Conectar
by Robin A. Pollini, Catherine E. Paquette, Brandon Irvin, Jennifer L. Syvertsen, Christa L. Lilly
Drug use is a highly stigmatized behavior, and drug-related stigma is a key driver of behavioral risk, lower health care utilization, and associated adverse health outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID). While instruments exist for measuring drug-related stigma, their applicability to community-based PWID across multiple stigma types (enacted, anticipated, internalized) and settings (health care, society, family) is limited, as most were developed using treatment-based samples and all were developed in urban populations. This study sought to develop a Drug Use Stigma Scale (DUSS) that addresses these limitations. We developed an initial list of 39 items based on literature review and qualitative interviews (N = 27) and three focus groups (N = 28) with PWID recruited from syringe services programs and via peer referral in two predominantly rural West Virginia counties. The scale items were administered in a survey to 336 PWID recruited from the same two counties divided into development and validation samples. Responses to the 39-item scale went through a multidimensional refinement process, including examination of internal consistency, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and a three-factor CFA based on stigma setting. Next, a set of final measurement CFAs were conducted. Finally, the resulting scale was examined for criterion-related concurrent validation. The final DUSS consisted of 16 items with excellent fit statistics for the development sample: SRMR: 0.03, RMSEA: 0.09, GFI: 0.92, CFI: 0.96, NFI: 0.94. Fit attenuated but remained satisfactory for the validation sample. DUSS scores were significantly associated with increased odds of not seeking healthcare when needed (OR: 1.47, p = 0.001; OR: 1.61, pby Claire A. MacGeorge, Matthew Henry, Hannah A. Ford, Lacy Malloch, Emily Fratesi, Shannon Cabaniss, Jaime Baldner, Melody Greer, Kristin Gaffney, Milan Bimali, Preetha Abraham, Linda Y. Fu, P. Songthip Ounpraseuth, Christine B. Turley
BackgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral condition of childhood and can be controlled with stimulant medication. Evidence-based guidelines endorse use of standardized ADHD symptom reports to facilitate medication titration to therapeutic dosage. Children living in under-resourced areas experience barriers to receiving this recommended evidence-based care. The Remote ADHD Monitoring Program (RAMP) uses a text-based platform to relay symptom reports from caregivers and teachers to healthcare providers. This pilot study is a feasibility study examining intervention uptake. It compares the submission of structured symptom reports in those children enrolled in RAMP compared to usual care as well as utilization of the RAMP platform by providers.
MethodsThis paper describes the protocol to evaluate the feasibility of deploying RAMP in practices serving rural or underserved children. We will recruit 36 dyads from 4 practices in 2 separate states. Each dyad will include a caregiver and their child aged 5–11 years with a diagnosis of ADHD who is starting or reinitiating stimulants. Dyads will be randomized 1:1 to receive the RAMP intervention or usual care with attention controls. Our primary outcome is number of symptom reports (paper assessments in control arm and RAMP reports in intervention arm) per participant that are completed by caregivers and teachers and returned to providers. Our secondary outcome is proportion of submitted RAMP reports that are reviewed by providers.
DiscussionAs telehealth use increases, it is critical that we improve access to high quality care for children with chronic conditions. Leveraging technology may be a meaningful approach to improve efficiency in optimizing medication management. This pilot study tests a text-based platform designed to improve communication between the caregivers and teachers of children with ADHD and health care providers. If successful, a future trial will examine the effectiveness of the RAMP intervention on improvement in symptoms.
Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06743425.
Harms due to methamphetamine use disorder (MAUD) are rising globally. Untreated withdrawal symptoms perpetuate the cycle of dependence and are a barrier to treatment. There is no pharmacotherapy approved for methamphetamine withdrawal. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) dimesylate has potential as an agonist therapy to ameliorate symptom severity during acute methamphetamine withdrawal and increase duration of initial abstinence and retention in treatment.
