FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Pluralising Scholarship: Repositioning Doctor of Nursing Practice Faculty Through Boyer's Framework: A Discursive Paper

ABSTRACT

Aim

To critically examine the structural exclusion of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared faculty from academic advancement and promotion pathways and to propose reforms grounded in Boyer's model of scholarship.

Background

The DNP is a practice-focused doctorate established in the United States, distinct from the research-oriented PhD. Similar professional doctorates in the United Kingdom and Australia share the goal of integrating clinical expertise with scholarly inquiry. Despite the rapid growth of DNP programs and the increasing recognition of applied scholarship, many universities continue to privilege traditional research metrics in academic tenure and promotion. This narrow focus on discovery-based outputs marginalises the contributions of DNP faculty in implementation science, systems leadership, and education.

Design

Discursive position paper.

Data Sources

Analysis of policy reports, faculty promotion guidelines, AACN Essentials, and peer-reviewed literature on doctoral education, professional doctorates, and academic equity, 2000–2025.

Implications for Doctoral Education

Current academic evaluation systems sustain hierarchical norms that undervalue practice-based scholarship. This misalignment restricts the career trajectories of DNP-prepared faculty and constrains nursing's leadership in applied innovation. Reframing scholarly legitimacy through Boyer's model of discovery, integration, application, and teaching enables recognition of diverse expertise without compromising academic rigour.

Conclusion

Fully integrating professional doctorates into academic structures requires deliberate reforms in evaluation frameworks, mentorship programs, and institutional policies. Such changes would advance equity, reflect the realities of modern nursing, and align doctoral education with the evolving needs of healthcare systems.

Impact

This paper contributes to the international discourse on the future of doctoral education by offering a practical model for inclusive faculty advancement. It also advocates adopting pluralistic definitions of scholarship to support diverse academic career paths in nursing.

No Patient or Public Contribution

No patients, service users, caregivers, or members of the public were involved in the development of this discursive paper. The analysis synthesises existing scholarship, policy documents, and theoretical frameworks and does not draw on primary data requiring patient or public involvement.

Mixed methods implementation research of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries: a study protocol

Por: Narayanasamy · S. · Gambanga · F. · Boeke · C. E. · Udayakumar · K. · Brothers · L. · Wolfe · C. R. · Agwuocha · C. · Asamoa-Amoakohene · M. N. · Detleuxay · K. · Griffith · B. C. · Hamza · N. · Joseph · J. · Kimani · P. · Kirungi · R. · Lufesi · N. · Mbewe · N. · McCarthy · E. · Mulenga
Introduction

There is an absence of real-world evidence, especially from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), on the implementation successes and challenges of COVID-19 Test and Treat (T&T) programmes. In 2022, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was provided as standard of care for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in eight LMICs (Ghana, Kenya, Laos, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and Zambia). This manuscript describes a research protocol to study novel drug introduction during the COVID-19 health emergency, with implications and learnings for future pandemic preparedness. The goal of the study is to provide simultaneous programme learnings and improvements with programme rollout, to fill a gap in real-world implementation data on T&T programmes of oral antiviral treatment for COVID-19 and inform programme implementation and scale-up in other LMICs.

Methods and analysis

This multiple methods implementation research study is divided into three components to address key operational research objectives: (1) programme learnings, monitoring and evaluation; (2) patient-level programme impact; and (3) key stakeholder perspectives. Data collection will occur for a minimum of 6 months in each country up to the end of grant. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for each country and then aggregated across the programme countries. Stakeholder perspectives will be examined using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research implementation science framework and semistructured interviews.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board (Pro00111388). The study was also approved by the local institutional review boards in each country participating in individual-level data collection (objectives 2 and 3): Ghana, Malawi, Rwanda, Nigeria and Zambia. The study’s findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through dialogue events, national and international conferences and through social media.

Trial registration number

NCT06360783.

❌