Conectar
Self-treatment of benign symptoms using hot water bottles, steam inhalation or hot tea is common in households and poses risks of severe scald injuries. This study aims to investigate associated hazards and identify high-risk patient groups to facilitate targeted prevention. A retrospective, single-center descriptive study was conducted on adult burn patients with scald injuries from hot water bottles, steam inhalation or hot tea. Demographic information, injury mechanism and outcomes were analysed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 37.5 years; female:male ratio 23:20) were included. Injuries were caused by hot water/tea (37.2%), steam (34.9%) and hot water bottles (27.9%). The average burned total body surface area (TBSA) was 4%, with 79.1% of injuries being superficial partial-thickness burns. Surgical intervention was required in 13.9% of cases. Hot water bottle injuries predominantly affected young females (75%, mean age 32.6 years), with a high incidence of genital burns (58.3%). Hot tea-related injuries were more frequent in older males (62.5%, mean age 41.6 years), involving greater TBSA (6.5%) and a higher necessity for skin grafting (18.8%). Common self-treatment strategies can cause serious scalds, particularly in specific demographic groups, thereby burdening healthcare systems. Awareness of these risks is pivotal for effective education and prevention.
To identify enablers and barriers for scaling up non-communicable disease (NCD) interventions across diverse global contexts and to map these factors to the WHO’s health system building blocks.
A multi-method qualitative study applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to analyse data from multiple projects nearing or completing scale-up.
Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases-funded implementation research projects conducted across 18 low- and middle-income countries and high-income settings.
Data was derived from documents (n=77) including peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, and reports and interviews with stakeholders (n=18) (eg, principal investigators, medical professionals, public health workers).
Various context-specific interventions targeting sustainable scale-up of NCD (eg, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease) interventions at the community, primary care or policy levels.
The primary outcome was identifying contextual enablers and barriers to intervention scale-up. Secondary outcomes included exploring how these factors aligned with health system building blocks (eg, leadership/governance, healthcare workforce).
Twenty enablers (eg, intervention adaptability, strong stakeholder engagement, local empowerment) and 25 barriers (eg, resource limitations, intervention complexity, stakeholder burnout) were identified. Contextual alignment, supportive governance and capacity building were critical for sustainability, while cultural misalignment and socio-political instability frequently hampered scaling efforts.
Tailoring interventions to local health systems, ensuring stakeholder co-ownership and incorporating strategies to mitigate stakeholder burn-out are essential to achieving sustainable, scalable NCD solutions. Future research should focus on integrating systematic cultural adaptation, sustainable financing and workforce capacity building into scale-up planning.
To explore cardiac rehabilitation (CR) professionals’ perspectives on kinesiophobia in patients with cardiovascular diseases. This study aims to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding their perceptions, assessments and management of kinesiophobia.
A qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews and thematic analysis.
The study was carried out through online interviews at a university teaching hospital in South India.
HCPs involved in CR, from around the world, were invited to participate through advertisements on social media and through professional forums. 12 HCPs, including CR nurses (n=1), CR physicians (n=1), cardiac surgeons (n=1), cardiac electrophysiologists (n=1), rehabilitation physicians (n=1), cardiologists (n=2), exercise physiologists (n=2) and physiotherapists (n=3), agreed to participate.
Not applicable (qualitative study without interventions).
Qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews focused on HCP perceptions regarding kinesiophobia and its assessment, management and awareness within CR.
Thematic analysis generated 337 codes, which formed seven subthemes: the perceived burden of kinesiophobia, reasons for kinesiophobia, HCP experiences with kinesiophobia, methods of assessing kinesiophobia, management strategies, reasons why kinesiophobia is overlooked and the importance of promoting awareness of kinesiophobia.
CR professionals recognise kinesiophobia as a significant issue among patients with heart disease but do not recognise the term or perceive it as a separate condition; instead, they view it as part of the overall clinical presentation. There is a strong need to advocate for early recognition and assessment of kinesiophobia and for the development of structured management strategies and its inclusion into CR programmes to improve patient outcomes during recovery.