We will conduct a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of LDX in reducing symptom severity during acute methamphetamine (MA) withdrawal. One hundred eighty-four adults with moderate to severe MAUD presenting to a health service requesting MA withdrawal treatment who report use of MA within the last 72 hours will be recruited. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive a tapering dose of lisdexamfetamine (250 mg on day 1, reducing by 50 mg per day to 50 mg on day 5, followed by 2 days of placebo washout on days 6 and 7), or placebo for 7 days. The study will be conducted over 7 days in an inpatient unit, and all participants will also receive standard inpatient withdrawal care. Participants will be followed up in the community to day 84. The primary outcome is efficacy, defined as the between-group difference in average withdrawal severity measured over the 7-day admission by the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are retention in treatment, treatment satisfaction, sleep and concomitant medication use (symptomatic medications and medications for other indications to day 7); safety, craving for MA, post-treatment withdrawal symptoms, depression, anxiety and stress, insomnia and cost effectiveness (to day 28) and MA use, mental, physical and social health and post-withdrawal treatment utilisation (to day 84). A First Nations qualitative substudy will assess the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants, ensuring the treatment meets the needs of First Nations people.
This protocol was first approved by the St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 15/05/2024 (2024/ETH00788). All participants will be provided with a participant information sheet and consent form, be fully informed about the study and given ample time to consider participation. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Findings will be presented such that individual participants will not be identifiable.
ACTRN12624001061527.
by Andrea Salinas, Christa Burgos, Aaron Rodríguez-Ramos, Alberto Burgos-Edwards, Nelson Alvarenga, Pablo H. Sotelo, Patricia Langjahr
Inflammation plays a crucial role in homeostasis and defense responses; however, exaggerated and chronic inflammation contribute to the development and worsening of various diseases. Acanthospermum australe (Loefl.) Kuntze (A. australe) is a medicinal plant traditionally used to alleviate inflammation. However, the anti-inflammatory activity of this plant has not yet been explored. This study aimed to evaluate the immunomodulatory activity of this species using network pharmacology, UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis, and in vitro assays. Network pharmacology analysis revealed the involvement of immune system processes, and among the main targets of A. australe related to inflammation were innate immune responses, toll-like receptors (TLRs), and T cell receptor signaling pathways. A methanolic extract was prepared and analyzed using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS, and 15 compounds were detected. Additionally, the potential targets of A. australe predicted by network pharmacology analysis were validated in vitro using monocytic THP-1 cells and splenocytes. The RT-qPCR analysis indicated that A. australe significantly inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, as well as chemokine CCL-2, in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cells. Finally, the extract significantly decreased concanavalin A (ConA)-induced T cell proliferation. Overall, our study provides evidence for the anti-inflammatory effects of this species and highlights its mechanisms of action.by Frederick Nchang Cho, Marie Clarie Fien Ndim, Diane Zinkeng Tongwa, Christabel Afor Tatah, Franklin Ngwesse Ngome, Eugine Mbuh Nyanjoh, Andrew N Tassang
BackgroundHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa. In Cameroon, young people are disproportionately affected but underrepresented in HIV testing statistics.
ObjectiveTo explore knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to HIV testing among youth in Kumba, Cameroon, and to identify barriers to inform community-based interventions.
MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted using nine focus group discussions (FGDs) with 75 youth (52 females and 23 males) aged 18 - 35 years across four quarters in the Kumba II municipality. Participants were purposively sampled to reflect diverse educational and occupational backgrounds. Data were thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke’s framework with NVivo Version 14.
ResultsParticipants demonstrated high awareness of HIV testing services (90.7%) and transmission via sexual contact (96.0%), though knowledge gaps remained regarding non-sexual transmission and testing procedures. While 93.3% had previously undergone HIV testing, 57.3% reported stigma and 46.7% raised confidentiality concerns as ongoing barriers. Female participants feared being labelled as promiscuous, while males cited social norms that discourage help-seeking. Most participants supported school-based or youth-centred community testing, emphasising the need for privacy and youth-friendly environments. Key motivators for testing included the desire to know one’s status (82.7%), symptom appearance (28.0%), and unprotected sex (17.3%).
