Conectar
In the UK, a range of services provide same day, urgent and emergency care (UEC). Urgent medical needs can be addressed through pharmacy services, same day general practice (GP) appointments, phone or online triage services, out-of-hours GP appointments and urgent treatment centres (or equivalents). For emergency medical needs, patients can access emergency departments (EDs) and ambulance services. These services are highly vulnerable to excessive strain due to rising, unpredictable demand and limitations in patient flow across the system. The workforce operates in time-critical situations, often with limited resources, which can lead to staff burnout, low job satisfaction and retention and poor health. The organisation of services and their workforce continues to evolve in response to local and national pressures and varies considerably across the UK, where there are four distinct, publicly funded healthcare systems managed separately in each country. This makes it difficult to describe and compare services within and across regions and understand the impact of workforce organisation on service delivery, staff well-being and patient care. This study aims to develop a comprehensive understanding of the range and types of UK UEC services, the relative experiences of the workforce and the available workforce data.
This mixed-methods study includes two components, integrated through an explanatory sequential design. Study 1 will use data on NHS service availability and direct enquiry to map UEC services and populate a structured database, which will facilitate the generation of a UEC typology of the range and types of services and regional variation across the UK. Multiple case studies will be conducted in a subset of services using qualitative interviews (n=136–220) with service leaders (n=3–5), workforce (n=10–12), and patients or carers (n=4–5), as well as document analysis where relevant, in each service of interest (n=8–10). Study 2 will create a metadata catalogue of workforce data and produce descriptive summaries of key metrics (eg, staffing levels and skill mix). The study will be supported by our Community Inclusion and Engagement (CIE) panel and Patient and Public Advisory Group (PPAG) to ensure relevance, inclusivity and impact.
This study received ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (04/08/2025, IRAS ID: 357276, REC Reference: 25/YH/0125) and HRA and Health and Care Research Wales approval (12/08/2025). Data collection poses minimal risk, informed consent will be obtained, and participants may withdraw at any time. Dissemination will follow knowledge mobilisation principles to maximise impact. We will build on our existing networks and work with our CIE panel and PPAG to tailor study outputs to different audiences. The outputs will improve understanding of the variation in how UEC services and workforces are organised across the UK, as well as the type and format of available workforce data, and provide benchmarks for future research.
Research Registry (REF: researchregistry11555; https://www.researchregistry.com/register-now/%23home/registrationdetails/68d402672341e502cd0ce888/)
To identify successful strategies and underpinning mechanisms for retaining nurses in home visiting nursing services.
Scoping review.
MEDLINE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Theses Global Databases (1 January 2000 to 23 November 2023); international nursing organisations websites (January–April 2024).
The methods followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Two researchers independently screened and reviewed, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Included papers were analysed for underlying mechanisms.
Of 1219 records identified, seven met the criteria. Four papers reported senior administrators' experience of successful multiple types of strategies (unspecified), but none reported retention outcomes. Three papers reported evaluations of initiatives providing clinical and peer support to nurses new to home visiting nursing. All three papers reported improved retention rates at 12 months in comparison to the year previous, although there was no consideration of other potentially influencing factors. We identified eight underlying mechanisms in the seven papers: (1) finance incentives; (2) work schedule flexibility for individuals; (3) team level management; (4) positive feedback on job performance; (5) team level interpersonal relationships; (6) the work organisation and resources; (7) support to individual's development in knowledge, clinical skill and confidence and (8) participation in organisation's decision making.
This review identified noticeable few papers over a time when all countries have been trying to address the growing health needs of the older populations. The gap in evidence as to the most effective combinations of retention strategies for home visiting nursing requires urgent attention. Clinical leaders and managers require evidence to inform their strategies for retaining home visiting nurses in order to provide high quality care as more health care systems increase the provision of acute, chronic, and palliative care in patients' own homes.
This paper conforms to PRISMA reporting guidelines for scoping reviews.
No patient or public contribution.
To investigate the experience and perceptions of the effectiveness of retention strategies of nurses and nursing associates in district nursing services.
Mixed methods cross-sectional online survey.
Electronic invitations were circulated via district nursing professional networks to complete an online survey in England. The survey questions were developed from international evidence-based guidance. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using multinomial regression analysis, tested the variation in experienced strategies by job and work characteristics. Content analysis informed qualitative data analysis.
Three hundred and forty-five completed surveys were received. Over 60% of respondents reported experiencing strategies related to a safe working environment (75%), flexible work schedules (65%), well-being (64%) and professional development opportunities (60%). The least frequently reported strategies experienced were involvement in service policymaking (26%), reducing job demands (31%); and creating cohesive nursing teams (40%). Nurses on lower pay grades were statistically less likely than those on the higher pay bands to experience strategies involving professional growth opportunities and involvement in service decision-making. Nurses working in affluent areas were statistically more likely to report experiencing more types of retention strategies than those working in socio-economically deprived areas. Participants' views on effective strategies were mixed but attention to financial aspects (particularly travel costs), manageable workloads, flexibility in work scheduling plus tailored induction/support for those new to district nursing were given the most testimony as effective.
Retention strategies are created and enacted by those within employing organisations, district nursing services and district nursing teams, but within the context of a wider health care and labour market system. We suggest the findings could be the starting point for review by district nursing services experiencing high vacancy rates. Our findings raise questions for subsequent investigation across health systems.