The study was prospectively registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2022/05/042502). This study received approval from the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee-2 (Student Research) with reference number IEC2:13/2022.
To contextualise an existing suicide prevention programme, and to assess the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of the contextualised suicide prevention programme among secondary school students in eastern Nepal.
A multi-method study is planned across four phases. The study will be informed by the Socio-Ecological Model. The first phase is a systematic review to identify available suicide prevention programmes, their effects and their contextualisation status. The second phase will be a descriptive qualitative study to contextualise the safeTALK suicide prevention programme for use among adolescents in a public school of Eastern Nepal, involving adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. The third phase will be a single-group pre-post-test design to test the preliminary effects of the contextualised safeTALK programme among 110 adolescents at the public school. Outcomes measured in the third study will be suicidal ideation and help-seeking behaviours, using the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale, and General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. The final phase will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the safeTALK suicide prevention programme through in-depth interviews with adolescents, teachers, parents, healthcare providers and policymakers. Quantitative and qualitative data will be analysed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences v.30 and NVivo v.14 respectively.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee and the Nepal Health Research Council. The findings will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.
There are no reported structured suicide prevention programmes for adolescents in low-middle-income countries, including Nepal. This study is expected to assist in mitigating the shortfall of contextualised adolescent suicide prevention programmes in low-middle-income countries. Additionally, evidence will be added to the global nursing literature, helping to contribute to evidence-based nursing practice.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12624000634572
by Maria Sabastin Sagayam, Priya Gupta, Ram Ramesh, Angan Sengupta
BackgroundThe Indian healthcare system continues to remain unstructured leading to sub-optimal health outcomes, not just in rural but even in urban areas. While physicians play a crucial role in shaping treatment trajectories and managing the referral process, their perspective on the referral system has received very limited academic attention in India. This study attempts to understand the archetypical physician’s referral mechanism and the factors influencing their referral practices. This study also highlights the challenges and possible solutions in operationalising an efficient referral process as suggested by the professionals.
MethodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with sixty-two physicians consisting of both general physicians and specialists from 19 different disciplines, associated with public and private hospitals in Bengaluru, India. The data, thus collected, was subjected to thematic analysis to generate relevant themes.
ResultsFive themes emerged from the thematic analysis from a phenomenological perspective based on the physicians’ lived experience. First of all, specialist physicians’ availability, accessibility, experience, and reputation strongly influenced referral recommendations. It was also observed that due to lack of a comprehensive healthcare provider database, personal connections and professional networks are utilised. Moreover, although physicians prioritize patients’ affordability and accessibility factors, referral counselling and caregiver-patient communication remained inadequate and required formalization. While the fourth theme clusters around several barriers related to communication, system inefficiencies, lack of awareness, accessibility and affordability among patients; the final theme suggests that the physicians emphasized on urgent need for clear guidelines, regulations and policies to streamline and monitor the referral system.
ConclusionThis research highlights that physicians recognize the systemic gaps leading to unsolicited health outcomes; yet they are helpless in most cases. The participants emphasized that robust information systems connecting all relevant stakeholders are essential. The exploration reveals that the system will not adopt a structured referral method without the government taking interest in it.
Older adults transitioning to nursing homes face challenges in adapting to a new environment and imposed lifestyle changes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with poor nursing home adjustment and to assess their impact on 1-year mortality.
This study is a secondary analysis of the KArukera Study of Ageing in ‘Établissement d'Hébergement pour Personnes Agées Dépendantes’ (EHPAD) (KASEHPAD) cohort, a prospective observational study conducted over 1 year in six nursing homes in the French Caribbean.
159 older adults (aged 60 years or older) living in nursing homes who were able to complete the self-administered adaptation scale.
