To develop and user-test a patient decision aid for people diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy and who are considering surgery.

Mixed-methods study describing the development of a patient decision aid.

A draft decision aid was developed by a multidisciplinary steering group (including study authors with degenerative cervical myelopathy, health professionals and researchers) informed by the best available evidence, authorship consensus and existing patient decision aids.

Patient-participants and health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy were recruited through social media and the steering group’s research and practice network. Quantitative questionnaires were used to gather baseline data, descriptive feedback, refine the decision aid and assess its acceptability. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted online to gather feedback on the decision aid and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

We conducted 32 interviews: 19 patient-participants and 13 health professional-participants who manage people with degenerative cervical myelopathy (neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiotherapists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioners, rehabilitation and pain specialists and consultant occupational physicians and chiropractors). Participants were from 10 countries (Australia, Canada, Cyprus, Germany, Ireland, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA). Most participants rated the decision aid’s acceptability as good-to-excellent and agreed with most aspects of the decision aid (eg, defining degenerative cervical myelopathy, management recommendations, potential benefits and harms, questions to consider asking a health professional).

Our patient decision aid was rated as an acceptable tool by both health professional-participants who treat degenerative cervical myelopathy and patient-participants with lived experience of degenerative cervical myelopathy. This decision aid can be used by clinicians and people with degenerative cervical myelopathy to help with shared decision making following a diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy. A study testing the potential benefits of this decision aid in a clinical setting is recommended.

To synthesise the prevalence and patterns of dementia-relevant structural brain MRI abnormalities in adults with suspected or confirmed dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to summarise MRI protocols and the incremental diagnostic contribution of MRI beyond cognitive screening.

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and PsycINFO (January 1990–27 January 2025), plus reference list screening and targeted manual searches.

Observational or diagnostic-accuracy studies from World Bank-defined LMICs including adults (≥50 years) with suspected or confirmed dementia who underwent brain MRI as part of diagnostic evaluation.

Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. Random-effects models pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities; diagnostic-accuracy outcomes were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneous reference standards and incomplete reporting.

39 LMIC studies were included; 23 studies (2513 participants) contributed to the meta-analysis. Dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities (defined as ≥1 clinically relevant structural abnormality per study definition) were present in 1248/2513 participants. The pooled prevalence of dementia-relevant MRI abnormalities was 58% (95% CI 43% to 72%), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=95%) and a wide prediction interval (8–96%), indicating marked between-study variability; this estimate should be interpreted as a descriptive summary of study-level proportions rather than a precise population parameter.

Brain MRI frequently demonstrates dementia-relevant pathology in LMIC clinical cohorts, usually with mixed neurodegenerative-vascular patterns. Structured visual ratings may add aetiologic specificity beyond cognitive screening, but pooled estimates should be interpreted as summaries of heterogeneous study-level findings rather than precise population parameters, given high heterogeneity and risk of bias.

CRD42024510241.

Spirituality has gained increasing attention in healthcare, particularly in palliative care, as it supports meaning, purpose and connection during illness. While literature extensively explores patients’ spiritual needs, growing evidence highlights the importance of addressing the spiritual needs of caregivers and healthcare professionals. Caregivers and relatives often face emotional, ethical and practical challenges during prolonged care pathways, impacting their well-being. Limited training and tools can hinder spiritual care, contributing to distress and burnout among professionals and unmet needs for families. Addressing spirituality in neurodegenerative disease palliative care is essential for holistic, person-centred approaches that foster coping, hope and ethical decision-making. This scoping review aims to map evidence on spiritual needs and challenges of caregivers, relatives and healthcare staff in end-stage neurodegenerative disease care.