This paper adhered to the relevant Equator guideline A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
Major haemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death in trauma, and prehospital blood transfusion may improve survival and outcomes for patients with prolonged out-of-hospital times. Globally, there is increasing interest in the use of whole blood in the prehospital environment, with randomised controlled trials ongoing. However, the results of these studies may not be generalisable to the longer out-of-hospital times seen in the Canadian trauma environment. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of performing a randomised clinical trial evaluating the use of leukocyte-reduced whole blood transfusion compared with component blood transfusion in the Canadian prehospital environment. The secondary objective is to explore whether whole blood transfusion is better in reducing the proportion of patients who die or require massive transfusion within 24 hours.
This is a multi-centre, open-label, randomised controlled feasibility trial. Patients aged 16 years or older will be eligible if they have suffered a major traumatic haemorrhage, are attended by the provincial air ambulance service and require a prehospital blood transfusion. The primary outcome is feasibility as measured by the following metrics: proportion of patients enrolled with full data collection, proportion of patients who received at least one prehospital transfusion prior to arriving at the receiving trauma centre, proportion of patients who completed transfusion of all assigned blood units, number of patients unable to be enrolled due to lack of whole blood availability and number of whole blood units produced for the study that were wasted or expired. The secondary outcome is a composite outcome of death (all-cause mortality) or receipt of massive transfusion (receipt of 10 units of blood or more) within the first 24 hours from randomisation. We plan to recruit 60 patients, with an anticipated post-randomisation exclusion of ~10 patients for traumatic cardiac arrest or who do not meet eligibility criteria.
Provincial ethics approval was obtained (Clinical Trials Ontario REB ID: CTO-4921). An opt-out consent model will be employed for participants. The SWiFT Canada trial will recruit 60 patients through the provincial air ambulance organisation in Ontario who are transported to one of the six participating lead trauma centres. It will investigate the feasibility of a pre-hospital transfusion clinical trial in Canada to compare the effectiveness of whole blood compared with component blood therapy in a future definitive trial.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06495294 (
To examine burnout levels, nurse perceptions of the work environment, job satisfaction, intention to stay and quality of care for nurses working in emergency departments before and following a planned change to nurse staffing levels.
A pre-post observational design.
A systematic approach (Nursing Hours per Patient Presentation) was introduced to determine nurse staffing levels based on patient presentations resulting in adjustments to nurse staffing. Data on burnout, the work environment, intention to stay, job satisfaction and quality of care were collected from three emergency departments prior to and following the adjustments to nurse staffing.
An adjustment to nurse staffing levels was made to all three emergency departments. Mean emotional exhaustion scores were significantly lower, and quality of work environment scores and levels of job satisfaction were significantly higher for nurses following staffing adjustments. There was an increase to the proportion of nurses who perceived an improvement in quality of care delivered. In general, the results indicated improvements in outcomes following adjustments to nurse staffing levels.
A more holistic organisational approach is required to address staffing in emergency departments. Initiatives that involve frontline nurses in resource planning facilitating a bottom-up approach to allow for improved work environments would be beneficial.
This study addressed a planned change to nurse staffing levels in emergency departments and staff outcomes pre and post changes to staffing levels.
This study highlighted that staffing an emergency department, based on nursing hours per patient presentation, was associated with improvements in staff outcomes.
The research will impact on nurses working in emergency departments as outcomes from this research were used to develop a Framework for Safe Nurse Staffing and Skill Mix in Emergency Care Settings.
STROBE and SQUIRE checklist.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Older crime victims may be particularly vulnerable to psychological distress.
To compare the clinical effectiveness of a Victim Improvement Package (VIP) to treatment as usual (TAU) for reducing continued crime-associated distress.
A three-step parallel-group single-blind randomised controlled trial.
Police-reported victims of community crime aged 65 and over were recruited from 12 local authority areas in a major urban city in England, UK.
Selection criteria—inclusion: victims of community crime aged 65 years or more, with significant Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) distress associated with the crime. Exclusion: type of crime, diagnosis, receipt of cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) in the last 6 months; an inability to participate in CBT; cognitive impairment. Participants were typical of our local authority population; 71% were female, 69% white, with the majority of crimes associated with burglary (35%) and theft (26%). 67% (88/131) of the randomised participants were included in the primary analysis.
TAU was compared with TAU plus up to 10 sessions of a cognitively-behaviourally informed VIP, delivered by a mental health charity over 12 weeks.
Timings are in relation to the crime; baseline (3 months), post-VIP intervention (6 months) and follow-up (9 months). The primary outcome was a composite of the Beck Anxiety and Beck Depression Inventories. The primary endpoint was 6 months.
24% (4255/17 611) of reported crime victims were screened, 35% (1505/4255) were distressed. Of 60% (877/1505) rescreened at 3 months, 49% (427/877) remained distressed. Out of our target of 226, 131 participants were randomised; 65 to VIP and 66 to TAU alone. 68% (89/131) completed the primary outcome (post-intervention). The VIP showed no overall benefit; mean VIP –0.41 (SD 0.89) vs mean TAU –0.19 (SD 1.11); standardised mean difference –0.039; 95% CI (–0.39, 0.31), although stratified analyses suggested an effect in burglary victims (n=27, standardised mean difference –0.61; 95% CI (–1.22, –0.002), p=0.049).
Community crime had long-lasting impacts. The police are ideally placed to screen for distress, present in 35% of victims, but only 58% of participants were recruited and the cognitive–behavioural therapy was not delivered competently. Further research on victim care and improving the delivery and quality of therapy is required.
All procedures were approved by the University College London (UCL) Research Ethics Committee on 17 March 2016 (6960/001). International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number is ISRCTN16929670:
FreshRSS 