Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have become the leading cause of mortality globally, with a sharp rise in Iran due to lifestyle changes and urbanisation. Although many NCD risk factors are modifiable, limited understanding of their determinants hinders effective prevention. To address this, the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN) Cohort was established in 2014 to study NCDs nationwide. The Sabzevar PERSIAN Cohort Study (SPECS) is the first in northeastern Iran, aiming to investigate environmental and social factors influencing NCDs in a unique regional context.

SPECS enrolled 5174 adults (aged 35–70 years) in northeastern Iran between January 2018 and January 2019 through a census and an online registration process. The baseline data collection included demographic verification, informed consent, health questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and biological samples (blood, urine, hair, nails). The annual follow-up began in April 2019, with full reassessments every 5 years over a 15-year period. The data is gathered via an active and passive follow-up, supported by trained staff and registry linkages.

Of the 5174 participants, 4241 (81%) remained in the study. Among the cohort, 54.5% were female, with a mean age of 50.5 years. The majority were married (93.5%), and nearly half had at least high-school education (46.5%) and moderate socioeconomic status (49.4%). Drug abuse history (smoking/drugs) was reported by about 15% of the sample. The mean body mass index was 26.9 kg/m², and the average blood pressure was higher in males (118.1/74.0 mm Hg) than in females (111.5/70.2 mm Hg). The common conditions included hypertension (22.8%), kidney stones (22.4%), fatty liver (15.4%) and diabetes (13.8%). Cancer had the highest treatment rate (100%), while fatty liver had the lowest (70.1%). Stroke had the highest mean age of onset (51.2 years), and epilepsy the lowest (23.7 years). All health data were self-reported.

SPECS, part of the national PERSIAN cohort initiative, is the only adult NCD-focused study in Khorasan Razavi. Its 15-year follow-up aims to generate region-specific insights into the incidence of NCDs and their risk factors. The ethnically homogeneous sample enhances statistical power, and the findings may inform culturally tailored health policies. While self-reported data have limitations due to bias, high initial participation and access to free healthcare support long-term engagement, especially among lower-income groups.

This study investigates the association between healthcare staff turnover and quality of care in nursing homes.1 2 In recent years, the healthcare industry has faced serious challenges regarding workforce shortages. Particularly in long-term care facilities such as nursing homes, staff shortages and high turnover rates are considered major problems.1 2 This situation has not only negatively impacted patient care quality, but has also placed considerable pressure on healthcare systems...

Childbirth readiness can reflect women’s childbirth readiness in terms of knowledge, psychological aspects and planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate childbirth readiness, its related factors and consequences in Iranian pregnant women.

This longitudinal study was the first stage (quantitative stage) of a sequential explanatory mixed-method study. It followed women during late pregnancy (from 37 weeks of gestation) and the postpartum period (4–6 weeks after childbirth) from March to September 2023.

Health centres of Tabriz, Iran.

This study involved 360 pregnant women with a gestational age of 37 weeks and above, selected via cluster sampling. Participants were excluded for high-risk pregnancies, unfavourable incidents in the last 3 months, mental-psychological diseases or a prior caesarean section.

Childbirth readiness and its related factors were assessed using several instruments completed from the 37th week of pregnancy onward, including the Childbirth Readiness Scale, a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pregnancy Experience Scale and the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire Version A. The consequences of childbirth readiness were then evaluated 4–6 weeks post partum using the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Postpartum-Specific Anxiety Scale.

The mean (SD) childbirth readiness score was 67.83 (9.41) out of 90. In the adjusted general linear model (GLM), several factors were significantly associated with lower readiness. These included a higher fear of childbirth score (β –0.12, 95% CI –0.16 to –0.08, p

Key factors associated with readiness included fear of childbirth, obstetric history (gravidity, parity, history of abortion and participation in childbirth readiness classes), maternal education, home ownership, husband’s occupation—though several associations showed small effect sizes. After adjustment, readiness did not independently predict childbirth experience or postpartum mental health. The low participation rate in readiness courses highlights a major service gap. Integrating readiness assessment into prenatal care and expanding access to targeted education are recommended to improve outcomes such as birth satisfaction and caesarean rates.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome characterised by primary cardiac dysfunction. Despite advances in therapeutic options such as mechanical cardiac support, it remains associated with high mortality. Although previous registries have described heterogeneous populations and outcomes across different centres, contemporary real-world data on management practices remain limited. This gap is particularly evident in low- and middle-income countries, where there is no robust registry that clearly defines the current state of CS management. Therefore, a multicentre registry is needed to better characterise current practices and outcomes. Our study aims to gain insight into current therapeutic trends in Mexico, a low- to middle-income country with a significant cardiovascular disease burden.