ConclusionsDespite strong awareness and high testing uptake, stigma and confidentiality concerns persist among youth in Kumba. To enhance HIV testing rates, community-based strategies should prioritise mobile clinics, peer outreach, and confidential youth-centred services. Strengthening education about HIV transmission and demystifying the testing process may further reduce barriers.
Limited literature has focused on people with cancers' preference for care providers in scenarios where trade-offs may have to be made.
To report the results of a comprehensive search and synthesis of discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling studies (± willingness to pay estimates) in scenarios involving cancer nurses, with a focus on: (1) preferred care provider; and (2) relative importance of attributes of care provision for people with cancer.
A search was conducted across: CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EconLit, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar for discrete choice experiments published between January and July 2025. Data were extracted and appraised by two authors. Results were narratively synthesised.
Of 461 studies screened, 11 were included, published in Australia (n = 3), UK (n = 3), and China (n = 5) including people with breast (n = 4), gastric (n = 4), prostate (n = 1), or mixed cancers (n = 2). In six studies exploring scenarios of follow-up care (i.e., survivorship/surveillance), cancer medical specialists were the preferred care provider, followed by cancer nurses, and then general practitioners. In four of the five studies of supportive care scenarios (i.e., diet and exercise advice, anxiety and depression screening), cancer nurses were the preferred care provider, followed by allied health professionals, then cancer medical specialists. The highest WTP estimate was $US226.15 for a medical specialist to provide follow-up care. For supportive care, the highest WTP was $US137.52 for a cancer nurse to provide diet-based lifestyle advice post-treatment for breast cancer.
Cancer nurses are highly valued by people with cancer, particularly for supportive care provision. Opportunities exist for an increase in cancer nurse specialists with expanded scope of practice, to support the preference of people with cancer to have cancer medical specialists, or cancer nurse specialists provide expert cancer follow-up care.
Employees of a cancer patient advocacy group were involved in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, and the preparation of the manuscript. No patients were involved in this work. However, this systematic review prioritized patient voices by including studies that reported on the preferences of people with cancer.
Post-traumatic neck pain is common, representing a substantial human and societal burden. About 15%–25% of individuals involved in an accident causing whiplash continue to experience moderate-to-severe symptoms and functional impairment 1 year post-trauma. Factors such as age, high pain intensity, hypersensitivity to pain and early post-traumatic hyperarousal are associated with persistent neck pain. However, multiple questions remain unanswered regarding how best to improve early care. As such, research on recovery patterns (including indicators for health economic burden) and their predictors is still needed, including biomarkers for pre-traumatic and peri-traumatic stress, and the value of early prediction tools.
This prospective cohort study will include 100 participants (≥18 years) suffering from post-traumatic neck pain sustained within 72 hours of an accident. At baseline (a combination of inclusion and 1 week assessment), eligible participants will undergo a thorough evaluation, including assessment of descriptive characteristics, self-reported variables (eg, pain, disability, sleep quality and post-traumatic stress), biomarkers (eg, heart rate variability (HRV) and hair cortisol) and clinical tests (eg, cervical range of motion). Follow-up will be conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months post-trauma. Further, register data (eg, data on labour market attachment) will be added for the period. Among other methods, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariable regression analyses will be used to evaluate performance and associations of the prediction tools and their associations with measures of HRV.
The sample size calculation is based on previous studies, estimating that 15% of participants will develop moderate-to-severe ongoing symptoms. Using a conservative estimate, 64 participants are needed to achieve a statistical power of 90% with an expected area under the curve of 0.80. Accounting for a 25% loss to follow-up, 80 participants are required. For regression analysis, 100 participants will be included. The prediction tool will be validated using ROC analysis, sensitivity and specificity. Logistic regression models will be performed with and without biomarkers and pain sensitivity. Health economic costs will be compared across groups. Multivariable regression will examine the link between HRV and post-traumatic stress disorder, adjusting for confounders and a moderation analysis will assess hair cortisol as a potential moderator.
