Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains a leading cause of infectious disease-related morbidity in the USA, disproportionately affecting people who inject drugs and people who are incarcerated. Despite the availability of highly effective, highly tolerated direct-acting antivirals, treatment uptake in jails remains limited due to short stays, unpredictable release dates and system-level barriers. The original MINMON trial demonstrated that a low barrier ‘minimal monitoring"’ model can achieve high cure rates in community settings. This study, MINMON-J, aims to adapt and evaluate a modified version of the MINMON model for use in a jail setting, addressing the urgent need for scalable, low-barrier treatment approaches among justice-involved individuals.

MINMON-J is a single-arm, hybrid effectiveness-implementation pilot study protocol planned to recruit at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections. 40 people who are incarcerated with positive HCV RNA, who are treatment-naïve, without cirrhosis and awaiting trial, will receive 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with no required lab monitoring during treatment. If released before treatment completion, participants will receive their remaining medication at discharge. Community health workers will provide post-release support. Mixed-methods evaluation will be guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance/Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model framework. Primary outcomes include feasibility, acceptability and adherence. Data will be collected through administrative records, surveys (Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Feasibility of Intervention Measure, Brief Adherence Rating Scale) and qualitative interviews with participants and other relevant parties. This study was reviewed and approved by the Brown University Health Institutional Review Board (2240400) and the Rhode Island Department of Corrections Medical Research Advisory Group.

This study was reviewed and approved by the Brown University Health Institutional Review Board (2240400) and the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RIDOC) Medical Research Advisory Group. All participants will provide written informed consent prior to enrolment. People who are incarcerated will be assured that participation is voluntary, will not impact their clinical care and that they may withdraw at any time without penalty. Study procedures follow ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and comply with federal regulations regarding research involving vulnerable populations.

Dissemination of findings will include peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences focused on infectious diseases, implementation science and/or correctional health. Lay summaries will be shared with RIDOC leadership and community partners. De-identified data and associated metadata may be archived in a publicly accessible repository in accordance with National Institutes of Health data sharing policies, contingent on final institutional review board approval and participant protections.

NCT06953479.

Evidence suggests a 38% risk reduction in breast and bowel cancer-specific mortality with higher levels of exercise, however, most of this evidence is observational. More clinical trials are needed to build strong evidence for exercise’s impact on recurrence and survival. This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of a remote, tailored exercise programme on disease-free survival in patients recently completing curative treatment for early-stage, high-risk lung, breast or bowel cancer.

This UK-based, multicentre randomised controlled basket feasibility trial compares a personalised, remote-delivered exercise programme supported by exercise professionals against usual care. Potential participants are approached if they are: aged 18 or over, diagnosed with high-risk, early-stage breast, bowel or lung cancer, and within 24 weeks of completing primary curative treatments. Participants complete objective measures of physical function (submaximal cardiovascular fitness, endurance, muscle strength and balance), body composition (bioelectrical impedance) and self-reported outcomes (total physical activity, sleep quality, general quality of life (QoL), cancer-related QoL and exercise confidence/motivation). Clinical case note review provides disease-free survival outcomes at 6, 12 and 24 months. The 12-week programme is delivered remotely (via phone, email and/or video conference) with trainer contact tapering off over the subsequent 12 weeks (24 weeks total). Recruitment is ongoing with a 660-participant goal. Descriptive measures (quantitative and qualitative) will be reported for feasibility outcomes: recruitment, adherence, retention rates, data collection quality, adverse events, intervention acceptability and fidelity. A process evaluation is being conducted concurrently and is reported separately. Kaplan-Meier curves will be plotted and median disease-free survival calculated for each arm. To determine intervention impact, a log-rank test (unadjusted) will compare 2-year disease-free survival between groups within and among cancer types. Secondary outcomes (physical function status, general/cancer-specific QoL and determinants of meeting activity guidelines) will be reported at each time point.

Ethical approvals were obtained through Hull York Medical School (ID: 23/SS/0060) and UK NHS Health Research Authority (ID: 327663). Findings will be submitted for publication in high-impact journals, presentation at national and international conferences, press releases where appropriate, and dissemination activities to be decided on with the Patient Advisory Group.

ISRCTN97662203.

In 2022, the WHO conditionally recommended the use of treatment decision algorithms (TDAs) for treatment decision-making in children

Within the Decide-TB project (PACT ID: PACTR202407866544155, 23 July 2024), we aim to generate an individual-participant dataset (IPD) from prospective TB diagnostic accuracy cohorts (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and two cohorts from TB-Speed). Using the IPD, we aim to: (1) assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs using a set of consensus case definitions produced by the National Institute of Health as reference standard (confirmed and unconfirmed vs unlikely TB); (2) evaluate the added value of novel tools (including biomarkers and artificial intelligence-interpreted radiology) in the existing TDAs; (3) generate an artificial population, modelling the target population of children eligible for WHO-endorsed TDAs presenting at primary and secondary healthcare levels and assess the diagnostic accuracy of published TDAs and (4) identify clinical predictors of radiological disease severity in children from the study population of children with presumptive TB.

