Conectar
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) and depressive symptoms (DS) are highly prevalent, burdensome, costly and comorbid health conditions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) was shown to improve pain and disability in patients with CLBP; however, the effect on comorbid DS remains less certain. Interestingly, CLBP and DS seem to be associated with changes in interoception, which may be reversed by OMT.
The study protocol proposes a single-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effect of OMT on clinical symptoms (depression, pain and disability) and interoceptive functions (interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS. A sample of 60 adult subjects with CLBP and comorbid DS shall be recruited from osteopathic, orthopaedic and physiotherapeutic practices and educational institutes for osteopathy, sports science, psychology and medicine in Hamburg, Germany. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive six 45 min treatment sessions of either OMT (standard-OMT group) or sham treatment imitating OMT (sham-OMT group). Primarily, symptoms of depression, pain and disability will be assessed with the Beck’s Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondarily, interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness will be evaluated using the Heartbeat Tracking Task (HTT), Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) and confidence-accuracy correspondence (CAC). Ancillary, the therapeutic alliance will be investigated with the Helping Alliance Questionnaire. Data will be collected at baseline (t0), the first, third and sixth treatment sessions (t1, t3, t6) and at 3 months follow-up (t7). The findings will be analysed for between-group differences using descriptive (mean and SD) and inductive statistics (mixed analysis of variance). It is hypothesised that standard-OMT, compared with sham-OMT, will reduce depression, pain and disability (BDI-II, NRS, ODI) and increase interoceptive accuracy, sensibility and awareness (HTT, MAIA-2, CAC) in patients with CLBP and comorbid DS.
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical School Hamburg (MSH-2023/288). The anonymised dataset will be published in an online repository, and the results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
DRKS00031694.
This study aimed to examine the challenges faced by pediatric nurses in implementing and sustaining clinical handover in intensive care units (ICUs), focusing on identifying key barriers affecting the handover process in these specialised environments.
Pediatric nurses encounter several challenges that hinder the effective implementation of clinical handover in intensive care settings. These challenges can compromise patient safety and care continuity. Understanding these obstacles is essential for identifying areas for improvement and enhancing handover practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the specialised university hospital for children in Alexandria, Egypt. The sample included 127 nurses who provided direct care to critically ill children. Participants were selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess various challenges encountered during the clinical handover process. The questionnaire covered five key areas: nurse-related challenges, handover quality-related challenges, organisational challenges, environmental challenges and communication challenges. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including multivariate regression analysis. The study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
The study found that the most significant challenges during clinical handover were nurse-related (mean = 74.7, SD = 5.6), followed by organisational challenges (mean = 69.2, SD = 16.7). Statistically significant differences were observed in nurses' characteristics, such as gender, age, marital status, years of experience and the place and duration of handover. Nurses who conducted longer handovers or performed them at the bedside reported fewer challenges compared to those who performed handovers at the nursing station or those with shorter durations.
Pediatric nurses in critical care settings face significant challenges in clinical handover, with barriers such as resistance to change, non-standardised language, time constraints and outdated reports being prominent. Female nurses, older nurses and those working in settings with less standardised handover practices reported more difficulties. Addressing these challenges is critical for improving handover processes, ensuring better patient safety and enhancing care outcomes.
Standardised handover protocols tailored to intensive care workflows, along with targeted training for nurses, are essential to address the identified challenges. These measures will enhance communication, improve handover efficiency and promote patient safety in pediatric ICUs. No patient or public contribution.
Stress and conflict in emergency departments are inevitable but can be managed. A supportive work environment is key to helping emergency care providers, especially nurses, constructively manage work-related stress and conflict.
The aim of this study was to assess the influence of supportive work environments on work-related stress and conflict management style among emergency care nurses.
A descriptive correlational research design was utilized. Data were collected from 221 staff nurses recruited from two university hospital emergency departments in Alexandria, Egypt. Three instruments were used: (1) perceived organizational support scale, (2) nurses' occupational stressors scale, and (3) conflict management style inventory.
There was a highly significant correlation between supportive work environments and work-related stress (p = .000) and a significant correlation between supportive work environments and conflict management style (p = .026). Supportive work environments had a significant inverse negative relationship with work-related stress experienced by nurses (p = .001) and accounted for 51% of variance in work-related stress. Meanwhile, supportive work environments had a significant positive relationship with conflict management styles of nurses (p = .026). Work-related stress had a significant relationship with nurses' conflict management style (p = .000) and accounted for 45% of the variance in conflict management style.
The style of conflict management modeled by staff within emergency departments can positively or negatively influence the work environment and level of work-related stress. There is a necessity to cultivate a supportive culture for nurses in emergency departments to develop skills for constructive conflict management styles to reduce work-related stress.
FreshRSS 