Conectar
Burnout, a form of moral suffering, has become more commonplace among health care workers in recent years. Measures of general resilience have been widely used to capture improvement in burnout but lack the ability to capture the anguish that comes with burnout from a moral standpoint. The purpose of this analysis was to understand whether moral resilience is uniquely related to burnout beyond a measure of general resilience in a sample of interprofessional health care workers.
Secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data.
In total, 702 interprofessional health care workers participated in a cross-sectional survey. Key measures included the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Hierarchical multiple regression modeling was used to examine the effect of moral resilience (RMRS) in predicting the three dimensions of burnout (MBI-HSS) over and above general resilience (CD-RISC-10).
Moral resilience explained five, six, and 4% of variance for personal accomplishment, depersonalization, and emotional exhaustion, respectively, after accounting for general resilience (CD-RISC-10) and all covariates.
Findings highlight the clear conceptual differences between general and moral resilience and their unique relationship to burnout. Accounting for moral resilience will facilitate an improved multi-level response to moral suffering among health care workers.
Measuring and understanding the differences between general resilience and moral resilience is vital for us to better facilitate the necessary support(s) for health care workers experiencing moral suffering. This will contribute to more sustainable clinical environments, reduced burnout and suffering, and improved patient outcomes.
Traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are common and often life changing. The 6-month period following injury is a critical phase in recovery, during which engagement with rehabilitation professionals can be key to achieving positive outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of which aspects of recovery matter most to patients, how they define a successful recovery and what this looks like when captured during the lived recovery process. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ views and perceptions of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma and to understand what constitutes successful recovery at 6 months postinjury.
Qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis through semi-structured interviews.
Major trauma centre in the UK.
13 participants (mean age (SD) 51 (17) years, 69% male) completed the interview. Eligibility criteria: adults
Three main themes were identified: (1) The recovery journey: participants reflected on their recovery while still processing the accident/injuries. They often drew on other people’s experiences to make sense of their recovery. Recovery was accompanied by a range of negative emotions and personal challenges. (2) The outcome: participants used multiple strategies to work towards recovery, guided by personalised individual goals. A successful recovery was defined as their ‘normal’. (3) Healthcare/clinicians impact recovery: Participants reported confusion and mixed messages from healthcare professionals, leading to uncertainty around injury management. Fragmented care pathway and difficulties accessing healthcare and support were also highlighted.
Recovery at 6 months post injury involves a complex interplay of physical and emotional factors. This period can be particularly challenging to navigate, often with no or limited support. There is a need for a targeted, individualised approach to guide patients through this period of recovery. Participants’ focus was on the outcome following their injury, setting goals for the future, with successful recovery defined as ‘normal’. Further research is needed to support clinicians in developing effective psychologically informed rehabilitation plans.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common paediatric spinal deformity with large curves surgically managed through spinal fusion. However, postoperative rehabilitation remains inconsistent and varies depending on clinician, hospital or location. Our international e-Delphi consensus established a broad range of statements from preoperative care until 12 months postoperatively. However, rehabilitation and graded return to sport between 3 and 12 months remains vague and further consensus work is needed. This study aims to understand the intermediate and late stages of rehabilitation in order to guide return to sport, exercise and physical activity. The primary objective is to explore content of rehabilitation and milestones between 3 and 12 months postoperatively. This understanding of postoperative care will form the basis for future postoperative guidance.
This protocol for a nominal group technique (NGT) study is written in accordance with the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document guidelines. A national sample of expert surgeons, physiotherapists and nurses in AIS will be recruited. The NGT will take place virtually and will consist of six stages: stage 1: idea generation; stage 2: round robin idea sharing; stage 3: discussion and clarification; stage 4: anonymous voting; stage 5: results feedback; and stage 6: discussion and final voting. This NGT will be preceded by a scoping review which will be disseminated a priori to inform stage 1 idea generation. The population, concept, context framework will be used to explore postoperative rehabilitation towards sports, exercise or physical activities following any kind of spinal surgery. The study steering group and patient and public involvement representative have been involved from conceptualisation and will continue to be involved until final dissemination.
The University of Birmingham has provided ethical approval: ERN_4201-Jun2025. Dissemination will take place through conference presentation and peer-reviewed publications.
Over 777 million COVID-19 infections have occurred globally, with data suggesting that 10%–20% of those infected develop Long COVID. Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of Long COVID. We aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a new, remotely delivered, multimodal rehabilitation intervention, paced to prevent post-exertional malaise (PEM), to support the conduct of a future, definitive randomised trial.
We will conduct a randomised, two-arm feasibility trial (COVIDEx intervention vs usual care). Sixty participants with Long COVID will be recruited and randomised prior to giving informed consent under a modified Zelen design using 1:1 allocation with random permuted blocks via central randomisation to receive either the COVIDEx intervention or usual care. The 50-minute, remotely delivered, COVIDEx intervention will occur twice weekly for 8 weeks. All participants will wear a non-invasive device throughout their entire study participation, to track heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, steps, sleep and monitor PEM. The primary feasibility objectives will be recruitment rates, intervention fidelity, adherence, acceptability (intervention and design), retention, blinding success and outcome completeness. Secondary objectives will include refined estimates for the standard deviation and correlation between baseline and follow-up measurements of fatigue. Feasibility and clinical outcomes will be collected at baseline, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. Qualitative interviews with participants and physiotherapists will explore intervention acceptability and barriers/facilitators.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained by the Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board (REB# 123902). Dissemination plans include sharing of trial findings at conferences and through open access publications and patient/community channels.
To gain insight into patients’ views, perceptions, experiences and expectations postlumbar discectomy.
A qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) purposively recruited patients undergoing lumbar discectomy at one UK spinal centre. Purposive criteria included age, sex, ethnicity, symptom duration, work/sick leave, education level and co-existing psychological issues. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a patient co-constructed topic guide. Interview transcriptions were analysed in accordance with IPA. Strategies enhancing trustworthiness included suspension of judgements and presuppositions, reflexivity, iterative coding process and critique from co-investigators.
Data from 14 participants (eight elective, 6 emergency surgery) informed four themes. The theme ready to move forwards was characterised by high satisfaction with post-operative improvement, positivity and optimism, with readiness to work towards personal goals. The theme post-operative fear and uncertainty was characterised by reflections on pre-operative difficulties fuelling fear about potential recurrence and long-term impacts. The theme of advice and guidance considered important was characterised by the expectation and value of support provided (verbal, written); instances of negative influences from healthcare interactions and access to unregulated patient information sources suggest scope for future improvement. The final theme, heterogeneity in peri-operative needs, was characterised by variation in depth/access to patient information, perceived post-operative support and wide-ranging preoperative activity/fitness.
Surgery offers physical and psychosocial changes which could be better harnessed to positively influence recovery through high quality verbal/written communication. Peri-operative advice and guidance was valued; while this was sufficient for some, personalised rehabilitation should be available owing to the identified heterogeneity.
FreshRSS 