To investigate how patients with sarcoma present prior to diagnosis—through a general practitioner (GP) or another healthcare professional (HCP)—and describe presenting symptoms.

International observational cohort study.

Data were obtained from the longitudinal ‘QUality of life and Experiences of Sarcoma Trajectories’ (QUEST) cohort study, conducted across the Netherlands, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia and New Zealand.

Among 572 patients, 487 (85.1%) started their diagnostic trajectory at the GP (subcohort 1) and 85 (14.9%) with another HCP (subcohort 2)—mainly medical specialists treating unrelated conditions (36/85; 42.4%). Soft tissue sarcoma patients most often reported swelling, whereas bone sarcoma patients reported unexplained pain. Notably, 31/85 (36.5%) of subcohort 2 were asymptomatic. Reasons for delaying GP visits included assuming symptoms were minor and expecting them to resolve. Patients sought care when, among others, symptoms persisted and worsened.

Most patients first consulted a GP, underlining the role of primary care in sarcoma diagnosis internationally. Due to rarity and nonspecific symptoms, faster diagnosis remains challenging, requiring improvements in both primary and specialist care.

NCT03441906; Results.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a common and severe infection, with a 90-day mortality of 24%–32%. Cloxacillin is regarded as a first-line antibiotic treatment in SAB in Sweden. However, exposure to cloxacillin in real-world hospitalised patients with SAB, most of whom are elderly patients treated outside the intensive care unit, is not well described. There are also limited data on the role of unbound cloxacillin exposure in relation to renal function or drug-induced toxicity.

This multicentre, prospective, observational clinical trial will include 95 adult patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteraemia, treated with cloxacillin. Patients with endocarditis, polymicrobial bacteraemia or those considered unsuitable for cloxacillin treatment are excluded. Trough and peak total and unbound cloxacillin concentrations will be measured at steady state at days 2 and 7. Blood cultures will be obtained at days 2, 3, 4 and 7 to assess time to negative culture. Renal function will be assessed daily for plasma creatinine and at days 1 and 6 for cystatin C and for 12-hour urine creatinine clearance. In a novel approach to detecting nephrotoxicity, renal tubular damage biomarkers will be measured at days 1 and 6 (KIM-1, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urine cystatin C, alpha-1-microglobulin). Detection of neurologic symptoms such as confusion, tremor, hallucinations and convulsions, as well as consciousness, will be monitored daily using a structured evaluation form.

We aim to investigate to which extent target attainment (100% of the dosing interval during which the free (unbound) drug concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration) is achieved with standard dosing of cloxacillin in a real-world cohort of hospitalised patients with SAB, and whether initial renal function can predict who is at risk for underdosing or overdosing. We will also explore whether neurological or renal damage is prevalent and associated with cloxacillin levels.

Ethics approval has been granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (EUCT 2023-505148-20-00) as part of a low-intervention clinical trial approval according to EU regulation 536/2014. Results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and at academic conferences.

EUCT 2023-505148-20-00.

To compare clinical radiography training experiences (structure, resources, participation, feedback) and self-perceived competence/practice readiness between public and private radiography centres in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Comparative cross-sectional survey design from August to October 2025 using a validated self-administered questionnaire distributed in person during departmental seminars and clinical debriefings at University of Lagos-affiliated centres.

Centre-based settings at public and private radiodiagnostic centres.

A total of 260 final-year students and recent graduates, 130 each from public and private radiodiagnostic centres. Inclusion criteria included: age ≥18 years, with ≥6 months clinical exposure, from centres affiliated to the University of Lagos. All participants completed the self-administered questionnaire. There were no interventions.

The primary outcome was the self-perceived competence/practice readiness, and the secondary was participation, extent and feedback mechanisms, measured as planned without protocol deviations. All variables were measured using validated items in the questionnaire.

Private centres significantly outperformed public centres in hands-on practice and feedback, with higher self-perceived competence (mean 35.6±5.7 vs 32.8±6.4; p=0.001). There were no significant differences in training structure (p=0.78). Public centres reported higher patient loads (86.2% vs 68.5%; p=0.001) but lower equipment availability (47.7% vs 72.3%; p

Private centres were associated with higher self-perceived competence and readiness, better resources and feedback, while public centres offered greater patient volumes. Hybrid placements and targeted infrastructure investment are recommended to help address disparities in perceived readiness.

Novel diagnostics, particularly point-of-care (POC) tests, play a crucial role in the early detection and management of infectious diseases, especially in resource-limited settings. Ensuring test performance and quality while minimising the risk of human error becomes more relevant when shifting testing tasks from highly controlled settings like centralised laboratories to people with minimal training. Applying usability and human factors engineering principles can reduce the challenges related to human errors. Despite existing frameworks and tools, the practical application of usability guidelines remains variable across different settings.

This scoping review protocol outlines a systematic investigation of current practices in assessing the usability of novel diagnostics, particularly POC tests for infectious diseases intended for use in low-income and middle-income countries. The review will analyse original research studies of all designs and product dossiers that report on the usability evaluation or validation of a diagnostic test for an infectious disease. A qualitative synthesis of the data extracted from the articles will be conducted. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for this scoping review.

No ethical approval is required because individual patient data will not be included. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.