This study will externally validate the first data-driven WHO TDAs in a large, well-characterised and diverse paediatric IPD derived from four large paediatric cohorts of children investigated for TB. The study has received ethical clearance for sharing secondary deidentified data from the ethics committees of the parent studies (RaPaed-TB, UMOYA and TB Speed) and as the aims of this study were part of the parent studies’ protocols, a separate approval was not necessary. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at local, regional and international scientific meetings and conferences. This database will serve as a catalyst for the assessment of the inclusion of novel tools and the generation of an artificial population to simulate the impact of novel diagnostic pathways for TB in children at lower levels of healthcare. TDAs have the potential to close the diagnostic gap in childhood TB. Further finetuning of the currently available algorithms will facilitate this and improve access to care.

Participation in physical activity (PA) is a cornerstone of the secondary prevention of stroke. Given the heterogeneous nature of stroke, PA interventions that are adaptive to individual performance capability and associated co-morbidity levels are recommended. Mobile health (mHealth) has been identified as a potential approach to supporting PA post-stroke. To this end, we used a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomised Trial design to develop an adaptive, mHealth intervention to improve PA post-stroke – The Adaptive Physical Activity programme in Stroke (TAPAS) (Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT05606770). As the first trial in stroke recovery literature to use this design, there is an opportunity to conduct a process evaluation for this type of adaptive intervention. The aim of this process evaluation is to examine the implementation process, mechanism of change and contextual influences of TAPAS among ambulatory people with stroke in the community.

Guided by the Medical Research Council Framework for process evaluations, qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to examine the (1) implementation process and the content of TAPAS (fidelity adaptation, dose and reach); (2) mechanisms of change (participants’ response to the intervention; mediators; unexpected pathways and consequences) and (3) influence of the context of the intervention. Quantitative data will be presented descriptively, for example, adherence to exercise sessions. Qualitative data will be collected among TAPAS participants and the interventionist using semi-structured one-to-one or focus group interviews. Transcribed interviews will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Key themes and sub-themes will be developed.

Ethical approval has been granted by the Health Service Executive Mid-Western Ethics Committee (REC Ref: 026/2022) (25/03/2024). The findings will be submitted for publication and presented at relevant national and international academic conferences.

Relational continuity of care (RCC) refers to the sustained therapeutic relationship between a patient and a clinician, which fosters trust, enhances communication and facilitates the accumulation of knowledge about the patient. RCC is associated with enhanced patient outcomes, reduced hospital admissions, lower mortality rates, decreased healthcare costs and improved patient experience. Despite these benefits, reorganisations within the NHS and workforce challenges have led to an increased reliance on multidisciplinary and part-time working, resulting in fragmented care and a decline in RCC. Our study aims to explore who needs RCC, under what circumstances, to what extent and why, with the goal of informing optimal implementation strategies.

We will conduct a realist review to develop an evidence-based programme theory explaining the mechanisms underlying RCC, the populations that benefit most, the contextual factors influencing RCC and effective care models. Following Pawson’s five iterative stages, we will: (1) Locate existing theories, (2) Search for relevant evidence, (3) Select appropriate articles, (4) Extract and organise data and (5) Synthesise findings to draw conclusions. A stakeholder advisory group, comprising policymakers, healthcare professionals, public contributors and patients, will be engaged throughout the process. We will adhere to Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) for realist reviews to ensure methodological rigor.

Our findings will inform practical, evidence-based recommendations for optimising RCC within general practice. Outputs will include peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, plain English summaries, social media infographics, a short video and end-of-study events. Collaborations with stakeholders and public involvement will ensure both accessibility and impact. Ethical approval is not required for this review.

Combined vascular endothelial growth factor/programmed death-ligand 1 blockade through atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) is the current standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A/B substantially improved objective response rates compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib; however, a majority of patients will still not respond to A/B. Strong scientific rationale and emerging clinical data suggest that faecal microbiota transfer (FMT) may improve antitumour immune response on PD-(L)1 blockade. Early trials in melanoma with FMT and reinduction of immune checkpoint blockade (ICI) therapy in patients with anti-PD-1-refractory metastatic melanoma were reported in 2021 and demonstrated reinstatement of response to ICI therapy in many patients. Due to anatomical vicinity and the physiological relevance of the gut-liver axis, we hypothesise HCC to be a particularly attractive cancer entity to further assess a potential benefit of FMT in combination with ICI towards increased antitumour immunity. Additionally, HCC often occurs in patients with liver cirrhosis, where liver function is prognostically relevant. There is evidence that FMT may increase hepatic function and therefore could positively affect outcome in this patient population.

This prospective, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II clinical trial has been designed to assess immunogenicity and safety of FMT via INTESTIFIX 001 combined with A/B in advanced HCC in comparison to A/B with placebo. Primary endpoints are measured as tumour CD8+ T cell infiltration after 2 cycles of treatment with vancomycin, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001 in comparison to vancomycin-placebo, A/B+INTESTIFIX 001-placebo and safety of the therapeutic combination in advanced HCC. INTESTIFIX 001 is an encapsulated FMT preparation by healthy donors with a high alpha-diversity in their gut microbiome for oral administration, manufactured by the Cologne Microbiota Bank (CMB). Sample size was calculated to achieve a specific expected accuracy for the primary immunological endpoint. 48 subjects will be randomised to reach a goal of 42 usable measurements in the modified intention-to-treat set. Subjects will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to A/B or placebo (28 A/B, 14 placebo).

