In March 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, a set of voluntary recommendations for initiating and managing opioid treatment in the ambulatory setting. This scoping review examined guideline effects on patients, providers and health systems.

A scoping review was conducted with a preregistered protocol. Comprehensive searches of PubMed, Embase and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature were conducted in April 2025. Reports published between 2016 and 2025 that explored the effects of the CDC guideline were included. No restrictions on language or country of study origin were applied, though all retrieved reports were published in the USA and in English. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text reports. Data were extracted by healthcare setting, study aims and design, sample size, study population, participant characteristics and study findings and outcomes. Reports were characterised as empirical studies that evaluated guideline effects or implementation studies that assessed uptake. Study findings were presented descriptively and by evidence maps.

Ninety-four studies met the inclusion criteria: 75 empirical studies and 19 implementation studies. Eighty-eight per cent measured changes in opioid prescribing; all but one found significant reductions in at least one prescribing measure, often among people receiving ≥50–90 morphine mg equivalents per day. Effects occurred across specialties and populations, including groups not targeted by the guideline. Studies found increased rates of tapering, with mixed findings on opioid-benzodiazepine coprescription. Legal analyses showed widespread policy adoption at the state level. Implementation studies described expanded risk-mitigation strategies, sometimes beyond guideline text. Few studies reported patient-centred outcomes, participant race or ethnicity or equity measures.

This voluntary federal guideline had significant intended and unintended effects. The guideline was associated with reductions in opioid prescribing among groups targeted and not targeted by its design, with limited evidence on patient outcomes. Future work should prioritise equity-focused patient outcomes to inform implementation of the 2022 CDC guideline.

Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a significant public health concern in the USA, with considerable prevalence and mortality and no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved pharmacotherapies. Recent advances in addiction science emphasise the need for novel, mechanism-based treatments. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide, have shown promise in modulating reward-related behaviours and may offer therapeutic benefits for CUD. We present a study protocol evaluating semaglutide, as an adjunct to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), as a novel approach for treating CUD.

This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 75 treatment-seeking adults with CUD. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either once-weekly semaglutide (0.25–1.0 mg) or placebo injections over 14 weeks, alongside weekly individual CBT. Primary outcomes include changes in neurophysiological reactivity to drug-related and non-drug-related motivationally relevant cues (late positive potential), behavioural economics (cocaine demand), craving (Cocaine Craving Questionnaire) and cocaine use (self-report, urine drug screens). Exploratory aims assess associations between mechanistic changes and cocaine use, consumption of other substances (ie, tobacco, alcohol and cannabis) and dose–response relationships. Data will be analysed using Bayesian statistical methods using an intention-to-treat approach.

The study has been approved by the UTHealth Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (HSC-MS-25-0412) and is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. All participants will provide written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences.

NCT07227948.

The Comprehensive High-dose Aphasia Treatment (CHAT) programme is an intensive comprehensive aphasia programme, which aims to address evidence-practice gaps in aphasia rehabilitation where there are known barriers to service delivery requiring implementation strategies. The aims of this study are to (1) evaluate the clinical implementation of the CHAT programme, (2) assess the clinical effectiveness of CHAT compared with usual care in rehabilitation services and (3) determine whether the real-world implementation of CHAT compared with usual care is cost-effective.

Four participant groups will be recruited across six hospital and health services Australia-wide to participate in a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study: (1) people with aphasia, (2) support persons, (3) treating clinicians and students and (4) clinical stakeholders (eg, managers). This before-and-after study will include three time periods: (1) ‘usual care’ where people with aphasia will receive their usual care aphasia therapy, (2) ‘implementation transition’ where clinicians will be trained to deliver CHAT and (3) ‘intervention implementation’ where people with aphasia will receive the CHAT programme (ie, 50 hours of evidence-based aphasia therapy over 8 weeks). Evidence-based implementation strategies will be used to facilitate implementation within participating rehabilitation services. The primary outcome is delivery of evidence-based aphasia treatment (ie, CHAT) as measured by a composite score of quality indicators. Clinical effectiveness outcomes, measuring change in language impairment, communication effectiveness, confidence and quality of life, and implementation outcomes will also be examined. We will also conduct an embedded mixed-methods process evaluation and economic evaluation.

