Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals with haematological cancers, but the duration of elevated risk in long-term survivors remains uncertain. Although previous attempts to summarise the existing literature on this topic would have been hampered by the sheer volume of studies on cancer and all-cause infections, emerging artificial intelligence tools now offer the ability to streamline the screening process, allowing for broader and more comprehensive reviews.

This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. Eligible studies will include original observational data reporting long-term (≥1 year follow-up from diagnosis) infection-related outcomes in haematological cancer survivors compared with a general or cancer-free population. Screening will be supported by ASReview, an artificial intelligence-based tool for abstract prioritisation. An internal validation step will be conducted by comparing artificial intelligence-assisted screening results with manual review performed by two independent researchers on a subset of abstracts. The primary outcomes of infection incidence and infection mortality will be summarised by type of infection, type of haematological cancer and time since cancer diagnosis. Information on anti-cancer treatments received will also be described. Data synthesis will be mostly narrative due to the broad scope of the review, though meta-analyses will be performed in cases where studies are sufficiently homogenous. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Ethical approval is not applicable to this study. The results of the review will be disseminated to clinical audiences and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD420251047091.

Administration of antibiotics before incising the skin (‘surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis’) is a critical infection prevention strategy in surgery. Extending doses of prophylaxis into the postoperative period is a common practice in cardiac surgery; however, the benefit has not been clearly established and may lead to emergence of antimicrobial resistance and patient harm. We present the protocol for a large international multicentre, adaptive, pragmatic, double-blind, three-arm, placebo-controlled, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the incidence of surgical site infection after three different durations of postoperative surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

This adaptive, multi-arm multistage non-inferiority trial will compare intraoperative only (Arm A), to intraoperative and 24 hours (Arm B) and, to intraoperative and 48 hours (Arm C) of intravenous cefazolin and placebo as surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in 9180 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The adaptive design allows for potential dropping of any of the three arms if clear inferiority is indicated at any of the scheduled interim analyses. The trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the three different antibiotic prophylaxis durations.

Ethics approval will be obtained at all participating sites. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and the key findings presented at national and international conferences. Patients and members of the public will also be involved in the dissemination and translation of the trial results.

NCT05447559.

Over 100 000 service users are admitted to acute mental health wards annually, many involuntarily. Wards are under incredible pressure due to high bed occupancy rates and staff shortages. In a recent survey, over 80% of mental health nurses reported experiencing aggression and violence within their role. National and international policy dictates that mental health ward staff manage incidents of aggression and violence using communication, known as de-escalation. However, de-escalation practice is variable, and there is little empirical evidence to underpin training. As such, there is still a reliance on more restrictive practices, including seclusion and physical restraint.

The aim of this study is to identify the communication and organisational factors that characterise effective management of service users’ behaviour and distress in acute adult inpatient mental health wards, reducing the reliance on more restrictive practices (eg, seclusion and restraint).

This observational study will be conducted on mental health wards in England. It will be comprised of three work packages (WPs).

Ethical approval for sites in England has been granted by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3, REF 22/WA/0066. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific conferences and service user and clinical networks.

Evidence suggests a 38% risk reduction in breast and bowel cancer-specific mortality with higher levels of exercise, however, most of this evidence is observational. More clinical trials are needed to build strong evidence for exercise’s impact on recurrence and survival. This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and potential efficacy of a remote, tailored exercise programme on disease-free survival in patients recently completing curative treatment for early-stage, high-risk lung, breast or bowel cancer.

This UK-based, multicentre randomised controlled basket feasibility trial compares a personalised, remote-delivered exercise programme supported by exercise professionals against usual care. Potential participants are approached if they are: aged 18 or over, diagnosed with high-risk, early-stage breast, bowel or lung cancer, and within 24 weeks of completing primary curative treatments. Participants complete objective measures of physical function (submaximal cardiovascular fitness, endurance, muscle strength and balance), body composition (bioelectrical impedance) and self-reported outcomes (total physical activity, sleep quality, general quality of life (QoL), cancer-related QoL and exercise confidence/motivation). Clinical case note review provides disease-free survival outcomes at 6, 12 and 24 months. The 12-week programme is delivered remotely (via phone, email and/or video conference) with trainer contact tapering off over the subsequent 12 weeks (24 weeks total). Recruitment is ongoing with a 660-participant goal. Descriptive measures (quantitative and qualitative) will be reported for feasibility outcomes: recruitment, adherence, retention rates, data collection quality, adverse events, intervention acceptability and fidelity. A process evaluation is being conducted concurrently and is reported separately. Kaplan-Meier curves will be plotted and median disease-free survival calculated for each arm. To determine intervention impact, a log-rank test (unadjusted) will compare 2-year disease-free survival between groups within and among cancer types. Secondary outcomes (physical function status, general/cancer-specific QoL and determinants of meeting activity guidelines) will be reported at each time point.

Ethical approvals were obtained through Hull York Medical School (ID: 23/SS/0060) and UK NHS Health Research Authority (ID: 327663). Findings will be submitted for publication in high-impact journals, presentation at national and international conferences, press releases where appropriate, and dissemination activities to be decided on with the Patient Advisory Group.

ISRCTN97662203.