Limited data exist on temporal changes in antibiotic use in low and middle-income countries. We evaluated trends in antibiotic use at tertiary hospitals in Uganda.
Retrospective trend analysis of a repeated point prevalence survey (PPS).
This study utilised antibiotic use data from quarterly PPS conducted among inpatients at nine regional referral hospitals in Uganda between October 2020 and December 2023.
We determined the proportions of antibiotic use, prescriptions guided by culture and sensitivity tests (CST), WHO AWaRe (Access, Watch and Reserve) categories, and prescriptions without documented indication. Linear regression was used to derive slope coefficients and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Of 15,154 patients surveyed, 8,892 (58.7%) received systemic antibiotics. The median age was 23 years (IQR: 11–38), 5,338 (60.5%) were female, and 4,583 (51.5%) were on treatment for infectious syndromes, including sepsis (1,400, 15.7%) and pneumonia (867, 9.8%). The drug utilisation index (DU75) consisted of ceftriaxone, metronidazole, gentamicin and ampicillin, which accounted for 76.9% (12,291/15,989) of total antibiotic use. The distribution of prescribed antibiotics was 46.6% Access, 45.5% Watch, 0.1% Reserve and 7.7% unrecommended combinations. Overall, 5,402 (60.8%) prescriptions were aligned with national guidelines, 2,147 (24.1%) prescriptions were issued without an indication, and CST guided 271 (3%) prescriptions. Over time, there was no significant change in antibiotic prescription prevalence (slope=0.09, CI –0.93 to 1.10) and prescriptions without indication (slope=–0.70, CI –1.79 to 3.98). However, adherence to treatment guidelines (slope=2.06, CI 0.14 to 3.98) and prescriptions based on CST results (slope=0.62, CI 0.12 to 1.13) significantly increased, while ‘Watch’ antibiotics prescriptions decreased (slope=–0.40, CI –0.63 to –0.17).
The antibiotic prescription rate remained high, with no significant change over time. Improvements were seen in adherence to treatment guidelines, use of CST and reduced use of ‘Watch’ antibiotics. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship is recommended to further improve practices.
Health cadres, who assist midwives in supporting pregnant women in community settings, need to enhance their competencies in identifying risk factors and referring high-risk pregnant women to midwives for further care. Since the capabilities of these health cadres are influenced by maternal complications, an educational programme was implemented to strengthen their skills. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the competency of health cadres by providing a researcher-developed educational programme.
An open-label, cluster non-randomised controlled trial.
Health cadres with at least 1 year of work experience were recruited at six public health centres (PHCs) in Banjarnegara Regency, Indonesia.
Six PHCs were selected and allocated into intervention group (IG=3 PHCs) and control group (CG=3 PHCs) groups. A total of 133 female health cadres were enrolled across the selected PHCs. At each PHC, a systematic random sampling method was used to select the participants. The researchers and health professionals provided a 3-week period of theoretical and scenario-based simulations to the IG, while the CG received no education.
Researcher-developed questionnaires and checklists were used to assess the knowledge, skills (health assessment, communication, attitude) and confidence. The primary endpoint was competency, a total score of knowledge and skills. The outcome domains were compared between the two groups, and a linear mixed-effect model was used to account for cluster-level variation.
A total of 130 (97.7%) completed the study (IG:64, CG:66). The competency score showed significant improvement at endline (CG=49.5 and IG=52.5; p=0.002). The median scores for health assessment skills (CG=12 vs IG=14; p
Education effectively increased the competency of health cadres. A well-structured education programme is necessary for health cadres to improve and maintain their competencies in monitoring high-risk pregnant women.
To explore the experiences of different stakeholders on the balance of package training and deployment of highly skilled Human Resources for Health for specialised services in Tanzania.
An exploratory qualitative case study was used as part of a larger tracer study conducted by Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) for its postgraduate programmes being a requirement for quality assurance. Semi-structured interview guides were used for in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). Qualitative content analysis was adopted to analyse the data.
