To develop an updated core dataset for acute stroke care in Ireland, informed by international audit benchmarking and national stakeholder consensus, for integration into the Irish National Audit of Stroke (INAS).

Scoping review and three-round Delphi process.

Medline Ovid, Embase, CINAHL EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, audit websites and grey literature (2010–2024). Additional audit documentation was obtained via direct author contact.

National stroke audits or registries with a country-wide scope, ≥1 year of continuous data collection and active in 2021 were eligible. Only audits covering acute stroke care were included in this study phase. All records were screened for inclusion.

Audit documentation (data dictionaries, item definitions and contextual metadata) was retrieved from eligible audits. Acute stroke care items were extracted, charted and benchmarked against existing INAS items and each other to identify commonalities and gaps. Frequently collected international items (appearing in ≥4 audits/registries) were shortlisted. A three-round Delphi process with 24 national stakeholders (clinicians, nurses, allied health professionals, researchers, policymakers and patient representatives) was conducted to audit and refine the dataset through structured, anonymised item rating, iterative feedback and consensus-building discussions.

Twenty-one eligible international stroke audits/registries were identified, yielding ~4500 audit items. Benchmarking against existing INAS items (n=103), frequently collected international items (n=97) and expert-suggested items (n=22) informed the Delphi consultation. The final dataset expanded INAS by 18 items, totalling 86 acute care and 35 thrombectomy-specific items. New additions included stroke-related complications and risk factor documentation.

This structured, consensus-led process resulted in an internationally benchmarked, stakeholder-informed core dataset to enhance standardised stroke auditing in Ireland. The expanded dataset supports enhanced clinical monitoring, quality improvement and health system planning. This approach may inform audit development and research efforts in other contexts.

Adolescent pregnancy is a global issue. Early childbearing is strongly linked to poverty and negative health outcomes, including increased neonatal death risk. This study explores spatial patterns of adolescent pregnancies and neonatal deaths and their association with socioeconomic characteristics.

This population-based study used spatial analysis techniques to investigate the geographical distribution of adolescent pregnancies, socioeconomic characteristics and neonatal mortality rate (NMR).

The 645 municipalities of State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

All live births to mothers residing in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil, between 2004 and 2020.

The socioeconomic indicators used were: municipal human development index and per capita income (PCI). Spatial patterns were assessed for spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I, LISA), and smoothed using local Bayesian estimation. Spearman’s correlation was used to ascertain the relationship between the percentage of live births to adolescent mothers and socioeconomic indexes. This calculation was also undertaken between different maternal age groups of NMR.

The study analysed over 10 million live births, with 14.3% attributed to adolescent mothers. Spatial analysis revealed significant clustering of adolescent pregnancies, strongly associated with lower socioeconomic indicators. NMR also exhibited spatial clustering, particularly after smoothing. Statistically significant differences were observed in PCI medians between high–high and low–low clusters for adolescent births. High and low incidence areas of NMR, both in all maternal ages and stratified by adolescent and non-adolescent mothers, demonstrated considerable overlap.

The results indicated the existence of clustering areas of adolescent pregnancy and neonatal deaths and suggested that the prevalence of births to adolescent mothers is not distributed equally and is higher in lower socioeconomic developed areas.

Despite significant global advancements, the past decade has seen stagnation in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) service coverage and a concerning high under-five and maternal mortality rates, which have been worsened by COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. This scoping review protocol will support the comprehensive mapping, evaluation and assessment of the application, impact, effectiveness and adaptability of health-resilient frameworks in maintaining these services during pandemics, while also identifying gaps in the literature and areas for further research.

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a literature search across databases such as PubMed, Scopus and African Journals Online for studies published from the inception of the databases to 2024 will be conducted. Covidence will facilitate the iterative screening process by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will employ the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Healthcare Contexts framework to categorise information. The thematic synthesis will integrate the findings to comprehensively evaluate the framework’s application, impact, effectiveness and adaptability in the context of routine immunisation and MNCH services.

This is part of a broader study approved by the evaluation committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Free State, and ethical clearance was granted by the university’s Human Research Ethics Committee with registration number UFS-HSD2025/0102/2705. The findings will be shared with relevant stakeholders through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at meetings, conferences, seminars and professional forums.

Shared decision-making (SDM) between clinicians and patients is considered ‘best practice’. There is limited evidence regarding SDM in surgery, particularly in the emergency setting. Emergency SDM may be particularly challenging due to: time pressures, the patient’s underlying condition and the nature of the patient-surgeon interaction. However, emergency surgery arguably has a greater need for SDM due to the likelihood of disparate outcomes from intervention, which is dependent on the various treatment options available. This is necessary for patients to make informed decisions regarding their treatment of surgical pathology. The primary objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to SDM in emergency surgery to determine methods for improving SDM.

Any studies reporting SDM in emergency surgery on adult patients (age >18 years) will be included. EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Scopus databases will be searched for articles with no language or date limits. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers, with consensus met prior to data extraction. Data extracted to include study design, details of study population, tools used to measure SDM, prevalence of SDM and barriers and enablers for SDM.

A systematic narrative synthesis will be performed following JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) guidance. These will summarise findings of included studies. The findings may inform future research into facilitating implementation of SDM in emergency surgery.

This study does not require ethical approval. Final findings will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication and presentation at surgical conferences.