The Mexican Registry of Cardiogenic Shock is a quality initiative that aims to identify therapeutic trends, demographic characteristics and clinical presentations. It also aims to evaluate outcomes, including mortality and cognitive function at in-hospital and 1-year follow-ups, and to identify areas for improvement in the care process across the broad spectrum of CS.

Ethical approval for this multicentre study was obtained from the local research ethics committees of all participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated to all participating institutions in the form of summary reports and presentations on completion of the analysis.

While health services leaders rely heavily on information gathered via environmental scans (ESs) to guide strategic decision-making, formal guidance on how to conduct these scans is notably absent. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of agreement on essential components of a definition and a methodological framework for ESs. The goals were to (1) advance our working definition to a concept definition for ESs and (2) develop a methodological framework to guide health service researchers conducting ESs.

We used a real-time, modified Delphi survey in a virtual platform setting to seek perspectives on statements related to ESs from individuals who were recruited based on having verifiable experience designing or conducting ESs in health services delivery research. Surveylet, an online software, was used to facilitate asynchronous data collection and to determine the level of agreement on the statements with an a priori threshold of 75% set for agreement on each statement.

21 panellists provided opinions on 59 statements related to a proposed ES definition and on 69 statements specific to components of a methodological framework for ESs.

Panellists from four countries participated in the survey representing 2 to ≥11 years of experience with ESs and having completed 1 to ≥7 ESs. Agreement was achieved in 28 of the 59 statements related to the ES definition and for 51 of 69 statements related to a methodological framework.

The agreement on many elements deemed essential for a definition of ES support development of a proposed concept definition of ES in health service delivery research. As well, the agreement on components deemed necessary for a methodological framework will help in future development of such a framework to guide stakeholders in the planning and implementation of ESs. These results provide a starting point for a common understanding of ESs in the field of health services delivery research.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions account for up to one-third of general practice consultations and over one-fifth of emergency department attendances in the UK. Postpandemic, the elective orthopaedic surgery backlog remains one of the most substantial across surgical specialties. Despite this burden, undergraduate exposure to trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) remains limited and inconsistent. Most UK medical students receive only 2–3 weeks of T&O teaching, with up to 40% of foundation doctors feeling underprepared to manage MSK conditions. The Evaluation of Trauma and Orthopaedic Teaching in Medical Schools Nationally (TENDON Study) aims to evaluate the current state of undergraduate T&O education in UK medical schools from both student and educator perspectives.

This national, prospective, cross-sectional survey will be conducted between 25 July and 27 October 2025. A dual-instrument electronic survey was developed through Qualtrics, informed by the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) Undergraduate Curriculum and UK Medical Licensing Assessment content map. Participants will include medical students (Years 1–6), foundation doctors and orthopaedic educators recruited through British Orthopaedic Medical Students Association and BOA networks, and designated school representatives. Survey domains include curriculum coverage, teaching methods, clinical exposure and self-reported competence. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics; qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis. Reporting will follow the Checklist for Reporting Of Survey Studies framework, with relevant elements drawn from the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys checklist.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Biology Research Ethics Committee, University of Cambridge. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and summary reports to curriculum leads and relevant educational bodies.

The Shoulder Instability Registry (SIR) was established in 2019 to systematically capture and monitor outcomes following surgical treatment of shoulder instability (SI). The aim of this cohort profile is to describe the purpose, design, data structure and baseline characteristics of the SIR, and to outline how the registry supports longitudinal assessment of safety, functional recovery, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of SI.

The registry includes all patients treated surgically for SI. Data collection includes medical history of instability, surgical techniques and intraoperative findings. Clinical assessments include range of motion, instability-specific tests, hyperlaxity signs, Constant Score, subjective shoulder value and SI-specific scores such as the ROWE Score and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Radiological evaluations included initial and follow-up imaging via X-rays and CT to assess bony lesions and SI-related arthropathy, as well as MRI for soft tissue injuries. Data are documented preoperatively, at 6 months and at 24 months postoperatively. Although the SIR is an observational cohort rather than a randomised clinical trial, treatment effectiveness is evaluated through longitudinal changes in validated patient-reported outcomes, clinical performance measures and imaging findings.