Nursing home adjustment was assessed at baseline using the adaptation scale for older adults to their residence (EAPAR). Bivariate analysis was used to assess associations between adjustment status and sociodemographic or clinical characteristics at baseline. Poisson regressions were used to assess the relationship between 1-year mortality and adjustment status.
A total of 159 older adults (mean age: 79.6 years; male/female ratio: 84/75) were included. The mean length of stay was 4.1 years. Among older adults, 78 (49.1%) were classified as poorly adapted. Age, gender, education level, dependency, cognition and comorbidities were not significantly associated with poor adjustment. In contrast, depressive symptoms, lower social support, lower health-related quality of life, lower subjective quality of life, malnutrition and sleep disturbances were associated with poor adjustment. After 12 months, 14 deaths (17.9%) occurred in the poor adjustment group, compared with 4 (4.9%) in the no major adjustment difficulties group (adjusted relative risk for age, gender and baseline activities of daily living score=4.64 (95% CI 1.53 to 17.5; p=0011).
In a sample of older adults with moderate cognitive impairment, poor adjustment to nursing home was associated with depressive symptomatology and increased 1-year mortality. The issue of adjustment in nursing homes represents an emerging research area that warrants further investigation through dedicated interventional studies.
To estimate the prevalence of sleep problems among children aged 2–5 years residing in South India, assess its association with screen time and identify a predictive screen time threshold.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
Field practice areas in rural and urban centres of a medical college in South India.
In total, 523 children aged 2–5 years were selected by simple random sampling.
Sleep problems were assessed using the validated bedtime problems, excessive daytime sleepiness, awakenings during the night, regularity of sleep and snoring sleep screening tool. Sociodemographic and behavioural factors, including screen time, were also examined. The optimal predictive screen time cut-off was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Sleep disturbances were reported in 39.6% of children (95% CI 35.5% to 43.8%). The most common sleep problems were irregular sleep (22.2%), bedtime resistance (20.8%) and night awakening (19.9%). Multivariate logistic regression showed strong associations between sleep problems and screen use in bed (adjusted OR (AOR) = 3.8; 95% CI 2.4 to 6.1), excess screen time (AOR=3.3; 95% CI 1.8 to 6), smaller family size (AOR=3.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 6.1), reduced physical activity (AOR=2.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 4.2), shorter birth spacing (AOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8), lower socioeconomic status (AOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and maternal screen time>2 hours/day (AOR=1.6; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.6). ROC analysis identified ≥2.4 hours per day of screen time as the optimal threshold for predicting sleep problems (area under the curve=0.800; sensitivity, 73.9% and specificity, 77.2%).
In this large population-based study, two of the five preschool children experienced sleep problems, with excess screen time, particularly screen use in bed, being the key contributing factor. This is one of the few Indian studies to establish an ROC-derived screen time threshold for identifying sleep problems. These findings can guide targeted parental advice and early preventive strategies to promote healthy sleep in preschool children.
Cervical cancer (CaCx) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in South Africa, often presenting at advanced stages and requiring chemoradiotherapy. In South Africa, the burden is disproportionately high among women living with HIV, with limited access to radiotherapy further compounding treatment challenges. Despite this documented disparity, limited data exist on patients in a South African context. This protocol describes the research methodology to assess patterns of care, treatment delays, interruptions and survival outcomes in patients with advanced CaCx, addressing an urgent need for local data in low-income and middle-income countries to provide evidence-based improvements in care.
The Cervical Cancer Cohort at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH-CCC), initiated in 2023, is a mixed retrospective and prospective single-centre study investigating the characteristics, challenges and outcomes of patients with advanced CaCx. It includes women aged ≥18 years with a histopathological diagnosis of stage IB3–IVA CaCx treated at CMJAH Radiation Oncology. The retrospective component covers data from September 2018 to August 2023. Data collection is complete and the team is currently conducting quality control. The prospective component began in October 2023 and aims to enrol participants over 2 years, with follow-up for up to 3 years. The study is ongoing, and an extension for continued enrolment beyond September 2025 is being sought. Participants provide baseline data on demographics, socioeconomic status, cultural influences and healthcare access, with updates every 3 months. When necessary, the next of kin provides follow-up information. The study aims to inform strategies to improve outcomes and reduce the CaCx burden in South Africa.
Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, with an ethical clearance certificate (MM221001 MED22-09-085). The results will be widely distributed through presentations at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed open-access journals, ensuring wide access to the results.
To explore how neonatal nurse leaders sustain human-centred care while implementing digital technologies in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Qualitative descriptive multi-site study across four NICUs in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia (November 2024–May 2025), reported in accordance with COREQ.
Purposive maximum-variation sampling recruited 24 neonatal nurse leaders across leadership levels, hospital types and digital maturity stages. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Arabic or English, transcribed, translated as needed and thematically analysed in NVivo 14 using a hybrid inductive–deductive approach. Directed content analysis of key organisational documents enabled triangulation. Trustworthiness was supported through member checking, peer debriefing, audit trail, external review and double coding of a subset of transcripts.
Four interrelated strategies were identified: (1) embedding a values-based human-centred vision; (2) selecting and customising digital tools to strengthen, not replace, nurse–family connection; (3) redesigning workflows (e.g., device-free openings, protected presence time, family-inclusive portals) to preserve presence and partnership; and (4) fostering team capability and psychological safety for digital–human integration.
Human-centred care in digital NICUs is intentionally led and structurally engineered. The study offers a practice-ready framework that translates values into reproducible routines within complex sociotechnical systems.
The framework supports nurse leaders in aligning digital transformation with family-centred care, protecting nurse–family presence, and enhancing safety, trust and partnership for high-risk neonates.
Addresses risks of relational erosion in digital and AI-enabled NICUs and provides transferable nurse-led strategies to sustain ethical, family-centred practice.
COREQ-compliant qualitative study.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
by Ramón Ventura Roque Hernández, Rolando Salazar Hernandez, Adán López Mendoza
IntroductionThe widespread use of smartphones among university students has raised concern because of their potential effects and the need to detect profiles of problematic use. This study aimed to identify, characterize and differentiate different profiles of smartphone users in a sample of university students on the basis of variables such as use, nomophobia, risk and sociodemographic characteristics.
MethodsA total of 681 university students participated. A total of 681 university students participated in this study. The sample was recruited using a non-probabilistic, convenience sampling method. Latent class analysis -LCA- was performed to identify profiles from variables that included smartphone use patterns such as daily hours, messaging, social networks, browsing, history of technology adoption, situational use, NMPQ nomophobia questionnaire -a scale designed to assess the fear of being without a smartphone-, and reported consequences such as accidents, visual or musculoskeletal problems. The resulting classes were compared in subsequent analyses using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Mann‒Whitney U tests for ordinal variables.
ResultsLCA revealed two clearly differentiated user profiles. Class 1 (n = 348) grouped users with moderate use and less exposure to risks and was characterized by shorter daily use of smartphones (mean = 5.46 hours), significantly lower scores on the total scale of nomophobia (mean NMPQ = 65.4 out of 140 possible points, moderate level), a lower frequency of accidents reported due to mobile use and lower reports of visual and musculoskeletal health problems. Class 2 (n = 333) grouped users with high digital involvement and multiple vulnerabilities and showed a significantly more intensive use pattern (mean = 11.01 hours per day), higher levels of nomophobia (mean NMPQ = 74.3 out of 140 possible points, moderate level), and a higher frequency of accidents and major visual and musculoskeletal health problems.
ConclusionWhile both groups of undergraduate students could benefit from awareness and training programs, interventions could be differentiated and designed to mitigate the risks associated with problematic smartphone use. These findings provide evidence for higher education institutions and health professionals in the development of programs aimed at promoting digital well-being among university students.
