Conectar
To investigate the relationship between a quality of life (QOL) score and clinical parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
A multicentre cross-sectional study.
We analysed data from the Searching for Atrial Fibrillation and Early Recruitment of Heart Failure in HCM registry, collected between 2018 and 2023.
Patients with HCM (n=499) aged ≥18 years from 12 institutions (Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan) were consecutively enrolled.
Clinical parameters, along with data from a short form of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), were collected. The association between each clinical parameter and the KCCQ-12 score was analysed. Clinical parameters with a significant univariable association (p
In the univariable analysis, KCCQ-12 scores exhibited significant associations with 21 clinical parameters, including sex, left ventricular morphology and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The multiple regression model with 12 parameters that had a significant univariable association exhibited an adjusted R2 of 0.48. In this model, the PSQI (standardised coefficient –0.39; p
In patients with HCM, we investigated the association between the KCCQ-12 score and various clinical parameters. PSQI, as well as known heart failure-related clinical parameters, was significantly associated with the KCCQ-12 score. Visualising the associations of various clinical parameters with the KCCQ-12 score will help physicians to consider factors linked to the decline in QOL in patients with HCM.
by Sugy Choi, Elizabeth Knopf, Megan A. O’Grady, Ivy Van Domselaar, Jessica Ortiz, Carla King, Charles J. Neighbors, Thomas D’Aunno
BackgroundPregnant and parenting women with substance use disorders (SUDs) face complex and overlapping challenges, including substance use, legal issues, housing instability, and trauma. Effective interorganizational collaboration is critical but often hindered by fragmented care and resource limitations. This study explores the key barriers and facilitators that impact collaborative efforts among healthcare providers, government agencies, and community organizations in addressing SUD among pregnant and parenting women.
MethodsThis qualitative study was conducted in New York State between April 2022 and April 2023. The study focused on organizations that provide services to pregnant and parenting women with SUDs, including government agencies, SUD treatment centers, healthcare settings, and community-based care organizations. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted with staff to explore how their organizations coordinate care. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns related to interorganizational collaboration. Primary data were collected through interviews with 30 staff members across multiple stakeholder groups: child welfare services (n = 8), criminal legal agencies (n = 5), health agencies (n = 3), healthcare service settings (n = 4), SUD treatment programs (n = 6), and community-based organizations (n = 4). Interviews lasted approximately one hour and focused on organizational roles, referral processes, and coordination efforts in serving the target population.
ResultsCollaborative care was primarily facilitated through referral networks, case management teams, and the presence of embedded healthcare professionals. However, these systems were frequently limited by fragmented communication, stigmatizing attitudes, and insufficient resources. Organizational facilitators included co-located healthcare staff within child welfare services and formalized partnerships across sectors. Key barriers included staffing shortages, burnout, and misalignment of organizational goals. At the individual level, collaboration often depended on informal relationships and staff-driven initiatives, though interdisciplinary knowledge gaps remained a significant challenge.
ConclusionsImproving service coordination for pregnant and parenting women with SUDs will require stronger organizational infrastructure, investment in cross-sector communication strategies, and deliberate efforts to address stigma. Future research should explore models that support sustained, formalized interagency partnerships to enhance care integration.
This study aimed to analyse the number of myocardial infarction (MI) admissions during the COVID-19 lockdown periods of 2020 and 2021 (March 15th to June 15th) and compare them with corresponding pre-pandemic period in 2019. The study also evaluated changes in critical treatment intervals: onset to door (O2D), door to balloon (D2B) and door to needle (D2N) and assessed 30-day clinical outcomes. This study examined MI care trends in India during the COVID-19 lockdown period, irrespective of patients’ COVID-19 infection status.
Multicentre retrospective cohort study
Twenty-three public and private hospitals across multiple Indian states, all with 24/7 interventional cardiology facilities.
All adults (>18 years) admitted with acute myocardial infarction between March 15 and June 15 in 2019 (pre-pandemic), 2020 (first lockdown) and 2021 (second lockdown). A total of 3614 cases were analysed after excluding duplicates and incomplete data.
Number of MI admissions, median O2D, D2B and D2N times.
30-day outcomes including death, reinfarction and revascularisation.
MI admissions dropped from 4470 in year 2019 to 2131 (2020) and 1483 (2021). The median O2D increased from 200 min (IQR 115–428) pre-COVID-19 to 390 min (IQR 165–796) in 2020 and 304 min (IQR 135–780) in 2021. The median D2B time reduced from 225 min (IQR 120–420) in 2019 to 100 min (IQR 53–510) in 2020 and 130 min (IQR 60–704) in 2021. Similarly, D2N time decreased from 240 min (IQR 120–840) to 35 min (IQR 25–69) and 45 min (IQR 24–75), respectively. The 30-day outcome of death, reinfarction and revascularisation was 4.25% in 2020 and 5.1% in 2021, comparable to 5.8% reported in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement in Kerala study.
Despite the expansion of catheterisation facilities across India, the country continues to fall short of achieving international benchmarks for optimal MI care.
FreshRSS 