Between January 2019 and December 2024, 668 patients have been registered (mean age 31 years, 82% men, mean body mass index of 25). According to the American Association of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification, 66% of patients were classified as ASA I, 33% as ASA II and only 1% as ASA III. 69% of admissions were due to accidents and 31% due to illness. Mean surgery duration was 75 min, and the median hospital stay was 2 days. 38% of patients were insured privately and had general insurance in 62%. 85% of cases were treated arthroscopically, and 15% were treated openly. Baseline clinical scores showed a mean Constant Score of 77 points, mean subjective shoulder value of 49%, mean ROWE Score of 46 points and mean Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index of 53. Based on Gerber’s classification, 68% of cases were type B2, 29% B3, 2% B5 and fewer than 2% were classified as B4 or B1. 85% of cases suffered from anterior instability, while only 13% experienced posterior instability, the remaining 2% showed multidirectional instability. Among posterior cases, Moroder’s classification identified 58% as type B2, 19% as A2, 7% as A1, 6% as B1, 6% as C1 and 4% as C2. Regarding osteochondral lesions, 20% showed none, 31% showed a glenoid defect, 54% showed a Hill-Sachs lesion and 13% showed a cartilage defect. Scheibel’s classification identified glenoid defects as type 3a in 38% of cases, type 2 in 24%, type 1a in 13% of cases, type 3b in 11%, type 1b in 8% and type 1c in 5% of cases. Positive Gagey and Walch signs were observed in 29% and 27% of cases, respectively. Dislocations presented as primary events in 24% of cases, while 76% were recurrent. Surgical interventions included 459 (70%) Bankart repairs, 6 Bankart plus repairs (

We will continue prospectively enrolling and monitoring patients that receive surgical treatment of SI. There are no current plans to halt the data collection in the near future, thereby consistently increasing the number of patients in the registry. A larger availability of data will additionally allow us to apply machine learning modelling and develop risk-prediction tools with the goal of aiding surgical decision making.

Prolonged glucocorticoid (GC) use is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including the development of GC induced adrenal insufficiency. Recent guidance from the European Society of Endocrinology and Endocrine Society provides a framework for tapering GCs. However, there is limited understanding of current practice across endocrine and other medical specialties, including barriers and challenges to GC weaning. This study aimed to establish how GCs are weaned in patients across endocrine and non-endocrine specialists.

Anonymous online surveys were disseminated to all members of the Society for Endocrinology and all members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations Federation of Endocrine Societies and the Endocrine and Metabolic Society of Singapore. Non-endocrine specialists were surveyed in the UK and in Singapore.

A total of 306 (258 endocrine specialists and 48 non-endocrine specialists) responded to the survey. Approaches to discontinuing prednisolone were heterogeneous. Among endocrine respondents, only 78% would fully wean the prednisolone, with 50.4% switching to hydrocortisone to wean and 12.6% favouring long-term GC replacement without further investigations. Among the non-endocrine respondents, 16.7% would stop prednisolone abruptly and 10.4% would refer to endocrinology to supervise weaning. The most common barrier to weaning GCs reported by both endocrine and non-endocrine specialists was relapse of the underlying condition (55.9% and 70.8%, respectively).

Relapse of the underlying condition is common, and endocrinology input may not be appropriate when this occurs. There remains a need to develop an evidence-based approach for safe and effective GC weaning and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis assessment.

To explore barriers and facilitators to a good death in patients with respiratory disease when advanced respiratory support, including non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), is used. Specifically, we examined healthcare professionals’ perspectives on what constitutes a good death in this context, how treatment failure is recognised, how decisions to continue or withdraw therapy are made, and the impact of providing this care on staff.

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and reflexive thematic analysis.

Secondary care services in a large UK National Health Service Trust, including acute medicine, general medicine, respiratory medicine and palliative care.

25 healthcare professionals (19 female, 6 male) from multidisciplinary backgrounds, including doctors, nurses and physiotherapists. Participants self-identified as experienced in the provision of NIV/CPAP at the end of life. Staff working primarily in intensive care units were excluded.

None.

Not applicable.

Healthcare professionals described the complexity of caring for patients dying while receiving or recently withdrawn from NIV/CPAP. Five interrelated themes were identified: beliefs around dying well, symptom management during active treatment, recognition of treatment failure, negotiated decision-making and the process of withdrawal. Staff reported tensions between providing active treatment and ensuring comfort, inconsistent practices regarding symptom control and withdrawal, and conflicts within multidisciplinary teams. Nurses highlighted hidden psychological and relational labour in supporting patients, while doctors often described delays in decision-making to align families with treatment withdrawal.