This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute framework (JBI) for scoping reviews. The search and reporting process will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Inclusion criteria followed JBI’s population, concept and context framework with no date or geographical limits; only English and Italian sources ensured accurate interpretation. Searches will use university-access databases and grey literature to capture policy and non-peer-reviewed sources. Databases selected: PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Scopus for comprehensive, multidisciplinary coverage. This inclusive approach is aligned with the purpose of scoping reviews, which aim to map the breadth and depth of available literature. Researchers independently screened titles/abstracts in Rayyan software with blinding, resolved discrepancies collaboratively, piloted and refined extraction tables, and jointly synthesised themes through iterative meetings to ensure rigour and consensus. Findings will highlight existing knowledge, identify gaps and inform future research and practice.

Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review. The protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/X9275

Inappropriate complementary feeding contributes to child undernutrition, even in food-secure areas. This paradox highlights the need to look beyond food availability and examine the household-level mechanisms that shape everyday feeding decisions in the farming and food-secure settings. The objective of this study was to explore the household dynamics of maternal caregiving and agricultural labour in complementary feeding practices in rural farming communities in Geita.

Phenomenology study design was employed to explore the lived experiences and perceptions of mothers regarding complementary feeding practices.

Rural farming communities in Geita Region, Tanzania.

Mothers of children aged 6–23 months were purposively selected to participate in seven in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions.

In these farming communities, four household-level factors were found to influence complementary feeding practices: maternal responsibility and farming obligations, carrying children and porridge to the farms, limited paternal involvement, fatigue due to prolonged farm work, reliance on elder siblings for childcare and fear of judgement or sanctions for late arrival at the farm. Farming emerged as a cross-cutting theme that intersected all these sub-themes.

Mothers described complementary feeding practices as closely linked to household division of labour, caregiving arrangements and the demands of farming activities that shaped daily routines. These findings suggest the need for context-sensitive strategies that consider intra-household roles and the time constraints associated with subsistence farming.

Men, particularly those belonging to gender minority groups, often experience poorer physical health outcomes. This study examined global health and quality of life (QoL) across diverse male gender subgroups in Switzerland. While emphasising male gender diversity, we aimed to identify key sociodemographic risk factors associated with reduced global health and QoL.

We analysed a subset of the Swiss Health Survey 2022, a cross-sectional nationally representative health-related dataset from the general Swiss population. Our sample included individuals falling into one of the three groups: cisgender men, transgender men (assigned female at birth with male gender identity) and men with ‘other’ gender identities (assigned male at birth but identifying as non-binary or non-specified gender identity). Global health and QoL were assessed using the Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) and the global QoL item of the WHOQOL-Bref. Four binary logistic regression models examined the association between male gender identities, sociodemographic data and MEHM and QoL outcomes.

Our study comprised 3 505 801 male cases after weighting. Of these, 12.9% reported fair to very poor health. Key risk factors included being unemployed, migration background and being a transgender man. The strongest protective factor was higher education. Chronic conditions were reported by 33.3% men, with unemployment again being the most relevant risk factor. Identifying as a man with ‘other’ gender identities emerged as a protective factor. Regarding QoL, 8% stated impaired QoL, while the male gender identity ‘other’ was the strongest risk factor and tertiary school education the most relevant protective factor.

Risk and protective factors vary across different global health outcomes and QoL in men. These findings highlight the importance of disaggregating male gender categories beyond the binary to better understand the complexity of health disparities. A differentiated, gender-inclusive approach is essential for accurately identifying vulnerable groups and tailoring public health interventions accordingly.

Multimorbidity among patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection has emerged as a priority for healthcare and public health systems worldwide.

This study aimed to characterise time-trends in multimorbidities among patients with CHB infection. We identified multimorbidity clusters and combinations and quantified their associations with healthcare services utilisation.

A retrospective observational study, using electronic medical record data.

A large tertiary general hospital in China.

The study included 23 137 patients with CHB infection admitted between 2011 and 2023.

Latent class analysis and association rule mining (ARM) were performed to identify multimorbidity clusters and combinations, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between the identified multimorbidity patterns and length of stay (LOS), daily expense and 1-year readmission for liver-related conditions (OYRL).