This study has been approved by the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2021/QRBW/72154). Outputs will include conference presentations, publications and a training package to optimise implementation of aphasia treatment in rehabilitation service contexts.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prospective registration ACTRN12621001765819. Trial registered 23 December 2021. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=381365&isReview=true.

This qualitative study aims to explore the experiences and preferences of Hispanic men participating in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP), an intensive lifestyle change intervention that effectively reduces diabetes risk, considering Hispanic men experience diabetes disproportionately yet remain underrepresented in the NDPP.

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted over the phone in English or Spanish between June 2023 and February 2024. Transcripts were analysed using a framework analysis.

17 Hispanic men engaged in the NDPP for ≥4 sessions. The majority were foreign-born (n=11) and self-identified as English proficient (n=11).

Through three major themes, Hispanic men reflected on their experiences: (1) Going into the NDPP: despite not knowing what to expect from the NDPP, their fear of diabetes motivated them to enrol in the programme; (2) During the NDPP: they felt relief from gaining critical knowledge about diet, exercise and diabetes prevention; and finally (3) Impressions of the NDPP: they appreciated the NDPP’s informational resources, personalised coaching, group format and acknowledgement of traditional cultural diets and found men-only groups often offered additional emotional safety but had mixed feelings about the programme’s virtual format.

Findings suggest that Hispanic men appreciate the knowledge and skills attained from the NDPP and value its resources, group format, culturally-tailored content and gender-tailored structure. Recruitment efforts may benefit from emphasising how the programme reduces uncertainty about prediabetes and from more clearly conveying the structure of the programme. Strategies to improve sustained engagement should consider how to feasibly offer delivery formats that accommodate diverse preferences.

Chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are heterogeneous conditions with a high multimorbidity burden. However, existing risk assessment instruments prioritise physiological measures while overlooking systemic comorbidities. We aim to develop and validate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded artificial intelligence (AI) model—AiRES (AI in patients with RESpiratory disease)—to predict the 30-day, 90-day and 180-day risks of all-cause and index-disease hospitalisations. This model represents a first step towards a clinical decision support tool for personalised multimorbidity management in patients with CRD.

Patients aged ≥18 years with a validated case definition of asthma and COPD will be identified from Singapore health administrative data (2012–2020). Candidate predictors will include age, sex, ethnicity, housing type, and comorbidities, measured across multiple care settings as visit frequency, grouped at quarterly intervals in Year 1 and annually for Years 2 and 3 over a 3-year lookback window. We will predict 30-day, 90-day, and 180-day risks of (1) all-cause and (2) asthma/COPD-specific hospital admissions using up to five randomly selected index dates per individual. Three machine learning algorithms—logistic regression (LR) with Lasso regularisation, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Categorical Boosting—will be trained using 10-fold cross-validation (CV) with an ensemble feature selection strategy. The optimal model, selected based on performance and feature importance, will be benchmarked against two reference models: a full LR and a Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial regression with hospitalisation history as the sole predictor. Discrimination and calibration will be assessed using internal-external cluster-based and temporal CV. Clinical utility will be evaluated using decision curve analysis.

This study obtained ethics approval from the National University of Singapore (NUS-IRB-2024-849). Results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.

To study the association between job demands and distress among working adults and to test whether perceived supervisor support moderates this relationship.

Mixed-effects analysis of repeated measures from a population-based cohort study, estimating overall (combined within-person and between-person) associations.

The Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH), an ongoing Dutch cohort with nationwide recruitment and follow-up including four measurement waves.

A total of 989 employed individuals (≥12 hours/week) with 1858 observations had complete data on distress, job demands, supervisor support and covariates.

The dependent variable was distress, measured using the 16-item distress subscale (range 0–32) of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire. Job demands and supervisor support were assessed with subscales from the Job Content Questionnaire. Multilevel linear models were used to estimate main and interaction effects, adjusted for age, sex, educational level, hearing impairment, contract type and chronic diseases.

