Conectar
To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.
A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.
Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.
Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.
Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.
No patient or public contribution.
Spiritual well-being (SpWB) is a critical yet often underexplored component of holistic care for patients with advanced cancer. This study aimed to assess the SpWB and quality of life (QOL) levels and examine their correlation among patients receiving palliative care at a tertiary cancer centre in Kerala, India.
Institution-based cross-sectional observational study among patients with advanced cancer conducted between August 2023 and December 2024.
The outpatient department of a major tertiary-level, autonomous cancer centre under the Government of Kerala, India.
398 patients with advanced cancer aged 18 and above.
SpWB and QOL were measured using validated Malayalam versions of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Spiritual well-being Expanded Version and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Core 30 questionnaires, respectively. Data collection included patient self-reports or assistance by a medical social worker.
The median (IQR) age of participants was 59 (51–65) years; most were married (94.5%) and from an upper-lower socioeconomic background (55%). Hinduism was the predominant religion (67.1%). Almost all patients (99%) were aware of their diagnosis, but only 62.3% knew their prognosis. The median (IQR) SpWB score was 67.5 (57–76), significantly higher in females (p=0.02). The median (IQR) QOL score was 50 (41.7–66.7). SpWB was positively correlated with QOL (r=0.766, p
SpWB showed a strong positive correlation with QOL among patients with advanced cancer. Enhancing SpWB may play a pivotal role in improving overall QOL in palliative care settings.
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering a vocational rehabilitation intervention (Return to Work After Trauma—ROWTATE), remotely to individuals recovering from traumatic injuries. The primary objectives were to assess therapists’ training and competence, adapt the intervention and training for remote delivery and assess the feasibility and fidelity of remote delivery to inform a definitive randomised controlled trial.
A mixed-methods feasibility study incorporating (1) telerehabilitation qualitative literature review, (2) qualitative interviews preintervention and postintervention with therapists and patients, (3) a team objective structured clinical examination to assess competency, (4) usefulness of training, attitudes towards (15-item Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale) and confidence in (4-item Evidence Based Practice Confidence Scale) evidence-based practice, intervention delivery confidence (8-bespoke questions) and intervention behaviour determinants (51-items Theoretical Domains Framework) and (5) single-arm intervention delivery feasibility study.
The study was conducted in two UK Major Trauma Centres. The intervention and training were adapted for remote delivery due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Therapists: Seven occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs) were trained, and six participated in competency assessment. Seven OTs and CPs participated in preintervention interviews and surveys; six completed post-intervention interviews and four completed post-training surveys. Patients: 10 patients were enrolled in the single-arm feasibility study and 4 of these participated in postintervention qualitative interviews. Inclusion criteria included therapists involved in vocational rehabilitation delivery and patients admitted to major trauma centres. Exclusion criteria included participation in other vocational rehabilitation trials or those who had returned to work or education for at least 80% of preinjury hours. Intervention: The ROWTATE vocational rehabilitation intervention was delivered remotely by trained OTs and CPs. Training included competency assessments, mentoring and adaptation for telerehabilitation. The intervention was delivered over multiple sessions, with content tailored to individual patient needs.
Therapists found the training useful, reported positive attitudes (Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale mean=2.9 (SD 0.9)) and high levels of confidence in delivering evidence-based practice (range 75%–100%) and the ROWTATE intervention (range 80%–100%). Intervention barriers identified pretraining became facilitators post-training. Half the therapists needed additional support post-training through mentoring or additional training. The intervention and training were successfully adapted for remote delivery. High levels of fidelity (intervention components delivered: OTs=84.5%, CPs=92.9%) and session attendance rates were found (median: OT=97%, CP=100%). Virtually all sessions were delivered remotely (OT=98%, CP=100%). The intervention was acceptable to patients and therapists; both considered face-to-face delivery where necessary was important.
The ROWTATE intervention was delivered remotely with high fidelity and attendance and was acceptable to patients and therapists. Definitive trial key changes include modifying therapist training, competency assessment, face-to-face intervention delivery where necessary and addressing lower fidelity intervention components.
A ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metric, developed for hastening the response to infectious disease outbreaks/pandemics, was adapted to improve screening and managing household contacts (HHCs) of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients. The feasibility, enablers, challenges and utility of implementing this modified metric through TB Champions (TB survivors) for HHC management were assessed.
This was an explanatory mixed-methods study with a cohort design (quantitative) followed by a descriptive design with focus group discussions (qualitative).
The study was conducted within routine programmatic settings in public health facilities in six districts from three states of India.
In total, 595 drug-susceptible index pulmonary TB patients registered for treatment in the selected health facilities, and their listed 2108 HHCs were included in the study between December 2022 and August 2023. All 17 TB Champions involved in implementation participated in the focus group discussions.