The mean number of multimorbidities among hospitalised patients with CHB infection was 2.82±1.89. From 2011 to 2023, mean age increased from 44.2±13.7 to 48.4±13.1 (p

Multimorbidity imposes a substantial burden on CHB-infected patients. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of CHB infection, as well as tailored integral strategies for multimorbidity management in individuals with CHB infection.

Socioeconomic inequalities in neonatal mortality are observed globally but gaps remain in the evidence from current reviews, specifically: a wider range of socioeconomic indicators at the individual, household and area level than previous reviews, and alternative time frames to define neonatal mortality. Thus, a comprehensive updated review of the literature is required, focusing on multiple measures of socioeconomic status and alternative time frames, to assess the relationship between maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality in high-income countries.

Three different search approaches will be used: electronic searching of three databases, grey literature searching and reference list checking. First, the three databases Medline, Scopus and Web of Science will be searched using relevant synonyms and adapted terms from medical subject heading terms (MeSH) in Medline for maternal socioeconomic status and neonatal mortality identified from previous systematic reviews on inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Second, grey literature will be searched by entering the relevant terms into Google. Title, abstract and full text screening will be conducted by the review team against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with at least 10% checked by a second reviewer to assess for any bias and errors. We will also conduct the kappa statistic for inter-rater reliability. Third, the reference lists of included studies will be reviewed for any additional studies that meet the criteria. Data will be extracted using a data extraction form and extracted studies will be assessed using the Liverpool Quality Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis will be conducted and, where appropriate, meta-analysis will be performed. If the data allow, subgroup analysis by neonatal care population and specific gestational ages will be performed.

Ethical approval is not required as all studies in this systematic review will be publicly available. The findings of this review will be presented at conferences and disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

CRD42022315407.

The clinical practicum is a critical component of nursing education. In Spain, it is currently facing systemic challenges that compromise its quality and sustainability. A persistent nursing shortage, combined with increasing pressure on healthcare systems and a growing number of students intended to address this gap, is adding strain to clinical learning environments, which may compromise the capacity of nurses to provide adequate supervision and meaningful learning experiences for nursing students. This not only diminishes the quality of the training experiences, but also negatively affects the well-being of both students and nurses, further worsening the situation. This protocol outlines a study aimed at conducting an in-depth analysis of the current challenges affecting the clinical practicum and proposing a new model that effectively addresses them, with significant potential for adaptation and implementation across different health education fields and geographical locations.

The study will employ a sequential mixed-methods design comprising two integrated phases. In phase I, quantitative, qualitative and scoping review methodologies will be combined to identify current challenges and opportunities. Quantitative data will be obtained by administering questionnaires to nursing students and clinical mentors (CMs) tutoring them in Catalonia, examining potential barriers and facilitators to their mentoring role. Data will be analysed through descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data will emerge from semistructured interviews with CMs and nurse coordinators, as well as from a visual elicitation technique, the ‘Emojional’ Calendar, conducted with students to understand their clinical practicum experiences. These will be analysed through an inductive thematic analysis approach. The scoping review, following the Arksey and O’Malley framework, will identify best practices in clinical practicums in nursing and other health studies globally. Phase II will involve a three-round qualitative Delphi study in which all preceding results will be presented to stakeholders and decision makers in order to redesign the clinical practicum model.

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Hospital del Mar Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Ref #2023/11123). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations, as well as via strategic actions (forums and meetings with healthcare managers, deans and policymakers) and general outreach (talks, social media and websites) targeted at professionals, students and the public.

Well-being of healthcare professionals (HCPs) is vital for care quality, staff retention and overall healthcare system effectiveness. This study aims to identify the organisational and workplace variables associated with sick leave and measures of engagement of HCPs on department level within a single Dutch academic hospital.

Cross-sectional study using routinely collected organisational data.

A tertiary-care academic hospital in the Netherlands.

25 clinical departments were included. Department level variables were derived from routinely collected hospital databases. Availability of data varied across variables. Analysis included information on patient population, human resources, care processes, quality of care and employee and patient experiences to assess differences, correlations and predictors for sick leave and engagement.

