Conectar
An affordable heart-healthy dietary approach is essential for the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH); however, the optimal dietary pattern and the role of adjunctive nutrient supplementation remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DICA Br), adapted from the Portfolio Diet, with or without phytosterol and/or krill oil supplementation in individuals with probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (Dutch MEDPED) criteria.
The DICA-FH study is a national, multicentre, randomised, factorial, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants aged ≥16 years receiving age-appropriate lipid-lowering therapy will be randomised into four groups: (1) adapted cardioprotective diet (DICA-FH) plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil placebo; (2) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil placebo; (3) DICA-FH plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil 2 g/day or (4) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil 2 g/day. All participants will undergo whole-genome sequencing and receive appropriate genetic counselling. Primary outcomes will be means of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels after 120 days. Secondary outcomes will include additional lipid biomarkers, adherence to protocol and adverse events. The planned sample size is 300 participants. Follow-up is expected to conclude in July 2026.
This study was registered under CAAE 65549622.2.1001.0060 and received ethical approval from the Hcor Research Ethics Committee (approval number 5.805.072) and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP; approval number 6.864.951). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and channels aimed at the general public.
The interfaces between the fields of communication, education and health have been indicated by international institutions such as the WHO and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. However, hegemonic scientific practices supersede dialogue between the three fields, isolating their practices. This fragmenting tendency is observed in scientific literature, which has created gaps in the dialogue and articulation between communication, education and health. Although health promotion requires both communicative and educational practices, the epistemological, historical, political, cultural and socioeconomic aspects have also engendered tensions between the fields. Communication is often seen as a mere instrument for other practices, rather than a phenomenon that (re)produces meanings and power dynamics. In opposing the reductionist and instrumentalising perspectives of knowledge fields, the primary objective of the scoping review is to map the scientific evidence on the interfaces between communication and education in health to indicate a conceptual framework that articulates communication and education practices within the context of health.
A transdisciplinary team developed this protocol based on the 2024 Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The procedures required to conduct the review were guided by the frameworks proposed by Arksey and O'Malley, Levac et al and Peters et al. The study eligibility criteria were established based on the Problem, Concept and Context outlined in the research questions. Primary and secondary studies will be retrieved from nine sources, covering both conventional and grey literature. These sources include Embase, ERIC, LILACS, PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, and the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. A categorised form will be used for data collection and subsequent analysis. The reporting of the review findings will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.
The nature of the research and the use of secondary data sources do not require informed consent forms or approval from ethics committees in Brazil. The scientific findings from the review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and other scientific communication channels.
The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3CX7.
Adults living with chronic conditions may need to access health programmes to mitigate health-related challenges that persist long after discharge from the hospital. Community physical activity programmes represent critical opportunities for health promotion and chronic disease self-management that can extend beyond hospital-based services. However, navigating the healthcare system and connecting to much-needed physical activity programmes can be challenging due to fragmentation of the health and social care system, especially for those who are transitioning between different healthcare providers, settings, stages of recovery and funding sources (eg, public, private). Patient navigation services can assist with this fragmentation by providing tailored support to individuals with chronic conditions. However, our understanding of patient navigation services in Canada is limited. This rapid review seeks to explore the landscape of patient navigation services supporting Canadians with chronic conditions in connecting to physical activity programmes in the community.
The rapid review will follow the recommendations published by Garritty et al in 2024. Integrated Knowledge Translation will be employed to facilitate meaningful engagement of people with lived experience of chronic conditions throughout the entire research process. Studies published in English that examine patient navigation services in physical activity for community-dwelling Canadians with chronic conditions will be included. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL and Google Canada will be searched for articles published from 1990 to May 2025 to identify the characteristics, strengths and limitations, and prioritised features of patient navigation services for community physical activity programmes. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies.
This protocol is a rapid review of published literature and does not require ethical approval. Review findings will be disseminated to various key interest groups through publications, presentations, infographics, social media posts and/or videos.
This scoping review aims to map evidence or literature on improvement strategies used by health leaders and professionals to strengthen the safety climate in the operating room.
A scoping review was performed on the basis of the method proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and applied to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension.
16 academic and grey literature data sources were searched using search terms on 17 January 2025, namely, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online via Pubmed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences via the Virtual Health Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, WorldCat, Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Brazilian Association of Surgical Center Nurses, Center for Material and Sterilization and Anesthetic Recovery, Association of Portuguese Operating Room Nurses, Association of PeriOperative Registered Nurses, Institute for Healthcare Improvement, WHO and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Study selection, data extraction and synthesis were based on the following eligibility criteria based on the acronym PCC (participants, concept, context): participants (health leaders and professionals), concept (strategies to improve the safety climate) and context (operating room). This scoping review considered studies published from 2009 onwards.
