Each year over 130 000 patients in the UK are discharged from an intensive care unit (ICU), with many experiencing poor outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, emergency ICU readmission and/or significant morbidity. Despite current national guidance and the availability of follow-up services, post-ICU care remains variable. Critical Care Outreach Teams (CCOTs) are key in supporting this patient group, yet practice differs considerably. Recovery pathways have been successfully employed in other patient populations and are a potential option to standardise post-ICU care. Understanding how care is currently delivered by CCOT throughout the UK is essential to inform future development of an evidence-based recovery pathway for this patient group. Our primary aim is to understand how post-ICU follow-up care is delivered within the wider remit of CCOT workloads.

This is a pragmatic multicentre qualitative study of post-ICU follow-up care. The study will be split into two sub-studies: semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with three groups of individuals: multi-professional staff members involved in the care of patients discharged from ICU to the wards, patients discharged from ICU to the wards and their family members. Direct participant observations alongside ad hoc informal discussions will be undertaken with members of the CCOT at participating sites focusing on their workflow to generate an understanding of the CCOT role and how post-ICU support fits within this. An overarching thematic analysis approach will be taken to analyse data from both sub-studies to clearly identify the barriers and facilitators to providing post-ICU support within the CCOT role.

Ethical approval has been obtained through the London—Chelsea Research Ethics Committee (25/PR/0773). We aim to disseminate the findings to local teams, at regional and international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals and through social media.

ISRCTN14138257.

A healthy diet improves glycaemic control and reduces cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, access to dietitians is limited. Several countries have implemented mandatory interpretive front-of-pack labelling to guide consumers towards healthier food choices, but Sweden has not. Smartphone applications may offer an alternative platform to provide such information. This study evaluates the dietary and clinical impact of a novel application providing interpretive labelling to Swedish adults with T2D.

This is a fully decentralised randomised controlled trial. 900 individuals with T2D for ≥2 years who regularly shop for groceries will be recruited via general practices and community advertisements. Participants will be randomised to receive either: (1) access to the FoodSwitch mobile application plus standard written dietary advice, or (2) standard written dietary advice only. The FoodSwitch application allows users to scan barcodes on packaged foods to receive recommendations of healthier alternatives within the same category. The primary outcome is the difference in change in mean self-measured glycated haemoglobin between groups after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include differences in changes in waist circumference, body weight, quality of life, medication use, hospitalisations and all-cause mortality at 26 weeks. Exploratory outcomes include omics analyses. Recruitment is ongoing. Expected study completion on 31 December 2026.

The trial has received ethical approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023-06622-01, 2024-06668-02, 2024-07357-02 and 2025-01095-02) and is performed in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and the General Data Protection Regulation. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed international journal.

NCT05977218.

The introduction of fentanyl and its analogues in the illicit drug supply has prompted greater emphasis on refining clinical treatment protocols to ensure sustained retention in opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Take-home dosing may lessen the treatment burden on clients and thus reduce the risk of treatment discontinuation. The evidence base supporting the use of take-home dosing, including the optimal duration of dispensations, is, however, limited. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of alternative take-home dosing schedules, as observed in clinical practice in British Columbia, Canada from 2010 to 2022.

We propose to emulate a target trial with a population-level retrospective study of individuals initiating methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022 who are 18 years of age or older and not currently incarcerated or pregnant with no history of cancer or palliative care. Our study will draw on nine linked health administrative databases from British Columbia and will evaluate take-home doses of 2–5 days, 6 days or >6 days compared with continuous daily dosing. The primary outcomes include OAT discontinuation and all-cause mortality on treatment. A causal per-protocol analysis is proposed with longitudinal matching and inverse probability of censoring weighting approaches to adjust for time-fixed and time-varying confounding. A range of sensitivity analyses will be executed to determine the robustness of results.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. Results will be disseminated and shared with local advocacy groups and decision-makers, developers of national and international clinical guidelines, presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.

Methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone are effective medications for people with opioid use disorder; however, interruptions in daily dosing are common and diminish the benefits of these medications. While clinical guidelines in most North American jurisdictions, including British Columbia (BC), recommend dose adjustment after treatment interruptions to varying levels of specificity, the evidence to support these recommendations is limited. We aim to estimate the comparative effectiveness of alternative dose adjustment strategies on subsequent overdose-related acute care visits and discontinuation of opioid agonist treatment in BC, Canada.

Using a linkage of nine health administrative databases, we propose a population-level retrospective cohort study of adults aged 18 years or older in BC who initiated methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. We will specify parallel hypothetical trials, known as target trials, for methadone interruptions of 1–3 days, 4 days and 5–14 days, and buprenorphine/naloxone interruptions of 1–5 days and 6–14 days. Following the index interruption, the primary outcomes are the time to overdose-related acute care visits and treatment discontinuation (interruptions lasting >14 days), with time to all-cause acute care visits as a secondary outcome. The intention-to-treat effect will be estimated using both propensity score and instrumental variable approaches. A range of sensitivity analyses will assess the robustness of our results, including cohort and timeline restriction, alternative definitions of exposure and outcome and alternative estimation strategies.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Institute and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. All data are deidentified, securely stored and accessed in accordance with provincial privacy regulations. Results will be disseminated to local advocacy groups and decision-makers, national and international clinical guideline developers, presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.