Primary outcome measures were (1) sick leave (%) and (2) engagement, assessed through two staff-survey items (vitality and connectedness; 0–10 Numeric Rating Scale). Both outcomes were analysed at department level.

Employee population data showed the most consistent patterns across analyses. Departments with higher staffing capacity had higher sick leave and lower engagement in group comparisons (p=0.009, p=0.030, respectively). In multivariable models, higher staffing capacity remained associated with increased sick leave (B=1.38, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.23, p=0.003). Engagement was positively associated with higher inflow (B=0.92, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.77, p=0.037) and negatively associated with outflow (B = –1.36, 95% CI –2.08 to –0.63, p=0.001). No consistent associations were found with patient population and patient experience measures.

Workforce-related factors, particularly staffing capacity and inflow and outflow, are strongly linked to sick leave and engagement. Routinely collected hospital data can be used to identify at-risk departments and inform targeted strategies for improving workforce sustainability. Future studies should explore more granular, team-level data to better support staff well-being and care quality.

Settings with insufficient human resources struggle to provide timely eye care services and information to the population. mHealth (mobile healthcare) is a promising solution; however, evidence on the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR) and real-time phone-based education remains scarce, despite their potential to be scalable and cost-effective. This study aims to implement the Virtual Baithak, an interactive mHealth platform, to improve eye-health literacy among older adults residing in rural India. The objectives are to (1) Develop and validate the Virtual Baithak for improving vision health and (2) Determine its effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability among the older adults.

This 3-armed, parallel, randomised controlled trial of 14 months duration will enrol 381 older adults (aged 60 years and above). Participants will be blinded and randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either of the three groups based on the intervention for eye-health education they receive: both IVR and group calls moderated by a healthcare professional, only IVR and usual care. The two intervention arms will receive the information weekly over a 3-month period through the Virtual Baithak platform, which will be designed for this study using a participatory research approach to develop the content. The primary study outcomes are digital health literacy and vision health knowledge scores, measured at baseline and 14 months. The secondary outcomes include m-health technology acceptance and usage practices. A mixed-method process evaluation will be conducted to assess the intervention feasibility and implementation, including in-depth interviews with participants. The qualitative data will be thematically analysed to explore factors that promote or restrain the implementation. The inferential statistical quantitative analysis will be performed using linear mixed models.

The study has been approved by the ‘Institute Ethics Committee,’ PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (PGI/IEC/2022/EIC000282 dated 18 February 2022). The results will be disseminated via presentations and/or publications at the national and international levels.

CTRI/2023/02/049383, dated 1 February 2023.

Colchicine has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and may improve outcomes in arteriovenous fistulas used for haemodialysis due to antiproliferative effects. However, it is often avoided in patients receiving dialysis. Therefore, a large trial assessing the potential benefits of colchicine in dialysis patients cannot begin without further data on feasibility. The primary objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of carrying out future trials of colchicine in dialysis patients.

This is an open-label, single centre, single arm study with 100 participants. The primary outcome is feasibility and the decision to progress to a full-scale trial. This will be based on the consent rate and the colchicine discontinuation rate. Secondary objectives are testing the feasibility of data collection procedures relating to quality-of-life measures, vascular access interventions and safety. Other secondary objectives are to assess the utility of the electronic health record for collecting trial data and to explore patients’ and healthcare providers’ experiences and attitudes towards colchicine and a feasibility study.

The study has Research Ethics Committee approval (Wales REC 6; 24/WA/0277). It is intended that the results of the study will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

ISRCTN91308625.

There is growing concern that curricula for advanced practice roles in psychiatric care are too generic and lack the depth and specificity required for the complex demands of mental healthcare.1 2 Robidoux and Lauerer2 felt curricula were frequently heavy on generic medical knowledge, including psychopharmacology, at the expense of other skills required for the realities of the role, including the delivery of talking therapies. In the study context, advanced practice programmes...