Information on the objective, method and findings addressing improvement strategies employed to strengthen the safety climate in the surgical centre was retrieved. The findings are presented in tables and in a qualitative thematic summary.
A total of 26 studies were analysed, published between 2009 and 2024, with the USA as the country of origin of the publications with the highest number (11 studies). As for the methodological approach, intervention and quasi-experimental studies stand out. When the studies in this review were mapped, strategies that strengthened the safety climate in the operating room were identified and grouped into two main axes that are interrelated: communication tools and training programmes.
It is evident that the implementation of tools that promote communication and training programmes enhances safe surgical care, as they contribute substantially to the domains of the safety culture. The use of communication protocols in the operating room is recommended as a perioperative safety tool.
This scoping review adhered to a protocol previously published in this journal and that is registered on the Open Science Framework website (https://osf.io/zg8nu/).
To understand the social representations of bedside milk expression (BME) among mothers of preterm newborns in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
Qualitative descriptive study.
The study was conducted from July to August 2024 in two NICUs of a referral maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. Nineteen mothers of hospitalised premature newborns participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and subjected to thematic content analysis.
Mothers perceived BME as a meaningful act of protection and bonding, though some were unfamiliar with the practice. Emotional ambivalence was common, shaped by prior breastfeeding experiences and the context of prematurity. Discomfort related to privacy and shared spaces was noted. Support from healthcare professionals was essential to promote understanding and adherence.
Social representations of BME are shaped by emotional, social and institutional experiences. Anchored in prior breastfeeding experiences and cultural meanings of maternal care, the practice is objectified through both gestures of affection and tangible barriers.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive training to support mothers in BME. Structural improvements, privacy and emotional support are essential for fostering maternal autonomy and confidence.
This study highlights the barriers to BME, emphasising the role of healthcare support and the need for better infrastructure, privacy and training to enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding.
The study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
None.
This paper highlights the pivotal role of healthcare professional support in overcoming barriers to BME and promoting breastfeeding practices.
Fresh breast milk is considered the gold standard for reducing complications and improving survival in preterm infants. BME is recommended as an effective strategy to ensure the availability of fresh breast milk. Mothers' social representations of this practice remain underexplored within the neonatal intensive care context.
Explores mothers' social representations of BME in NICUs, addressing a significant gap in qualitative research. Reveals how emotional, social and institutional factors shape mothers' perceptions, motivations and challenges related to BME. Highlights the need for targeted professional support, improved infrastructure and privacy to enhance maternal autonomy and adherence to milk expression practices.
Healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, should receive specialised training to provide technical guidance and emotional support, enhancing mothers' confidence and autonomy in BME. Improving infrastructure and ensuring privacy in NICUs are crucial to creating supportive environments that facilitate milk expression and strengthen maternal–infant bonding. Institutional policies should integrate maternal-centred strategies to support breastfeeding continuity and promote humanised neonatal care.
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) represent a significant cause of postoperative morbidity and even mortality. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding this composite endpoint, the definition of the individual components, classification and optimal outcome measures. This study aims to refine the PPCs composite framework by evaluating its construct validity, assessing the necessity and risks of a composite measure and exploring the feasibility of differentiating severity categories.
A Delphi consensus process will be conducted, engaging an international multidisciplinary group of 30–40 panellists, including clinicians, researchers, patients, public representatives and health economists. Through iterative rounds, the study will seek agreement on the individual components of the PPCs composite. Additionally, consensus will establish a framework for a composite outcome measure based on a standardised severity classification, appropriate timeframes and weighted grading of PPCs.
Consensus, defined by ≥75% concurrence in multiple choice questions or on Likert–scale statements, will be evaluated from round 2 onwards. Delphi rounds will be continued until all statements have reached stability of responses evaluated by 2 tests or the Kruskal-Wallis test.
The study will be conducted in strict compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and will adhere to ACCORD guidance for reporting. Ethics approval has been obtained for this study from the University of Wolverhampton, UK (SOABE/202425/staff/3). Informed consent will be obtained from all panellists before the commencement of the Delphi process. The results of the study will be published in a peer–reviewed journal with the authorship assigned in accordance with ICMJE requirements.
NCT06916598 (clinicaltrials.gov).
FreshRSS 