Conectar
Parenting stress among clinical nurses has been associated with turnover-related outcomes. For many nurses, critical periods of career development and accumulated clinical responsibility overlap with reproductive and early parenting years. Features of nursing work may shape parenting stress through demands related to scheduling, workload, and limited flexibility.
Integrative literature review.
An integrative literature review was conducted following the methodological framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The final searches across three databases (CINAHL Complete, Medline, and Embase) were completed on May 14, 2026. Eligible articles were published in English, addressed parenting stress, and, when empirical, included nurses as a distinct population. Reporting followed PRISMA guidelines.
Eight articles met all inclusion criteria. Countries of origin included South Korea, Turkey, and China. Approximately 1667 nurse-parent participants were represented across the included studies. Main themes included as follows: (1) Work-Family Role Conflict and Parenting Stress, (2) Parenting Stress Across Career and Family Life Stages, (3) Parenting Stress and Nurse Workforce Outcomes, and (4) Organizational and Structural Contributors to Parenting Stress.
Parenting stress appears to be a relevant nursing workforce issue shaped by structural conditions of practice. The structure and demands of patient care may intensify parenting stress. Additional research is needed to examine the effects of parenting stress in clinical nurses and the implications for nurse retention.
Organizational and policy-level interventions (including family-friendly scheduling, accessible childcare, and structured peer support programs) may support workforce sustainability among nurse-parents.
Compression therapy is the evidence-based treatment for healing venous leg ulcers. However, it is not routinely applied in many UK hospitals. This paper explores hospital staff's' perspectives of venous leg ulcer care provision where compression therapy is not routinely applied. A semi-structured interview study was conducted with 11 participants, drawn from a larger study, who confirmed that their respective hospitals did not apply compression therapy to inpatients with venous leg ulcers. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings indicate that venous leg ulcer care in hospitals was de-prioritised, which, along with structural and organisational constraints, affected clinicians' engagement and focus on it in their hospitals. This de-prioritisation also led to a lack of formal leg ulcer training in hospitals. However, some clinicians showed remarkable empathy for patients derived from their clinical professionalism and deep understanding of their suffering. To help hospital clinicians and senior managers prioritise venous leg ulcer care, it is crucial to first understand their clinical practise priorities. Secondly, understanding how some hospitals implement compression therapy could be beneficial for those where it is not routine practise. Further research should focus on better understanding clinicians and senior managers' clinical priorities and the structural and organisational constraints in real-world settings, ideally in hospitals where compression therapy is a routine practise. Most importantly, the study highlighted key questions for hospital leaders and policymakers: consider fostering the established clinicians' empathy before it is too late.
by Karin Törnbom, Dominique Hange, Eva-Lisa Petersson, Irene Svenningsson
BackgroundDespite increasing attention to youth mental health, children and adolescents in Sweden experience fragmented, inequitable care with regional variation. Delays in diagnosis, limited preventive interventions, and poor inter-sectoral collaboration contribute to significant unmet needs. This study investigates system-level challenges and stakeholder perspectives on opportunities to enhance care pathways.
MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study in the Västra Götaland region, Sweden. Fourteen purposively selected participants – including senior executives, healthcare professionals, and parents took part in semi-structured interviews. We used systematic text condensation, according to Malterud, and the four steps involved in this method for analysing the interviews.
ResultsA central theme across interviews was the requirement for a formal diagnosis before children can access mental health support, particularly in school and primary care settings. Participants described this as a major barrier that delays early intervention and leaves children and young people with complex or atypical presentations without adequate support. Primary care professionals reported increasing mental health caseloads without corresponding increases in staffing or funding, limiting preventive work. Child and adolescent psychiatry (BUP) was described as overwhelmed, with long waiting times and limited continuity of care. A care manager within primary care was proposed as a way to help families navigate fragmented services and improve collaboration, although participants emphasised that such a role would need to be part of broader structural reform.