Introducción: La Inseguridad Alimentaria (IA), vinculada a la pobreza, favorece el consumo de alimentos poco nutritivos y aumenta el riesgo de enfermedades crónicas. Su comprensión es clave en enfermería comunitaria y escolar para fomentar hábitos saludables desde edades tempranas. Objetivo: Analizar la relación entre el Nivel Socioeconómico (NSE) e IA en Estudiantes de Una Universidad Pública del Norte de Sinaloa, México. Metodología: Estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, correlacional y transversal en estudiantes de 18 a 25 años inscritos en un programa de Licenciatura. Los participantes fueron seleccionados a partir de un muestreo aleatorio simple. La muestra fue de 311 estudiantes. Se aplicó una cédula de datos sociodemográficos, el cuestionario AMAI y la Escala Latinoamericana y Caribeña de Inseguridad Alimentaria. Resultados: En los hogares sin presencia de menores, la IA severa presenta mayor prevalencia en NSE medio (29,6%) y alto (32,5%). Se observó una correlación positiva y significativa entre el NSE y la IA, tanto en hogares sin integrantes menores de edad (rs = 0,263, p < 0,01), como en aquellos con menores (rs = 0,231, p < 0,01). Conclusiones: En esta población de estudiantes universitarios, se observó que a medida que aumenta el NSE, también lo hace la IA, lo que sugiere que esta no es exclusiva de los sectores socioeconómicos bajos, sino que también afecta de forma considerable a los niveles medio y alto. La persistencia de esta problemática en todos los niveles sugiere que factores estructurales, más allá del ingreso, como el acceso a alimentos nutritivos, educación alimentaria y estabilidad laboral, podrían influir significativamente.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Food insecurity (FI), linked to poverty, promotes the consumption of unhealthy foods and increases the risk of chronic diseases. Understanding it is key in community and school nursing to foster healthy habits from an early age. Objective: To analyze the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and FI in students at a public university in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Methodology: A quantitative, descriptive, correlational, and cross-sectional study was conducted with students aged 18 to 25 years enrolled in an undergraduate program. Participants were selected using simple random sampling. The sample consisted of 311 students. A sociodemographic data form, the AMAI questionnaire, and the Latin American and Caribbean Food Insecurity Scale were administered. Results: In households without children, severe FI was more prevalent in middle (29.6%) and high (32.5%) SES groups. A positive and significant correlation was observed between socioeconomic status (SES) and food insecurity (FI), both in households without minor members (rs = 0.263, p < 0.01) and in those with minors (rs = 0.231, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this population of university students, it was observed that as SES increases, so does FI, suggesting that it is not exclusive to low socioeconomic sectors, but also significantly affects middle and high levels. The persistence of this problem at all levels suggests that structural factors, beyond income, such as access to nutritious food, nutrition education, and job stability, could have a significant influence.
by Mohajit Arneja, Swetharajan Gunasekar, Dharaneswari Hari Narayanan, Joshma Joseph, Harilalith Kovvuri, Sharath Shanmugam, Pavitraa Saravana Kumar, Asuwin Anandaram, Vinod Kumar Balakrishnan, Jayanty Venkata Balasubramaniyan, Sadhanandham Shanmugasundaram, Sankaran Ramesh, Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan
BackgroundFaster time to reperfusion can be achieved by minimizing various patient and system-level delays that contribute to total ischemic time. Procedural delays within the catheterization laboratory represent a non-negligible and modifiable component in the chain of reperfusion, but remain unquantified by conventional metrics such as door-to-ballon (D2B) time. Universal catheter approaches have rapidly gained traction as an alternative to the traditional two catheter approach for transradial coronary interventions. However, their utility for both diagnostic angiography and subsequent angioplasty is limited, and the impact of this strategy on reperfusion outcomes has remained unexplored. We utilized a procedural metric termed fluoroscopy-to-device (FluTD) time to quantify the efficiency of a single catheter strategy, and assessed its impact on epicardial and myocardial perfusion.
