Avoidable and unfair variation in access to palliative care exists for different groups of people and communities. Primary and community care teams deliver most palliative care and care to people at the end of life at home but the quality of care provided is variable. This is an under-researched area and receives little attention in service design and policy. This study will investigate the key contexts, resources and components required for an integrated approach to palliative care to deliver improved and more equitable outcomes for patients and carers.

This mixed-methods study adopts a realist methodological approach, and comprises four work packages:

A multi-perspective mixed-methods study to understand patient preferences and priorities in palliative care, prioritising recruitment of patients and family members/carers from areas of socioeconomic deprivation. Data collection will comprise: (1) qualitative interviews, (2) review of patient case notes and (3) a discrete choice experiment. Realist analysis will result in the development of theory based on the identification of the key contexts and underlying mechanisms required to achieve beneficial outcomes through an integrated approach to palliative care.

A realist evaluation of existing integrated models of palliative care will involve theory-refining interviews and theory-consolidating focus groups with professionals working in three different service areas.

Dynamic simulation modelling of the healthcare resources needed to deliver the proposed integrated approach, ensuring quality and equity.

The theoretical and economic modelling will be tested out at two expert stakeholder workshops to determine the key enablers to implementation in practice.

The study design was informed by patient and public involvement (PPI) with 16 patients and members of the public from diverse and socioeconomically deprived communities for 12 months in a National Institute for Health and Care Research-funded palliative care partnership. PPI will be continuous throughout the study, prioritising inclusivity.

Ethical approval was obtained from the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service Research Ethics Committee 2, on 20 August 2025 (IRAS ID: 354755) and Health Research Authority approval on 1 October 2025. The targeted dissemination strategy will include outputs and resources for key audiences including patients and families, professionals in primary care and specialist palliative care and service commissioners. The results will inform service delivery to reduce inequities and optimise the use of finite resources to maximise impact.

The study is registered with the ISRCTN UK Clinical Study Registry: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN61092011.

Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) remains a significant complication of endoscopic resection, contributing to morbidity and increased healthcare costs. Although prophylactic clipping is widely practised to mitigate this risk, evidence from recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) regarding its efficacy is inconsistent. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic clips following thermal resection.

We will conduct a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 February 2026, to identify RCTs comparing prophylactic clips vs no clips in patients undergoing thermal endoscopic resection of non-pedunculated polyps. The primary outcome is DPPB within 30 days, defined as overt bleeding requiring medical intervention or a haemoglobin decrease ≥2 g/dL. Secondary outcomes include DPPB in proximal large (≥20 mm) lesions, perforation, post-polypectomy syndrome and procedure time. Data synthesis will use a random-effects model. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots. We will quantify the effect of potential effect modifiers by meta-regression if appropriate. The quality of evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

This study will not use primary data, and therefore formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences.

CRD420251246840.

Perinatal depression is a common, yet understudied, mental health disorder among women and contributes to poor engagement in prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Male partners are positioned to provide critical forms of social and economic support during pregnancy and postpartum, and also may contribute to women’s stress, depression and anxiety through intimate partner violence and withholding of social support. Despite the critical role of men in pregnancy outcomes and HIV prevention, few interventions have engaged men around women’s depressive symptoms, nutrition and health, and engagement in PMTCT. We will conduct a pilot trial of Mphatso, a couple-based intervention based on problem-solving therapy with couple relationship skills to reduce depressive symptoms in perinatal women, improve food insecurity and prevent HIV transmission to the infant.

We will employ a two-arm pilot randomised controlled trial in the Zomba district of Malawi to assess the feasibility and acceptability of Mphatso (meaning ‘gift’ or the child) and explore health impacts on depressive symptoms, PMTCT engagement and food insecurity. We will enrol 60 pregnant women in the second or third trimester who are living with HIV and meet criteria for probable depression based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and their male partners. Couples will be randomised to receive either five sessions of Mphatso (problem-management skills plus health education and relationship skills) or enhanced usual care. Feasibility and acceptability outcomes will include session attendance rates, satisfaction levels and retention at 3 months and 6 months postpartum. Exploratory analyses using regression models including time and treatment arm will be conducted to explore effects on the mothers’ and fathers’ depressive symptoms, adherence to PMTCT (antiretroviral therapy, nevirapine use, HIV testing and exclusive breastfeeding) and food insecurity.

The pilot trial has been approved by the University of California, San Francisco (Human Research Protection Program (HRPP); Protocol Number 23-40685), and the study has also been approved by the National Health Sciences Research Committee in Malawi (NHSRC; Protocol Number 24/05/4431). Results will be disseminated to study participants, health officials, policymakers, community leaders and care providers, as well as through presentations at conferences and publications in peer-reviewed journals.