The primary outcome measures were the percentage of eligible participants receiving the desired service within the ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metric and challenges in achieving the timeliness metrics.
In 89% of 595 index patients, their HHCs were line-listed within 7 days of initiating anti-TB treatment (‘First-7’). In 90% of 2108 HHCs, screening outcomes were ascertained within 1 day of line-listing (‘Next-1’). In 42% of 2073 HHCs eligible for further evaluation, anti-TB treatment, TB preventive treatment (TPT) or a decision to not receive medication were made within 7 days of screening (‘Second-7’). Barriers to TPT uptake included lack of money and daily wage losses for travelling to clinics, reluctance of asymptomatic contacts to take medication and fear of adverse events. TB Champions felt timeliness metrics improved performance in the systematic and timely management of HHCs.
TB Champions found ‘7-1-7’ timeliness metrics were feasible and useful, and national TB programmes should consider their operationalisation.
The ROWTATE intervention helps people experiencing trauma to return to work (RTW) through vocational rehabilitation (VR) support from occupational therapists (OTs) and clinical psychologists (CPs). This study aims to explore and understand the acceptability of VR after traumatic injury for patients, therapists and employers.
Qualitative interviews in eight major trauma regions, UK.
Interviews were undertaken with a range of stakeholders—15 patients, 15 therapists and 6 employers. Data were analysed using the theoretical framework of acceptability.
Stakeholders understood the aim of the intervention was to support people to RTW and perceived it as effective in achieving this. Patients and therapists understood the benefits of working with a combination of occupational therapy and clinical psychology. The intervention fits with the values of patients wanting to recover, therapists wanting to offer support and line managers wanting to meet employer and employee needs.
Patients reported they could not have achieved RTW without the intervention, and their therapist helped them feel less alone. Therapists felt that their work was rewarding, effective and had good outcomes. Patients perceived remote delivery as less burdensome than attending in person. Therapists felt they wasted time on non-patient activity, such as (re-)arranging appointments.
Employers discussed the difficulty of balancing employer and employee needs and managing uncertainty. Some workplace policies lacked flexibility, and without the ROWTATE intervention, employers lacked confidence in supporting employees RTW.
A VR intervention delivered remotely by OTs and CPs is acceptable to patients, therapists and employers.
by Mohammad K. Siddiqui, Shagufta Khan, Rinchenla Bhutia, Vivek Nair, Ashok Rai, Nirmal Gurung, Tseten Yamphel, Peggy K. Dadul, Debya S. Kerongi, Karma Doma Bhutia, Jagat Pradhan, Kabita Khati, Sreenivas A. Nair, Shamim Mannan, Kiran K. Rade, Dinesh Gupta, Pawan Malhotra, L. Masae Kawamura, Shikha Dhawan, Asif Mohmmed
BackgroundMonasteries in India house individuals from childhood to advanced age. These congregate settings amplify tuberculosis (TB) transmission and exposure when the disease is present, especially in the high burden areas like Sikkim, India. However, the prevalence of active-TB disease (ATB), tuberculosis infection (TBI), and their associated risk factors have not been studied. The diagnosis and treatment of TBI remain a major bottleneck in eradicating TB. ATB and TBI risk among residents living in the congregate setting of monasteries in Sikkim, India, a high-TB burden area, may be high due to high-density living quarters, public interaction and their frequent travel history but has never been illustrated.
MethodA cross-sectional screening of the monks and residents of Rumtek Monastery (Sikkim, India) was carried out to assess extent of ATB and TBI in a congregate setting. TrueNat MTB and GeneXpert MTB/Rif systems were utilized for ATB diagnosis, whereas QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-plus) Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) analysis was used for TBI detection. Follow-up sputum testing by TrueNat MTB was performed on IGRA-positive individuals to exclude ATB.
ResultsAmong the 350 inhabitants of the monastery, 7% (25/350) were found to be symptomatic for TB, whereas 93% (325/350) were asymptomatic. Out of them, 189 participants, including symptomatic cases, agreed to participate in the study and were screened for TBI; however, 15 participants were excluded from the study due to result discrepancies. None of the participant were diagnosed with active tuberculosis (ATB), although, 44.2% (77/174) were found to be positive for TBI; however, none of those with TBI progressed to ATB during one year follow-up. Risk factors for TBI included: advancing age, frequent travel history, family history of TB or having contacts with TB patients and abnormal Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤18.5- ≥ 25.
ConclusionThis study confirms the high prevalence of TBI among residents in the congregate setting of monasteries, and justify TB prevention strategies by targeted screening, TBI testing and preventive treatment in congregate settings of high TB burden areas.
FreshRSS 