ConclusionsOur findings highlight persistent systemic issues in mental health care for children and young people, including inequitable access, insufficient prevention, and fragmented collaboration across sectors. Strengthening primary prevention, reallocating resources to primary and school-based mental health care and implementing well-defined care coordination roles within broader restructuring may improve continuity and equity in service delivery. Comprehensive policy reform is needed to support person-centred, integrated care pathways for children and young people with mental health needs.
by Sneha Vidyasagar, Kanakamani Jeyaraman, Syeda Farah Zahir, Paul Varghese
ObjectiveThis retrospective study evaluated calcitonin as an adjunct therapy for reducing phantom limb pain (PLP) following lower limb amputation.
MethodThe study included 35 patients who received at least 3 days of calcitonin treatment between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023. We collected demographic data and pain ratings (intensity, distress, and interference with activity) before and after calcitonin treatment. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests analysed the data, with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA used to compare outcomes between patients with and without diabetes. Raw and Standardized mean differences (Cohen’s d) are presented for each measure.
ResultsThe average age of participants was 57.09 years (SD = 13.66), with 40% female. Amputation types were below-knee (65.7%), above-knee (25.7%), and other (8.6%). The main causes of amputation included diabetic foot infection (25.7%), peripheral vascular disease (34.3%), trauma (25.7%), and other (14.3%). Ten participants had diabetes, and 20% had depression.Calcitonin was associated with significant reductions in pain outcomes from pre- to post-intervention (Day 0 to Day 7), with calcitonin given from day 1–3. Mean pain intensity decreased from 6.41 to 5.24 (Cohen’s d = 0.66); p = 0.02), and pain-related distress decreased from 5.85 to 4.81 (Cohen’s d = 0.71; p = 0.014). Perceived pain relief scores increased from 33.69 to 58.21, indicating greater patient-reported pain relief following treatment (Cohen’s d = 0.53; p = 0.035). No significant differences in pain intensity or distress were observed between patients with and without diabetes. Additionally, there was no significant change in the Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (p = 0.94).
ConclusionIn conclusion, calcitonin significantly reduced perceived pain intensity and pain-related distress scores while increasing perceived pain relief scores (i.e., patients’ reported degree of pain reduction), with similar effects observed in both patients with and without diabetes.
by Agatha Ribeiro Kalthof, Nikolas Dresch Ferreira, Caio Mateus Silva, Iuri Cordeiro Valadão, Iguaracy Pinheiro de Sousa, Ester Riserio Matos Bertoldi, Vanessa Morais Lima, Lauro Thiago Turaca, Ana Beatriz Ruiz Afonso Barbosa, Miriam Helena Fonseca-Alaniz, Jean-Paul Concordet, Elida Adalgisa Neri, Jose E. Krieger
Generating mature human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) remains a major obstacle to accurate disease modeling and cardiac repair. As the transcription factor Irx3 is a key determinant of ventricular conduction system fate in mice, we hypothesized that suppressing IRX3 expression accelerates human working cardiomyocyte differentiation. Here, we demonstrate that depleting IRX3 enhances hiPSC-CM differentiation. IRX3-knockout (KO) hiPSCs generated a greater number of cardiomyocytes with elevated expression of TNNI1 and CX43. Notably, IRX3-KO cardiomyocytes exhibited improved electrophysiological properties, more uniform mitochondrial distribution, better sarcomere organization, and enhanced intercellular connectivity. We observed that IRX3 expression peaks during the early stages of cardiomyocyte differentiation, whereas IRX3-KO cardiac progenitors have increased expression of GATA4, NKX2–5, and TBX5, as well as enhanced cell proliferation. These integrative analyses indicate that IRX3 influences cardiomyocyte differentiation by modulating the gene regulatory networks driven by GATA4, NKX2–5, and TBX5, providing functional evidence linking gene regulatory networks to the structural and electrophysiological development of cardiomyocytes. Collectively, these findings identify IRX3 as a key regulator of early cardiac commitment and highlight the potential of IRX3 suppression to enhance the molecular and functional phenotype of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes.After resuscitation from out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), mechanical ventilation (MV) and respiratory management are fundamental to support patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to minimise secondary brain injury. Best practices for MV and association with clinical outcomes in patients with OHCA remain unclear.
