To investigate the relationship between a quality of life (QOL) score and clinical parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
A multicentre cross-sectional study.
We analysed data from the Searching for Atrial Fibrillation and Early Recruitment of Heart Failure in HCM registry, collected between 2018 and 2023.
Patients with HCM (n=499) aged ≥18 years from 12 institutions (Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan) were consecutively enrolled.
Clinical parameters, along with data from a short form of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), were collected. The association between each clinical parameter and the KCCQ-12 score was analysed. Clinical parameters with a significant univariable association (p
In the univariable analysis, KCCQ-12 scores exhibited significant associations with 21 clinical parameters, including sex, left ventricular morphology and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The multiple regression model with 12 parameters that had a significant univariable association exhibited an adjusted R2 of 0.48. In this model, the PSQI (standardised coefficient –0.39; p
In patients with HCM, we investigated the association between the KCCQ-12 score and various clinical parameters. PSQI, as well as known heart failure-related clinical parameters, was significantly associated with the KCCQ-12 score. Visualising the associations of various clinical parameters with the KCCQ-12 score will help physicians to consider factors linked to the decline in QOL in patients with HCM.
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presents significant nutritional challenges during concurrent chemoradiotherapy, adversely affecting treatment outcomes and quality of life. Non-pharmacological interventions may help improve nutritional and immune status, reduce complications and enhance overall well-being. However, evidence of their effectiveness is scattered and inconsistent, and no systematic review has yet synthesised the evidence on their effectiveness. This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of non-pharmacological interventions on nutritional status, immune function and complications in NPC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. The findings may contribute to clinical recommendations and support evidence-based decision-making in the supportive care of NPC patients.
This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Wan Fang from November 2014 to November 2024. Search terms will include concepts related to NPC, nutrition, supplements, education, exercise, multimodal interventions and chemoradiotherapy. Only randomised controlled trials will be included. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2. Where appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan 5.4.
This systematic review does not directly involve the use of human beings; therefore, there is no requirement for ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and in various media, such as conferences, congresses or symposia.
CRD42024571769
Adherence to treatment strategies is essential for preventing future complications during diabetes management. This study evaluated the association between dropout history, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and subsequent risks of dropout (missed appointment)in patients with type 2 diabetes.
This was a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial (the Japan Diabetes Outcome Intervention Trial 2 Large-Scale Trial), focusing on the non-intervention group over the study period.
Data were obtained from a multisite trial conducted in Japan, encompassing patients with type 2 diabetes who received routine clinical care at participating clinics.
A total of 996 patients with type 2 diabetes from the non-intervention group were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics (eg, age, sex, smoking status, occupational status and diabetes medication use) were recorded at study entry.
The primary outcome measure was subsequent treatment dropout. The Cox proportional hazards model with the Huber/White method was used to estimate HRs and 95% CIs, with adjustment for age, sex, smoking status, occupational status and diabetes medication use at baseline.
Participants with treatment dropout history had a higher dropout rate than those without dropout history (multivariable-adjusted HR=3.59; 95% CI=2.25 to 5.71). Overall, HbA1c levels were not significantly associated with dropout risk. However, among the 855 participants without dropout history, the dropout risk was higher in the group with HbA1c level ≥10.0% (HR=3.76; CI=1.29 to 10.9) than in the group with HbA1c level of 6.0–6.9%.
This prospective cohort study of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes suggests that dropout history is strongly associated with a higher subsequent dropout risk. High HbA1c levels (≥10%) may be related to a higher dropout risk in patients without a dropout history. These findings may provide actionable indicators for tailored interventions, enhancing targeted healthcare strategies and improving continuity of care.
UMIN000002186.
This study aimed to assess the methodological quality of published systematic reviews of exercise therapy in knee osteoarthritis and summarise their reported effectiveness on quality of life, knee joint function, or adverse events.
Overview of systematic reviews.
PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and CENTRAL (searched on 14 April 2025), plus grey literature (PROSPERO, Epistemonikos, OpenGrey).
We included systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials in patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis by imaging or clinical criteria and treated conservatively with exercise therapy; we excluded reviews that enrolled patients scheduled for surgery, with acute inflammation or osteoarthritis of other joints (hand, hip, ankle), for which relevant author data could not be obtained after one contact attempt, or that did not report at least one primary outcome (quality of life, knee joint function or adverse events).
Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, interventions and outcomes, and assessed methodological quality using the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) tool. Due to heterogeneity in outcome measures across systematic reviews, meta-analysis was not conducted. Effectiveness was defined as any reported beneficial outcome of exercise therapy on predefined outcomes, including quality of life, physical function, pain or adverse events.
58 systematic reviews were selected. Muscle-strengthening (74.1%) and aerobic (48.2%) exercises were the most commonly prescribed exercise-based interventions. SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) and the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) were the most popular outcome-evaluation tools. Furthermore, 63.7% of the systematic reviews revealed that exercise therapy improved all outcomes. The number of intervention-related adverse events was small. Notably, almost all systematic reviews (87.4%) had a critically low quality.
Current evidence on exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis is inadequate. Nevertheless, exercise therapy can be considered for conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Future studies should use network meta-analyses to compare the effects of different exercise therapies and determine their superiority over other conservative therapies.