Conectar
Students enrolling in higher education often adopt lifestyles linked to worse mental health, potentially contributing to the peak age onset of mental health problems in early adulthood. However, extensive research is limited by focusing on single lifestyle behaviours, including single time points, within limited cultural contexts, and focusing on a limited set of mental health symptoms.
The UNIversity students’ LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M) is a prospective worldwide cohort study aiming to investigate the associations between students’ lifestyle behaviours and mental health symptoms during their college years. The UNILIFE-M will gather self-reported data through an online survey on mental health symptoms (ie, depression, anxiety, mania, sleep problems, substance abuse, inattention/hyperactivity and obsessive/compulsive thoughts/behaviours) and lifestyle behaviours (ie, diet, physical activity, substance use, stress management, social support, restorative sleep, environment and sedentary behaviour) over 3.5 years. Participants of 69 universities from 28 countries (300 per site) will be assessed at university admission in the 2023 and/or the 2024 academic year and followed up for 1, 2 and 3.5 years.
The study was first approved at a national level in Brazil (CAE:63025822.8.1001.5346). Study sites outside Brazil obtained additional ethics approval from their institutions using the main approval. Results from the UNILIFE-M cohort will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations at scientific meetings, press releases, the general media and social media.
To propose a conceptual model of dignity-centred care for hospitalised older adults using Levine's Conservation Model as a theoretical framework.
A discursive approach.
Data were obtained from an extensive search of five databases and grey literature without date restrictions for information on patient dignity, dignified care for hospitalised older adults and the Levine Conservation Model.
Dignity is a multifaceted concept encompassing an inherent self-worth and self-worth acquired through personal accomplishments and associations. Hospitalised older adults are at risk of dignity erosion due to complex health conditions, poor healthcare professional- patient communication, inadequate health information, loss of autonomy, inadequate privacy, and infrastructural and systemic barriers. Key components of dignified care include respect, autonomy, privacy, effective symptom management, effective communication and active patient involvement in decision-making. The proposed conceptual model integrates Levine's principles of conservation into a dignity-centred care framework. This model identifies threats to dignity in hospitalised older adults and outlines practical interventions to mitigate these threats in order to maintain or restore dignity.
The proposed conceptual model of dignity in care for hospitalised older adults, underpinned by the Levine Conservation Model, offers a practical framework to guide healthcare professionals in providing care that upholds the dignity and well-being of older adults. The model can serve as a foundation for developing institutional policies and training programmes that reflect the multidimensional nature of dignity in care for older adults.
The study addressed both the conceptual ambiguity and skills gap surrounding dignity-centred care for older adults by offering a practical guide for integrating dignity-centred principles into routine clinical practice. The findings hold substantial relevance for healthcare practice, providing a structured, theory-informed model to advance dignity-centred care and protect the dignity of hospitalised older adults.
Not applicable.
Nasogastric tubes (NGTs) are standard practice in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Their insertion can be associated with significant patient discomfort and complications. Current research suggests that patients with ASBO managed with NGTs may experience poorer outcomes and higher rates of operative intervention compared with those managed without. However, to date, there are no prospective clinical trials evaluating this.
This study will be designed as a single centre, prospective, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial to determine if the avoidance of an NGT is non-inferior to its use in ASBO. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomised to either receive an NGT or no NGT for ASBO management. The primary outcome will be the rate of operative intervention as determined by review of medical records at day 30 post discharge. Secondary outcomes will include rate of bowel resection or bowel ischaemia, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, time to operative intervention, rate of ICU admission, incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), quality of life scores (European Quality of Life 5 Dimension 5 Level: EQ-5D-5L) at admission, day 30 and day 90, 90-day mortality, incidence of pulmonary complications (Melbourne Group Scale), rate of NGT specific complications and rate of Gastrografin use. The study will be powered at 80% to detect a clinically relevant difference of 10% between groups receiving an NGT compared with no NGT, requiring a total of 490 study participants. Statistical analysis will follow intention to treat principles. Differences between treatment arms will be summarised using mean differences, 95% CIs and p values.
This study has been approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2023/ETH00296). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.
This study has been registered prospectively in the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000341628).
Improving the quality of life for preterm children is a global health priority, given their vulnerability to neurocognitive impairments and adverse health consequences. Lack of posthospital care further exacerbates these risks, necessitating effective interventions during the neonatal period. This protocol for a pilot study aims to investigate the effects of touch interventions, including physiotherapy and osteopathic manipulative treatment, on brain activity in moderately preterm infants using brain functional MRI (fMRI), computerised EEG and metabolomics.
A 3-arm randomised sham-controlled trial will be conducted with 15 infants per experimental group. The study will include stable preterm infants born between 32.0 and 33.6 weeks of gestational age who do not require any intensive care treatments.
The study aims to assess the impact of touch interventions on brain activity and metabolic sequelae. Using fMRI will primarily examine the pre-post changes between groups in blood oxygenation level dependent levels among different brain areas, specifically the anterior insula and the medial prefrontal cortex. Secondarily, we will explore the preterm brain’s neural effects on EEG slow delta wave band. Metabolomics will provide data on the effects among the three groups on metabolic changes associated with touch interventions.
Ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the local health agency in Milan (CET 449-2024). Understanding the effects of touch interventions on brain activity in moderately preterm infants, without needs of intensive care, can contribute to improving their clinical outcomes and promoting their growth, development and social behaviour. Findings from this pilot study will pave the way for future research, enabling the development of evidence-based interventions to enhance preterm infants’ well-being and long-term outcomes.
FreshRSS 