Co-developing SHELTER (Safe, Healthy Environments and Local Transformation for Equity and Resilience) with families with lived experience of homelessness in the New York City shelter system: A community needs assessment and data collection protocol

by Diana Margot Rosenthal, Kate Guastaferro, Jasia Kubik, Melody Goodman

In January 2025, the nightly census revealed that over 120,000 people were staying in New York City (NYC) shelters, including more than 41,000 children, of whom almost half were aged 0–5 years. Children under five years old (under-5s) experiencing homelessness are especially vulnerable because the first five years of life are a critical period for child growth, including approximately 90% of brain development. Furthermore, under-5s experiencing homelessness have a higher risk for multiple adverse childhood experiences, developing chronic health conditions, and recurrent homelessness across the life course. Data available for under-5s experiencing homelessness is generally lacking, and what is available is of notably poor quality in the United States, leaving a wide evidence gap and an inability to determine the actual needs of this population. This proposed protocol employs community-based participatory research and was co-developed with families with under-5s who have lived experience of homelessness in NYC shelters. The aim is to determine what barriers exist in the physical and social environments to optimizing health and wellbeing (e.g., milestones, child mental health, parental mental health, safety) among under-5s living in NYC shelters. Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we propose to address a gap in the current literature by conducting an assets- and deficits-based health needs assessment comprising a quantitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews. In the long term, our objective is to enhance the quality and quantity of data for this vulnerable population, thereby laying the groundwork for the future co-development of a comprehensive, optimized intervention addressing the needs of under-5s experiencing homelessness.

Study protocol for a pilot study for Remote ADHD Monitoring Program (RAMP) for children in rural areas

by Claire A. MacGeorge, Matthew Henry, Hannah A. Ford, Lacy Malloch, Emily Fratesi, Shannon Cabaniss, Jaime Baldner, Melody Greer, Kristin Gaffney, Milan Bimali, Preetha Abraham, Linda Y. Fu, P. Songthip Ounpraseuth, Christine B. Turley

Background

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral condition of childhood and can be controlled with stimulant medication. Evidence-based guidelines endorse use of standardized ADHD symptom reports to facilitate medication titration to therapeutic dosage. Children living in under-resourced areas experience barriers to receiving this recommended evidence-based care. The Remote ADHD Monitoring Program (RAMP) uses a text-based platform to relay symptom reports from caregivers and teachers to healthcare providers. This pilot study is a feasibility study examining intervention uptake. It compares the submission of structured symptom reports in those children enrolled in RAMP compared to usual care as well as utilization of the RAMP platform by providers.

Methods

This paper describes the protocol to evaluate the feasibility of deploying RAMP in practices serving rural or underserved children. We will recruit 36 dyads from 4 practices in 2 separate states. Each dyad will include a caregiver and their child aged 5–11 years with a diagnosis of ADHD who is starting or reinitiating stimulants. Dyads will be randomized 1:1 to receive the RAMP intervention or usual care with attention controls. Our primary outcome is number of symptom reports (paper assessments in control arm and RAMP reports in intervention arm) per participant that are completed by caregivers and teachers and returned to providers. Our secondary outcome is proportion of submitted RAMP reports that are reviewed by providers.

Discussion

As telehealth use increases, it is critical that we improve access to high quality care for children with chronic conditions. Leveraging technology may be a meaningful approach to improve efficiency in optimizing medication management. This pilot study tests a text-based platform designed to improve communication between the caregivers and teachers of children with ADHD and health care providers. If successful, a future trial will examine the effectiveness of the RAMP intervention on improvement in symptoms.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06743425.

Understanding readmission after hip fracture: a mixed methods study protocol

Introduction

Around 75 000 people suffer from hip fractures yearly in the United Kingdom (UK) leading to significant mortality and morbidity. Although mortality has dropped from 8% to 5% between 2013 and 2023 after hip fractures, those undergoing surgery for hip fractures have a 30-day readmission rate which has remained stagnant at around 11% over the same decade in the UK.

This study protocol describes a mixed-methods investigation (The ARTHUR Study—avoiding readmission after hip fracture) which aims to understand and offer solutions to prevent avoidable 30-day readmission after hip fracture surgery. The study will focus on two hospitals in acute and community settings in a large urban and ethnically diverse city in the UK.

Methods and analysis

We describe two work packages.

Work Package One (WP1) involves analysis of 5 year’s worth of routinely collected health data provided by PIONEER, a Health Data Research UK data hub in Acute Care for our local population. Work Package Two (WP2) will involve semistructured interviews with patients, carers or family members as well as non-participant observations of hospital processes to understand systems-based issues related to readmissions after hip fracture surgery. Although recruitment may be an issue, our timeline for recruitment reflects this. We also aim to recruit a diverse population, which has often been under-represented in studies into hip fractures and aim to explore relevant interventions which can be widely generalisable.

Ethics and dissemination

This protocol was submitted via IRAS: 330074 and obtained UK NHS REC approval via the West Midlands Coventry and Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee (REC 23/WM/0242) on 25 January 2024. The results of this study will be published in relevant scientific journals and presented at orthopaedic, fragility fracture and geriatric specialty conferences and scientific meetings. A lay summary of the findings will be publicly available on the HRA website.