The study is approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics of Southern Denmark (S-20230037). Due to the acute nature of recruitment, the study design does not allow for a 24-hour reflection period; however, this approach has been approved by the Committee.
Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through non-scientific outlets, including patient and professional publications, press releases and social media. If effective, workshops for clinicians will be organised. Results will be published regardless of outcome, with coauthorships following ICMJE guidelines.
Exploring the potential relationships among moral distress (MD), general health (GH) levels, secondary traumatic stress (STS) and levels of empathy within nursing personnel is of specific interest.
This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of MD and its associations with GH, STS, and empathy levels among nurses employed in eight public hospitals across the Attica Basin in Greece.
Between January and March 2020, a cross-sectional study was conducted among nursing staff working in surgical, medical, and psychiatric units of 6 public hospitals and 2 psychiatric institutions in the Attica Basin. Respondents completed the validated Greek versions of the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Health Professionals, the 28-item General Health Questionnaire, and the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale. Participants were asked to complete a paper-pencil data sheet consisting of 27 sociodemographic questions.
A total of 267 out of 350 distributed questionnaires were completed and returned, corresponding to a response rate of 76.3%. The findings showed that nurses experienced moderate MD in both frequency and intensity, moderate-to-high GH and empathy, and moderate levels of STS. Psychiatric nurses reported lower STS and better GH than their counterparts in general hospital settings. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between increased STS and deterioration in GH. A rise in the frequency of MD is significantly linked to an increase in its intensity.
Incorporating proven screening methods, programs that build resilience, supportive workplace cultures, ongoing evaluations over time, and peer support systems creates a complete approach to lowering moral distress and secondary traumatic stress, improving nurse well-being, maintaining work efficiency, and enhancing the overall safety and quality of healthcare services.
Deaths related to drug overdose and suicide in the USA have increased 500% and 35%, respectively, over the last two decades. The human and economic costs to society associated with these ‘deaths of despair’ are immense. Great efforts and substantial investments have been made in treatment and prevention, yet these efforts have not abated these increasing trajectories of deaths over time. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and highlighted these problems. Notably, some geographical areas (eg, Appalachia, farmland) and some communities (eg, low-income persons, ‘essential workers’, minoritised populations) have been disproportionately affected. Risk factors have been identified for substance use and suicide deaths: forms of adversity, neglect, opportunity indexes and trauma. Yet, the biological, psychological and social mechanisms driving risk are not uniform. Notably, most people exposed to risk factors do not become symptomatic and could broadly be considered resilient. Achieving a better understanding of biological, psychological and social mechanisms underlying both pathology and resilience will be crucial for improving approaches for prevention and treatment and creating precision medicine approaches for more efficient and effective treatment.
The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multimodal, integrated familial study designed to identify biological, psychological and social risk and resilience factors and processes leading to mental health disorders, substance use disorders, substance overdose, suicide and associated psychological/medical comorbidities which reduce life expectancy and quality of life. It includes two nested longitudinal samples: (1) WD Survey: an address-based random population epidemiological sample of 15 000 individuals (unique households) representative of the state of Ohio assessed for psychosocial, psychiatric, behavioural health and substance use factors and (2) Brain Health Study: a family-based, multimodal, deep-phenotyping study conducted in 1200 families (up to 3600 persons aged 12–72 years) including MRI, electroencephalography, blood biomarkers and psychiatric diagnostic interviews, as well as neuropsychological, psychosocial functioning and family/community history, dynamics and support assessments. SOAR is designed to discover, develop and deploy advanced predictive analytics and interventions to transform mental health prevention, diagnosis, treatment and recovery.
All participants will provide written informed consent (or parental permission and assent for minors). The study was approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board (study numbers 2023H0316 (Brain Health) and 2023H0350 (Wellness Survey). The Brain Health study was also approved by institutional review boards at each partnering institution involved in conducting participant assessments. Findings will be disseminated to academic peers, clinicians and healthcare consumers, policymakers and the general public, using local and international academic channels (academic journals, evidence briefs and conferences) and outreach (workshops and seminars).
