Conectar
Virtual scholarly events play an increasing role in doctoral education, particularly in nursing. The PhD Virtual Connect-event has been held annually for the past decade, evolving as a platform for engagement, knowledge exchange and professional development. However, its potential as a structured virtual Community of Practice remains underexplored.
This study explores the experiences of PhD students participating in the 9th and 10th editions (2023 and 2024) of the Sigma Theta Tau European Region's PhD Virtual Connect, examining how they perceive its alignment with Community of Practice principles and its role in doctoral nursing education.
A qualitative, open-ended survey was administered to the event participants who presented their studies across both editions, with responses being analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by a comparative discussion of findings.
A total of 36 participants answered the survey. The analysis identified four key themes: developing a scholarly identity, reciprocity in feedback, structuring engagement and broadening research perspectives. Participants highlighted the event's role in strengthening academic confidence and fostering a sense of belonging. A shift towards peer-driven feedback and structured engagement in 2024 reflected increasing demand for organised discussions and thematic breakout sessions. These findings support the event's function as a dynamic Community of Practice, where participants co-construct knowledge, refine collaborative processes and navigate interdisciplinary learning.
The PhD Virtual Connect fosters scholarly engagement, mentorship and interdisciplinary exchange as an evolving virtual Community of Practice. While it sustains meaningful academic interaction, addressing digital inequities, enhancing interactive elements and formalising mentorship structures will be key to ensuring long-term inclusivity and engagement. Future research should examine the long-term impact of the virtual Community of Practice on academic career trajectories and professional networking in doctoral education.
No Patient or Public Contribution. This study focused on PhD nursing students' experiences in a virtual scholarly event, involving only academic participants. As it was not a healthcare intervention or service-related study, patient or public involvement was not applicable.
Infant feeding practices in the first 2 years of life are linked to long-term weight trajectories. Despite the importance of obesity prevention interventions, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary caregiver-targeted interventions on child weight and feeding outcomes.
To assess the efficacy of an 18-month digital health intervention (Tiny Bites) delivered to ECEC services and primary caregivers of children aged 4 to ≤12 months on child age-adjusted and sex-adjusted body mass index-for-age z-score (zBMI) relative to usual care control in the Hunter New England (HNE) region of New South Wales, Australia.
This type 1 hybrid cluster RCT will include up to 60 ECEC services and 540 children/caregiver dyads. The intervention supports ECEC services and caregivers to deliver recommended responsive feeding practices to infants. ECEC services will receive access to an online assessment platform, training and resources, and implementation support. Primary caregivers will receive text messages, monthly e-newsletters, online links and direct communication from ECEC services. We will assess the impact on child zBMI at 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include duration of consuming any breastmilk, child diet and caregiver responsive feeding practices. We will also assess ECEC policy and practice implementation related to targeted feeding practices, programme cost effectiveness, adverse effects and engagement with the programme (ECECs and caregivers). For the primary outcome, between-group differences will be assessed for paired data using two-level hierarchical linear regression models.
Ethics approval has been provided by HNE Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (2023/ETH01158), Deakin University (2024-202) and University of Newcastle HREC (R-2024-0039). Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific conferences locally and internationally and to relevant practice stakeholders.
ACTRN12624000576527.
There is an absence of real-world evidence, especially from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), on the implementation successes and challenges of COVID-19 Test and Treat (T&T) programmes. In 2022, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was provided as standard of care for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in eight LMICs (Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia). This manuscript describes a research protocol to study novel drug introduction during the COVID-19 health emergency, with implications and learnings for future pandemic preparedness. The goal of the study is to provide simultaneous programme learnings and improvements with programme rollout, to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programmes of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform programme implementation and scale-up in other LMICs.
This multiple methods implementation research study is divided into three components to address key operational research objectives: (1) programme learnings, monitoring and evaluation; (2) patient-level programme impact; and (3) key stakeholder perspectives. Data collection will occur for a minimum of 6 months in each country up to the end of grant. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for each country and then aggregated across the programme countries. Stakeholder perspectives will be examined using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research implementation science framework and semistructured interviews.
This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00111388). The study was also approved by the local institutional review boards in each country participating in individual-level data collection (objectives 2 and 3): Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Nigeria and Zambia. The study’s findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through dialogue events, national and international conferences and through social media.
FreshRSS 