FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

How do medical and social contexts affect telemedicine efficiency and quality? A propensity-score matching protocol in Canadas primary care

Por: Tsuei · S. H.-T. · McGrail · K. · Law · M. · Stucchi · A. · Hedden · L.
Introduction

Telemedicine use has risen significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence suggests that the quality of care in telemedicine could be as good as in-person care, but this is likely context-dependent. Expert guidelines have declared the appropriate medical conditions, but often without empirical evidence that grapples with the fundamental information limitations facing telemedicine. We draw on the task-technology fit theory and empirical evidence around human communication to examine how the medical and social contexts affect the efficiency and clinical quality of primary care.

Methods and analysis

We will use a population-based dataset from the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) to inform a quasi-experimental study using propensity score matching (PSM). The treatment group will consist of telemedicine visits from April to December 2022. We will use PSM to create a control group of matched, in-person visits in the same period. We will then use cluster-robust linear regression to identify how specific medical conditions and social contexts are associated with higher rates of prescription, follow-up with primary care providers, emergency department visits and acute care admissions. We plan for the study to take place from 1 August 2025 to 1 August 2026.

Ethics and dissemination

The Research Ethics BC has granted approval for this study (H21-02244-A006). Our findings will be shared with patients, healthcare providers and policymakers and disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

A phase I, open-label, multicentre, first-in-human study to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of AMG 404, a PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumours

Por: Price · T. · Lugowska · I. · Chawla · S. P. · Falchook · G. · Subbiah · V. · Monzon · J. G. · Arkenau · H.-T. · Hui · M. · Kuboki · Y. · Dziadziuszko · R. · Shibaki · R. · Hong · M. H. · Tan · D. · Rocha Lima · C. M. · Wang · K. · Hindoyan · A. · Shi · W. · Wong · H. · Kistler · M. · Prenen
Objective

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary antitumour activity of AMG 404, a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death-1, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Design

First-in-human phase I study comprising eight dose expansion cohorts, including cohorts with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumours and non-small cell lung cancer with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression (NSCLC/PDL1-H, tumour proportion score ≥50%).

Setting

Conducted across 28 global sites.

Participants

This study enrolled adult patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation. The inclusion criteria included a life expectancy of >3 months, ≥1 measurable or evaluable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) V.1.1, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2 and adequate haematological, renal and hepatic function. Patients with prior treatment with checkpoint inhibitors, primary brain tumour or untreated or symptomatic brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease and history of other malignancy within the past 2 years were excluded.

Interventions

The planned doses were 240 mg, 480 mg and 1050 mg of AMG 404 administered every 4 weeks (Q4W).

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, changes in vital signs and clinical laboratory tests. Secondary endpoints included PK parameters, incidence of antidrug (AMG 404) antibodies and antitumour activity assessed per modified RECIST V.1.1 (objective response, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control and duration of stable disease).

Results

A total of 171 patients were enrolled; 168 were treated. Median (range) follow-up was 36.3 weeks (1.6–137.1). No DLTs were observed. Grade 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16 (9.5%) and 12 (7.1%) patients, respectively. The 480 mg Q4W dose was selected as the recommended phase II dose. AMG 404 serum exposure increased approximately dose proportionally. The objective response rate (80% CI) was 19.6% (15.7–24.1) for the overall population and 36.6% (26.4–47.8) and 30.8% (14.2–‍52.3) for cohorts with MSI-H tumours (n=41) and NSCLC/PDL1-H (n=13), respectively. The overall disease control rate (80% CI) was 54.8% (49.5–59.9). The median (80% CI) PFS was 3.7 (3.5–4.5) months for the overall population and 14.8 (9.0–not estimable) and 4.4 (2.2–9.7) months for cohorts with MSI-H tumours and NSCLC/PDL1-H, respectively.

Conclusions

AMG 404 monotherapy was tolerable at the tested doses, with encouraging antitumour activity observed across tumour types.

Trial registration number

NCT03853109.

❌