Higher job demands were associated with greater distress (B=0.22, 95% CI (0.17 to 0.27)). Higher supervisor support was associated with lower distress (B=–0.26, 95% CI (–0.38 to –0.15)). The interaction between job demands and supervisor support was statistically significant (B=-0.02, 95% CI (-0.04 to 0.001), p=0.042). Stratified analyses showed that the association between job demands and distress was stronger among employees with low supervisor support (B=0.27, p

Job demands and supervisor support were independently associated with distress. Supervisor support appeared to buffer the impact of job demands, as the association between job demands and distress was stronger among employees reporting low levels of supervisor support. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening supportive supervisor practices, alongside addressing excessive job demands, as integral components of workplace mental health strategies.

Scabies is a common skin condition and poses a substantial disease burden in resource-poor tropical settings. The Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh represent one of the world’s largest and most protracted humanitarian crises. Using 3 years of data from 2021 to 2023, this study analysed the seasonality of scabies and examined its association with climatic factors.

This is a retrospective observational study conducted in the Rohingya refugee camps and adjacent host communities in Ukhiya and Teknaf, Cox’s Bazar. All patients clinically diagnosed with scabies and who received treatment at 35 International Organization for Migration (IOM)-supported health facilities between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2023 were included. Climate data, including daily mean, minimum and maximum temperature and total and maximum rainfall, were obtained from the Bangladesh Meteorological Department. Seasonal–Trend decomposition using LOESS (locally estimated scatterplot smoothing) (STL) was applied. Associations between climatic variables and the decomposed seasonal component of scabies cases and corresponding attack rate, as well as overall scabies case counts and overall attack rate, were assessed using Pearson’s correlation tests.

A total of 323 106 new scabies cases were reported from IOM-supported health facilities between January 2021 and December 2023. Children aged under 5 years and 6–18 years accounted for the highest proportion of cases (32.08% and 38.95%, respectively). The average monthly number of scabies cases was highest in November (12 625) and lowest in May (5862). Case numbers increased from November to February (high season), with a peak between October and November, and declined between April and June (low season). An inverse relationship was observed between temperature and scabies incidence, with higher case numbers during cooler months and lower numbers during warmer months. Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated a strong and significant negative correlation between the seasonal components of both scabies cases and attack rate and temperature variables, including maximum (cases: r=–0.492, p=0.002; attack rate: r=–0.484, p=0.003), minimum (cases: r=–0.506, p=0.002; attack rate: r=–0.489, p=0.002) and mean temperature (cases: r=–0.525, p=0.001; attack rate: r=–0.511, p=0.001). No significant association was observed between the seasonal component of scabies cases or attack rate and humidity or rainfall.

This study identified a distinct seasonal pattern of scabies, with higher caseloads and attack rate during late autumn and winter (October to February) and lower caseloads and attack rate during summer months (April to June). Temperature showed a strong negative association with the seasonal component of scabies burden. These findings may inform the timing of public health strategies, including mass drug administration, intensified case management and social and behavioural change communication, in humanitarian settings.

Accurately capturing social contact data is essential for developing effective mathematical models to forecast disease trends and evaluate interventions. There are limited population-based data of social contacts in the USA which limits our ability to accurately model infectious disease transmission.

To fill in this gap, we conducted a staggered longitudinal cohort study in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We aimed to characterise contact patterns and examine how they varied by (1) participant demographics, (2) seasonality and (3) self-managed and medically-attended symptoms. Once per month for 6 months, participants reported individual contacts they can name, individual contacts they cannot name and contacts that occurred in group settings. We defined individual contacts as a two-way conversation with five or more words in the physical presence of another person or physical skin-to-skin contact and group contacts as contacts with a group of people with whom participants talked, interacted or shared space. Participants were enrolled on a rolling basis, and data is collected from November 2024 through April 2026. Data analysis will generate age-specific contact matrices using individual contacts and compare contact rates by symptoms. We will also analyse the number and characteristics (eg, indoor/outdoor) of each type of contact. The contact matrices and results will be publicly available for the wider modelling community.

