A significant proportion of infants born at ≤29+6 weeks’ gestation develop lung disease during the neonatal period, thus putting them at risk of developing prematurity-associated lung disease in childhood and adulthood. After discharge from the neonatal unit, pre-existing lung disease in preterm-born infants is exacerbated by (often frequent) respiratory viral infections requiring greater health utilisation, including hospital admissions, than their term-born equivalents. Opportunities to prevent viral infections in infancy are largely limited to anti-respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antibody prophylaxis and recently maternal RSV immunisation, but in term-born infants, trained immunity-based vaccines such as Bactek (MV130, Inmunotek, Spain) are increasingly used. Bactek provides a promising therapeutic avenue for preterm-born infants to target postdischarge respiratory viral infection in this vulnerable group of infants. The BALLOON study aims to assess this treatment in a very/extremely preterm-born population and determine if treatment with the trained immunity-based vaccine Bactek decreases the risk of unscheduled visits to healthcare professionals for lower respiratory tract infections, when compared with placebo. Included infants are born at ≤29+6 weeks’ gestation and treated daily from term-equivalent (37–43 weeks’ postmenstrual age, PMA) or from discharge, if earlier, up to 1 year of corrected age.

542 infants are being recruited prior to discharge by neonatal units in the UK. They are being randomised to receive Bactek or placebo, once daily dose of 2 sprays (each 0.1 mL) of IMP (300 Formazin Turbidity Units), from 37 to 43 weeks’ PMA or discharge if earlier up to 1 year of corrected age. The primary objective is to assess if sublingual Bactek spray decreases the risk of health professional diagnosed lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (unscheduled visits to general practitioners, accident and emergency departments and hospital admissions) between enrolment and 1 year of corrected age. Secondary outcomes include the number of parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visits for LRTIs, the time to first parent-reported, health professional-confirmed unscheduled visit for LRTI, parent-reported wheeze episodes (identification aided by WheezeScan (Omron, Japan)), parent-reported use of respiratory medications, growth (weight, length and head circumference), parent(s)/guardian(s) reported time missed from work and/or nursery time missed for the infant and volume of adverse reactions. Viruses associated with LRTIs will also be identified.

Ethics permission has been granted by the Wales Research Ethics Committee 3 (Ref 24/WA/0181), and regulatory permission by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (CTA reference 21323/0063/001-0004). The study is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN14019493). Findings will be disseminated via national and international peer-reviewed journals, and conferences. Oversight of the study is being provided by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee and an independent Trial Steering Committee (TSC). The Trial Management Group (TMG) meets every month.

ISRCTN14019493.

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a broad range of diseases associated with abnormalities/degeneration of retinal cells. We aimed to identify the top 10 Australian research priorities for IRDs to ultimately facilitate more meaningful and potentially cost-effective research.

We conducted a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership that involved two Australian-wide surveys and online workshops.

Australia-wide.

Individuals aged 16 years or older were eligible to participate if they had an IRD, were caregivers of an individual with an IRD or were health professionals providing care to this community.

In Survey 1, we gathered participants’ unanswered questions about IRDs. We grouped these into summary questions and undertook a literature review to verify if they were truly unanswered (ie, evidence uncertainties). In Survey 2, participants voted for the uncertainties that they considered a priority. Top-ranked uncertainties progressed for discussion and final prioritisation in two workshops.

In Survey 1, we collected 223 questions from 69 participants. We grouped these into 42 summary questions and confirmed 41 as evidence uncertainties. In Survey 2, 151 participants voted, with the 16 uncertainties progressing to final prioritisation. The top 10 priorities, set by the 24 workshop participants, represented (1) treatment/cure; (2) symptoms and disease progression; (3) psychosocial well-being and (4) health service delivery. The #1 priority was for treatment to prevent, slow down or stop vision loss, followed by the #2 priority to address the psychological impact of having an IRD.

The top 10 research priorities highlight the need for IRD research that takes a whole-person, systems approach. Collaborations to progress priorities will accelerate the translation of research into real-world benefits.