Centralisation of paediatric intensive care has required that greater numbers of critically ill children are transferred from local hospitals to the nearest paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The...

Music intervention is a complementary treatment that aims to ameliorate symptoms related to a medical condition. Music intervention is distinct from music therapy in that it is a solo listening experience rather than an active or therapist-guided session. Music intervention is thought to be a low-risk and convenient treatment with potentially positive effects on patients with breast cancer as measured by self-assessed symptom or quality of life scores or pain treatment...

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has become one of the most prevalent occupational health problems1 and represents a major burden for individuals, employers1 2 and healthcare systems.1 The need to consider psychosocial factors such as stress and coping strategies is increasingly recognised...

This study aimed to understand hospital doctors’ priorities (target use cases and aetiologies) for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever.

A cross-sectional online survey.

Europe-wide.

Secondary and tertiary care doctors involved in patient assessment and diagnosis across Europe.

Online survey from April to September 2024.

Importance of developing a new test on a scale of 1–10 for up to 19 ‘use cases’ (types of febrile presentations in specific demographic groups): use case scores and ranks and differences across subgroups of respondents, with free text to capture additional suggestions; respondents’ preferences (multiple choice) regarding which aetiologies should be included in a new test.

265 respondents from 30 European countries (out of 270 starting the survey) were included in the analysis. Top priorities included febrile immunocompromised patients and fever without a focus for both paediatric and adult use cases, and 1–3 months old febrile infants. Rankings were similar across clinician subgroups despite some differences in average scores. 92% (243/263), 95% CI 89% to 95%, of respondents would find a ‘generic’ test for bacterial aetiology useful, even if it does not differentiate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative aetiologies. 54% (63/116), 95% CI 45% to 63%, of respondents would find a ‘generic’ test for inflammatory aetiology useful when seeking to diagnose children for whom Kawasaki’s disease (KD) is on the differential, even in the absence of any KD-specific test, 83% (96/116), 95% CI 75% to 89%, would find such a ‘generic’ test useful if they could use it alongside a KD test when desired.

Clinicians prioritise the most vulnerable patients (because of age or comorbidities) and unclear presentations (fever without a focus) for the development of a new fever diagnostic test. Even relatively simple (eg, bacterial, inflammatory) tests could provide added value to most clinicians.

Adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes (APPOs), including pre-term birth, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes, can result in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, parental anxiety and increased healthcare costs. A better understanding of the causes of APPOs is essential to inform lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions for their prevention and management. Given the difficulty of undertaking randomised controlled trials in pregnant women, triangulating evidence from across methods with different sources of bias may improve causal inference for APPOs. The purpose of the Mendelian randomisation in pregnancy (MR-PREG) collaboration is to support such triangulation using genetic (eg, Mendelian randomisation (MR)) and non-genetic (eg, partner negative controls) approaches to investigate the causal effects of maternal exposures on a comprehensive set of APPOs.

The MR-PREG collaboration includes individual participant data from three birth cohorts (two from the UK and one from Norway) and UK Biobank, as well as summary data from FinnGen and publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Data have been harmonised across studies and currently include information on up to 35 APPOs in up to 707 797 women.

The main aims of MR-PREG are to strengthen the evidence base for (1) prevention, by advancing understanding of maternal lifestyle factors on APPOs, (2) the role of pre-conceptional health, by improving understanding of the effect of maternal pre-existing conditions on APPOs, and (3) treatments, by evaluating the efficacy and safety of existing medications used for pre-existing conditions, and by identifying and testing novel or repurposed therapies for APPOs. To date, our published work has mainly addressed aims 1 and 3. Examples include triangulation of evidence from MR, conventional multivariable regression and paternal negative control, showing that higher maternal body mass index increases the risk of multiple APPOs, as well as the identification of maternal circulating metabolites and proteins that may influence birth weight.