Kaiser Permanente Interregional Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed and approved all submitted study documents. An IRB Authorization Agreement was established with the Emory University IRB documenting the roles and responsibilities of each study site. On study completion, de-identified individual level contact data as well as contact matrices and analytical code will be made publicly available on GitHub/Zenodo platform. Study findings will be published in scientific journals and presented at conferences.

To explore existing qualitative research on patients’ experiences from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of sarcoma, with the purpose of identifying patient-perceived barriers at both patient and healthcare system levels and to highlight opportunities for improvement.

Systematic review of qualitative studies using thematic synthesis.

We systematically searched Medline [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], PsycINFO [EBSCOhost] and CINAHL [EBSCOhost] from database inception to 11 April 2025 for qualitative studies reporting sarcoma patients’ experiences during their diagnostic trajectory. The final search was conducted on 11 April 2025. All articles were screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Six studies conducted in Australia, the Netherlands and the UK were included. Data were analysed using a thematic synthesis approach guided by Thomas and Harden (2008). Confidence in the synthesised findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERqual) approach.

Four overarching themes emerged: patients’ experience and interpretation of symptoms, diagnostic pathways, healthcare system factors, and reflections and recommendations. Key contributors to delayed diagnosis were symptom normalisation, misattribution by both patients and healthcare professionals, limited continuity of care and communication challenges. These findings were consistent across multiple countries, indicating relevance and validity in many settings. Patients emphasised the importance of disease awareness, persistence of patients and coordinated care.

Diagnostic delays in sarcoma are influenced by both patient and healthcare systemic factors. Addressing these factors requires increased disease awareness among healthcare professionals and the public, improved coordination within the healthcare system, and targeted research to guide future interventions. This review provides cross-country insights into barriers to early sarcoma diagnosis, informing future priorities in clinical practice and research.

CRD420251030726.

To clarify and define the clinical practice concept of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery.

A concept analysis guided by Walker and Avant’s method.

MEDLINE (Ovid), AMED-(Ovid), Embase (Elsevier) and CINAHL (EBSCO) were searched through 5 December 2024.

Relevant studies that included combinations of the terms ‘early mobilisation’, ‘early ambulation’, ‘early acceleration’, ‘abdominal surgery’ and ‘surgical procedures’ were selected. We restricted the search to English full-text publications involving adult patients, limited to the year 2000 and onward. Inclusion criteria were original research articles describing the timing and/or type of mobilisation.

The study derives its defining attributes, antecedents and consequences through data analysis. To enhance understanding of the model, we constructed related and contrary cases of the concept and outlined relevant empirical referents.

In total, 140 studies were included in the analysis. Early mobilisation is characterised by the key defining attributes of initiating active physical movement, including standing, sitting in a chair or walking, within the first 24 hours of surgery. Antecedents include haemodynamic and respiratory stability, adequate pain management, and the patient’s cognitive and physical readiness. Contextual antecedents include competent and adequately staffed healthcare teams. Consequences include improved physiological recovery and enhanced postoperative outcomes.

This analysis provides a clarified, practice-focused definition of early mobilisation after abdominal surgery. By delineating its key attributes and contextual prerequisites, the study offers a conceptual foundation that can support clinical guidelines, promote consistent implementation and inform future research aimed at optimising postoperative recovery.

To assess the mental health status and identify associated factors among rural adult women in Bangladesh.

Cross-sectional study using face-to-face interviews with a semistructured questionnaire.

Data were collected between January and February 2025 in three rural upazilas (Dhamrai, Nawabganj and Sreepur) using multistage systematic sampling. The semistructured questionnaire included sociodemographic characteristics, household assets and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The wealth index was calculated using principal component analysis. Cases with mild to extreme levels of depression, anxiety and stress were grouped together to indicate the presence of any level of the three mental health problems. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses using ², Fisher’s exact test and Welch two-sample t-test, and multivariable binary logistic regression to identify predictive factors of mental problems. A Venn diagram was generated to display the proportion of patients with anxiety, depression and stress. Data analysis was performed using SPSS (V.26) and R Studio (V.2025.05) with a significance level of p

A total of 1350 women aged 18 years or older who were available at home during the data collection period and gave consent to participate. Women who were unable to participate due to illness were excluded.

Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 36.35 (±12.58) years. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress was 47.7%, 60.7% and 23.2%, respectively. Moderate severity was most common among patients with depression (20.34%), anxiety (24.20%) and stress (8.03%). 20% of participants experienced all three conditions simultaneously, with 22% having both depression and anxiety. Multivariable analysis revealed that factors associated with an increased odds of depression, anxiety and stress were chronic diseases (ORs (95% CIs): 2.02 (1.50 to 2.73), 1.44 (1.05 to 1.99) and 1.91 (1.35 to 2.71), respectively) and history of abuse (1.84 (1.28 to 2.66); 3.15 (2.06 to 4.93) and 1.91 (1.28 to 2.83), respectively). Family history of mental illness was associated with an increased odds of anxiety (1.71 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.87)) and stress (1.61 (95% CI 1.01 to 2.52)). So was the presence of a caregiving role (1.68 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.42) and 1.50 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.19) for anxiety and stress, respectively). Having a financial problem was associated with an increased odds of anxiety (1.52 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.00)). A happy family relationship was associated with decreased odds of depression (0.28 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.93)), anxiety (0.22 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.60)) and stress (0.50 (95% CI 0.25 to 1.00)). Conjugal satisfaction was protective against anxiety (0.42 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.80) and stress (0.32 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.59)). Unexpectedly, higher wealth status (being rich) increased depression (1.56 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.34) and anxiety (1.57 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.41) risk.

A major segment of rural adult women of Bangladesh experiences mental health problems. The findings recommend community-based comprehensive mental health screening programmes, interventions and integration of mental healthcare into primary health systems to address this critical public health challenge.

Cycling can be beneficial for health, well-being and the environment; however, cycling participation in the UK remains low. Effective and cost-effective strategies are needed to support people in the community to increase cycling. The Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate whether a 9 week multi-component cycling programme (Cycle Nation) is more effective and cost-effective than an existing national cycle training session on cycling participation, transport use and health and well-being.

This pragmatic, single-blinded, two-arm RCT will recruit ≥268 adults who cycle infrequently. Participants will be randomised to the 9 week multi-component individual/social-level group-based Cycle Nation programme or an existing national standard single group-based cycle training session. Both arms will be delivered by community-based cycling organisations in Glasgow. Participants will complete self-reported measurements at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 weeks; change in weekly number of rides and minutes of cycling and use of private car, taxi, public transport and walking at 12 weeks and 12 months; change in motivation, perceptions of cycling safety, confidence to cycle, self-esteem, vitality, health-related quality of life and perceived general physical health at 12 weeks and 12 months. A within-trial economic evaluation from a National Health Service/personal social service and a broader societal perspective will be undertaken. Pending within-trial results, a long-term model may be developed. An embedded process evaluation will use participant and facilitator interviews, participant acceptability questionnaires, facilitator delivery proforma and session observations.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Glasgow Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (11 April 25). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to stakeholders and the public.

NCT07005674.

Outcome reporting in studies on sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) is highly heterogeneous, which limits comparability across studies and thus hampers the development of international treatment guidelines.

Variation in treatment and access to facilities contributes to differences in outcome reporting between centres and countries. Establishing a Core Outcome Set (COS) can improve consistency in outcome reporting and facilitate global collaboration and data comparison. We therefore aim to develop a Core Outcome Set for SCT (COS-SCT) using the Delphi method to achieve consensus on key outcomes. This will enhance the standardisation of outcome reporting and improve the quality of research and clinical care for SCT patients globally.

The development of the COS-SCT will consist of three phases. First, a systematic review will be performed to identify outcomes reported in studies on the surgical treatment of SCT in children. Second, an international Delphi survey will be conducted among key stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers and patient representatives, to establish consensus on outcome prioritisation. Finally, a consensus meeting with representatives from all stakeholder groups will be held to ratify the final Core Outcome Set. The study will follow methodological guidance from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative and will be developed and reported in accordance with the Core Outcome Set Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Core Outcome Set Standards for Reporting (COS-STAR).

