Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a broad range of diseases associated with abnormalities/degeneration of retinal cells. We aimed to identify the top 10 Australian research priorities for IRDs to ultimately facilitate more meaningful and potentially cost-effective research.

We conducted a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership that involved two Australian-wide surveys and online workshops.

Australia-wide.

Individuals aged 16 years or older were eligible to participate if they had an IRD, were caregivers of an individual with an IRD or were health professionals providing care to this community.

In Survey 1, we gathered participants’ unanswered questions about IRDs. We grouped these into summary questions and undertook a literature review to verify if they were truly unanswered (ie, evidence uncertainties). In Survey 2, participants voted for the uncertainties that they considered a priority. Top-ranked uncertainties progressed for discussion and final prioritisation in two workshops.

In Survey 1, we collected 223 questions from 69 participants. We grouped these into 42 summary questions and confirmed 41 as evidence uncertainties. In Survey 2, 151 participants voted, with the 16 uncertainties progressing to final prioritisation. The top 10 priorities, set by the 24 workshop participants, represented (1) treatment/cure; (2) symptoms and disease progression; (3) psychosocial well-being and (4) health service delivery. The #1 priority was for treatment to prevent, slow down or stop vision loss, followed by the #2 priority to address the psychological impact of having an IRD.

The top 10 research priorities highlight the need for IRD research that takes a whole-person, systems approach. Collaborations to progress priorities will accelerate the translation of research into real-world benefits.

To understand and compare women’s antenatal and postnatal views on: (1) priorities for information provided about labour and delivery and (2) decision-making in labour and delivery.

Qualitative interview study using repeat interviews at two time points: during pregnancy (≥13 weeks gestation); and after birth (≥6 weeks).

Large maternity hospital in the Southwest of England.

Pregnant women accessing antenatal care were purposively sampled and recruited antenatally by community midwives to ensure representation from different sociodemographic groups, with diverse experiences of low and high-risk care.

Telephone interviews with a single researcher using a semistructured interview topic guide.

Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke’s six-stage process.

Twelve women participated (12 antenatal interviews; 10 follow-up postnatal interviews). Overall, women’s postnatal views were consistent with their antenatal views about what they wanted to know and the factors that influence decision-making. Three themes were generated. Theme 1 ‘Sources of information’ presents evidence of how women obtain and use information (sub-themes: ‘social influences’, ‘patient responsibility for information seeking’, ‘NHS vs non-NHS resources’). Theme 2 reports women’s views and experiences of ‘The influence of Healthcare Professionals in decision-making’ (sub-themes ‘patient and professional roles in decision-making’, ‘conflicting advice and preferences’, ‘taking authority in emergency decision-making’). The final theme, theme 3, ‘When, how, and what information women want’ shows women want time to process information (sub-themes ‘when: it’s definitely information and time’, ‘how: presentation of information’, ‘what: information required’). Cross-cutting all themes, we found an unmet need for information to be tailored to the individual.

Women understand decision-making during labour and birth is a dynamic process. Women can struggle with the volume, quality and timing of information available. In busy maternity settings, the challenge is to better equip women with the information they want, and health professionals with the information they need to provide for personalised care and shared decision-making. Antenatal interventions that warrant further research include decision aids, birth plans, and structured counselling using core information sets. Insights from both antenatal and postnatal perspectives will help inform their development.