NCT06659315.

In the UK, a range of services provide same day, urgent and emergency care (UEC). Urgent medical needs can be addressed through pharmacy services, same day general practice (GP) appointments, phone or online triage services, out-of-hours GP appointments and urgent treatment centres (or equivalents). For emergency medical needs, patients can access emergency departments (EDs) and ambulance services. These services are highly vulnerable to excessive strain due to rising, unpredictable demand and limitations in patient flow across the system. The workforce operates in time-critical situations, often with limited resources, which can lead to staff burnout, low job satisfaction and retention and poor health. The organisation of services and their workforce continues to evolve in response to local and national pressures and varies considerably across the UK, where there are four distinct, publicly funded healthcare systems managed separately in each country. This makes it difficult to describe and compare services within and across regions and understand the impact of workforce organisation on service delivery, staff well-being and patient care. This study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of the range and types of UK UEC services, the relative experiences of the workforce and the available workforce data.

This mixed-methods study includes two components, integrated through an explanatory sequential design. Study 1 will use data on NHS service availability and direct enquiry to map UEC services and populate a structured database, which will facilitate the generation of a UEC typology of the range and types of services and regional variation across the UK. Multiple case studies will be conducted in a subset of services using qualitative interviews (n=136–220) with service leaders (n=3–5), workforce (n=10–12), and patients or carers (n=4–5), as well as document analysis where relevant, in each service of interest (n=8–10). Study 2 will create a metadata catalogue of workforce data and produce descriptive summaries of key metrics (eg, staffing levels and skill mix). The study will be supported by our Community Inclusion and Engagement (CIE) panel and Patient and Public Advisory Group (PPAG) to ensure relevance, inclusivity and impact.

This study received ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (04/08/2025, IRAS ID: 357276, REC Reference: 25/YH/0125) and HRA and Health and Care Research Wales approval (12/08/2025). Data collection poses minimal risk, informed consent will be obtained, and participants may withdraw at any time. Dissemination will follow knowledge mobilisation principles to maximise impact. We will build on our existing networks and work with our CIE panel and PPAG to tailor study outputs to different audiences. The outputs will improve understanding of the variation in how UEC services and workforces are organised across the UK, as well as the type and format of available workforce data, and provide benchmarks for future research.

Research Registry (REF: researchregistry11555; https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now/%23home/registrationdetails/68d402672341e502cd0ce888/)

Total alloplastic replacement of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a viable treatment option for severe TMJ disorders (TMDs) unresponsive to conservative approaches, as well as for reconstruction of congenital or acquired TMJ defects. However, clinical data on indications, outcomes, complications and long-term effects remain limited, and no global registry currently exists. This study aims to address this gap by establishing an international registry to collect data from patients undergoing total alloplastic TMJ replacement systematically. The registry will document clinical indications and disease progression, explore relationships between treatments, outcomes and quality of life, identify predictors of favourable outcomes and inform future research.

This international, prospective, multicentre, observational registry will enrol approximately 200 patients with TMD requiring total alloplastic TMJ replacement, with follow-up lasting up to 5 years postoperatively. The data collected will include underlying disease, treatment details, functional outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. The registry will also monitor patients who decline surgery and record their reasons. All treatments will adhere to the standard of care at each participating centre.

Ethics approval was obtained from the responsible ethics committee (EC) at each participating site prior to TMJ surgery. All patients will be enrolled following an informed consent process approved by the relevant EC. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

Approving ECs include: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital EC, KCDS/Ethical Comm/54/2022–23; Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, 2019–02387; University of Belgrade School of Dental Medicine EC, 36/19; National Videnskabsetisk Komité, 2401881; University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research EC, BREC/00001592/2020; Etikprövningsmyndigheten, 2019–04477; Ethikkommission Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 8660_BO_K_2019; Ethik-Kommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, 080/21-lk; Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 19/392; Landesärztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz EC, 2025–18012-andere Forschung/nachberatend; Local Ethical Committee at National Medical and Surgical Centre named after NI Pirogoov, LEC meeting 5; Ethikkommission bei der LMU München, 19–589; Komisja Bioetyczna przy Warmiłsko-Mazurskiej Izbie Lekarskiej w Olsztynie, 12/2021; De Medisch Ethische Toetsings Commissie Erasmus MC, MEC-2019–0696 and Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, 3.825.711.

NCT03991728.

Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations—such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs—to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer’s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.

The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) National service mapping—outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) Quantitative analysis—quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England’s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) Qualitative case studies—up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,

Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.

Research Registry (researchregistry11126).