The medical research ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) confirmed that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to this study, and therefore a full review by the ethics committee is not required. This study is registered in the COMET initiative database. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: COMET registration number 3485

Evidence-based, compassionate practice is a key objective in midwifery care, with particular emphasis on existential aspects of women’s experiences during the transition to motherhood. In 2014, a scoping review was published exploring this phenomenon. The interest in this review exemplified the growing scholarly and clinical interest in this subject. However, the scoping review is outdated and does not meet up-to-date methodological standards. This qualitative systematic review will synthesise qualitative studies that explore the existential aspects of becoming a mother, aiming to identify potential unmet needs and articulate women’s preferences for care during motherhood transition. Findings from this synthesis may contribute valuable insights for developing evidence-informed clinical guidelines that promote person-centred and holistic maternal care.

This qualitative systematic review will use framework synthesis based on Peter la Cour’s model of Existential health. The data will be collected from five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science), which will be searched from 2010 to the present day. Study selection will prioritise the transition to motherhood in contemporary Western countries.

Ethical approval is not required for a review, and findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and social media.

CRD420251018563.

To determine the prevalence of internet addiction and examine its association with psychological factors specifically depression, anxiety and loneliness among Malaysian public university students.

Cross-sectional study.

All public universities in Malaysia, 20 universities.

The study included 7278 students from 20 public universities in Malaysia.

Statistical analyses were performed usingSTATA V.17 software. Descriptive statistics summarised participants’ demographic characteristics, prevalence of internet addiction and psychological distress (depression, anxiety and loneliness). Pearson’s correlation was used to assess bivariate relationships between internet addiction and psychological variables, while multiple logistic regression identified independent factors associated with internet addiction after adjusting for significant confounders.

The study found that 38.6% of the students showed signs of internet addiction, along with a high level of psychological distress; 24.8% had depressive symptoms, 32.4% experienced anxiety and 35.5% reported loneliness. Moderate positive correlations were observed between internet addiction and depression, anxiety and loneliness (p

The findings indicate significant associations between internet addiction and psychological factors such as depression, anxiety and loneliness. A comprehensive, multifaceted approach is essential to address psychological distress among university students and reduce the risk of internet addiction.

Hospitalised patients nearing the end of life (EOL) often face complex treatment decisions, leading to potential conflicts among care teams, patients and families. Palliative care consultations may enhance decision-making processes, improve satisfaction and reduce unnecessary interventions. This systematic review will assess the impact of palliative care consultations on treatment decisions, family and patient satisfaction, and psychological outcomes in hospitalised adults.

We will include randomised controlled trials comparing palliative care consultations to standard care in hospitalised adults. The primary outcomes will include decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments, patient and family satisfaction with EOL decision-making, and psychological outcomes such as anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Secondary outcomes will include intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, utilisation of potentially non-beneficial treatments, and the use of institutional policies or legal actions. Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO will be systematically searched from inception to September 2025. Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data using Covidence. Meta-analyses will use random-effects models to generate pooled estimates for primary and secondary outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and evidence certainty will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Subgroup analyses will explore variations by ICU versus non-ICU settings, cancer versus non-cancer diagnoses and default versus clinician-initiated consultations.

Ethical approval is not required for this review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CRD420250624190.

To explore the experiences of clinicians providing pastoral and mental health services to racially and ethnically minoritised students (REMS) at UK universities, aiming to understand the challenges REMS face in accessing support and to identify ways to improve service inclusivity.

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

Student health and well-being services at five universities in the North East of England, a region with comparatively low racial diversity.

Ten clinicians (nine female, one male; nine White British, one other ethnic background; mean age 42.8 years) working in therapeutic roles with experience supporting REMS. Participants were recruited via opportunity sampling.

Semi-structured interviews, averaging 44 min, were video-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis to identify key themes.