To investigate whether treatment with oral corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) improves pregnancy outcomes in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) following assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment.
A randomised, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted from January 2021 to February 2024.
A single-centre trial at a Danish tertiary clinic for RPL management.
80 women with at least two consecutive early pregnancy losses following ART, age 18–41 years, body mass index below 35, and no identified cause of RPL. Forty participants were allocated to each group, with 37 fulfilling the protocol criteria in each group.
Participants were randomised to receive either a combination of low-dose oral prednisolone starting on the first day of menstruation and IVIg given the first time around the time of embryo transfer; or matching placebo tablets and albumin infusions. Treatment continued until gestational week 8+4 in those who conceived with a total of four infusions.
The primary outcomes were the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) defined as a living fetus in gestational week 13 among all randomised participants and in those who conceived after embryo transfer, respectively, based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Secondary outcomes included safety outcomes related to pregnancy complications and neonatal health.
OPR was equal to live birth rate. Among all randomised participants (ITT), the OPR was 25.0% in the treatment group and 15.0% in the placebo group (relative risk 1.67; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.15; p=0.26). Among participants without major protocol deviations (PP), OPRs were 21.6% and 16.2%, respectively (relative risk 1.33; 95% CI 0.51 to 3.47; p=0.55). Among participants who became pregnant following embryo transfer, ongoing pregnancy occurred in 83.3% of the treatment group and 42.9% of the placebo group (relative risk 1.94; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.75; p=0.05). No differences in adverse events or neonatal outcomes were observed between the two groups.
The combination of oral corticosteroids and IVIg did not improve overall pregnancy rates in women with RPL after ART. However, among those who achieved pregnancy after embryo transfer, the risk of pregnancy loss appeared reduced. Larger randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings.
ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04701034. Registration date: 5 January 2021
EudraCT number: 2020-000256-35; Registration date: 11 November 2020
The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics: N-20200066, Registration date: 16 December 2020
The Data Protection Agency: 2020-156; Registration date: 4 November 2020
WHO universal trial number: U1111-1273-8585
Date of first patient’s enrolment: 28 January 2021.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts poor prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with or without atrial fibrillation. In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the CHA2DS2-VASc score by itself and extended with clinical data to predict adverse events in patients after AMI.
In this longitudinal observational study, we used a cohort of 955 patients hospitalised for AMI at Västmanland County Hospital, Västerås, Sweden, to derive prediction models. The CHA2DS2-VASc score alone and combined with clinical data (systolic blood pressure, creatinine level, ST-segment elevation and diuretic use at discharge) was analysed using Cox regression to evaluate the risk of major adverse events (MAE), defined as all-cause death or hospitalisation due to recurrent MI, heart failure or ischaemic stroke. Discriminatory performance was presented as the time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC). The prediction models were validated in 416 patients with AMI hospitalised at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
During a median of 2.5 years, 287 (30.1%) patients experienced MAE. CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 2, 4 and 6 were associated with fourfold, ninefold and 18-fold increases in the relative risk of MAE, respectively, with a tdAUC of 0.76 at a 2-year follow-up. Extending the CHA2DS2-VASc score with clinical data significantly improved the prediction model (p
The addition of clinical data to the CHA2DS2-VASc score was superior to a model with CHA2DS2-VASc alone in predicting adverse events in patients after AMI, and the model performed well in external validation.
The aim of this study is to map nursing publications on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in Web of Science, highlighting trends, key contributors, and central research themes to identify potential areas for future research.
The globally-spanning 2030 Agenda promotes sustainable development using research technology and scientific innovation. However, research data availability is a challenge. By conducting big data analyses, using all available nursing research literature indexed in the Web of Science database (Core Collection) pertaining to this field, aid in understanding and advancing this area.
This study adopts a cross-sectional descriptive bibliometric study design.
