FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Femoral radiographic indices for pre-operative osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal female patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis

by Masanori Nishi, Yasushi Yoshikawa, Yuki Usui, Hajime Nishida, Shota Nakamura, Koichiro Tashiro, Yoshifumi Kudo

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between femoral morphological indices from anteroposterior hip radiographs and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-assessed bone mineral density in postmenopausal female patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis. We also evaluated the impact of hip deformity on these correlations and the diagnostic cut-off values for osteoporosis. This retrospective study, conducted at a single institute (February 2018 to July 2024), reviewed the data of postmenopausal patients (>50 years old) with hip osteoarthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Patients with a history of hip surgical procedures, infection, metabolic bone disease, or inadequate imaging findings were excluded. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess bone mineral density at the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, and distal radius. Five femoral indices were measured: the canal-to-calcar ratio, canal flare index, cortical thickness index, canal diaphysis ratio, and canal bone area ratio. Analyses included Pearson’s correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Moderate correlations were observed between total hip bone mineral density and indices in 95 hip osteoarthritic joints (all Tönnis grade 3) and 86 normal joints. The canal bone area ratio had the strongest correlation (hip osteoarthritis: r = −0.61; normal: r = −0.62; p 

Serum albumin and gamma gap levels, and combined effect for risk of mortality in a Japanese population from the J-MICC study

by Kenichi Shibuya, Rie Ibusuki, Daisaku Nishimoto, Shiroh Tanoue, Chihaya Koriyama, Shuhei Niiyama, Yasuyuki Kakihana, Toshiro Takezaki, Megumi Hara, Yuichiro Nishida, Sadao Suzuki, Takeshi Nishiyama, Mako Nagayoshi, Takashi Tamura, Yudai Tamada, Rieko Okada, Teruhide Koyama, Satomi Tomida, Kiyonori Kuriki, Jun Otonari, Hiroaki Ikezaki, Asahi Hishida, Masashi Ishizu, Sakurako Katsuura-Kamano, Kenji Wakai, Keitaro Matsuo, for the J-MICC Study group

Although the clinical importance of serum albumin and gamma gap levels is well established, it is unclear how these levels are associated with health risks in the general population. This cohort study aimed to clarify the association between serum albumin and gamma gap levels, and their combined effect, and mortality risk in a Japanese population. The participants totaled 35,746 (17,160 men and 18,586 women) aged 35–69 years from the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study. The mean follow-up period was 11.8 years, with 1,529 deaths and 1,907 censoring. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals after adjusting for related factors. Increased HRs of low albumin and high gamma gap levels were respectively observed for deaths from all-causes, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory system diseases without pneumonia, and other-causes; and the HR was the highest on respiratory system diseases without pneumonia (HR = 7.31, 4.15–12.9). Low albumin and low gamma gap levels were strongly associated for pneumonia death (HR = 12.4, 3.98–38.5). The interaction between albumin and gamma gap levels was significant for deaths from all-causes, pneumonia and other-causes. The dose relationship for each association was dose-dependent in albumin and threshold-type in gamma gap, except for other-causes. This study suggests that albumin and gamma gap levels are independent indicators of an increased risk of mortality in a Japanese population. Combined effect was apparent for mortality from all-causes, pneumonia, and other-causes.

Neurological outcomes with hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with moderate initial illness severity following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (R-CAST OHCA)

Por: Naito · H. · Nishikimi · M. · Okada · Y. · Maeyama · H. · Kiguchi · T. · Yorifuji · T. · Nishida · K. · Matsui · S. · Kuroda · Y. · Nishiyama · K. · Iwami · T. · Nakao · A. · JAAM R-CAST OHCA Trial Group · Nishikimi · Otani · Ryosuke · Yumoto · Hayakawa · Sakurai · Fukushima · Tanaka
Introduction

Temperature control is a fundamental intervention for neuroprotection following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) remains unclear. Retrospective studies suggest that the clinical effectiveness of hypothermia may depend on the severity of PCAS. The R-CAST OHCA trial aims to compare the efficacy of hypothermia versus normothermia in improving 30-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderately severe PCAS following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods and analysis

The multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) is conducted with the participation of 35 emergency and critical care centres and/or intensive care units at academic and non-academic hospitals. The study enrols moderately severe PCAS patients, defined as those with a revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for induced Therapeutic Hypothermia score of 5.5–15.5. A target number of 380 participants will be enrolled. Participants are randomised to undergo either hypothermia or normothermia within 3 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Patients in the hypothermia group are cooled and maintained at 34°C until 28 hours post-randomisation, followed by rewarming to 37°C at a rate of 0.25°C/hour. Patients in the normothermia group are maintained at normothermia (36.5°C–37.7°C). Total periods of intervention, including the cooling, maintenance and rewarming phases, will occur 40 hours after randomisation. Other treatments for PCAS can be determined by the treating physicians. The primary outcome is a favourable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 30 days after randomisation and compared using an intention-to-treat analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Ethics Committee (approval number: R2201-001). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants or their authorised surrogates. Results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

jRCT1062220035.

❌