Six overarching themes were identified: (1) the chokehold of layered systemic challenges, (2) dynamics of power, (3) lack of safety for REMS, (4) "Am I really getting it?", (5) psychological therapies for white people by white people and (6) the thirst for expertise. Clinicians were enthusiastic about providing culturally responsive care but reported limited access to reflective spaces and training. Contextual factors—including racism, Brexit and the marketisation of higher education—were perceived to affect service delivery and REMS’ engagement with mental health support. Business-model approaches to service provision were sources of frustration.

Clinicians face structural and systemic challenges in providing culturally sensitive mental health support to REMS. Enhancing staff training, reflective practice and service adaptation may improve access and efficacy. Findings offer practical insights for universities aiming to strengthen equity in student mental health services, and future work could evaluate interventions to increase clinician preparedness and REMS engagement.

Hospital patients are at an increased risk of falls, which are a significant safety concern within healthcare settings.¹ Understanding how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced fall risks is essential for identifying key factors that could inform future fall prevention strategies.² This scoping review aims to explore the barriers and challenges associated with preventing inpatient falls in the context of the post-COVID-19 environment.

The methodology for this scoping review follows the framework established by Arksey and O’Malley. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted using specific keywords to identify relevant published studies. Searches will be performed across selected electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. This review will focus on a global perspective. Two authors will independently screen titles and abstracts to identify potential studies for inclusion. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria will be retrieved for full-text review, and their references will be assessed for relevance using the same criteria. The PRISMA flow diagram will guide the review process. Data will be extracted, analysed and charted according to categories from the selected publications.

This scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the barriers and challenges in preventing inpatient falls in the post-pandemic context. The findings will be disseminated through submission for publication in a scientific journal.

This scoping review protocol is registered with Open Science Framework (OSF) available at https://osf.io/.

Falls are highly prevalent among individuals with dementia, largely due to the cognitive and physical impairments associated with the condition. Understanding the barriers and challenges to fall prevention in community-dwelling individuals with dementia is essential for developing tailored strategies that address their unique risks. Despite the existing evidence on fall prevention in older adults, few reviews specifically examine the obstacles faced by persons with dementia and their caregivers in community settings. This scoping review, therefore, aims to map the barriers and challenges to preventing falls among community-dwelling individuals with dementia.

This review will follow Arksey and O’Malley’s five-stage framework and be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses—Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Six electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and Embase) will be searched for relevant studies published between 2014 and 2024. Grey literature sources, including dissertations and conference proceedings, will also be included. Data will be charted and synthesised thematically to provide an overview of barriers and contextual factors influencing fall prevention. The study commenced in August 2025 and is expected to be completed by February 2026.

As this review involves the analysis of existing literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries tailored for healthcare providers and caregiver groups.

The protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/gnw47/(dataset).

Upper limb task-oriented training (UL-TOT) is a complex intervention in which practice conditions related to motor learning principles are applied to enhance upper limb motor recovery after stroke. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication guidelines suggest that detailed reporting of a complex intervention is essential in published studies. Therefore, this review aimed to determine the extent to which practice conditions related to motor learning principles were reported in UL-TOT stroke clinical trials.

A comprehensive search was done using appropriate keywords in PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2024. Two reviewers independently conducted title screening, abstract screening and full-text evaluation based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. A third reviewer resolved the conflicts between the two reviewers during the screening process. Finally, the articles that fulfilled the criteria were included for data extraction.

23 802 studies were retrieved, and 166 studies were retained. Practice conditions such as practice variability (98%), dosage (97%) and movement complexity (96%) were reported more frequently, task selection for practice (75%), challenging and progressive task practice (76%) were reported frequently, practice order (57%), practice distribution (51%), feedback type (44%) and timing (44%) were reported occasionally. Feedback frequency (37%) was reported rarely.

Practice conditions such as practice variability, dosage, movement complexity, task selection, challenging and progressive task practice were reported consistently, while practice distribution, order and feedback were reported inconsistently. Developing a standard checklist for practice conditions related to motor learning principles can improve detailed reporting of practice conditions in future UL-TOT stroke clinical trials. This can help researchers replicate and reliably implement the intervention in specific populations and build on and create more effective interventions.