This protocol describes a pre-planned respiratory-focused series of sub-analyses within the Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, an ongoing interventional study evaluating 6-month mortality after randomisation in patients admitted to ICUs following OHCA. The primary aim is to describe real-world ventilator settings and gas-exchange targets during the first 72 hours after ICU admission in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation after OHCA. Secondary aims include to estimate the incidence of respiratory complications during ICU stay (eg, ventilator-associated pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, barotrauma); and to explore the association between early ventilator settings/gas-exchange parameters and 6-month outcomes (mortality and neurological status). Exploratory aim is to characterise weaning and extubation practices, including timing and failure rates.
Eligible patients will include adult STEPCARE participants receiving invasive MV after return of spontaneous circulation with available respiratory data recorded within the STEPCARE database.
Data collected in the STEPCARE trial that will be analysed include patients’ prehospital characteristics; clinical examination at hospital admission and at ICU admission; ventilator settings and arterial blood gases recorded at predefined time points during ICU stay. In particular: MV setting (mode, tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, fraction of inspired oxygen, tidal volume, mechanical power, plateau/driving pressures), gas-exchange values (arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide, pH, arterial saturation of oxygen), timing of measurements and the occurrence/timing of respiratory complications and weaning outcomes.
The STEPCARE study has been approved by the regional ethics committee at Lund University (Dnr 2022-02425-01, Approved IRB on 2022-06-18) and by all ethics boards in the participating countries. No additional ethical approval is required for this predefined secondary analysis, as no further data collection or interventions will be performed. Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and, where appropriate, conference abstracts and presentations. Patients and the public were not involved.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Public health responses to CVD require complex, multisectoral strategies that combine population-wide preventive interventions with individualised approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as transformative tools in this field, enabling more accurate diagnosis, prognosis and treatment personalisation. However, most AI applications remain confined to clinical domains, with limited translation into public health policy modelling.
This review aims to identify and synthesise recent evidence on the application of AI and ML systems for cardiovascular risk prediction and management, with a specific focus on their potential use in public health policy design and decision-making.
A systematic review will be conducted, registered in PROSPERO and reported following PRISMA guidelines. Searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Bireme and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers using standardised Descriptores en Ciencias de la Salud, Medical Subject Headings and Emtree terms. Eligible studies will include AI-based or ML-based models for cardiovascular risk prediction applied at a population, territorial or public health management level, published in English, Spanish or Portuguese within the last 5 years. Data extraction will consider article characteristics, health condition, AI/ML purpose, system features, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development classification, validation and performance and applicability to public health policy. Quality appraisal will use MINIMAR, DECIDE-AI or PROBAST-AI, depending on the study type. Data will be synthesised qualitatively, with descriptive frequencies and graphical summaries.
Ethical approval is not required as this study will be based on previously published data. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and policy-oriented forums involving the European Union and Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) academic stakeholders, with relevance for public health decision-making in Colombia and the LAC region.
CRD420251163276.
Loneliness and social isolation are critical public health issues linked to significant adverse health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation, including visits to the emergency department (ED). The ED often serves as a primary societal safety net, providing care for vulnerable populations who may be disproportionately affected by these conditions. In fact, loneliness and social isolation might be the underlying reasons they presented to the ED in the first place either consciously or not. For such individuals, the ED encounter may represent a rare point of human contact, yet the stressful and depersonalising nature of the ED environment may paradoxically exacerbate their sense of isolation. Furthermore, ED staff may lack the training and awareness of the scope of the problem to properly screen for loneliness and address it. Yet, the compounded impact of the ED experience on lonely or socially isolated patients and the relationship between loneliness and healthcare utilisation remains poorly understood. This paper presents a protocol for a scoping review designed to systematically map the existing evidence on the experiences of these patients and the perspectives of the clinicians who care for them.