Future priorities include increasing diversity within the MR-PREG collaboration by expanding representation of participants from non-European ancestries. We are also integrating molecular data, including circulating protein levels and placental transcriptomics, to better characterise the molecular mechanisms underlying APPOs. Additionally, we are using whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing to identify novel causal genes and to inform the prioritisation of candidate therapeutic targets for APPOs.

Increasing demand for haematological specialist care makes the optimisation of referrals and outpatient workflow a priority. Automated placing of standardised test orders prior to the first appointment may provide haematologists with necessary information to reach diagnoses and initiate treatment at the first patient encounter, reducing low-value follow-up appointments. We aimed to evaluate rates of patient participation in an initiative using artificial intelligence to place standardised test orders as well as reasons for non-participation, differences in the number of participants and non-participants discharged back to primary care with a diagnosis or appropriate treatment plan, and potentially avoidable referrals.

A retrospective, multicentric cohort study.

Four academic hospitals in Madrid, Spain.

18 190 patients referred for a first haematologist appointment for 11 included presenting complaints.

Referral notes from primary care were classified using natural language processing and automated placement of standardised test order sets was carried out prior to first appointment for participating patients.

We compared demographic differences between participants and non-participants, the main motives for not participating, and the number of patients discharged back to primary care at first appointment with a diagnosis and treatment plan. Most frequent International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision codes for each of the included presenting complaints were described.

During the study period, 18 190 (41%) patients were referred for a first haematologist appointment for presenting complaints included in the intervention (‘eligible patients’), of which 612 (3.3%) patients agreed to participate in the intervention. Participants were significantly younger than non-participants. Most common motives for not participating were administrative reasons (6268, 76.9%). Only 122 (1.5%) patients expressed explicit unwillingness to participate. A significant increase in the number of patients discharged upon first appointment was observed for participants (146 (23.9%) vs 3375 (19.36%); p=0.041), signifying a 22% relative reduction in avoidable follow-up. The diagnosis ‘haematological disorders ruled out’ was constantly observed as one of the ten most common diagnoses made by the haematology specialist for all but one of the included presenting complaints.

Natural language processing of referrals from primary to specialist haematology care with automated placing of standardised test orders can decrease low-value follow-up appointments. Explicit refusal to participate was low. Participants tended to be younger than non-participants, underlining the importance of designing strategies to target the older population in order to improve participation.

Healthcare quality improvement increasingly relies on patient experience data, yet traditional survey modes face declining response rates and rising costs. Mobile web surveys have emerged as a promising alternative for improving response rates. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of mobile web surveys in improving response rates in South Korea’s Patient Experience Assessment. We also aimed to assess the impact of a mixed-mode approach integrating mobile web and follow-up telephone surveys across different demographic groups.

A randomised experimental design was employed to compare response rates as well as contact and cooperation rates among survey modes. A total of 4800 patients from four general hospitals were randomly allocated to telephone, mobile web or mixed-mode survey, with 1600 patients per mode. Each mode allowed five contact attempts through calls or mobile survey links. The mixed-mode survey included follow-up calls for mobile non-respondents.

The survey was conducted between October and November 2022 among patients discharged from four general hospitals in South Korea.

A total of 4800 patients aged 19 years or older who were hospitalised for more than 1 day and discharged within 2–56 days from four general hospitals were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included patients in day clinics, palliative care, paediatrics and neuropsychiatry, as well as those without personal information consent forms during hospital admission.

The primary outcome measure was the response rate for each survey mode. Secondary outcome measures included the contact rate and the cooperation rate.

The mobile web survey yielded an overall higher response rate (32.5%) than the telephone survey (22.4%), with the mixed-mode survey achieving the highest response rate (39.3%). Decomposing response rates revealed that while contact rates were comparable for both telephone and mobile web surveys, the cooperation rate was considerably higher for the mobile web survey (73.2%) compared with the telephone survey (52.2%). Substantial gender-age subgroup differences were found.

Adopting mobile web surveys for patient experience assessments, which aligns with the public’s preference for information and communication technologies, could significantly improve response rates in patient experience surveys.

KCT0011374 (post-results).