamoto · H. · Saito · H. · Hayashi · K. · Wakahara · N. · Unno · K.
Objective

To investigate the relationship between a quality of life (QOL) score and clinical parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

Design

A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Setting

We analysed data from the Searching for Atrial Fibrillation and Early Recruitment of Heart Failure in HCM registry, collected between 2018 and 2023.

Participants

Patients with HCM (n=499) aged ≥18 years from 12 institutions (Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan) were consecutively enrolled.

Outcome measures

Clinical parameters, along with data from a short form of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), were collected. The association between each clinical parameter and the KCCQ-12 score was analysed. Clinical parameters with a significant univariable association (p

Results

In the univariable analysis, KCCQ-12 scores exhibited significant associations with 21 clinical parameters, including sex, left ventricular morphology and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The multiple regression model with 12 parameters that had a significant univariable association exhibited an adjusted R2 of 0.48. In this model, the PSQI (standardised coefficient –0.39; p

Conclusions

In patients with HCM, we investigated the association between the KCCQ-12 score and various clinical parameters. PSQI, as well as known heart failure-related clinical parameters, was significantly associated with the KCCQ-12 score. Visualising the associations of various clinical parameters with the KCCQ-12 score will help physicians to consider factors linked to the decline in QOL in patients with HCM.

Acute myocardial infarction diagnosis and treatment following implementation of a multicomponent intervention in Tanzania: the MIMIC pilot trial

Por: Hertz · J. T. · Nworie · J. E. · Shayo · F. · Galson · S. W. · Coaxum · L. A. · Daniel · I. · Makambay · P. S. · Akrabi · A. M. · Manyangu · G. J. · Thielman · N. M. · Bloomfield · G. · Sakita · F. M.
Background

In Tanzania, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is underdiagnosed, and uptake of evidence-based care is suboptimal. Using an implementation science approach, an intervention was developed to address local barriers to care: the Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Myocardial Infarction Care in Tanzania (MIMIC).

Methods

This sequential cohort design trial was conducted in a single northern Tanzanian emergency department (ED). During the preintervention phase (February–August 2023) and the postintervention phase (September 2023–August 2024), adults presenting with chest pain and/or dyspnoea were prospectively enrolled and their ED care was observed. AMI was defined by the Fourth Universal Definition criteria. Telephone follow-ups were conducted to ascertain 30-day mortality. Pearson’s ² was used to compare care before and after MIMIC implementation.

Results

A total of 275 participants were enrolled in the preintervention phase and 577 were enrolled in the postintervention phase. Following MIMIC implementation, significant increases were observed in ECG testing (89.4% of postintervention participants vs 55.3% preintervention, OR 6.82, 95% CI 4.79 to 9.79, p

Conclusions

The MIMIC intervention was associated with large increases in uptake of AMI testing, case identification and evidence-based treatment in a single Tanzanian ED. Multisite studies are needed to evaluate the effect of MIMIC on AMI care in diverse settings across Tanzania.

Trial registration number

NCT04563546.

Shared decision-making using a decision aid for patients with breast cancer considering breast reconstruction: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Japan

Por: Sowa · Y. · Osaka · W. · Tsuge · I. · Komiya · T. · Saiga · M. · Taminato · M. · Nagura · N. · Shiraishi · T. · Seki · H. · Otsuki · Y. · Matsuoka · Y. · Tomita · S. · Akita · S. · Fujimoto · H. · Otani · K. · Yoshimura · K.
Introduction

Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that individuals are correctly and smoothly supported to make decisions. However, in Japan, development of decision aids (DAs) to support implementation of SDM is lagging behind Western countries, and there are few reports focused on breast reconstruction. Thus, it is unclear if SDM using a DA in the context of the unique national character and medical culture in Japan is useful in decision-making for breast reconstruction, including whether or not to undergo reconstruction. The aim of this multicentre collaborative study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of SDM using a DA for patients with breast cancer considering reconstruction, from the perspectives of decisional conflict and postoperative quality of life.

Methods and analysis

A multisite trial will be conducted at 12 facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. A cluster-randomised controlled trial is planned at centres that have implemented SDM with DAs and those that have not implemented SDM, but use a conventional surgical explanation and informed consent to make decisions about reconstruction methods. The study participants will be female patients aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed stage 0–III breast cancer who are interested in breast reconstruction. Data collection includes baseline and follow-up patient surveys and medical record review. The effectiveness of the DA at reducing conflict and regret in decision-making (primary outcome) will be evaluated using the decision conflict scale.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol has been approved by the Kyoto University Central Institutional Review Board, and permission for performance of the study has been obtained from the Ethics Review Board at each participating centre. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including a presentation of the research results at the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making and have the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities.

Trial registration number

UMIN000052161.

Efeitos da pandemia da covid 19 no trabalho e na saúde dos profissionais atuantes no serviço pré-hospitalar: revisão integrati-va

Objetivo: Identificar os efeitos da pandemia da COVID 19 nos profissionais atuantes no atendimento pré-hospitalar. Método: revisão integrativa, conduzida de acordo com o protocolo prisma, por meio das bases de dados: Medline/PubMed, Lilacs, SciElo, BDENF, CUIDEN, CINAHAL. Adotaram-se os Descritores em Ciências da Saúde (DeCS): “Saúde do trabalhador” “Pandemia” “COVID 19” “Atendimento pré-hospitalar” “Segurança” “Profissionais de saúde” “Trabalho”. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, foram selecionados treze artigos que compuseram a amostra do estudo. Resultados: dezoito artigos foram analisados e duas categorias foram construídas: risco de contaminação e exposição ocupacional dos profissionais da saúde que cuidam de pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19 e risco de adoecimento psicoemocional dos profissionais da saúde que cuidam pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19. Conclusão: A revisão mostrou os potenciais efeitos sobre a saúde dos profissionais durante o atendimento de pacientes acometidos pela COVID-19. E a importância da implementação de estratégias de intervenção focadas nos riscos ocupacionais.

❌