This scoping review will be conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The findings will be reported according to the Extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (PRISMA-S; see ). A comprehensive search will be performed across five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CNKI) and grey literature sources. Studies published in English or Chinese that address loneliness or social isolation in the ED context, from the perspective of adult or paediatric patients or clinical staff, will be included. A novel, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted screening process will be utilised for initial relevance assessment, followed by full manual screening and data extraction by two independent reviewers to ensure rigour and mitigate bias. Findings will be synthesised using a narrative approach and thematic analysis to identify key concepts, themes and existing gaps in the literature.
As this study synthesises data from previously published literature, it does not require formal ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through a manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. The aim is to provide an evidence-based roadmap to guide future research, inform policy and support the development of interventions designed to improve care and outcomes for this vulnerable population within the acute care setting.
The review has been registered at Open Science Framework, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/MBVSR.
Acute febrile illness is a major cause of morbidity and healthcare seeking in sub-Saharan Africa, including Mozambique. However, few studies have explored the perceptions and practices related to clinical management of acute febrile illness. Our aim was to understand the perceptions, knowledge and practices of healthcare professionals and community members regarding the management of acute febrile illness.
A qualitative study was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. Eight focus group discussions (FGDs) and three in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted in two Mozambican provinces across four healthcare facilities. Purposive sampling was used to select participants, comprising both healthcare professionals and community members. Data were analysed thematically through manual coding, applying inductive and deductive approaches, in line with established qualitative analytical frameworks.
The study included a total of 60 participants, 28 healthcare professionals who participated in FGDs (25) and IDIs (3) and 32 community members who participated in FGDs. Major causes of fever, according to healthcare professionals, were upper and lower respiratory infections, malaria, diarrhoeal diseases and COVID-19. The diagnostic approach for febrile patients primarily included screening, malaria testing and other non-specific investigations depending on availability at health facilities. Antibiotics and antipyretics were the most commonly prescribed treatments. The healthcare professionals reported a decrease in prescribing antimalarials due to extensive training on malaria case management. In contrast, community members reported relying primarily on home-based and traditional practices to treat acute febrile illness before seeking care at health facilities. These practices are related to sociocultural habits, such as the use of traditional medicine and self-medication. The main barriers to seeking care at health facilities were the perception of poor quality of care, long waiting times, cultural beliefs and lack of medicines.
Proper management of non-malarial febrile illness remains a major challenge for both healthcare professionals and communities. Training, adherence to case management protocols and efforts to change behaviours to mitigate harmful sociocultural practices are urgently necessary to improve febrile illness management.