Caring for patients using NIV/CPAP at the end of life presents ethical, clinical and emotional challenges for staff, patients and families. Variation in practices and perspectives highlights the need for structured training, interdisciplinary approaches and greater recognition of the often hidden relational and emotional labour involved in this work, particularly among nursing colleagues. Further research should evaluate strategies to support consistent and compassionate withdrawal practices.

To develop a context-specific health technology assessment (HTA) framework tailored to the healthcare needs and system of Iran, to improve evidence-based decision-making, optimise resource allocation and support progress towards universal health coverage.

A mixed-methods Delphi consensus study conducted using a three-phase, sequential approach: document review, qualitative focus group discussions and Delphi consensus rounds. The study reporting follows the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document guideline to ensure transparent reporting of consensus methods.

A national-level study conducted in Iran’s healthcare system between January 2023 and March 2024, including perspectives from public and academic institutions, policy bodies and patient organisations.

The study involved 18 purposively selected stakeholders in three focus group discussions, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives. Subsequently, 20 HTA experts participated in three iterative Delphi rounds to refine and reach consensus on the framework components.

Identification of core components and operational steps required to develop and implement a comprehensive HTA framework in Iran.

The final HTA framework includes nine core components: (1) establishing a national HTA body; (2) engaging stakeholders; (3) building capacity through training and research; (4) developing standard HTA methodologies; (5) implementing prioritisation and evaluation processes; (6) ensuring sustainable funding; (7) enhancing transparency and accountability; (8) promoting continuous improvement and (9) fostering innovation. Detailed operational steps and micro-activities were developed for each component. The framework achieved an 84% consensus among Delphi panellists, indicating strong agreement on its content and applicability.

This tailored HTA framework provides a structured roadmap to institutionalise evidence-based decision-making in Iran’s healthcare system. Its implementation can strengthen the efficiency, equity and sustainability of healthcare planning and policy. Pilot testing is recommended to assess feasibility and scalability, with potential to serve as a model for other low-income and middle-income countries.

To estimate the treatment outcomes among individuals treated for hypertension in the public sector in 89 districts across 15 states in India and to identify the risk factors for uncontrolled blood pressure (BP).

An analysis of a cohort of people with hypertension from 2018 to 2022 from public sector health facilities.

All India Hypertension Control Initiative (IHCI) implementing districts using digital information systems across 15 states of India, namely Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Nagaland, Puducherry, Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal.

Individuals aged 30 years or older, who were diagnosed with hypertension or on medication at the time of registration between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were included in the study.

Treatment outcomes were controlled BP, uncontrolled BP and missed visits in the reporting quarter (1 January 2022–31 March 2022). We analysed the risk factors for uncontrolled BP.

Out of 1, 235, 453 hypertensive individuals enrolled in the IHCI project across 15 states, 1, 046, 512 remained under care, with 44% BP control. The control varied from 26% to 57% in various types of facilities. The states of Maharashtra, Punjab and Rajasthan had above 50% control, while Nagaland, Jharkhand and Bihar had below 25%. BP control declined from 68% when defined using a single recent reading to 52% when defined using the two-visit readings. Younger individuals (

We documented the implementation of IHCI strategies at scale and measured treatment outcomes in a large cohort. Overall, BP control improved with variations across states. We need focused strategies to improve control in higher-level facilities, among males and people with diabetes. Using two BP readings may support consistent treatment adherence.

Military personnel are a unique population with heightened vulnerability to sexually transmitted infections (STIs), often exhibiting higher prevalence rates than civilians due to demographic, environmental and occupational factors. These vulnerabilities underscore the need for global prevalence estimates to guide effective, evidence-based interventions. This study aims to quantify the global burden of STIs among military personnel, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment.

This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Guidelines (2020). Using the CoCoPop (Condition, Context, and Population) framework, a comprehensive search strategy will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health and Scopus to retrieve peer-reviewed records published between January 2010 and June 2025. Eligible studies will report numerical STI prevalence data among military personnel. Studies with insufficient information to calculate prevalence or those relying on self-reported STI data will be excluded. Data extraction will include study details, military descriptors, STI prevalence and diagnostic methods. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical assessment tool for prevalence and incidence studies. Prevalence estimates with 95% CIs will be reported for each STI and, where appropriate, pooled for curable STIs. Subgroup analyses will stratify prevalence by geographic region, service status, deployment status and socioeconomic factors. Heterogeneity will be evaluated within predefined subgroups using the I² statistic. Data will be presented in comprehensive tables and visualised with graphical tools, including forest plots for subgroup analyses and pooled estimates.

Ethical approval is not required for this review. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

CRD42023472113.