The search yielded 131 publications, comprising 116 articles (89%) and 15 review articles (11%). This can be compared to adjacent disciplines such as Internal General Medicine (n = 360), Nutrition/Dietetics (n = 171), and Paediatrics (n = 152). The leading countries in publication output were the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Among the included publications, only eight SDGs were addressed: SDG3 (Good Health and Well-Being), SDG13 (Climate Action), SDG4 (Quality Education), SDG5 (Gender Equality), SDG6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), SDG16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), SDG1 (No Poverty), and SDG9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure).
The findings indicate a scarcity of articles in nursing publications focusing on the SDGs, suggesting insufficient evidence of nursing's contributions to these goals—particularly beyond SDG3.
This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric review and analysis of existing nursing publications on the SDGs. The results offer valuable insights for future research areas related to the SDGs, particularly for nursing scholars, clinicians, managers, and policymakers concerned with the underrepresentation of nursing publications. To address this gap and advance both the SDGs and quality patient care, action plans should be developed to integrate the SDGs into daily nursing practice.
No Patient or Public Contribution. This study was a bibliometric analysis.
To explore Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
A cross-sectional survey design.
An online survey was sent to Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators across the 45 Schools of Nursing and Midwifery between July and September 2023. The online survey consisted of 29 open- and closed-ended questions about nursing and midwifery educators' planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices.
There was a total of 127 responses to the first open-ended question. A total of 97 nursing and midwifery educators then completed the remaining questions. While educators had mostly positive views about integrating planetary health into their teaching, they lacked the knowledge and/or confidence to do so effectively.
Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators acknowledge that planetary health should be included in nursing and midwifery curricula, but most reported a deficit in knowledge and/or confidence to integrate these complex concepts into their teaching. When considering planetary health, most educators focussed on climate change, which demonstrates their limited understanding of the concept of planetary health.
All nurses and midwives need to understand how the health of the planet and human civilization are interconnected and be prepared to address complex global health challenges now and in the future. Across the world, key healthcare organizations have called upon nursing and midwifery educators to prepare the healthcare workforce to practice in a more sustainable way, including supporting decarbonization of healthcare. However, our study has demonstrated that nursing and midwifery educators do not feel ready to respond due to a lack of required knowledge and/or confidence.
We used the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).
No patient or public contribution.
To identify instruments for measuring nurses' well-being at work, evaluate their dimensions, validity, reliability, and determine the most comprehensive of all.
Systematic literature review of measurement properties.
Science Direct, PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCO, Scopus, Sage, and Google Scholar for all periods.
Quantitative research articles that provide information on psychometric testing of instruments for measuring nurses' well-being were analyzed, excluding non-scientific, and non-English sources. The Consensus-based Standards for The Selection of Health Measurement Instrument (COSMIN) was used to identify the risk of bias. Terwee quality criteria were used to assess the quality of the measurement properties. The synthesis process was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024532860).
A total of 22 articles, covering 17 instruments developed based on different theories and concepts were identified. The number of items ranges from 5–69, with 1–8 dimensions, where the interpersonal relationship is the most widely used dimension. Only a few instruments assess nurses' well-being in particular units. Validity and reliability were tested through various methods, but none met all COSMIN criteria. GRADE analysis revealed that over half of the instruments had low-quality assessment results.
Instruments varied in structure, including the number of items, scales, and dimensions. The low-quality assessment results of most instruments highlight the need for better instrument development and validation, especially for nurses in specific units by considering their respective work culture and climate.
This study emphasizes the need to develop an instrument to measure nurses' well-being in certain units specifically according to the COSMIN guidelines to improve its validity and reliability. The results of such measurements can help management formulate effective intervention strategies and serve as a basis for further research.
No patient or public contribution.
Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) serve as crucial devices for essential care administration in emergency departments (ED). In Australia, to standardise clinical practice, the national PIVC Clinical Care Standard was introduced in 2021, however adherence to the Standard has not been adequately explored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate ED clinicians' adherence to the Standard via prospective audit.
This cross-sectional observational study of PIVCs was conducted in three Australian EDs between 2022 and 2023. Data were collected in alignment with the quality indicators in the PIVC Clinical Care Standard. Research nurses collected the data from bedside observation and chart audit, with data analysed descriptively.