by Daniel H. Nguyen, Debottama Das, Ali Bilgin, Dianne Patterson, Matthew Hook, Chris Butson, Alberto Cacciola, Vinod Kumar Jangir, Manojkumar Saranathan
Leveraging diffusion tractography, connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) is one of the oldest methods for thalamic nuclei segmentation. The goal of this work was to reassess CBP using higher spatial resolution diffusion MRI data and reconstruction algorithms, and to compare it with recent state-of-the-art methods for thalamic nuclei segmentation. Furthermore, these methods were systematically evaluated against three histological atlases and one functional MRI–based atlas to examine their relative anatomical similarities and differences. High resolution diffusion and T1-weighted MRI data from 67 healthy individuals in the Human Connectome Project Young Adult database were analyzed. CBP was performed using probabilistic tractography with cortical targets derived from combining labels of the Human Connectome Project Multi-Modal Parcellation 1.0 atlas into 8, 11, and 23 regions. Results were compared against three recent methods: orientation distribution function clustering (ODF), track density imaging (TDI), and structural MRI-based segmentation. Group level analyses were conducted in the Montreal Neurological Institute space, and Dice overlap coefficients were calculated using four atlases (three histological, one functional). CBP results using newer data and methods were still remarkably similar to the original CBP parcellation results. Across atlases, a consistent hierarchy was observed: HIPS-THOMAS performed best, followed by TDI, ODF, and CBP (Kendall’s W = 1.00, p = 0.007). Histological atlases showed strong mutual agreement (Pearson r = 0.71–0.85), whereas the Zhang atlas demonstrated lower concordance (Pearson r = 0.51–0.63). Despite methodological advances, CBP remains constrained in its ability to delineate thalamic nuclei with histological accuracy. By contrast, structural and diffusion microstructural approaches provided better nuclear localization. These findings highlight the need for hybrid workflows that integrate structural and diffusion-based information to enable more reliable thalamic segmentation for neuroscience research.by Paula Becerra Fuello, Javier Lescure, Aaron Lackinger, María Sedeño Ráez, Jesús Gámiz Caro, Gonzalo Aranda Jiménez
This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and limitations of a multi-proxy approach for identifying potential indicators of horizontal positioning in cremated heads from archaeological, and to a lesser extent, forensic contexts. Two outdoor experimental cremations using fleshed and dry pig crania were conducted to evaluate the influence of pre-burning condition, vertical placement within the pyre and pyre dynamics on the expression of lateralised burning patterns. Combining macroscopic observations, fragmentation, colorimetric and Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) mode, our preliminary observations suggest that lateralised differences in thermal exposure may be detectable under certain conditions. Significant differences (p-valueby Linda Furness, Janani Pinidiyapathirage, Matthew French, James Ware, Liam Weber, Brendan Carrigan
IntroductionIn rural generalist clinical settings, medical trainees routinely assess patients and discuss their findings with supervisors to plan ongoing care. These interactions termed ‘learning conversations’, serve as important opportunities for workplace-based learning and clinical decision making. However, preliminary evidence and stakeholder feedback indicate a lack of shared understanding regarding how these conversations should be structured, facilitated, and optimised. This study aims to observe current practices, identify supervisor and trainee learning needs, and co-design a model of learning conversations that enhances educational value and supports safe, effective patient care.
Methods and analysisThis study will use an exploratory sequential mixed methods design structured around the 3Cs of co-design (Co-define, Co-design, Co-refine). Phase 1 (co-define) will involve qualitative observation and audio-recording of learning conversations across two rural hospitals to characterise current practice and inform a protype model. In Phase 2 (co-design), supervisor and trainee focus groups will explore perceived needs, expectations, and feedback on the prototype model. A national online survey of rural supervisors and trainees will further inform model refinement. Phase 3 (co-refine) will incorporate national stakeholder input through a workshop, followed by feasibility testing of the refined model during a pilot simulation at a Rural Clinical School. Outcome data will focus on model usability, perceived relevance, applicability across contexts, and users’ experiences of employing the model during simulated learning conversations.
DiscussionThis study will produce a stakeholder-informed model that responds to the specific learning and clinical needs of rural generalist practice. By embedding co-design throughout the research process, the resulting model is expected to strengthen learning conversations, optimise trainee learning, and enhance the quality and safety of patient care. The findings have potential applicability across broader health professional training contexts and can support workforce development in rural healthcare settings.