Methods and resultsIn this retrospective study, consecutive STEMI patients undergoing transradial primary PCI (pPCI) at a tertiary care center in India between May 2022 to October 2024 were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: 51 underwent PCI using a single universal guiding catheter (UGC), and 51 underwent the conventional two-catheter (CTC) approach. The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of the FluTD time between the two procedural strategies. Secondary outcomes included myocardial blush grade (MBG), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, total fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, device safety and efficacy, and procedural success.The median FluTD time was significantly shorter in the UGC compared to the CTC group (3 minutes [IQR 3–4] vs. 10 minutes [IQR 8–17], p Conclusion
A single catheter strategy for both angiography and pPCI in STEMI patients was associated with a significant reduction in FluTD time and improved microvascular perfusion, without compromising device safety or efficacy. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where intra- and extra-procedural delays are often more pronounced, inclusion of the single catheter strategy can optimize catheterization workflows and yield substantial cost-savings.
To identify and explain the challenges of effective pain management in patients with cancer in Iran.
A convergent mixed-methods study.
Oncology departments and palliative care units across multiple healthcare institutions in Iran.
Quantitative phase: 320 healthcare providers, including anaesthesiologists, general practitioners, oncologists, nurses and pharmacists, selected via convenience sampling. Qualitative phase: 10 stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, policy makers and clinicians.
Quantitative data were collected using a psychometrically validated 23-item questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to cancer pain management. Qualitative data were obtained through semistructured interviews and analysed using Graneheim and Lundman’s content analysis method with MaxQDA software. Integration was performed using a side-by-side approach.
Quantitative data showed that over 65% of providers did not routinely assess pain, and only 29.1% believed pharmacological treatments were effective. Qualitative analysis identified 13 barriers across three domains—professional, patient and organisational—spanning physical, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions. Integrated findings revealed consistent patterns of underassessment, legal and cultural resistance and lack of interdisciplinary collaboration. These converging challenges highlight the need for holistic, system-level reform.
The convergence of quantitative and qualitative data reveals a multilayered system of barriers, professional, patient-related and organisational—rooted in physical, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions. These interlinked challenges contribute to fragmented pain management and limited interdisciplinary coordination. Addressing them requires a holistic reform strategy that integrates structural, cultural and clinical solutions.
The number of patients requiring wound care is increasing, placing a burden on healthcare institutions and clinicians. While negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) use has become increasingly common, Middle East-specific wound care guidelines are limited. An in-person meeting was held in Dubai with 15 wound care experts to develop guidelines for NPWT and NPWT with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) use for the Middle East. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Science Direct and Cochrane Reviews. Prior to the meeting, panel members reviewed literature and existing guidelines on NPWT and/or NPWTi-d use. A wound management treatment algorithm was created. Patient and wound assessment at presentation and throughout the treatment plan was recommended. Primary closure was recommended for simple wounds, and NPWT use was suggested for complex wounds requiring wound bed preparation. NPWTi-d use was advised when wound cleansing is required, if the patient is unsuitable for surgical debridement, or if surgical debridement is delayed. When NPWTi-d is unavailable, panel members recommended NPWT. Panel members recommended NPWT for wound bed preparation and NPWTi-d when wound cleansing is needed. These recommendations provide general guidance for NPWT and NPWTi-d use and should be updated as more clinical evidence becomes available.
Predicting the progression to severe dengue remains a critical yet challenging aspect of patient management. This umbrella review aims to identify biomarkers associated with the development of severe dengue. The primary objective is to determine which biomarkers can predict progression to severe disease in dengue-infected patients. Secondary objectives include identifying (a) early biomarkers (detected on days 1–3 of illness), (b) late biomarkers (detected after day 3), (c) biomarkers requiring further investigation and (d) differences in predictive biomarkers between patients aged
The review questions were formulated based on the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) framework. This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for umbrella reviews and be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Systematic Reviews guidelines. The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251058284). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, JBI Evidence Synthesis and DARE databases will be searched from 1/1/1990 to 1/6/2025. The findings are expected to support early risk stratification and guide future biomarker research in dengue infection. The systematic reviews included in this umbrella review may define severe dengue according to either the WHO 1997 or 2009 guidelines.