Out of 1568 episodes of PIVC care recorded, there were notable shortcomings. ED nurses and doctors provided minimal patient partnership during insertion episodes: PIVC self-care education (n = 4, 1.4%), discussion of potential risks/benefits (n = 8, 2.9%), and reporting of concerns (n = 16, 5.8%). Insertions primarily occurred at the antecubital fossa (n = 225, 81.2%), with a common issue being inadequate time for antiseptic solution to air dry (n = 156, 56.3%). Ongoing needs assessment was unable to be assessed due to documentation limitations, which were generally incomplete. Idle catheters (inserted but not used) were prevalent (n = 115, 41.8%), and only a quarter of inpatient ward admissions (n = 75, 27.3%) had clear indications for PIVC use.
These findings highlight the suboptimal ED PIVC practices that require attention and improvement. Innovative interventions and technology are necessary to address some of these suboptimal practices due to their complexity and persistent challenges, despite previous efforts by clinicians and researchers.
The findings underscore the need for well-resourced efforts to ensure adherence to evidence-based practices in dynamic clinical settings.
The study is reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement.
None.
To describe the factors influencing clinical integration of self-management support by primary care nurses for people with physical chronic diseases and common mental disorders, as well as strategies for improvement.
Thorne's interpretive descriptive qualitative approach.
Semi-structured interviews lasting from 60 to 90 min were carried out virtually with nurses from Family Medicine Groups and University Family Medicine Groups across the province of Quebec (Canada) from January 2022 to January 2023. Twenty-three primary care nurses were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling from three networks. Iterative deductive and inductive thematic analysis was completed using Valentijn's Rainbow Model of Integrated Care.
The study identified several factors influencing integrated self-management support from primary care nurses across integration domains: clinical (knowledge, skills, training and experience; workload; approaches and activities; attitudes and behaviours; clinical tools), professional (interprofessional and nursing roles; collaboration; team composition), normative and functional (culture and organisational mechanisms). Improvement strategies pointed to the necessity of developing training regarding common mental disorders, adapted clinical tools, clinical support and coaching through collaboration and culture change.
These findings suggest that a cultural shift emphasising continuous improvement through targeted training and coaching is essential to enhance integrated self-management support. Identifying factors and improvement strategies will help implement future interventions and tailor current practices.
Identifying barriers and facilitators, along with proposing improvement strategies, will enable the implementation of more effective interventions and the adaptation of care practices to better support self-management. Additionally, it will influence stakeholders to modify the context surrounding integrated self-management support and interprofessional practise.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
No patient or public contribution.
To examine burnout levels, nurse perceptions of the work environment, job satisfaction, intention to stay and quality of care for nurses working in emergency departments before and following a planned change to nurse staffing levels.
A pre-post observational design.
A systematic approach (Nursing Hours per Patient Presentation) was introduced to determine nurse staffing levels based on patient presentations resulting in adjustments to nurse staffing. Data on burnout, the work environment, intention to stay, job satisfaction and quality of care were collected from three emergency departments prior to and following the adjustments to nurse staffing.
An adjustment to nurse staffing levels was made to all three emergency departments. Mean emotional exhaustion scores were significantly lower, and quality of work environment scores and levels of job satisfaction were significantly higher for nurses following staffing adjustments. There was an increase to the proportion of nurses who perceived an improvement in quality of care delivered. In general, the results indicated improvements in outcomes following adjustments to nurse staffing levels.
A more holistic organisational approach is required to address staffing in emergency departments. Initiatives that involve frontline nurses in resource planning facilitating a bottom-up approach to allow for improved work environments would be beneficial.
This study addressed a planned change to nurse staffing levels in emergency departments and staff outcomes pre and post changes to staffing levels.
This study highlighted that staffing an emergency department, based on nursing hours per patient presentation, was associated with improvements in staff outcomes.
