A Descriptive Evaluation of Evidence‐Based Rounds in Critical Care Using Mixed Data Types

ABSTRACT

Objectives

To pilot and evaluate the implementation of a structured Evidence-Based Rounds (EBR) education model in critical care.

Design

A mixed data type design was used to evaluate Evidence-Based Rounds in a critical care setting. Structured observational data were captured and open-ended survey responses were submitted by attendees. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse survey findings.

Results

Seventeen rounds were completed between March 2023 and January 2024 with a total of n = 83 clinical staff members. From these, n = 55 staff completed and submitted evaluation surveys. Rounds were most frequently attended by nurses of all bandings including senior clinical nurses, support workers and student nurses. Evidence-Based Rounds were globally perceived as a positive and useful education strategy and staff were very willing to attend future sessions. Patient outcomes were not directly assessed and rounds specifically facilitated three outcomes: (1) helping staff apply evidence to practice, (2) building staff confidence in presenting clinical information and (3) supporting staff in identifying local improvements to patient care.

Conclusion

Evidence-Based Rounds are an adaptable effective model of bedside education within critical care. In our setting, staff perceived that this model facilitated the application of evidence in clinical practice and positively influenced feelings of confidence. Importantly, this education strategy empowered nurses to explore and identify improvements locally to patient care. Whilst this model offers a practical education approach to address some of the key critical care workforce issues, such as an expanding curriculum and loss of senior staff, it could also be widely adopted to other clinical areas.

Implications for the Profession

Evidence-Based Rounds are perceived by staff as a successful bedside education model that facilitates nurses to apply evidence in practice. It is feasible that this strategy is a potentially sustainable, low-cost model for continuing professional development centred around routine clinical work.

Patient and Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Prevalence and factors associated with tuberculosis infection (TBI) among residents of a monastery situated in a high-TB burden area: A cross-sectional study, Sikkim, India

by Mohammad K. Siddiqui, Shagufta Khan, Rinchenla Bhutia, Vivek Nair, Ashok Rai, Nirmal Gurung, Tseten Yamphel, Peggy K. Dadul, Debya S. Kerongi, Karma Doma Bhutia, Jagat Pradhan, Kabita Khati, Sreenivas A. Nair, Shamim Mannan, Kiran K. Rade, Dinesh Gupta, Pawan Malhotra, L. Masae Kawamura, Shikha Dhawan, Asif Mohmmed

Monasteries in India house individuals from childhood to advanced age. These congregate settings amplify tuberculosis (TB) transmission and exposure when the disease is present, especially in the high burden areas like Sikkim, India. However, the prevalence of active-TB disease (ATB), tuberculosis infection (TBI), and their associated risk factors have not been studied. The diagnosis and treatment of TBI remain a major bottleneck in eradicating TB. ATB and TBI risk among residents living in the congregate setting of monasteries in Sikkim, India, a high-TB burden area, may be high due to high-density living quarters, public interaction and their frequent travel history but has never been illustrated.

A cross-sectional screening of the monks and residents of Rumtek Monastery (Sikkim, India) was carried out to assess extent of ATB and TBI in a congregate setting. TrueNat MTB and GeneXpert MTB/Rif systems were utilized for ATB diagnosis, whereas QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-plus) Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) analysis was used for TBI detection. Follow-up sputum testing by TrueNat MTB was performed on IGRA-positive individuals to exclude ATB.

Among the 350 inhabitants of the monastery, 7% (25/350) were found to be symptomatic for TB, whereas 93% (325/350) were asymptomatic. Out of them, 189 participants, including symptomatic cases, agreed to participate in the study and were screened for TBI; however, 15 participants were excluded from the study due to result discrepancies. None of the participant were diagnosed with active tuberculosis (ATB), although, 44.2% (77/174) were found to be positive for TBI; however, none of those with TBI progressed to ATB during one year follow-up. Risk factors for TBI included: advancing age, frequent travel history, family history of TB or having contacts with TB patients and abnormal Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤18.5- ≥ 25.

This study confirms the high prevalence of TBI among residents in the congregate setting of monasteries, and justify TB prevention strategies by targeted screening, TBI testing and preventive treatment in congregate settings of high TB burden areas.