Ethical approval is not required since the work involves published documents. The review findings will be communicated to relevant stakeholders through conference presentations and publication in an open-access journal.
PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251058284. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251058284.
Process evaluation provides insight into how interventions are delivered across varying contexts and why interventions work in some contexts and not in others. This manuscript outlines the protocol for a process evaluation embedded in a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation randomised clinical trial of incremental-start haemodialysis (HD) versus conventional HD delivered to patients starting chronic dialysis (the TwoPlus Study). The trial will simultaneously assess the effectiveness of incremental-start HD in real-world settings and the implementation strategies needed to successfully integrate this intervention into routine practice. This manuscript describes the rationale and methods used to capture how incremental-start HD is implemented across settings and the factors influencing its implementation success or failure within this trial.
We will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks to inform process evaluation. Mixed methods include surveys conducted with treating providers (physicians) and dialysis personnel (nurses and dialysis administrators); semi-structured interviews with patient participants, caregivers of patient participants, treating providers (physicians and advanced practice practitioners), dialysis personnel (nurses, dieticians and social workers); and focus group meetings with study investigators and stakeholder partners. Data will be collected on the following implementation determinants: (a) organisational readiness to change, intervention acceptability and appropriateness; (b) inner setting characteristics underlying barriers and facilitators to the adoption of HD intervention at the enrollment centres; (c) external factors that mediate implementation; (d) adoption; (e) reach; (f) fidelity, to assess adherence to serial timed urine collection and HD treatment schedule; and (g) sustainability, to assess barriers and facilitators to maintaining intervention. Qualitative and quantitative data will be analysed iteratively and triangulated following a convergent parallel and pragmatic approach. Mixed methods analysis will use qualitative data to lend insight to quantitative findings. Process evaluation is important to understand factors influencing trial outcomes and identify potential contextual barriers and facilitators for the potential implementation of incremental-start HD into usual workflows in varied outpatient dialysis clinics and clinical practices. The process evaluation will help interpret and contextualise the trial clinical outcomes’ findings.
The study protocol was approved by the Wake Forest University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB). Findings from this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.
The objective of this study was to explore medical practitioners’ understanding of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and its aspects, such as its causes, possible outcomes and how doctors can contribute to its prevention.
This qualitative study was conducted in Sri Lankan healthcare settings.
Using convenience sampling, the study included allopathic medical practitioners aged 18–60 years, excluding intern-medical officers, until data saturation.
One-on-one interviews were conducted online or in person, depending on each participant’s preference. A structured questionnaire was used to triangulate the information.
Data were categorised into four: (1) understanding, awareness and identifying AMR as an issue among medical practitioners, (2) knowledge and understanding of factors that contribute to AMR development among medical practitioners, (3) knowledge and understanding of the outcome of AMR and (4) knowledge and understanding of preventive measures against AMR among medical officers. Interviewees showed an awareness of AMR; however, their knowledge was not up to date. Key reasons for inappropriate antibiotic use included unavailability and poor quality of antibiotics and unawareness of updated guidelines, especially in the government sector. In the private sector, patient pressure, the need to attract patients and the high cost of investigations contributed to misuse. Additionally, low patient literacy about AMR was a significant factor.
This study revealed that although medical practitioners in Sri Lanka are aware of AMR, their knowledge remains limited in certain areas. Several challenges contributed to inappropriate antibiotic use, including the availability and quality of antibiotics, external pressures from patients and financial constraints. The findings of this study highlight the urgent need for continuous medical education and public awareness campaigns to improve both practitioner and patient understanding of AMR. Addressing these issues is essential for effectively preventing and managing AMR in healthcare settings in Sri Lanka.