The study was approved by ethics committee review and the German Federal Ministry of Drugs and Medical Devices. The trial is registered under EU CT no. 2023-506887-15-00. The outcome of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and at international conferences.

NCT05690048.

Preterm infants, particularly those born before 29 weeks of gestation, are at increased risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other complications of prematurity. Substantial evidence suggests that respiratory tract colonisation with Ureaplasma species significantly contributes to pulmonary inflammation, impaired lung function and subsequent lung disease especially in very immature infants. Moreover, Ureaplasma exposure has been implicated in the pathogenesis of other inflammation-related sequelae of prematurity. Although representing a potentially actionable risk factor for adverse short-term and long-term neonatal outcome, controversies on Ureaplasma-associated morbidity remain and recommendations for screening practices in preterm infants are missing. The NEO-CONSCIOUS (Neonatal Colonisation and Infection with Ureaplasma in very immature preterm infants born Ureaplasma colonisation and infection in very preterm infants at high risk of adverse outcome, the extent of potentially accompanying inflammation and the impact on short-term and long-term morbidity.

This is a prospective observational multicentre study being conducted in level III neonatal intensive care units in Germany and Austria. In total, 400 infants born before 29 weeks of gestation are screened for Ureaplasma colonisation immediately after birth. In addition, biomarkers of systemic inflammation are determined on day 1 and day 28. The study infants are followed up until discharge and at 2 years corrected age. The primary outcome BPD and/or death is assessed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes include systemic inflammation, secondary infections, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months corrected age.

The study has been approved by the ethics committees in Würzburg and Leipzig and the local ethics committees of all participating centres. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international publications and conferences. The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00033001.

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00033001).

Patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are experiencing longer and uncertain trajectories of life-limiting illness due to advances in precision medicine. These advanced cancer survivors face new challenges related to living with uncertainty and desire more support to maximize their health and quality of life. Therefore, we developed a population-specific, blended palliative and survivorship care intervention to address the supportive care needs of patients recently diagnosed with advanced lung cancer and who are receiving targeted therapy for NSCLC with EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or RET driver mutations.

This study is a single-site, non-blinded pilot randomised controlled trial of an intervention for patients with metastatic oncogene-driven NSCLC, Patient-centred, Optimal Integration of Survivorship and palliative carE (POISE) versus usual care. POISE consists of a brief series of structured visits with a trained palliative care clinician to address coping with uncertainty, increase prognostic awareness and promote healthy lifestyle behaviours. We will recruit 60 patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. Patients will be randomised into a 1:1 ratio to the intervention arm or the usual care arm. Patients randomised to the intervention arm will complete four 60 min virtual or in-person visits with a palliative care physician. The usual care arm will receive standard oncology care. Patients in both arms will complete survey assessments at enrolment, 12 weeks and 20 weeks after enrolment, and patients in the intervention group will complete an exit interview. The primary outcome measure of this trial is feasibility, which will be defined by ≥60% enrolment among eligible patients, ≥70% completion of all sessions for participants in the intervention arm and ≥70% completion of all surveys for all study participants. Exploratory outcomes include acceptability, emotional coping with prognosis, self-efficacy for chronic disease management, prognostic awareness, quality of life, anxiety, depression, intolerance of uncertainty and documentation of goals and values discussions in the electronic health record.

This study was approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center’s institutional review board (protocol 20-722). The protocol is reported in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines, and the study will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials.

NCT04900935.

About one-third of all patients with cancer in Germany are still of working age at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, occupational reintegration is an important goal after the completion of the treatment. Compared with the general population, patients with cancer are more frequently affected by unemployment, early retirement and reduced earning capacity pensions. Yet, there are no robust results about which factors determine occupational reintegration, whether downward social mobility is associated with a cancer diagnosis and which groups are particularly at risk for not returning to work or the loss of their social position. The aim of this study is to analyse social inequalities in occupational reintegration, work-related changes and vertical social mobility processes, as well as to explore the role of rehabilitative measures and other intermediary influences in these processes.

Data are collected in a retrospective cross-sectional study with a qualitative in-depth sequential mixed-methods design. For this purpose, patients from three federal states in Central Germany who have been diagnosed with cancer between 2017 and 2022 and are between 18 and 60 years will be asked to participate in this study. Participants answer a standardised questionnaire (written or online). A subsample will subsequently be questioned in a qualitative interview.

Analysis will be done by descriptive and multivariate methods as well as qualitative content analysis.

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (reference number 2023-117). All research activities will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants have to provide informed consent before enrolment. The study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register. Results will be presented in peer-reviewed academic journals, at (international) conferences and on a joint workshop with stakeholders and patients.

DRKS00032076.