Despite significant global advancements, the past decade has seen stagnation in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) service coverage and a concerning high under-five and maternal mortality rates, which have been worsened by COVID-19 pandemic-related disruptions, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. This scoping review protocol will support the comprehensive mapping, evaluation and assessment of the application, impact, effectiveness and adaptability of health-resilient frameworks in maintaining these services during pandemics, while also identifying gaps in the literature and areas for further research.

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a literature search across databases such as PubMed, Scopus and African Journals Online for studies published from the inception of the databases to 2024 will be conducted. Covidence will facilitate the iterative screening process by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will employ the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Healthcare Contexts framework to categorise information. The thematic synthesis will integrate the findings to comprehensively evaluate the framework’s application, impact, effectiveness and adaptability in the context of routine immunisation and MNCH services.

This is part of a broader study approved by the evaluation committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of the Free State, and ethical clearance was granted by the university’s Human Research Ethics Committee with registration number UFS-HSD2025/0102/2705. The findings will be shared with relevant stakeholders through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at meetings, conferences, seminars and professional forums.

To seek consensus among global experts on concepts, measures and approaches to guide national and global action to address HIV-related stigma and formulate a call to action. This outlines priorities to unite actors in more effectively responding to and resourcing efforts to address HIV-related stigma.

An adapted Delphi consensus-building process using two rounds of online questionnaires.

Online questionnaires sent to a global expert panel.

50 global experts on HIV-related stigma and discrimination representing sectors including civil society, people living with HIV and key populations, research and academia, clinical practice, law, non-profit organisations, the United Nations, and policy and donor organisations.

The panel reached consensus on 55 points relating to the 12 broad themes extracted from the evidence base. These comprised the importance of addressing HIV-related stigma at scale; HIV-related stigma terms and definitions; Frameworks; Programming and approaches; Community leadership in HIV-related stigma-reduction implementation; Intersectional stigma and discrimination; Stigma and discrimination measures and assessment scales; Monitoring and evaluation; Stakeholder and community participation in monitoring and evaluation; Knowledge gaps and research needs; Funding and Commitment calls. From these, a consensus statement and call to action were formulated on priorities for strong political and financial commitments by all countries to reduce and mitigate HIV-related stigma and achieve global HIV targets adopted in 2021.

This study illustrated that global experts across sectors consider that action is needed to support the three critical enablers of the HIV response—society, systems and services—to ensure that HIV services are non-discriminatory and person-centred. The importance of attention and action to reduce stigma is critical in the current geopolitical and funding crisis affecting HIV and global health.