The research will impact on nurses working in emergency departments as outcomes from this research were used to develop a Framework for Safe Nurse Staffing and Skill Mix in Emergency Care Settings.
STROBE and SQUIRE checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To explore Registered Nurses' experiences of continuity of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.
An inductive, descriptive qualitative study.
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 11 purposively sampled Registered Nurses of varying levels of experience from eight regions in Sweden. The audiotaped interviews were conducted over a 5-month period (December 2023–April 2024), transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretive description.
Registered Nurses' experiences of continuity of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are described by three themes (seven subthemes): Patient continuity (Building personal relationships: Being accessible and enabling trust and confirmation), Collaborator continuity (Having a colleague to lean on: Colleagues can lean on me: Feeling alone with my expertise) and Continuity with myself (Trusting my own competence: Carrying a burden alone).
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Guidelines.
This study provides an understanding of Registered Nurses' experiences of continuity of care in primary care. The results may help improve future care since nurses play an essential role in the care of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease within primary care.
To enhance continuity of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the relationship between the nurse and the patient is important, as is collaboration with colleagues. This collaborative approach allows these nurses to maintain continuity with both the patients and themselves, fostering a more stable and effective care environment.
This study offers valuable insights into the experiences of Registered Nurses in maintaining continuity of care within primary care, particularly for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. By highlighting the critical role of Registered Nurses in managing these patients, the study underscores the importance of strong nurse–patient relationships and effective collaboration among healthcare professionals.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
To achieve consensus on the knowledge and skills that undergraduate/pre-licensure nursing students require to steward healthcare towards a more sustainable future.
A two-phase real-time Delphi study.
Phase 1 included the generation of Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability knowledge and skill statements based on a review of relevant literature. Phase 2 consisted of a real-time Delphi survey designed to seek consensus on the proposed statements from a panel of 42 international experts.
Of the 49 survey statements, 44 (90%) achieved ≥75% consensus and 26 (53%) achieved ≥80% consensus. Three were removed and 32 were modified to improve clarity of language.
The knowledge and skills statements that emerged through this Delphi study can serve as a guide for incorporating Planetary Health, climate change and sustainability into nursing education programs.
Incorporating Planetary Health and climate change education into nursing programs has the potential to produce more environmentally conscious and socially responsible nurses.
The absence of consensus on the essential knowledge and skills expected of nursing students has hindered the advancement of curricula and impacted educators' confidence in teaching Planetary Health and climate change. This study has resulted in a meticulously crafted framework of knowledge and skill statements that will be beneficial to educators, the future nursing workforce, and, ultimately, the individuals and communities whom nurses serve.
This paper adheres to the Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) reporting guideline.
No patient or public contribution.
To explore how parents of children with de novo retinoblastoma (RB) experience the diagnostic process and acute treatment phase, and to identify factors that may support parental coping and adaptation.
A qualitative interview study using reflexive thematic analysis.
National Retinoblastoma Unit at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Thirty-one parents (21 mothers, 10 fathers) of 21 children diagnosed with de novo RB were recruited via hospital follow-up clinics and a support group day.
For most parents, the diagnostic process was short. In cases of diagnostic delay, parents described frustration and guilt due to missed symptoms. Receiving the RB diagnosis was described as a surreal experience, accompanied by feelings of shock, grief and loss of control. Parents faced challenges in adapting to rapid medical decisions and the unfamiliar demands of hospital protocols. However, meeting the clinical experts was a relief, as parents felt they were in capable hands, experiencing empathetic communication and a clearly framed treatment plan. Parents emphasised the importance of support systems, including family, healthcare professionals and the child’s resilience, as crucial for coping with and managing the diagnosis.
Parents faced a sudden and disruptive transition from symptom recognition to life-altering diagnosis and treatment. While professional care and communication were experienced as supportive, they did not eliminate the emotional impact. Clinical pathways should prioritise early validation of parental concerns and provide transparent communication, both prior to referral and throughout treatment. Future research should examine longer-term parental adjustment and identify interventions that support emotional resilience beyond the acute phase.
FreshRSS 