by Sven Göbel, Lennart Jacobtorweihe, Max-Leopold Rössig, Frauke Braatz, Fabien Perugi, Yvonne Genzel, Udo Reichl
Building on the established use of enveloped viral vectors, like lentivirus and vesicular stomatitis virus, we investigated the stability of the oncolytic Newcastle disease virus LaSota strain and the chimeric construct of a Zika vaccine candidate YF ZIKprM/E. These vectors are currently being developed for the treatment of solid tumors, such as melanoma and glioblastoma, and for vaccine initiatives, respectively. Virus stability is a critical attribute during cell culture-based virus production and also relevant for downstream processing, storage of the produced material, final vaccine storage and shelf life. Therefore, temperature and pH stability were tested as important parameters during upstream processing and freeze-thaw cycles were tested in context of laboratory-analytics. In this study, both viruses exhibited strong stability of the infectious virus titer when subjected to repeated freeze-thaw cycles. However, exposure to temperatures above 22°C substantially reduced the infectious titers, indicating sensitivity to elevated temperatures. To improve viral stability during storage, we investigated the use of sucrose as a stabilizing excipient. While this did not result in significant improvements for YF-ZIKV, an extended half-life for NDV at room temperature was observed. The observed half-life values of upstream material from NDV of 2.6 h and 2.8 h for YF-ZIKV at 37°C demand consideration of changes to the process design, such as the implementation of a perfusion process to enable continuous, cooled virus harvesting.To identify a correlation between unmet needs and HL levels in people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) and to evaluate how sociodemographic characteristics influence HL levels and unmet needs.
A cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted using a questionnaire including the HLS19-Q12 to assess HL and the Long-term Unmet Needs in Multiple Sclerosis tool, which evaluates five domains (neuropsychological, ambulation, physical, interpersonal relationship, and informational) and identifies whether needs are met or unmet and the desire for support.
Among the 116 participants included in the study, the overall HL level was sufficient. Mean scores across unmet needs domains were comparable. A significant difference in HL emerged in the informational domain, where participants reporting informational needs and a desire for support showed higher mean ranks. Although not significant, participants who acknowledged a need and expressed a desire for help showed higher mean ranks in HLS19-Q12 scores across several domains. No significant correlations were found between HL and unmet needs domains.
HL levels may enhance patients' ability to recognize and express needs without necessarily ensuring that these needs are met.
Routine assessment of both HL and unmet needs may help healthcare professionals identify patients who recognize problems but lack the structural support to address them.
The impact of HL on need recognition and communication, together with the complexity and interconnectedness of unmet needs, highlights the need for healthcare systems to implement organizational, systemic, and multidimensional interventions aimed at promoting HL and effectively addressing patients' needs. Such strategies may support better disease management and improve quality of life in pwMS.
This study was reported according to STROBE checklist.
None.
An affordable heart-healthy dietary approach is essential for the management of familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH); however, the optimal dietary pattern and the role of adjunctive nutrient supplementation remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the Brazilian Cardioprotective Diet (DICA Br), adapted from the Portfolio Diet, with or without phytosterol and/or krill oil supplementation in individuals with probable or definite FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (Dutch MEDPED) criteria.
The DICA-FH study is a national, multicentre, randomised, factorial, parallel-group, superiority, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Participants aged ≥16 years receiving age-appropriate lipid-lowering therapy will be randomised into four groups: (1) adapted cardioprotective diet (DICA-FH) plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil placebo; (2) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil placebo; (3) DICA-FH plus phytosterol placebo and krill oil 2 g/day or (4) DICA-FH plus phytosterol 2 g/day and krill oil 2 g/day. All participants will undergo whole-genome sequencing and receive appropriate genetic counselling. Primary outcomes will be means of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels after 120 days. Secondary outcomes will include additional lipid biomarkers, adherence to protocol and adverse events. The planned sample size is 300 participants. Follow-up is expected to conclude in July 2026.
This study was registered under CAAE 65549622.2.1001.0060 and received ethical approval from the Hcor Research Ethics Committee (approval number 5.805.072) and the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP; approval number 6.864.951). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and channels aimed at the general public.
To synthesise evidence from systematic reviews on difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in adults, focusing on definitions, diagnostic criteria, risk factors and clinical interventions to guide clinical practice and health policy.
Umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Any clinical setting involving adult patients requiring peripheral venous access (including hospital, emergency and outpatient care).