The trace study was carried out in all seven geopolitical zones of the Tanzania mainland and Unguja in Zanzibar.
We conducted 14 FGDs and 301 IDIs. Participants included alumni, immediate supervisors at employment sites, MUHAS faculty, continuing students at MUHAS and management of professional councils in Tanzania.
Key findings revealed variations in demands and recognition within the scheme of services, even after registration by professional councils. Five main themes emerged from the qualitative interviews: Package training to improve service provision, Unprofessional collegial relationships or issues related to professionalism within interdisciplinary teams, Silence of scheme services on super specialisation in the medical cadre, Silence of scheme services on specialisation in the nursing cadre, Integrated scheme of services for specialties in pharmacy.
The findings highlight the demand for specialised training, challenges with professionalism and inconsistencies in the recognition and remuneration of specialists across medical, nursing and pharmacy cadres within existing service schemes. There is a need for harmonisation between specialisation/super specialisation and the scheme of services. This harmonisation is crucial to ensure the provision of quality healthcare services. Furthermore, harmonisation requires multistakeholder engagement to realise universal health coverage strategies.
To clarify how public health nurses allocate their time across various tasks and compare time-use patterns between prefectural and municipal public health nurses in Japan, where distinct administrative mandates define their roles.
A self-reported, prospective time study.
Public health nurses from two municipalities and one prefecture recorded their daily practices and time allocations using Kintone. Time allocation differences by administrative level and job position were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
Overall, 121 participants contributed 9502 person-days of data. Participants spent an average of 463.6 min/workday on work-related activities. Municipal public health nurses dedicated more time to application paperwork (64.0 min), health examinations (57.6 min), and individual coordination (48.3 min). Prefectural public health nurses allocated more time to business management and organisational operations (69.0 min) and traveliing, particularly in rural contexts. Managers spent less time on direct care and more on administrative tasks.
This study provides the first quantitative, self-reported evidence of task distribution among public health nurses across administrative levels and positions. The findings reflect structural differences in role expectations and underscore the need to reallocate workloads to better align with each level's mandate.
Task prioritisation, information and communication technology tool integration, and administrative support are essential in optimising public health nurses' contributions to community health. These strategies can reduce non-clinical workload and enable public health nurses to focus on high-impact, value-added public health services that promote health equity.
This study closes a longstanding gap by quantifying PHNs' time allocation, revealing the hidden burden of administrative work, and providing critical insights for workforce planning and sustainable public health service delivery.
This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guideline.
No Patient or Public Involvement.
UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000051509 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_his_list.cgi?recptno=R000058761; August 1, 2023)
Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.
Cross-sectional with a nested case–control study.
Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.
Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.
We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.
Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score
Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).
Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.
To assess the reliability and validity of a negative emotion scale for public health nurses conducting child abuse prevention activities.
A four-phase mixed method design.
Participants were public health nurses with experience in child abuse prevention across Japan. The initial scale was developed and refined based on previous studies, expert panel reviews, interviews with public health nurses, and a questionnaire-based pilot study. In 2024, 549 public health nurses completed a questionnaire on scale items. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, comparisons with a preexisting scale, the number of times negative attitudes and the types of behaviours exhibited by parents were used to narrow the scale and assess its psychometric properties.
Item analysis and exploratory factor analysis reduced the scale to 15 items on two factors: ‘negative emotions toward aggressive and emotional attitudes’ and ‘negative emotions toward rejecting and uncooperative attitudes.’ Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. The Cronbach's alpha was high, and the negative emotions scale score positively correlated with the pre-existing scale, negative attitudes and parental behaviours.
The Cronbach's alpha coefficient and other factors confirmed the scale's reliability, and correlations with other scales confirmed its validity.
Evaluating negative emotions provides critical insights into the quality of support and its influence on psychological well-being.
By assessing negative emotions that public health nurses find difficult using this scale, the support system for them can be examined.
STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.
Public health nurses were involved in the generation of items for the scale. Their perspective was sought in determining the items for the scale.
Registered in the UMIIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000054650).