Conectar
by Saad Al-Lahhaam, Raghad Dweikat, Tala Nazzal, Aman Maraqa, Joud Khalil, Tala Albadawi, Raghad Doufish, Wa'd Amer, Mustafa Ghanim, Mohammad Abuawad, Amer Ghrouz, Samar Alkhaldi, Laith El-lahham, Majdi Dwikat, Maha Rabayaa, Malik Alqub
BackgroundTinnitus is a prevalent condition worldwide, particularly among adolescents, that has a substantial impact on quality of life, yet it remains an understudied issue.
ObjectivesThis study aims to determine the prevalence of tinnitus and its associated risk factors among Palestinian adolescents aged 15–18.
MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2025. A convenience sample of participants was recruited. The study utilized the European School for the Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Research Screening Questionnaire.
ResultsA total of 1,131 participants were enrolled in the study, with 64.5% being females. The prevalence of tinnitus among the study sample was 532, representing 47% of the population. Females had a higher prevalence of tinnitus, with 370 affected (50.7%) compared to males (40.4%). Significant associations were found between tinnitus and several factors: age, positive family history of tinnitus (threefold increased risk), sensitivity to external sounds (2.7 times higher likelihood), slight hearing difficulty in noisy environments (1.7 times higher risk), pain symptoms (double the risk), and difficulty falling asleep (1.8 times higher risk). Notably, the majority of affected participants (71.5%) had never sought professional care for their tinnitus.
ConclusionAlthough Tinnitus is common among Palestinian adolescents aged 15–18 years, the majority of affected participants did not seek professional care for tinnitus. These findings highlight the importance of conducting further research to shed insight into this prevalent and neglected health priority.
Accessible, person-centred, non-pharmacologic modalities are needed to address chronic pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Building off prior single-site pilot studies of music therapy (MT) in SCD, the purpose of this study is to (1) examine the data collection processes and intervention implementation overall and across two sites and (2) evaluate the implementation of the MT and health education interventions using quantitative and qualitative data.
This three-arm, two-site, feasibility randomised controlled trial will include 90 individuals ≥14 years who have SCD, chronic pain and access to a mobile device who are not currently engaged in mind-body pain management interventions under the supervision of a healthcare professional. Participants will be randomised to six sessions over 8 weeks of either: (1) in-person MT, (2) hybrid (one in-person, five virtual) MT or (3) hybrid health education. Patient-reported outcome measures of HRQoL and self-efficacy will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention and 6 weeks post-intervention. 24 participants (eight per arm) and 20 stakeholders (eg, haematologists, music therapists, nurses) will be invited to complete semi-structured interviews to further examine intervention acceptability, perceived benefits and implementation. Sessions will be monitored for fidelity, and participants lacking access to home internet or videoconferencing technology will be provided tablets to engage in virtual sessions. Feasibility will be determined by rates of data completion, recruitment, retention, session attendance and home practice.
This study was approved by the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Institutional Review Board (STUDY20231055). The dissemination plan includes presenting findings at national and international scientific conferences and publishing in peer-reviewed journals. All activities will be conducted in collaboration with SCD community stakeholders.
by Petar Stanimirović, Tea Borozan, Katarina Petrović, Dragan Bjelica, Zorica Mitrović, Marko Mihić, Dejan Petrović, Anđelija Đorđević Tomić
Young people often face uncertainty during the transition from education to work, along with high unemployment and job dissatisfaction, which is addressed in the EU Youth Strategy, highlighting the need for better career support. This study aimed to identify main factors influencing youth career decisions and to develop a decision-making model. Five core constructs were defined through literature review: Dealing with Uncertainty, Risk Preference, Adaptability and Resilience, Education and Support, and Life Satisfaction. Data were collected from 673 engineering students. Regression analysis was used to test the proposed model and hypotheses, while Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests examined group differences. The developed model accounts for 46.2% (R² = 0.462) of the variability in students’ career choices. Adaptability and resilience emerged as the most influential factor (β = 0.557). Certain differences, for specific constructs, were also observed in relation to different groups of family income, gender and extracurricular activity engagement. The model supports more informed career decisions and provides insights that may help improve career guidance and educational policy. The findings also may contribute to bridging theory and practice in career development research. The study is limited by its sample, which included only engineering students from the Republic of Serbia, potentially restricting the generalizability of the results.by Maha Rabayaa, Mustafa Ghanim, Malik Alqub, Mohammad Abuawad, Majdi Dwikat, Samar Alkhaldi, Haneen Badawi, Johnny Amer
IntroductionAllergy is a form of chronic illness with an increasing prevalence globally. Adequate knowledge among the community about the causes, symptoms, and treatment of allergy is crucial in preventing the associated life-threatening complications. Limited research has been conducted in Palestine regarding this health priority. The current study aimed to assess the Palestinian community’s level of knowledge regarding allergy.
MethodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire targeting Palestinians aged 18 years and older between 1 June 2024 and 26 January 2025. The questionnaire gathered demographic information about the participants and assessed their knowledge level concerning allergy.
ResultsA total of 1002 participants were included in the study. The mean age of the participants was 30.33 years. 66.1% of the participants were females, 60.2% were unmarried, 60.1% had possessed a bachelor’s degree, 63.1% had a personal history of allergy, and 82% reported knowing of someone with allergies. The mean knowledge score about allergies was 5.4 out of 10, with over half of the participants having an average level of knowledge (4–6). The knowledge score about allergies was significantly different based on the participants’ sex, marital status, place of residence, educational level, and occupation (p-value Conclusion
The Palestinians’ knowledge of allergy is considered good regarding its common causes and symptoms. However, there is still inadequate knowledge about the treatment of allergy and its less common causes. The community awareness of allergy should be improved through targeted campaigns and brochures aimed at achieving earlier diagnosis and proper management to prevent the development of life-threatening complications.
With the COVID-19 pandemic driving people into social isolation, causing a financial crisis and creating uncertainty, individuals were at an even greater risk of experiencing negative mental health outcomes. Individuals who identify as women living with diabetes mellitus (DM) of low socioeconomic status (SES) are potentially at increased risk of negative mental health outcomes secondary to health-related risks of COVID-19, as well as financial barriers to access to medications and diabetes-care supplies.
The objective of this scoping review is to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected the mental health of those who identify as women living with DM of low SES including the consequences of public health measures put in place to stop the spread of the virus. The review aims to identify what is known about the impact of COVID-19 on this and identify potential areas for further investigation.
The scoping review protocol was developed with guidance from the framework created by Arksey and O’Malley and refinements from the Joanna Briggs Institute and Levac et al published studies employing experimental and correlational designs to collect quantitative and/or qualitative data will be considered. Search strategies were developed for the MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant sources. Article titles and abstracts will be screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Full-text review will be conducted by two reviewers with a third reviewer being included if disagreement must be resolved. Data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers, one extraction and one quality check, and a third will resolve conflict if necessary. Data will be synthesised and reported in a narrative structure that provides a thematic analysis of the currently available literature.
As this is a scoping review, there are no ethical approval requirements. There is to be a full publication of findings and analysis in a peer-reviewed journal.
Marginalised populations—such as racialised groups, low-income individuals, newcomers and those in rural areas—disproportionately experience severe diabetes-related complications, including diabetic foot ulcers, retinopathy and amputations, due to systemic inequities and limited access to care. Although community-based programmes address cultural and accessibility barriers, their isolation from mainstream healthcare systems leads to fragmented care and missed opportunities for early intervention.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered technologies can enhance accessibility and personalisation, particularly for underserved populations. However, integrating AI into community settings remains underexplored, with socioethical concerns around inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility requiring urgent attention.
This realist review aims to examine how, why and under what circumstances AI applications can be effectively integrated into community-based diabetic care for marginalised populations. The review will develop a programme theory to guide ethical, inclusive and effective AI implementation to ensure AI-driven innovations address health disparities and promote culturally sensitive, accessible care for all.
Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Reviews guidelines, this realist review will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane library, Google Scholar and Scopus, alongside grey literature. A two-stage screening process will identify eligible studies, and data extraction will use a developed tool. Synthesis will employ realist logic, analysing relationships between contexts (eg, organisational capacity), mechanisms (eg, AI functionalities) and outcomes (eg, reduced disparities).
Ethics approval is not required for conducting this realist review. Ethics approval will be obtained from the University of Toronto; however, following the completion of the realist review for patients and community members’ engagement to support knowledge mobilisation and dissemination to ensure practical application and reciprocity.
This protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42025636284).
FreshRSS 