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science in July 2025.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses published from 2014 to 2025 that addressed DIVA in the adult population were included. Primary studies and protocols were excluded.
Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews tool. Data extraction followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for overviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews reporting guideline.
Seven reviews (six systematic reviews and one meta-analysis) were included. Three analytical dimensions emerged: (1) the conceptual and operational definition of DIVA, identifying common elements such as ≥2 failed attempts, lack of visible or palpable veins and a documented history of difficult access; (2) risk factors and clinical assessment, highlighting obesity, chronic diseases, prior chemotherapy, venous invisibility or non-palpability and the limited validation of diagnostic tools and (3) interventions, including organisational strategies (escalation protocols, specialised teams), technological resources (ultrasound guidance) and clinical measures (pain management and technique optimisation).
DIVA is a multifactorial challenge that requires a standardised definition to improve clinical identification. Effective management relies on a combination of specialised training, the use of ultrasound technology and the implementation of escalation protocols to ensure patient safety and efficiency.
CRD420251084947.
This study aimed to determine the associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines and symptoms of anxiety and depression among Colombian university students.
Cross-sectional study.
1125 individuals (mean age 20.2±2.5 years; 56.7% female).
Students sampled from a single public university.
Participants completed validated self-report instruments: the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form to assess physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess sleep duration. Symptoms of depression and anxiety were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, with a score of ≥11 used to classify elevated symptoms. Binary logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between adherence to the 24-hour movement guidelines (meeting all three, two, one or none) and mental health outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders.
Only 15.5% of students met all three components of the 24-hour movement guidelines. Meeting a greater number of components was significantly associated with lower odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms. In fully adjusted analyses, students who met all three guidelines were less likely to report anxiety symptoms (OR=0.26; 95%CI 0.13 to 0.54) and depressive symptoms (OR=0.42; 95%CI 0.22 to 0.79) compared with those who met none. Among individual behaviours, sufficient PA and adequate sleep were independently associated with lower odds of both outcomes, whereas high SB was associated with higher odds of elevated symptoms.
In this cross-sectional study, adherence to a greater number of 24-hour movement guideline components was associated with lower levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms in a graded manner. However, the cross-sectional design precludes inference regarding directionality or causality, and bidirectional associations or residual confounding remain possible. Longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to determine whether integrated daily movement behaviours influence mental health outcomes in young adults, particularly in Latin American populations.
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have emerged as significant public health concerns, imposing a substantial burden on both individuals and the healthcare system of the country. Additionally, STIs may also result in major extensive psychological consequences that profoundly affect individuals with STIs. Despite the government’s implementation of different initiatives aimed at addressing STI-related challenges, these conditions are associated with shame and stigma which act as barriers to the effective utilisation of healthcare services. The purpose of the present study is to generate evidence on barriers and facilitators to service utilisation and management of STIs in India.
Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, is conducting a multi-centre study employing a mixed-method approach. The study involves different levels of healthcare systems, including both government and private healthcare facilities across seven sites in several states of India, including Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Punjab, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and New Delhi. For the quantitative data, individuals seeking healthcare services related to STIs will be enrolled and assessed using a semi-structured pilot-tested questionnaire. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions will also be conducted with different stakeholders as per the standard guidelines of the qualitative method by the designated trained project staff. Descriptive and inferential statistics will be applied to the quantitative data, while the qualitative data will be analysed using a deductive approach with thematic content analysis.
The study protocol has been approved by the ethics review committees of all the participating sites individually. The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through scientific conferences and meetings among policy-makers and government agencies. AIIMS/IEC/2024/609; AIIMS/Pat/IEC/2024/1205; F. 7/BIOETHICS/AIIMS-RBL/APPROEM/2021/1; KIMSDU/IEC/11/2022; LHMC/IEC/2024/11; IEC/02/EX/2024; PGI/IEC/2024EIC000373.
FreshRSS 