Economic evaluations are essential for informing healthcare resource allocation. When conducted from a societal perspective, they may include productivity costs such as paid and unpaid productivity losses for patients and their caregivers. Although several methods exist to measure and value productivity costs, there is limited methodological consensus on which methods should be used. This scoping review aims to synthesise existing methods for measuring and valuing patient and caregiver productivity costs.
This review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework, enhanced by subsequent methodological guidance from Levac and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The six stages include identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; selecting studies; charting the data; collating, summarising and reporting the results; and consultation. We will search MEDLINE, Embase and EconLit from 1996 to July 2025. Eligible sources will include peer-reviewed literature that reports methods for the measurement or valuation of productivity costs related to paid or unpaid work among patients or caregivers. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Extracted data will include types of productivity costs, instruments used, valuation approaches, as well as recommendations on preferred measurement and valuation methods. Results will be synthesised thematically and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews checklist.
Ethics approval is not required as this review will rely exclusively on publicly available literature and does not involve human participants or the use of primary data. The findings will first be shared with Canada’s Drug Agency as a report and then disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and academic presentations to inform future research and practice.
This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FK9D4).
Hospital patients are at an increased risk of falls, which are a significant safety concern within healthcare settings.1 Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced fall risks is essential for identifying key factors that could inform future fall prevention strategies.2 This scoping review aims to explore the barriers and challenges associated with preventing inpatient falls in the context of the post-COVID-19 environment.
The methodology for this scoping review follows the framework established by Arksey and O’Malley. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted using specific keywords to identify relevant published studies. Searches will be performed across selected electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. This review will focus on a global perspective. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts to identify potential studies for inclusion. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for full-text review, and their references will be assessed for relevance using the same criteria. The PRISMA flow diagram will guide the review process. Data will be extracted, analysed and charted according to categories from the selected publications.
This scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the barriers and challenges in preventing inpatient falls in the post-pandemic context. The findings will be disseminated through submission for publication in a scientific journal.
This scoping review protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (OSF) available at https://osf.io/.
The growing complexity of global health issues underscores the need for a skilled workforce, achievable through competency-based training (competency-based curricula, CBC) that integrates knowledge and practice. Starting from 2022, medical and nursing CBC were harmonised across universities in Tanzania to ensure all graduates attain nationally defined core competencies. The reform aligned programme structure, learning outcomes and assessment methods to promote consistency and interprofessional collaboration. However, questions remain about whether harmonisation alone can ensure the development of practical clinical competencies among students. This study explored the experiences of medical and nursing faculty and students in implementing clinical training as a component of CBC in two health training institutions in Tanzania.
An exploratory qualitative case study was conducted with 67 participants, using 8 in-depth interviews with administrators and 8 focus group discussions with faculty and students. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic approach.
Two private, faith-based medical universities in the United Republic of Tanzania.
The study purposefully recruited a total of 67 participants. The participants included university administrators (including Deputy Vice Chancellors for Academics, quality assurance officers and deans), medical and nursing faculty and students (fourth-year medical and third-year nursing students).
Two main themes emerged: challenges in implementing clinical training and strategies used to enforce clinical training. Key challenges included curriculum design gaps, inadequate faculty and clinical instructors, a large number of students and a shortage of hospital staff. Strategies used were utilisation of clinical skills and simulation laboratories, involvement of non-academic clinical specialists’ staff, use of student-centred learning methodologies and leveraging regional, district and specialised private hospitals for clinical teaching.
Despite notable challenges in clinical training, the institutions in this study have implemented proactive strategies to support clinical training. Based on the findings, stakeholders should invest in increasing faculty and clinical instructors and expanding clinical placements to regional, district and private hospitals.
FreshRSS 